Microsoft's head of AI wants to create an artificial overly-attached companion for us all: 'It will have its own name, its own style. It will adapt to you. It may also have its own visual appearance and expressions'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
As part of Microsoft's 50th-anniversary celebrations, it's been talking a lot about its past but also its future and one doesn't need a crystal ball to figure out what that will entail. According to the CEO of Microsoft's AI division, we're all going to be seeing a lot more of Copilot and, ultimately, digital companions powered by AI that will form a "lasting, meaningful relationship" with you.
This is all claimed by Mustafa Suleyman, the head of Microsoft's AI section, and he expounded on what this would all be like in an interview with the Associated Press. "My goal is really to create a true personal AI companion. And the definition of AGI [artificial general intelligence] sort of feels very far out to me and sort of not what I'm focused on in the next few years.'
As to what he means by a 'companion', he explained by saying Microsoft's AI technology will be "[o]ne that knows your name, gets to know you, has a memory of everything that you've shared with it and talked about and really comes to kind of live life alongside you,' he told AP. "It's far more than just a piece of software or a tool. It is unlike anything we've really ever created."
AI is already a big part of everything that Microsoft churns out these days, all wrapped up under the moniker of Copilot. From Office to Notepad, full operating systems to Surface laptops, the chatbot-on-steroids is ever-present but at least one never has to interact with it.
I'm not suggesting for one moment that some aspects of the integration of Copilot aren't useful—for the right user, the features provide a variety of shortcuts to boost productivity or gain better insights into what you're doing. Like all software tools, it can be very useful or very useless. However, it's clear that Suleyman envisages something rather different for the future of Microsoft's AI.
And we're not just talking about things in the far future. Some of this will start to roll out relatively soon, starting with Microsoft's mobile applications, which will gain some kind of 'visual memory capability' that sounds very much like the much-delayed Recall.
Suleyman is no recent convert to the world of AI. Nearly 25 years ago, he co-founded and led DeepMind, a UK-based AI company that would ultimately be snapped up by Alphabet, Google's parent company, in 2014. DeepMind is famous for creating AlphaGo, an AI system that could give some professional Go masters a run for their money.
After leaving Google in 2022, Suleyman went on to start up another artificial intelligence company, Inflection AI, before eventually joining Microsoft as the executive vice president and chief executive officer of its AI division in 2024. While clearly a big fan of AI and what it can do for us, he's also been a vocal proponent for the enforcement of AI ethics and the like. However, he's also well known for having the view that pretty much anything on the Internet is fair game to be used for AI training, which rather flies in the face of copyright laws.
While attending this year's Game Developer Conference, I saw an awful lot of stands, press talks, and lectures on AI in games and gaming. Artificial NPCs, artificial gaming buddies, artificial advice, artificial rendering—AI couldn't be escaped. We might not see Suleyman's vision of an overly-attached AI companion anytime soon but given how much money Microsoft and the rest of the tech world are spending on all of this right now, you can be sure that it will happen.
Windows 11 review: What we think of the latest OS. How to install Windows 11: Guide to a secure install.Windows 11 TPM requirement: Strict OS security.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Google Makes New $200 Father's Day Offer To Pixel 9 Buyers
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA - AUGUST 13: A new Google Pixel 9 phone is displayed during the Made By ... More Google event at Google headquarters on August 13, 2024 in Mountain View, California. Google announced new Pixel phones, watches and AI features during the Made By Google event. (Photo by) Following one of its most aggressive Pixel 9 price drops yet, Google has once again slashed the price of its flagship smartphone. However, for serious deal hunters the company's new Pixel 8 Pro bundle offer might be the better deal. Let's start with the Pixel 9 discount. All models, including the Pixel 9a, are cheaper for this sale, which ends on June 15th. The Pixel 9 price cut is similar to what we have seen in previous sales, but Google does have some new bundle deals, alongside discounts for virtually all wearables. Virtually all of Google's wearables and smart home devices are on sale, too. These are the standout deals. A Google Pixel 8 pro phone is displayed during a product launch event for the Google Pixel 8, and ... More Pixel 8 pro phones, Pixel Watch 2, and Pixel Buds Pro earbuds, in New York on October 4, 2023. (Photo by Ed JONES / AFP) (Photo by ED JONES/AFP via Getty Images) The most eye-catching promotion is for the Pixel 8 Pro, which is now down to $599. Google lists this as a $400 discount, but the 2023 flagship hasn't cost $999 since it launched two years ago. Despite the chicanery, this is a solid deal for a phone that isn't wildly different from the Pixel 9. The promotion is boosted by Google throwing in a free Pixel Watch 2 LTE and a free case with the Pixel 8 Pro. To me, this makes the Pixel 8 Pro the better choice if you're on a budget because the free Pixel Watch can be sold to extend the discount. If you're worried about buying older tech, there's very little daylight between the Pixel 8 and Pixel 9 ranges. The Pixel 8 has many of the Pixel 9's features, including AI tools like Magic Editor, Best Take, and Video Boost (on the Pixel 8 Pro). Formerly exclusive Pixel 9 features, such as the Pixel Weather app, have now migrated over to the Pixel 8. Only the updated hardware separates the two phones. I wrote more extensively about why the Pixel 8 Pro may be the better choice for tight budgets here. Crucially, the Pixel 8 still has five years of software support left. When the device launched in 2023, Google extended the amount of Android updates and security patches its Pixel phones would get to seven years. We will have to see if Google (and Samsung) honor that promise as we edge closer to 2030. But if we take Google at face value, that extended support adds value to the Pixel 8, especially since there are fewer reasons to buy new hardware that only marginally improves per year. Manufacturers may struggle to convince fans to buy new phones when the near-identical predecessor is half the price. This is good news for Pixel 9 and Pixel 8 shoppers because it is currently the best time to buy high-end, cheap, phones.
Entrepreneur
2 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
Cut Overhead, Not Capabilities: Microsoft Office Pro 2021 Is Just $49.97
Disclosure: Our goal is to feature products and services that we think you'll find interesting and useful. If you purchase them, Entrepreneur may get a small share of the revenue from the sale from our commerce partners. If you're running a business, managing a team, or just trying to stay ahead in a demanding field, you know how essential your software stack is. Right now, you can ditch the subscription model (like Microsoft 365) and own a full-featured, professional Office suite for a one-time cost of just $49.97 (reg. $219.99). That's a significant savings over the 2024 version, which offers only five apps but demands a higher price tag. Office 2021 Professional still offers everything most professionals need to do their jobs exceptionally well: Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams (free version), OneNote, Publisher, and Access. The tools are robust, familiar, and built to handle real business tasks—whether you're formatting a client proposal, managing spreadsheets, designing print collateral, or coordinating project details via email. It runs natively on your Windows machine, is optimized for performance, and includes updated features like enhanced Excel functions, visual refreshes in PowerPoint, and improved collaboration tools in Word. It's stable, streamlined, and doesn't require constant online syncing or cloud dependence to perform. For entrepreneurs and small teams who prioritize functionality over flash, Office 2021 Pro strikes the perfect balance. You get the same professional-grade software trusted by Fortune 500s without the recurring fees or unnecessary extras. This version is ideal for independent professionals, remote workers, and business owners who don't require Microsoft's latest innovations but seek proven reliability. It's especially valuable if you're outfitting multiple employees and need to keep costs in check without sacrificing quality. Unlike Microsoft 365, which renews monthly or annually, this is a perpetual license—you buy it once, and it's yours for life on one Windows PC. That means no surprise charges, no account expiration, and no downgrade in features. Don't miss the chance to own Microsoft Office Professional 2021 for Windows for $49.97 (reg. $219.99) for a limited time. Microsoft Office Professional 2021 for Windows: Lifetime License See Deal StackSocial prices subject to change.
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
How faulty DOGE AI tool impacted VA contracts
The code, using outdated and inexpensive AI models, produced results with glaring mistakes. For instance, it hallucinated the size of contracts, frequently misreading them and inflating their value. It concluded more than a thousand were each worth $34 million, when in fact some were for as little as $35,000. The DOGE AI tool flagged more than 2,000 contracts for 'munching.' It's unclear how many have been or are on track to be canceled — the Trump administration's decisions on VA contracts have largely been a black box. The VA uses contractors for many reasons, including to support hospitals, research and other services aimed at caring for ailing veterans. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up VA officials have said they've killed nearly 600 contracts overall. Congressional Democrats have been pressing VA leaders for specific details of what's been canceled without success. Advertisement We identified at least two dozen on the DOGE list that have been canceled so far. Among the canceled contracts was one to maintain a gene sequencing device used to develop better cancer treatments. Another was for blood sample analysis in support of a VA research project. Another was to provide additional tools to measure and improve the care nurses provide. Advertisement ProPublica obtained the code and the contracts it flagged from a source and shared them with a half dozen AI and procurement experts. All said the script was flawed. Many criticized the concept of using AI to guide budgetary cuts at the VA, with one calling it 'deeply problematic.' Cary Coglianese, professor of law and of political science at the University of Pennsylvania who studies the governmental use and regulation of artificial intelligence, said he was troubled by the use of these general-purpose large language models, or LLMs. 'I don't think off-the-shelf LLMs have a great deal of reliability for something as complex and involved as this,' he said. Sahil Lavingia, the programmer enlisted by DOGE, which was then run by Elon Musk, acknowledged flaws in the code. 'I think that mistakes were made,' said Lavingia, who worked at DOGE for nearly two months. 'I'm sure mistakes were made. Mistakes are always made. I would never recommend someone run my code and do what it says. It's like that 'Office' episode where Steve Carell drives into the lake because Google Maps says drive into the lake. Do not drive into the lake.' Though Lavingia has talked about his time at DOGE previously, this is the first time his work has been examined in detail and the first time he's publicly explained his process, down to specific lines of code. Lavingia has nearly 15 years of experience as a software engineer and entrepreneur but no formal training in AI. He briefly worked at Pinterest before starting Gumroad, a small e-commerce company that nearly collapsed in 2015. 'I laid off 75% of my company — including many of my best friends. It really sucked,' he said. Lavingia kept the company afloat by 'replacing every manual process with an automated one,' according to Advertisement Lavingia did not have much time to immerse himself in how the VA handles veterans' care between starting on March 17 and writing the tool on the following day. Yet his experience with his own company aligned with the direction of the Trump administration, which has embraced the use of AI across government to streamline operations and save money. Lavingia said the quick timeline of Under a time crunch, Lavingia said he finished the first version of his contract-munching tool on his second day on the job — using AI to help write the code for him. He told ProPublica he then spent his first week downloading VA contracts to his laptop and analyzing them. VA press secretary Pete Kasperowicz lauded DOGE's work on vetting contracts in a statement to ProPublica. 'As far as we know, this sort of review has never been done before, but we are happy to set this commonsense precedent,' he said. The VA is reviewing all of its 76,000 contracts to ensure each of them benefits veterans and is a good use of taxpayer money, he said. Decisions to cancel or reduce the size of contracts are made after multiple reviews by VA employees, including agency contracting experts and senior staff, he wrote. Advertisement Kasperowicz said that the VA will not cancel contracts for work that provides services to veterans or that the agency cannot do itself without a contingency plan in place. He added that contracts that are 'wasteful, duplicative or involve services VA has the ability to perform itself' will typically be terminated. Trump officials have said they are working toward a The VA has said it would avoid cutting contracts that directly impact care out of fear that it would cause harm to veterans. ProPublica recently reported that relatively small cuts at the agency have already The VA has not explained how it plans to simultaneously move services in-house, as Lavingia's code suggested was the plan, while also slashing staff. Many inside the VA told ProPublica the process for reviewing contracts was so opaque they couldn't even see who made the ultimate decisions to kill specific contracts. Once the 'munching' script had selected a list of contracts, Lavingia said he would pass it off to others who would decide what to cancel and what to keep. No contracts, he said, were terminated 'without human review.' 'I just delivered the [list of contracts] to the VA employees,' he said. 'I basically put munchable at the top and then the others below.' VA staffers told ProPublica that when DOGE identified contracts to be canceled early this year — before Lavingia was brought on — employees sometimes were given little time to justify retaining the service. One recalled being given just a few hours. The staffers asked not to be named because they feared losing their jobs for talking to reporters. Advertisement According to one internal email that predated Lavingia's AI analysis, staff members had to respond in 255 characters or fewer — just shy of the 280 character limit on Musk's X social media platform. Once he started on DOGE's contract analysis, Lavingia said he was confronted with technological limitations. At least some of the errors produced by his code can be traced to using older versions of OpenAI models available through the VA — models not capable of solving complex tasks, according to the experts consulted by ProPublica. Moreover, the tool's underlying instructions were deeply flawed. Records show Lavingia programmed the AI system to make intricate judgments based on the first few pages of each contract — about the first 2,500 words — which contain only sparse summary information. 'AI is absolutely the wrong tool for this,' said Waldo Jaquith, a former Obama appointee who oversaw IT contracting at the Treasury Department. 'AI gives convincing looking answers that are frequently wrong. There needs to be humans whose job it is to do this work.' Lavingia's prompts did not include context about how the VA operates, what contracts are essential or which ones are required by federal law. This led AI to determine a core piece of the agency's own contract procurement system was 'munchable.' At the core of Lavingia's prompt is the direction to spare contracts involved in 'direct patient care.' Such an approach, experts said, doesn't grapple with the reality that the work done by doctors and nurses to care for veterans in hospitals is only possible with significant support around them. Advertisement Lavingia's system also used AI to extract details like the contract number and 'total contract value.' This led to avoidable errors, where AI returned the wrong dollar value when multiple were found in a contract. Experts said the correct information was readily available from public databases. Lavingia acknowledged that errors resulted from this approach but said those errors were later corrected by VA staff. In late March, Lavingia published a version of the 'munchable' script According That openness may have eventually led to Lavingia's dismissal. Lavingia confirmed he was VA officials have declined to say whether they will continue to use the 'munchable' tool moving forward. But the administration may deploy AI to help the agency replace employees. Documents previously obtained by ProPublica show DOGE officials proposed in March consolidating the benefits claims department by relying more on AI. And the government's contractors are paying attention. After Lavingia posted his code, he said he heard from people trying to understand how to keep the money flowing. 'I got a couple DMs from VA contractors who had questions when they saw this code,' he said. 'They were trying to make sure that their contracts don't get cut. Or learn why they got cut. 'At the end of the day, humans are the ones terminating the contracts, but it is helpful for them to see how DOGE or Trump or the agency heads are thinking about what contracts they are going to munch. Transparency is a good thing.'
