Waqf Law Supreme Court Hearing:CJI BR Gavai ने किया खजुराहो मंदिर का जिक्र, Kapil Sibal ने पूछे सवाल
ऐश्वर्या शुक्ला
Authored by: |
Navbharat Times• 21 May 2025, 11:34 pm
Waqf Law Supreme Court Hearing:CJI BR Gavai ने किया खजुराहो मंदिर का जिक्र, Kapil Sibal ने पूछे सवाल
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Smog, Yamuna pollution biggest environment issues in Delhi: SC judge
Supreme Court judge Justice Sanjay Karol on Thursday said smog and Yamuna River pollution were the biggest environmental issues in the national capital. The judge was speaking at the Society of Indian Law Firms (SILF) Climate Change Conference and Awards 2025 when he emphasised on environmental protection. Each citizen, he said, was responsible to protect the environment and the onus wasn't just on the judiciary, the executive and the legislature. "We have to make sure that the environment, be it in any form, has to be protected. I would also say this, that over the years we have developed certain principles, and the public trust doctrine is one such doctrine which we must always keep in mind," Justice Karol said. He continued, "But I would say this, if you were to see our report card in the last 75 years, or since the 1980s, what have we done? Have we done enough to protect the environment? My view is that a lot needs to be done, at all levels. And I would borrow an expression, that the solution to the problem now is grassroots solutions to an international problem. The way forward, according to me, is that we as individuals have to take up the causes pertaining to the environment." Environmental issues could not be left to the courts for passing of verdicts, the legislature for making relevant laws or the executive for implementing them, he added. "Each one of us, as responsible citizens, has to understand, become aware of, and ensure that we protect the environment for posterity." He highlighted the two major issues -- air pollution and a polluted Yamuna -- Delhi has been grappling with required attention. "I don't know how many of you have travelled in the metro, or how many of you have gone beyond the Lutyens. But if you go to Noida or Trans-Yamuna, you would see what Yamuna really is. These are the two biggest challenges," Justice Karol said. He outlined judiciary's "zealous" role in protecting the environment. "The reason is very clear. And it is that Mother Earth is not ours. We are there for her and we are there not only for her but also for posterity, for future generations, not only in India, but the world over," the judge said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Trump's travel ban on a dozen countries set to take effect on Monday
President Donald Trump is resurrecting the travel ban policy from his first term, signing a proclamation Wednesday night preventing people from a dozen countries from entering the United States. The countries include Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. In addition to the ban, which takes effect at 12:01 a.m. Monday, there will be heightened restrictions on visitors from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. I must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people, Trump said in his proclamation. The list results from a January 20 executive order Trump issued requiring the departments of State and Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence to compile a report on hostile attitudes toward the U.S. and whether entry from certain countries represented a national security risk. During his first term, Trump issued an executive order in January 2017 banning travel to the U.S. by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travellers from those nations were either barred from getting on their flights to the US or detained at U.S. airports after they landed. They included students and faculty as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family. The order, often referred to as the Muslim ban or the travel ban, was retooled amid legal challenges, until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. The ban affected various categories of travellers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families. Trump and others have defended the initial ban on national security grounds, arguing it was aimed at protecting the country and not founded on anti-Muslim bias. However, the president had called for an explicit ban on Muslims during his first campaign for the White House.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
India aims to be global arbitration hub with strong legal framework: CJI
Chief Justice of India B R Gavai on Thursday said India has continuously aspired to become a hub of international arbitration by building a progressive legislative framework, a pro-enforcement judiciary and robust institutional support. In his keynote address on "Arbitrating Indo-UK Commercial Disputes" as part of the London International Disputes Week, the CJI said India and the United Kingdom shared a rich history, bound by a common legal heritage rooted in the principles of common law. He referred to the July 2018 memorandum of understanding signed between India and the United Kingdom for cooperation in the area of law and justice and said it has enhanced the engagement between the two countries and paved the way for greater collaboration and exchange of expertise across areas including the rule of law, dispute resolution, training and legal services resolution. "Speaking as the Chief Justice of India, I state that India has continuously aspired to become a hub of international arbitration by building a progressive legislative framework, a pro-enforcement judiciary and robust institutional support," he said. CJI Gavai highlighted that this bond between India and the UK was further strengthened by the signing of a Free Trade deal between the two nations this year -- a step that would significantly enhance bilateral trade and economic cooperation. "The United Kingdom, with its established reputation as a hub for commercial arbitration, and India, with its expanding economy and legal reforms, stand poised to deepen cooperation in this critical domain. By promoting dialogue, encouraging joint institutional initiatives, and building confidence among businesses and practitioners, we can create a seamless dispute resolution environment that benefits both jurisdictions," he said. He added as any form of commercial activity, disputes were an inevitable part of the process but what truly mattered was not the existence of these disputes, but the capacity and commitment to efficiently resolve them. "The manner in which we address and settle conflicts is what defines the strength and resilience of our commercial relationships," he said. He said such a framework ensured that disagreements did not undermine trust or hinder progress and instead turned into an opportunity for constructive engagement, promoting long-term cooperation and stability in business interactions. "One such mechanism is international commercial arbitration. In light of the expanding trade and investment flows between India and the UK, the need for an effective, reliable, cost efficient, and timely dispute resolution process has never been more pressing," the CJI said. Referring to the statutes, CJI Gavai said the current legislations regarding arbitration in both India and the United Kingdom were enacted around the same time period with similar provisions focusing on party autonomy, choice of jurisdiction, independence of arbitrators, and finality of the arbitral awards. "Both countries have a single legislation for arbitration that governs both international and domestic arbitration procedures. These legislations have been used by the parties and interpreted by the courts for more than two decades now," he said. He, as a result, underscored the importance to learn from each other's experience and adopt the best possible practices to promote a business-friendly environment for both countries. He said it wouldn't be an "overstatement" to say that for India to become a leading hub for international commercial arbitration, the international arbitration community must have access to high-quality, independent and impartial arbitrators, both as a matter of fact and of perception. "As with India's potential to be an international arbitration hub, there is huge potential for Indian lawyers to become arbitrators that are in demand across the globe. However, this potential is, as yet, unrealised," the CJI pointed out. Courts in India, he continued, have been making a conscious effort to ensure that for arbitral proceedings, the best candidates were chosen, keeping in mind the subject matter of the dispute, amount in dispute, arbitrator's expertise and availability and the requirements of the parties. "Concluding this discourse on arbitrating Indo-UK commercial disputes, it can be said that the synergy between our two nations, rooted in a shared legal heritage and mutual economic interest, presents a unique opportunity to build a robust, efficient, and globally respected arbitration ecosystem," he said. India's evolving arbitration framework, the CJI said, reflected a strong commitment to aligning with international best practices, promoting institutional arbitration and ensuring judicial support that was "facilitative" than being "interventionist". The CJI referred to the decision of the Bar Council of India to notify rules for the registration and regulation of foreign lawyers and law firms in India, underlining its positive affect on the resolution of international commercial disputes.
