Wizz Air plunges as engine trouble grounds a fifth of the budget airline's planes
Shares in Wizz Air tumbled after the budget airline revealed engine problems had grounded a fifth of its planes.
The low-cost carrier said profits tanked 62 per cent from £369million to £141million in the year to March 31 as more than 40 aircraft were out of action. And it continued to be affected by conflict in Ukraine and Israel – two key markets.
Wizz was upbeat as passenger numbers hit a record 63.4m but the shares plunged 27.9 per cent, or 467p, to 1207p, having peaked at 5500p in 2021.
Chief executive Jozsef Varadi said: 'Wizz Air is a more resilient business today.
'Despite the unproductivity of a grounded fleet, we successfully delivered a second year of profitability.
'We have the benefit of more than a year of experience operating under unique circumstances – conditions airlines would never experience when demand exceeds supply.'
Nosedive: Wizz Air said profits tanked 62% from £369m to £141m in the year to March 31 as more than 40 aircraft were out of action
He said it had reached a 'transformation point' in relation to its grounded planes.
The Airbus planes have been affected by problems at Pratt & Whitney, the engine maker owned by aerospace and defence giant RTX, formerly known as Raytheon.
The US manufacturer began recalling some engine models for inspection in 2023, prompted by concerns that there were contaminants in the powdered metal that was used in manufacturing.
Wizz has been the worst-hit European airline, issuing two profit warnings in the last year.
As many as 44 planes were grounded, it said. By early May, 37 were out of action – a figure expected to shrink to 34 by the end of September.
It takes around 300 days for engines to be checked and returned to service. But the problems are expected to drag on until at least 2027.
Wizz secured a two-year compensation package with Pratt & Whitney last year and said the support would mitigate 'some, but not all, of the operational and financial impacts on the business'.
Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said: 'The airline described its past year as 'resilience and transformation', whereas the market reaction suggests 'awful' might be a better word.
'Wizz used to be the aggressive growth player, with talk that it tried to buy Easyjet in 2021. The tables have turned and it is being left behind.
'With shares at a fraction of their peak, failure to resolve its problems could see Wizz turn from predator to prey.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Tesla's Optimus humanoid robot program head exiting firm, Bloomberg News reports
June 6 (Reuters) - The head of Tesla's (TSLA.O), opens new tab Optimus program, Milan Kovac, is leaving the company, casting uncertainty over chief executive Elon Musk's humanoid robot project, Bloomberg News reported on Friday, citing a person familiar with the matter. Kovac, vice president and head of engineering for Optimus, told colleagues on Friday that he was departing, effective immediately. Ashok Elluswamy, who leads Tesla's autopilot teams, will take on Kovac's role, the report said. Tesla, Kovac and Elluswamy did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. Musk has earlier said he expected Tesla to make thousands of Optimus robots this year. He said in April that China's export restrictions on rare-earth magnets had affected production of the humanoid robots. Tesla has shifted focus to launching the robots and its robotaxi service, with much of the company's valuation hanging on that bet. "The only things that matter in the long term are autonomy and Optimus," Musk told CNBC in an interview in May.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
ALEX BRUMMER: 'Wise old hen' Chancellor dances on a pinhead
Rachel Reeves's pledge to restore fiscal stability and confine herself to one budgetary event a year is threadbare. When she delivers Labour's first full spending review next Wednesday, it will be her fourth visit to the dispatch box. As the Economist magazine remarked this week, it has been 'all pain, no gain'. Most of her difficulties can be traced back to the alleged discovery of a £22billion black hole in her public spending audit on July 30 last year. Reeves established a narrative, repeated by rote by her Cabinet colleagues, about a terrible inheritance. The number was contrived, in that the biggest element was a giveaway to public sector unions and railway workers, which brought a temporary truce. The Chancellor has made a series of tactical and strategic mistakes. At that very first appearance at the Treasury, she sowed the seeds of festering political dissonance by withdrawing the winter fuel allowance from pensioners. A costed gain to the Exchequer of £1.4billion last year and £1.5billion this year has proved ferociously politically expensive. It is now to be partly reversed in the spending review with the fuel payments restored but taxed as income for better-off silver surfers. Reeves then created a new rod for her back in her first Budget in October. The impact of £40billion of tax increases, fuelled by the debilitating rise in National Insurance Contributions, caused a growth stammer. The fundamental error was in shaping the fiscal rules. Taxation and current spending would be broadly balanced. The Government would only borrow for investment. But by leaving herself so little room for error on current spending, £10bn of headroom, the Chancellor sprung a trap. She ignored Harold Macmillan's dictum, 'Events, dear boy, events.' The headroom detonated another booby trap. Reeves's third intervention came in the spring. She took the axe to welfare, most notoriously to personal independence payments (PIPs) for those claiming disability benefits. It started a debate about Labour values, which has exposed Reeves to pressure to restore £3.5billion of payments to families with more than two children. Which brings us to the spending review. Any hopes that this would be the moment for Reeves to repair struggling public services have been smashed. A downgrade to the Office for Budget Responsibility's growth forecast, surging defence spending, the U-turn on winter fuel and the rocketing cost of servicing the national debt mean the envelope for current spending is negligible, with overall increases confined to 1.2 per cent or so. The joy, such as it is, will come from the capital spending plans. We had a flavour of this earlier in the week when Reeves unsheathed £15billion of transport investment across the North. One cannot but think most of these are reheated plans already announced by her predecessors. Infrastructure is critical and the Elizabeth Line in London and HS2 activity around Birmingham provide graphic evidence of how bold schemes can generate growth. But axing a supercomputer project in Edinburgh, as the Chancellor did last July, hardly speaks to UK tech ambition. In conversation at the CBI this week, Reeves described herself as a 'wise old hen' among G7 finance ministers as elections have brought newbies to the table. Her fiscal fortitude is creditable. Further tax increases, having pledged not to come back for more, would be a deception too far.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Tariff-hit steel maker Tata begs for US trade deal
Britain's biggest steel maker has urged Labour to step up efforts to finalise a US trade deal as the industry remains saddled with double digit tariffs. Rajesh Nair, boss of Tata Steel UK, said a deal with Washington is needed 'as soon as possible'. There is growing frustration that an agreement made last month has yet to take effect. Additional steel and aluminium tariffs remain at 25 per cent. The UK, however, was spared a recent doubling of the rate to 50 per cent, which hit other countries. Doubt continues over whether Indian-owned Tata will benefit from either exemption. That is because it imports steel from sister companies in India and Europe for finishing in the UK. US rules state that steel must be 'melted and poured' in the country they are imported from. Nair said it was 'critical for our business that melted and poured in the UK is not a requirement to access the steel quotas in any future trade deal'.
