
What could US and Europe security guarantees look like for Ukraine?
In the Oval Office, Donald Trump hosted Ukraine 's Volodymyr Zelensky and senior European figures to thrash out what security guarantees for Ukraine might look like if a peace deal with Russia can be reached.
The meeting was described as 'historic' by Sir Keir Starmer, who has emerged as one of the driving forces behind Europe's response.
But even as the talks took place, Moscow dismissed the plans as dangerous and warned against any Western military presence in Ukraine.
Trump has made clear that the United States will not commit troops on the ground in Ukraine.
But the prospect of an arrangement that borrows some of the deterrent effect of Nato's Article 5 has been discussed, a move revealed by the alliance's secretary general Mark Rutte.
He told Fox News: 'What we are discussing here is not Nato membership, what we are discussing here is Article 5 type of security guarantees for Ukraine and what exactly they will entail will now be more specifically discussed."
Ukraine also wants to buy $90 billion (£67bn) worth of US weapons and says they could form part of the security guarantee.
Beyond that, however, Trump has been vague about how much the US would contribute.
Speaking in the Oval Office on Monday, Trump underlined that European nations would be expected to carry most of the burden.
'When it comes to security, there's going to be a lot of help,' he said, sitting next to Zelensky. 'They are a first line of defence because they're there. But we'll help them out.'
British guarantees and the coalition of the willing
The United Kingdom has taken a leading role in shaping European proposals. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has spearheaded the creation of a 'coalition of the willing', a group of allies prepared to go further than financial and weapons support.
Under this plan, international 'reassurance' forces could be deployed in Ukraine after a ceasefire or peace deal, helping to deter renewed Russian attacks and to provide reassurance that Kyiv is not left to stand alone.
The plan was discussed in a virtual meeting on Tuesday attended by more than 30 international leaders.
The virtual meeting, co-chaired by Sir Keir, also discussed possible further sanctions on Russia to pile pressure on Vladimir Putin to end the war.
European leaders see security guarantees as essential to any peace deal, but they also stress that Ukraine must be directly involved in shaping the terms.
The European Union 's existing training mission for Ukrainian troops will also continue, ensuring that Kyiv can sustain and modernise its armed forces in the years ahead.
Moscow has dismissed Western plans for security guarantees. The Russian foreign ministry yesterday reiterated its opposition to the deployment of Nato or Nato-affiliated troops in Ukraine, warning that such a move would be seen as a direct threat to Russia's security.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Hidden in the hills: photos of French peacekeepers uncovering Hezbollah's remnants in Lebanon
A convoy of armored vehicles carrying French peacekeepers barrels through southern Lebanon. Last year's war between Israeli forces and Hezbollah left villages scarred and empty. Rubble lines the roads. Torn Lebanese flags and Hezbollah banners flutter from shattered buildings. From a UNIFIL base above Kafr Kila, the town below looks like a wasteland of crumpled concrete. Across the valley, bulldozers churn dust as they build new positions on land held by Israeli forces despite the November ceasefire. French peacekeepers trek up wooded slopes in the Saluki Valley, under the hum of an Israeli drone. Less than 200 meters in, they uncover remnants of a Hezbollah post: a cannon hidden among trees, an abandoned shack with blankets, playing cards, and books—frozen traces of fighters who once occupied the hillside. Electrical wires snake toward destroyed rocket launchers. Empty rocket cartons and torn manuals litter the hillside. 'We find all kinds of weapons — rocket launchers, cannons, small arms, mines, IEDs, ammunition,' said Col. Arnaud de Coincy, commander of UNIFIL's Force Commander's Reserve, about 700 French and 200 Finnish troops. Earlier this month, Lebanese soldiers were killed dismantling an arms depot. Their deaths underscore both dedication and the urgent need for support. At a base in Deir Kifa, peacekeepers track Israeli overflights with a Mistral missile system. On this day alone, they counted more than 10 drones. UNIFIL's future depends on an upcoming Security Council vote. Critics call it costly and ineffective. Lebanon's government says the force is vital. This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.


BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Dozens more Afghan relocation data breaches uncovered by BBC
The Ministry of Defence has admitted there have been 49 separate data breaches in the past four years at the unit handling relocation applications from Afghans seeking safety in the out of the 49 breaches were already publicly known - including the leak in 2022 of a spreadsheet containing details of almost 19,000 people fleeing the mammoth data breach, which led to thousands of Afghans being secretly relocated to the UK, was only revealed last month after the High Court lifted a gagging was described by the UK's information watchdog as a "one-off occurrence following a failure to [follow] usual checks, rather than reflecting a wider culture of non-compliance". However, lawyers representing Afghans affected by data breaches said the new figures, released to the BBC under the Freedom of Information Act, raised concerns about a culture of lax security among those working on the resettlement MoD has refused to provide any details of the nature of each breach but incidents which have previously been made public include officials inadvertently revealing the email addresses or other personal details of applicants to third Malik, Head of Data Protection at Barings Law which represents hundreds of Afghans affected by the biggest of the breaches in February 2022, said: "What began as an isolated incident, which the Ministry of Defence initially sought to keep from public view, has now escalated into a series of catastrophic failings."We urge the Ministry of Defence to be fully transparent with both those affected and the wider public. Victims should not be forced to learn the truth through legal action or news reports."The Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) was set up in April 2021 to help people who feared their lives were at risk because they had worked with British armed forces in Afghanistan and to resettle eligible applicants and their family members in the UK. It was closed in July this scheme has been dogged by revelations about poor data security, potentially putting the lives of Afghans who worked with British forces at risk. In September 2021, BBC News revealed that more than 250 Afghans seeking relocation to the UK were mistakenly copied into an email from the Ministry of Defence, putting them at risk of reprisals.A total of 265 email addresses were shared in this way across three separate incidents that month, which ultimately led to a £350,000 fine from the breaches were "intensely difficult and embarrassing for the government handling publicly", one defence source Wallace, the then-defence secretary, expressed his personal anger at what had occurred, telling MPs: "I am very keen that it is not just the poor person who drafts the email who is held to account, but the chain upwards, to ensure that this does not happen again."Two months after the incidents, in November 2021, the then Conservative government announced "significant remedial actions", including new data handling procedures and training as well as a new "two pairs of eyes rule" requiring any external email to an ARAP-eligible Afghan national be reviewed by a second member of staff before being government said the measures were taken to "prevent such incidents occurring again".Instead, data breaches continued including, in February 2022, a potentially catastrophic leak which saw a soldier at Regent's Park barracks send a spreadsheet with what they believed to be a small number of applicants' names to trusted Afghan did not realise that hidden data in the spreadsheet in fact contained the names, contact details and some information about family members and associates for nearly 19,000 the leak was discovered some 18 months later, in August 2023, the then-Conservative government sought a gagging order to prevent details of the error being made public. The government successfully argued that lives were at risk and the Taliban would be alerted if an injunction wasn't super injunction which was imposed was not lifted until July this Baines, a senior data protection specialist at the law firm Mishcon de Reya, said the new figures uncovered by the BBC show a "remarkable number of data security incidents in relation to the ARAP scheme"."It is difficult to think of any information more sensitive than that which is involved with the scheme, and it baffles me why there were not better security measures in place," he added. Seven of the 49 data breaches were sufficiently serious to require MoD officials to notify data watchdog the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO).This includes three breaches - one in 2021, and two in 2022 - that have not been made public ICO said it was limited in the amount of information it still held on those breaches and why it didn't take further action but that its work with the MoD was "ongoing"."We continue to engage with the MoD, so we can be assured that they have made the required improvements," a spokeswoman watchdog has not taken any action against the MoD over the large spreadsheet data breach which was previously subject to court-imposed reporting restrictions, arguing "there was little we could add in this case that would justify the further allocation of resource away from other priorities".Jon Baines said there were "serious questions firstly as to whether the ICO should have conducted more in-depth investigations previously, and secondly, whether there is now an urgent need for more investigation."What assurance can we all have now that the MoD are properly protecting the highly sensitive personal data it is often entrusted with?", he added.A Labour government source blamed previous Conservative administrations for inadequate data protection measures and said new software has been introduced and other changes made since Labour came to power last year."Current ministers repeatedly highlighted the Tory mismanagement of data around the ARAP scheme while in opposition," the source said."Since last July, we've brought in a host of new measures to improve data security and we've made public the largest Afghan data breach which occurred under the previous government, to allow for parliamentary scrutiny and accountability."A Conservative Party spokesman said: "This data leak should never have happened and was an unacceptable breach of data protection secretary of state for defence has issued an apology on behalf of the government, and Conservatives joined in that apology."When this breach came to light, the immediate priority of the then-government was to protect persons in the dataset."An MoD spokesperson said: "We take data security extremely seriously and are committed to ensuring that any incidents are dealt with properly, and that we follow our legal duties."All incidents that meet the threshold under UK data protection laws are referred to the Information Commissioner's Office, and any lesser incidents are examined internally to ensure lessons are learned."If you have any information on stories you would like to share with the BBC Politics Investigations team, please get in touch at politicsinvestigations@ Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.


Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Ukraine's answer to Russia's drone swarm
Shortly before dawn on July 9, Russia had fired 728 drones and 13 missiles into Ukraine, making it the largest Russian aerial bombardment of the war so far. The previous record had been set on July 4, and the one before that five days earlier. Russia's 'swarm' warfare, enabled by its ability to mass-produce low-cost, long-range attack drones, has exhausted and overwhelmed Ukraine's air defences, allowing targets to now be hit three times the typical rate. With its stocks of Western air defence missiles depleted and Russia's Iranian-designed Shahed-type drones flying faster, higher and with greater precision, Ukraine has become increasingly vulnerable. Volodymyr Zelensky had set a target by the end of July for Ukraine to produce 1,000 interceptor drones a month and blunt Russia's relentless drone offensive. The Ukrainian president bet big, estimating it would cost £4.4bn to ramp up production and train more pilots. The maths makes sense. It costs £3m to fire an interceptor missile from a US-made Patriot system – or £400,000 for those from the European IRSI-T – to knock out a £50,000 Shahed or possibly even a cheap decoy. Ukraine's new anti-aircraft drones, however, cost as little as £1,000 to £4,000. Depending on the interceptor, they either smash into their target, blow up next to it or shoot it down. Those being produced now have to be able to hunt the newer Shahed variants that are flying out of range of truck-mounted machine gun units, a core pillar of Ukraine's air defence. Kyiv already has a huge domestic drone industry manufacturing cheap but highly effective unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) en masse and quickly adapting them to the evolving aerial battlefield. To domestically produce a low-cost air shield will depend on time, money and whether it can defend against newer Russian drones. In July, Ukraine's military signed a major deal with Swift Beat, a company belonging to Eric Schmidt, the former Google chief executive, to mass-produce 'hundreds of thousands' of AI-driven drones. Sources say the company's three drones – kept secret for security reasons – are responsible for 90 per cent of Shahed interceptions. One of Ukraine's newest domestically-produced interceptors is the Bagnet (Bayonet) UAV, which is being lauded as the 'Shahed killer'. Purpose-built to down the lethal munitions, it can match the increased speeds of the Shahed (up to 150mph), fly at altitudes of 16,500ft with a 10-mile range. It is currently being used by several Ukrainians on the frontline, with confirmed successes. Five defence companies are now mass producing it for the military. Wild Hornets, a Ukrainian UAV manufacturer, this month showed its ' Sting' interceptor drone flying at speeds of up to 195mph, making it one of the fastest first-person-view drones on the market. Less than a year ago, the Sting flew at half the speed. Now, pilots have used the $2,500 (£1,860) model to down at least 100 Shaheds, the company said. It's a small contribution in the fight against Russia's drone attacks – it launched 6,129 Shahed-type drones in July alone, 14 times the amount launched in July 2024. 'Ukrainians feel they have found the technical solution to Russia's exponential increase in production of Shahed-type drones, but now it is a matter of scaling it up,' John Hardie, deputy director of the Russia programme at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, told The Telegraph. He said Kyiv had already proved it was up to the task, given its success in mass-producing interceptor drones to target Russian reconnaissance drones last year, which helped to blind Moscow's eyes in the sky. 'I was sceptical it could be done, but it could,' he said. The results are likely to be seen in 'six months to a year'. It's not as simple as producing drones – the pilots need to be trained and radar stations built. 'And then comes the adaptations,' he said. And yet the aerial battlefield changes fast. Ukraine has the edge now – but how long this lasts is unclear, said Mr Hardie. Some of Russia's attack drones are starting to show an ability to counter Ukraine's new interceptors. It's a cat and mouse game, with both sides locked in a technological race to gain the edge in a sky filled with drones. 'The dance never really stops,' he added. Valerii Riabykh, a Ukrainian weapons expert and the editor of Defence Express, said: 'Frankly speaking, it should take some time for Ukraine to have enough interceptor drones to combine them in an efficient system to counteract enemy suicide drones.' The state is also still playing catch-up. Ukrainian charities that crowdfund weapons through civilian donations have been supplying military units with interceptor drones for almost a year. Taras Tymochko, a consultant from one of the largest of them, Come Back Alive, said that they now supply interceptors to 90 units and that over 3,000 Russian drones have been downed as a result, including 100 Shaheds. He told The Telegraph: 'The Shaheds became the main weapon of terror attacks on our civil population. We needed to increase our capabilities'. Mr Tymochko estimates the value of downed Russian drones at $195m (£145m), over a dozen times more than the cost of the drones and equipment handed over under the project. 'When it comes to cost, it cannot be compared,' he said. But interceptor drones are no silver bullet to sealing the holes in Kyiv's air defences. The small propeller-powered interceptor drones are also no match for Russian missiles, or for its new jet-powered Shahed-type Geran-3 drones, which can fly at up to 500mph and are difficult to catch and being launched in increasing numbers. It also does not solve the issue of Russia's ability to launch cheap mass attacks of drones and decoys all across Ukraine at once as there are simply not enough Ukrainian drone pilots to target them all. 'They will change the future of air defence, but they won't replace conventional systems, they will compliment them,' he said.