logo
Your soap, lotion, and shampoo may contain formaldehyde

Your soap, lotion, and shampoo may contain formaldehyde

Fast Company13-05-2025

Common personal care and beauty products like lotions, soaps, shampoos, eyeliner, and even eyelash glue can contain formaldehyde or preservatives that release formaldehyde—a known carcinogen that has been linked to cancer. And Black and Latina women could be at particular risk.
Formaldehyde is a preservative (it's a key ingredient of embalming fluid) and so it's sometimes added to beauty products as a way to extend their shelf life and inhibit the growth of bacteria or mold. Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives are seen as an alternative to formaldehyde, but these chemical compounds do the same thing: they extend shelf life while slowly releasing formaldehyde into the product over time (just how much depends on multiple factors, but studies suggest longer storage times and higher temperatures lead to more formaldehyde released).
That formaldehyde could then be absorbed by the skin, and even though the amount may be small, experts say low levels of formaldehyde still pose health risks. Personal care products are often used frequently, so repeated exposures could add up.
These chemicals have already been found in hair-straightening products, which are predominantly used by Black women. A new study, recently published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology Letters, found that this risk extends beyond chemical hair relaxers to all sorts of beauty products: lotions, shower gels, face creams, shampoo and conditioners, hair oils, eyeliner, eyelash glue, and so on.
In that study, researchers asked a group of Black and Latina women in Los Angeles about their use of personal care products over a week. More than half reported using items that contain formaldehyde-releasing preservatives—and many of those products are ones that the participants used daily, or multiple times in a week.
Finding formaldehyde in beauty products
For the study, 64 Black and Latina women were tasked with tracking all of their beauty product use, logging the information in an app developed by the Silent Spring Institute, a research organization focused on the environmental causes of breast cancer. (Silent Spring chemists authored the study, and it was part of a larger research effort between Silent Spring, Occidental College Black Women for Wellness, and Columbia University.)
That app also asked them to take a photo of each ingredient label, which allowed the researchers to analyze the ingredient lists for formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing preservatives. Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives often go by complex chemical names like 1,3-dimethylol-5,5-dimethylhydantoin, also called DMDM hydantoin or DMDMH, meaning they don't actually appear as 'formaldehyde' on ingredient lists.
Fifty-three percent of participants said they used at least one product with formaldehyde releasers on its ingredient label, and DMDMH was the most common. Of the items that contained any formaldehyde-releasing preservatives, DMDMH was in 47% of skincare and 58% of hair products.
The fact that these toxic chemicals are in so many products highlights the health risks women face, particularly Black and Latina women. One woman in the study used three products with formaldehyde-releasing preservatives: a leave-in conditioner, rinse-off conditioner, and a body wash. Some women used these products multiple times a day, like hand soap or lotion. Over a five day period, 20 study participants used lotions with formaldehyde-releasing preservatives for a total of 76 times. One eyelash glue even specifically listed formaldehyde as an ingredient. The preservatives were also found in hair gels, oils, curl creams, and edge controls, predominantly used by Black women.
The study didn't list specific brands or product names containing formaldehyde-releasing preservatives, though it did note that 12 such lotions were from Bath & Body Works. 'While this study does not specify which of body lotions its participants were using, we rigorously test formulas for all our personal care and home fragrance products, including FRPs to meet regulatory and safety standards,' a Bath & Body Works spokesperson said in a statement.
Protecting consumers from formaldehyde releasers
Formaldehyde exposure is linked to adverse health effects, including increased risk of multiple types of cancer. Researchers say there's been a growing concern about formaldehyde-releasing preservatives, and how personal care products that contain them could pose a risk to women's health, particularly Black and Latina women. Previous studies have connected the use of hair relaxers to an increased risk of uterine cancer in Black women.
Others say these formaldehyde-releasing chemicals aren't a concern. Unilever, for example, has a web page about how it doesn't use formaldehyde as an ingredient but does use 'formaldehyde donors' like DMDMH. It says they're safe to use, per the U.S. Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel and Europe's Scientific Community on Consumer Safety.
Still, in Europe, products with formaldehyde are more regulated. The European Union has banned formaldehyde in cosmetics, and requires any cosmetics with formaldehyde releasers above a 0.001% concentration to have a warning label.
The U.S. currently doesn't ban formaldehyde in cosmetics (a federal ban on formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers in chemical hair straighteners was considered back in 2023, and is currently stalled after President Donald Trump paused all federal regulations). At least 10 states, including California and Oregon, have enacted or considered laws to regulate formaldehyde in cosmetics—either by banning it, or requiring warning labels for formaldehyde releasers. There has been a drop in products containing formaldehyde in California after the state's Safe Cosmetics Program began in 2007, but experts say even beyond warning labels, banning formaldehyde releasers completely across the country would be the best-case scenario to reduce risks.
The researchers suggest people avoid products containing DMDMH. Silent Spring has resources for how people can avoid formaldehyde releasers, including by noting the other chemical names for such preservatives that may appear on ingredient lists. Black Women for Wellness also has resources for consumers concerned about chemical exposure.
'We're trying to do the right thing,' Janette Robinson Flint, executive director of Black Women for Wellness, says in a statement. 'But there needs to be more government oversight. We shouldn't have to be chemists to figure out what kinds of products will make us sick.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The U.S. Government Is Stuck With SpaceX. But Trump Can Still Hurt It.
The U.S. Government Is Stuck With SpaceX. But Trump Can Still Hurt It.

Forbes

time20 minutes ago

  • Forbes

The U.S. Government Is Stuck With SpaceX. But Trump Can Still Hurt It.

Donald Trump and Elon Musk arrive for a test launch of SpaceX's Starship rocket on November 19, 2024, in Brownsville, Texas. In the barrage of attacks that President Donald Trump and Elon Musk fired at each other Thursday, one stood out: Trump's threat to cancel federal contracts with companies owned by the world's richest man. The primary target: SpaceX, which has received at least $21 billion in government contracts, with about $13 billion still outstanding. Musk probably doesn't have much to fear. Legally, the Trump administration would likely enmire itself in lengthy legal disputes if it appeared to cancel contracts out of spite. Moreover, as the world's No. 1 launch provider and maker of low-Earth orbit satellites, SpaceX may have made itself indispensable. 'The [U.S. government] is simply too locked in to cut them off over a social media meltdown,' said Kimberly Siversen Burke, director of government affairs at the consultancy Quilty Space. Nonetheless, there are some types of contracts that could be vulnerable for cancellation, and ways the government could lessen its dependence on SpaceX going forward. The 134 rockets SpaceX launched last year accounted for 83% of all satellites put into orbit worldwide. With its reliable, partially reusable Falcon 9, the company has come to dominate U.S. national security launches. Its chief competitor, United Launch Alliance, a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin, has struggled to keep up, with multiyear delays in developing its new Vulcan rocket. The U.S. government may have more options to carry its military satellites to space going forward. Vulcan is now operational and Blue Origin, the space company founded by Musk's billionaire rival Jeff Bezos, pulled off a successful first launch of its New Glenn rocket in January. In the latest round of contracts awarded by Space Force, SpaceX won 28 launches from 2027 through 2032, a little more than half, with ULA getting 19 and Blue Origin seven. But ULA and Blue Origin have their hands full scaling up, said Todd Harrison, a defense and space analyst with the American Enterprise Institute. 'There's no replacing SpaceX. You just do not have the capacity in our other launch options.' SpaceX has also become a major supplier of national security satellites. The National Reconnaissance Office is depending on SpaceX to build out a multibillion-dollar network of hundreds of spy satellites in low-Earth orbit based on the company's Starshield platform. For delivering cargo and astronauts to the International Space Station, NASA has also had to rely on SpaceX, as Boeing has struggled to fix defects in its Starliner spacecraft. But there are some relatively small-dollar SpaceX contracts that could be vulnerable, said Burke. The government could lower its exposure to SpaceX by looking for early phase development programs that don't have a contractor locked in yet. For example, SpaceX has won roughly $140 million in contracts on an Air Force program to test whether commercial satellite services can be integrated into tactical military communications, Burke said. Another way Trump could hurt Musk, as well as Ukraine, would be to cancel or reduce a $537 million contract to provide Starlink satellite communications services to the Ukrainian military. But rather than targeting existing contracts, where the administration could make a greater impact is by steering new business to others and reorienting its plans. The Commerce Department could backtrack on a revamp announced in March to a $42 billion program to expand rural broadband access that was expected to make Starlink eligible to compete for grants. Till now the program has only included telecom companies laying fiber-optic cables. Trump could also pull back from the support he promised in his inaugural address for Musk's ultimate ambition: to reach Mars. 'Where Trump can single handedly harm SpaceX in a significant way is redirecting the mission goals for NASA,' Harrison said. Given how mercurial Musk has proven to be, perhaps diversifying away from SpaceX isn't a bad idea. Burke worries, however, that the bad blood will undo years of work to convince the Pentagon and other national security agencies that they can rely on any commercial companies. 'Elon's antics are threatening to rewind the tape,' she said. MORE FROM FORBES

How AI Is Helping Cancer Patients: Saving Lives And Money
How AI Is Helping Cancer Patients: Saving Lives And Money

Forbes

time25 minutes ago

  • Forbes

How AI Is Helping Cancer Patients: Saving Lives And Money

Medical technology concept. Medical doctor. getty Cancer treatment is costly. The average cost of cancer care in the U.S. is around $150,000 per patient—more than four times the cost of treatment for other common health conditions, according to AARP. The American Cancer Society projected that In 2025, more than 2 million people in the U.S. are expected to be diagnosed with cancer, with over 618,000 deaths projected. With these high costs, artificial intelligence (AI) is offering new solutions that are not only saving lives but also making cancer care more affordable. Early detection is one of the most effective ways to reduce cancer treatment costs. When cancer is caught in its earliest stages, treatments tend to be less aggressive and more affordable. At The Christ Hospital, AI has significantly improved lung cancer detection. 'Nearly 70% of lung cancer cases are now found at stage I or II, well above the national average of 46%,' said Seth Howard, executive vice president of research and development at Epic. 'In just six months, over 60 patients started treatment earlier, significantly improving their chances of survival.' By diagnosing cancer earlier, AI allows doctors to offer more cost-effective treatment options, which helps lower the financial burden on both patients and healthcare systems. ArteraAI is another example of how AI is transforming cancer care. Their AI technology is helping doctors determine which cancer treatments are best for their patients, preventing unnecessary therapies. 'AI is the most transformative tech we've had in a long time,' said Andre, founder of Artera. 'The impact AI has had on the healthcare system is as powerful as computers have had on the healthcare system. With the ArteraAI Prostate Test, we can personalize treatments, reducing unnecessary costs while improving outcomes.' The ArteraAI Prostate Test is fully reimbursed by Medicare under its established payment rate, meaning no out-of-pocket costs for eligible Medicare patients. This makes prostate cancer care more affordable and reduces financial strain during treatment. Surgery is often a key part of cancer treatment. Proprio, a company that has developed AI-powered surgical technology, provides surgeons with real-time data during operations, reducing the need for traditional imaging like CT scans and X-rays. This technology allows for faster surgeries, less strain on hospital staff, and quicker recovery times, which ultimately lowers the cost of care for patients. Another breakthrough demonstrating AI's transformative potential in cancer care is AION Biosystems' TempShield device. A recent study showed that TempShield, an AI-powered wearable thermometer for oncology patients, can reduce mortality rates by an astonishing 90% among cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and inpatient hospital stays by 79%. This innovation addresses a crucial, yet often overlooked, fact: more than 50% of cancer deaths are preventable because they result from infections like pneumonia rather than cancer itself. If you spot a temperature spike (and hence an infection) early and treat it, you save lives. TempShield's continuous temperature monitoring provides clinicians with alerts up to 72 hours before symptoms of infection appear, enabling earlier intervention. 'The real danger in cancer care isn't just the disease—it's the complications we miss,' said Sam Barend, CEO of AION Biosystems. 'TempShield is a game-changer: small, simple, and affordable, and it's helping save lives by catching infections before symptoms appear—just like the blood glucose monitor did for diabetes.' AI is revolutionizing cancer care, not only improving outcomes but also making treatment more affordable. Early detection, personalized treatment, and more efficient surgeries all contribute to lowering the financial burden on patients while providing better care. With innovations like the ArteraAI Prostate Test and TempShield, AI is making cancer care smarter, more accessible, and more cost-effective for patients across the globe. As AI technologies continue to evolve, they will undoubtedly play an even greater role in both saving lives and reducing the financial strain of cancer treatment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store