logo
The new SLO County missionaries: From conquest to coexistence

The new SLO County missionaries: From conquest to coexistence

Yahoo2 days ago

Colonizers come in all creeds, cultures, and colors. I know. I am one. White, but born in Nigeria. Raised on tales of imperial contradiction and the soft hypocrisy of good intentions, I recognize cultural conquest when I see it.
And I see it now in San Luis Obispo County. Only this time, the missionaries wear yoga pants and BLM T-shirts.
When the British colonized Africa, they came with muskets, trinkets and the King James Bible. At least they were honest enough to say, 'We're here to civilize and trade.' No one claimed they moved to Lagos for the weather.
Contrast that with SLO County. Today's colonizers arrive not in redcoats but Teslas. They marvel that Paso Roblans wave at the sheriff, not because they're high, but because they know his name. They ask, 'Why is there an American flag outside the church, but no LGBTQ++ flag in the classroom?'
This isn't just demographic drift. It's felt like a cultural coup. Yes, the change has come through ballots not bayonets, but the effect is no less perturbing. In 1990, San Luis Obispo County was a Republican stronghold. The GOP held 52% of registrations, outnumbering Democrats by more than 21,000 voters. A political landscape as red as a SLO County sunset. Today, the tide has turned. Democrats now lead by over 5,000 voters, holding 38% to the GOP's 35%.
What was once a bastion of agrarian grit and frontier faith has been re-tilled and replanted into a progressive outpost. Cal Poly, once an apolitical haven for ag and engineering, now resembles a Berkeley annex with rodeo, oenology and trigger warnings.
For a crowd obsessed with condemning 19th-century colonialism, 21st-century progressives seem oddly eager to reenact it. They denounce empire while building their own. Like missionaries with MacBooks, they believe the locals are running outdated software in desperate need of an upgrade. They seize school boards like administrators with manifest destiny, introduce DEI programs like colonial governors introducing cricket, and dismantle tradition in the name of 'equity.'
The natives, of course, must be saved from themselves. Always the excuse of the colonizer.
However, while it's easy to critique the colonizers, the harder task is the cure. History teaches us that conquest is easy; coexistence is hard, but not impossible. Look to Botswana, Canada and parts of Europe where cultures, when not hell-bent on dominance, manage to share a flag and a future. So can we.
The first step? Ditch the missionary robes and martyr complexes. Abandon the intoxicating binary of 'left' versus 'right'. Of 'us' versus 'them'. If local leaders and activists of The Democrats and GOP such as Tom Fulks, Bruce Gibson, Randall Jordan, John Peschong, Moms for Liberty and The Lonely Liberals can pursue their agendas with mutual respect, we may yet replace cultural conquest with something more lasting and meaningful, genuine coexistence.
We need a politics of 'and' not 'or'. Heritage and innovation. Liberty and responsibility. Compassion and common sense. These aren't enemies, they're nutrients in the soil of civil society. Civilization doesn't demand that we trade truth for tolerance. We can honor pride without erasing patriotism.
We must prioritize pragmatism over purity. Real change doesn't spring from ideology; it grows from ideas that work. In SLO County, that means fixing water infrastructure before funding unconscious bias seminars. Building affordable homes before signaling virtue. Upholding academic standards over chasing DEI quotas and union indulgences.
Progress isn't a performance, it's a plan. Let's get back to one. Judge policy not by whether it's progressive or conservative, but by whether it improves lives.
We don't need a crusade; we need a Local Civic Compact. A shared vow, from newcomers and natives alike, to preserve what made this place worth moving to in the first place. Free speech, even when it bruises. Education, not indoctrination. Heritage, not hysteria. Conversation over creed. Dialogue over dogma.
Let Paso be Paso. Let the Five Cities, Cayucos and Cambria surf their own waves. SLO County is not Hollywood with vineyards or Silicon Valley in cowboy boots. The closer power sits to the people, the more likely it serves them. If we look to Sacramento to dictate our values, we become vassals in someone else's experiment.
Which brings us to the final question: Do we want to be right, or do we want to make a difference?
Being right is easy. We can play keyboard warriors and bask in our own cognitive dissonance. However, making a difference takes compromise. It means losing a few fights so others might win something lasting. Real progress begins not with purging, but persuasion.
SLO County stands at the intersection of two American impulses. The grit that built it from the ground up, and the orthodoxy now eager to remodel it from the top down. We need humility to admit we don't know everything and the courage to defend what we do.
Progress, like truth, doesn't shout. It listens. It holds the past not as an anchor, but as a compass.
Let's not mistake moral conceit for civic virtue. Civilizations don't endure because one wins. They endure because both sides grow up. Together.
Or, as Twain might have said, 'The secret to getting along ain't agreeing, it's remembering you've got to keep living next door after the shouting stops.'
Colonizer Clive Pinder married into a fifth-generation Paso Robles family. He lives in Templeton, hosts CeaseFire on KVEC radio and opinionizes for The Tribune. Find more of his columns at clivepinder.substack.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Joe Walsh says he's becoming a Democrat
Joe Walsh says he's becoming a Democrat

The Hill

time30 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Joe Walsh says he's becoming a Democrat

Joe Walsh, a former Republican congressman, said on Tuesday he is becoming a Democrat, marking the end of his five-year streak as a political independent after leaving the GOP in 2020. Walsh announced his formal affiliation with the Democratic Party in a Tuesday Substack post, saying he made the decision because he views the Republican Party as a threat to democracy and the rule of law and thinks defeating the GOP requires 'a broad coalition of moderates, progressives, and, yes, even conservatives.' 'Three words I never thought I'd ever utter: I'm a Democrat. This former Republican Congressman, former Republican candidate for President, this former TEA Party champion is formally joining the Democratic Party. The stakes are simply too high to NOT become a Democrat,' Walsh wrote in his Substack post, before outlining his reasoning. 'Let's start with the obvious—a tyrant sits in the White House. The very thing our Founders feared most is here. Throw in the fact that one of our two major political parties is a real and direct threat to democracy and the rule of law. These are unprecedented, dangerous times in America. I know it. You know it. There are even Republicans who know it,' he continued. Walsh challenged Trump for the GOP nomination in the 2020 presidential race but dropped out after performing poorly in the Iowa caucuses. He quickly left the party and became a vocal critic of Trump. He endorsed former President Biden in 2020. Walsh has been unaffiliated for the last five years but said in his Substack post that Trump critics who are holding out hope for a third party are misguided. 'Without freedom, democracy, and the rule of law, America ceases to be. And currently, only the Democratic Party is on the side of all three of these core American values,' he wrote. 'There isn't a third party coming to the rescue any time soon,' he continued. 'Right now, the Democratic Party is democracy's lone defender and best hope.' Walsh acknowledged some issues with the Democratic party but said 'for democracy and the rule of law to persevere, Democrats must succeed' — which necessitates becoming a 'big tent' party and learning how to fight against Trump's GOP. 'Take it from a former Republican fighter,' he wrote. 'Republicans fight to the death to win politically, and they've always believed Democrats won't. I've been a fighter my whole life, and if there's ever been a moment when Americans are crying out for a Democratic Party with some fight, it's now.' He added: 'And look, here's the thing. We're gonna need a HUGE tent to defeat this Republican Party,' he wrote. 'We're gonna need a Democratic tent big enough to hold both a conservative like Joe Walsh and a progressive like Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. I want to help build that big tent because I want to win, and…Trump's Republican Party must lose.' Walsh also reflected on his political and personal journey, saying he still is 'a border hawk, an unabashed gun rights advocate, and an unyielding defender of free speech. But I'm not the same guy as I was 15 years ago, or even eight years ago.' 'I've opened my eyes and listened to people who don't think like me,' he continued. 'And by doing so, I gained a greater understanding of and appreciation for LGBTQ issues, structural racism, the need for empathetic immigration reform, the dangers of climate change, and the role government must play to help care for the neediest and most vulnerable among us.' Walsh said he's more compassionate and sees the importance of decency, tolerance, understanding and empathy in politics, saying only the Democratic Party 'values and practices these traits.' 'Donald Trump is the worst of us, and, sadly, the rest of the Republican Party emulates his cruelty, dishonesty, and authoritarianism,' he continued. 'We're better than what we've seen every day these past four months. America is better than this. As a former Republican, I know that cruelty sells. Well, it's time for decency to sell.'

Trump ramps up criticism of Republican senators who could stall his funding bill
Trump ramps up criticism of Republican senators who could stall his funding bill

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump ramps up criticism of Republican senators who could stall his funding bill

President Donald Trump is ramping up his criticism of Republican senators who are threatening to complicate the passage of the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," which advances his legislative agenda. On Tuesday, he railed against Sen. Rand Paul in a social media post after the Kentucky Republican publicly criticized the House-passed megabill. Paul opposes the bill because of a debt ceiling increase in it that he said would "explode deficits." Paul said at an event in Iowa last week that the cuts in the bill are "wimpy and anemic" and called for slashes to other entitlements, which Trump has made clear are a red line for him. MORE: Trump's funding bill runs into Senate GOP fiscal hawks "Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming. He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not," Trump said in a post on his conservative social media platform Tuesday morning. In a separate post, Trump said Paul "never has any practical or constructive ideas." Over the weekend, Trump said that if Paul votes against the bill, "the GREAT people of Kentucky will never forgive him!" Trump is working the phones and having meetings with senators to try to get his sweeping agenda passed by Congress. The legislation extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts and boost spending for the military and border security -- while making some cuts to Medicaid, SNAP and other assistance programs. It will also add about $3.8 trillion to the federal government's $36.2 trillion in debt over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Trump met with Senate Majority Leader John Thune at the White House on Monday, according to a White House official. The meeting comes as Thune faces the Herculean task of moving this House-backed bill through the Senate as expeditiously as possible. Thune has so far not made clear what his strategy will be for moving this package through the upper chamber. But as things currently stand, Thune can only afford to lose three of his GOP members to pass the package, and right now, he has more members than that expressing serious doubts about the bill. The president's outreach so far has targeted a number of senators who have publicly expressed a need to see substantive changes to the House-backed bill. Trump met with Republican Sen. Rick Scott on Monday to discuss the bill, sources confirmed to ABC News. Scott is among a group of Senate hardliners who wants to see larger cuts to government spending in this bill. Republican Sen. Ron Johnson -- who also received a call from Trump on Monday, according to the White House -- has also been vocal about his concerns that the bill doesn't go nearly far enough to slash federal spending. But anyone wishing to change the bill will have to balance the desire for spending cuts from hardliners against the calls from others in the conference who are insisting there be no cuts to Medicaid. Changes to Medicaid are one of the key ways the House bill slashes spending levels. Trump seems to be targeting this part of the GOP conference as well, speaking with Republican Sen. Josh Hawley by phone, a White House official confirmed. Hawley, who has said he opposes potential cuts to Medicaid benefits, said in a post on X after that call, that Trump "said again, NO MEDICAID BENEFIT CUTS." Trump put pressure on Republican senators to fall in line in a post on his social media site on Monday night, emphasizing that he wants the GOP tax megabill on his desk before the Fourth of July holiday. "I call on all of my Republican friends in the Senate and House to work as fast as they can to get this Bill to MY DESK before the Fourth of JULY," Trump wrote. MORE: Senate parliamentarian will have final say on some provisions in Trump's funding bill Echoing sentiments from Trump, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Monday suggested that Republican senators who vote against Trump's megabill will have a price to pay. "Their voters will know about it. That is unacceptable to Republican voters and all voters across the country who elected this president in a Republican majority to get things done on Capitol Hill," Leavitt told reporters. Despite expressing some displeasures about the large tax bill last week, Leavitt said Trump was keen on keeping the bill largely in-tact. "Those discussions are ongoing, but the president is not going to back down from those key priorities that he promised the American public, and they are expecting Capitol Hill to help him deliver," Leavitt said.

Elon Musk left the White House. Don't be surprised to see him in campaign ads next year.
Elon Musk left the White House. Don't be surprised to see him in campaign ads next year.

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk left the White House. Don't be surprised to see him in campaign ads next year.

Elon Musk's time at the White House is over. His time as a mainstay of American politics is probably not. It's not just that Republicans love him. It's that Democrats love to hate him. Elon Musk's tenure as a White House employee is over. His time in the political spotlight is probably not. That's not just because he says he'll continue to be in Washington frequently, or because Republicans will continue to call on him for advice. It's also because Democrats are likely to keep bringing him up, continuing to use him as a foil as they look to retake power in the 2026 midterm elections. "He doesn't get to just go away," Mike Nellis, founder and CEO of the Democratic campaign firm Authentic told BI. "He's indelibly tied to everything that happens in the Trump administration." As the informal head of DOGE, Musk embarked on a dramatic campaign of firings and shuttering of federal agencies that helped reignite what had once been a dormant Democratic resistance. Musk's favorability with the public sank lower than Trump, according to numerous polls, and that unpopularity eventually spilled over to Tesla. Six months later, Musk is a mainstay of Democratic messaging, popping up in places he wasn't before. Democrats aren't just taking on billionaires; they're taking on "billionaires like Elon Musk." Republicans aren't just cutting taxes for the wealthy; they're cutting taxes for the world's richest man. Viet Shelton, a spokesperson for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said that Musk "is, and forever will be, an instantly recognizable manifestation of the fact that House Republicans don't work for the American people, they work for the billionaires." "Top of mind for voters are the pocketbook issues," Shelton said. "Democrats are going to win by highlighting the fact that Republicans are failing at lowering costs because they are too busy pushing tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations, while making the rest of us pay for them." Going after Musk is seen as a political winner, and Democrats are unlikely to just give it up, even if Musk himself isn't hanging around the White House so much anymore. The tech titan spent nearly $300 million to elect Trump and other Republicans in 2024, making it easy to cast Musk as the GOP's prime benefactor. "He's turned himself into a poison pill for the Republican Party, and they tied themselves right to him, and he's an anchor," Nellis said. "So as long as that continues to be effective messaging, there's no reason to get away from that." As Musk says he's turning back toward his companies, some lawmakers have taken to insisting that the tech titan is as present as before, but keeping out of sight. "He's just trying to hide in the shadows," Democratic Rep. Mark Pocan of Wisconsin previously told BI, saying that Republicans "realize he's a liability, and they just want to put him in the back closet." Rep. Greg Casar of Texas, a prominent progressive who led the charge among Democrats to make Musk into a villain, told BI in a statement that Musk was "forced to leave" by public outcry over his work at DOGE and his financial entanglement with the federal government. "We cannot allow Musk to slink back behind the curtain and continue pulling the strings of the government out of sight," Casar said. "As long as Musk continues to corrupt our government, I will be organizing to make sure Americans know what he is doing and hold him and Trump accountable." Even if Musk isn't physically present in Washington as much, Democrats can fundraise off of his name, as they have with other major GOP donors. "He's actually the first billionaire to remove the veil," Nellis said. "The Koch brothers didn't go work in the government. Sheldon Adelson didn't go work in the government. Elon Musk did." Musk did not return a request for comment. He has lamented the reputational hit his companies have taken, and he said in two different interviews recently that DOGE had become the "whipping boy" for any unfavorable policies enacted by the Trump administration. "That's what happens when you choose to make yourself a public figure like this," Nellis said. "He could have done this more quietly, and it still probably would have happened anyway, but he went all in, in a way you've never seen a billionaire do before." Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store