‘How to Train Your Dragon' Is a Dazzling Fantasy Epic
The live-action How to Train Your Dragon is a sweeping, faithful adaptation of the animated franchise's world inspired by the original books by Cressida Cowell. Director Dean DeBlois, who helmed DreamWorks' original trilogy, imbues the heart of the beloved franchise and captures the magic of the series with new dramatic depth. The new take grounds the coming-of-age story in a visionary opening entry that invites new and old fans to a Viking world where dragons could actually exist.
Mason Thames (The Black Phone) is Hiccup made real; he's the audience's endearing conduit to see dragons in a different light than his Viking family—who actively hunt the awe-inspiring but dangerous mythical monsters—does. His meeting with Toothless, who is just an adorable gentle giant of a Nightfury dragon, is still such a powerful hook into the tale of love, survival through community, and balance with the different kinds of lives around us. Hiccup's journey from dragon slayer to dragon trainer remains as timeless as ever.
The father and son relationship between Hiccup and his dad Stoick remains a central part of the narrative. Gerard Butler reprises his role from the animated film but adds even more layers to it, digging into the push and pull of parenting a child on the verge of adulthood and the expectations that come with it. The gruffness is there with Butler's mannerisms as a Viking leader, but there's pauses where his vulnerability as a performer truly shines opposite Thames. No parent is perfect and Butler brings a more nuanced take on the cartoon character that is powerful and heartfelt. It brings a timelessness to the core conflict in the film as he pushes for a world that is set on dragons being the enemy, and this resonates deeply within the father-son relationship, especially in a world that needs to push fear aside and change like Hiccup does.
Through the lens of Bill Pope, the fantastical worldbuilding of the Isle of Berk is given new life as a place you can really see Vikings and dragons duking it out. The cinematography in collaboration with DeBlois' vision soars to craft one of the best family fantasies yet. It's an exciting adventure that sets up the ensemble stories we can't wait to see continue to unfold. Astrid, played by Nico Parker, shines brightly in a standout performance embodying the leader Hiccup sees himself uplifting in their romance.
Parker's chemistry with Thames only makes us so much more excited for what's to come for the two romantic leads as they meet each other's worldviews for a better Viking future. We don't get as much of the supporting characters as fans of the franchise might have wanted—but that fact does bring into question whether or not the film franchise might branch out into series in between the planned sequels, much like the animated films did with their cartoon series centering the dragon trainers bridging the gaps.
Berk's rich lore is ripe for exploration and DeBlois masterfully reignites the fire of his beloved universe for a new generation. Overall, How to Train Your Dragon delivers an epic adventure that lays the groundwork of Toothless and Hiccup's story. The CG animation on Toothless retains his familiarity from the animated movies of an adorable cat/dog energy—but make it dragon—and it works seamlessly in this fresh new take on the franchise.
Full of heartfelt storytelling, How to Train Your Dragon evokes the feeling of a journey that is just beginning, with the perfect blend of nostalgia in an imaginative but familiar world. DeBlois expertly fuses the emotional core in Cowell's book series with his knack for animated storytelling through the CG visuals of the film, which brilliantly raises the stakes in the film's epic and action packed dragon battles.
I'm so ready for How to Train Your Dragon II, and as a fan of the franchise, eagerly anticipate the release of my favorite in the series (the Easter eggs!). For a fun time at the movies with your kids, or even just the kids at heart, How to Train Your Dragon is a must-see quest.
How to Train Your Dragon opens June 13.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
Netflix's Best New Action Movie Is Certified Fresh On Rotten Tomatoes
Daniella Pineda, Gerard Butler and Yoson An star in the 2023 action thriller 'Plane.' During the Golden Age of Hollywood, the term 'B-movie' referred to the second half of a double feature. Essentially, these were cheaply made flicks that relied on stock sets, contract actors and genre formulas (westerns, crime thrillers, monster movies, etc.), and they were perceived to be inferior to the 'A-movies' that featured big stars and prestige. But over time, the B-movie status evolved from a technical label to a tonal one, and these films became a playground for genre experimentation. And over time, the genre has evolved into something beautiful and modern. This is all to say you shouldn't skip on watching Plane, the latest and greatest action movie to grace Netflix—especially since the film surprised everyone, including critics, and scored nearly 80% over on Rotten Tomatoes from 173 reviews. When Plane was first announced, it felt as though everyone on the internet collectively rolled their eyes. The title seemed like a parody of itself: Gerard Butler…on a plane. Right. He probably punches someone mid-flight. Right. And he has to save everyone from impending destruction. Right. We get it. We've seen this kind of story before, with Den of Thieves, with Olympus Has Fallen, with Copshop and Greenland and Hunter Killer—I could go on. The whole thing sounded like the kind of bargain-bin action flick you half-watch on a Sunday afternoon while folding laundry. And honestly? That's not entirely wrong. But what's surprising about Plane is that, despite its throwback packaging and B-movie premise, it manages to be… solid. More than solid, really. And in today's landscape of overbaked blockbusters and algorithm-churned content, 'solid' feels almost radical. In fact, it's a fantastic way to spend 107 minutes in front of the television. The film follows Captain Brodie Torrance (Butler), a widowed pilot just trying to get through a New Year's Eve flight from Singapore to Tokyo. On board his flight is a handful of passengers, a convicted murderer in cuffs (Mike Colter) and a weather pattern that would make anyone nervous to fly. After a harrowing emergency landing on a remote island controlled by anti-government militias, the film veers into full-throttle jungle mayhem, with Butler and Colter teaming up for a violent fight for survival. Essentially, it's Sully meets Rambo, but with more grit and less polish. Critics were quick to admit their expectations were low—and that the movie cleared the bar with surprising ease. Over at The Hollywood Reporter, Frank Scheck praises the 'breathlessly paced suspenser' and Richet's clarity in staging action sequences. He singles out a brutal, single-take fistfight that gives Plane some real brawn, and applauds the film's ability to sneak in character beats without slowing the tempo. 'It gets the job done,' Scheck writes, 'which is more than you can say for most genre films these days.' Variety's Owen Gleiberman described Plane as a genre blender that keeps pivoting, from disaster film to jungle thriller to buddy movie, but never loses its grip. He compared it to something pre-Die Hard, when action movies felt more grounded in character than spectacle. Butler, now in his 50s, leans into the role with just enough gruff sincerity to make Brodie feel like more than a stock hero. And Colter's Louis Gaspare might be one of the more interesting sidekicks in recent action memory: stoic, enigmatic, and constantly teetering between threat and ally. David Ehrlich at IndieWire was even more enthusiastic. He framed Plane as a dad-movie dream, praising its 'sinewy sincerity' and restraint. Unlike so many modern action flicks, Plane takes its time. The cockpit sequences are given space to breathe. The fight scenes are brutal but coherent. And Butler, as Ehrlich puts it, 'knows his strengths like the back of a bad guy's broken neck.' There's a warmth to the movie that makes its cliches feel earned, not lazy. It's throwback cinema, sure—but of the kind that actually throws punches you feel. That doesn't mean Plane is without its issues. Its portrayal of the Philippines as a third-world hellscape hasn't gone unnoticed. Nor has its simplistic view of geopolitical conflict. But even those critiques sit beside acknowledgment that the movie doesn't take itself too seriously. It's a film where a man MacGyvers a jungle phone line just to call his daughter, fights mercenaries with a handgun and a headset, and then climbs back into a busted jet to finish what he started. It's ridiculous…but intentionally so. In an era where so many action movies feel bloated, impersonal, or too preoccupied with setting up spin-offs, Plane is refreshingly straightforward. It's less than two hours long, and its pulp fiction done right. You might not remember every detail after the credits roll, but for a film called Plane, it doesn't just fly—it lands.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
'How to Train Your Dragon' director says most live-action remakes seem unnecessary — except his
The co-director of "How to Train Your Dragon" is back with a live-action remake of the original movie. He's not a fan of remakes and acknowledged that they can seem unnecessary, but thinks his is different. He told BI he hopes studios will take "more risks on establishing new original stories." Dean DeBlois, the director of the "How to Train Your Dragon" live-action remake, told Business Insider that he thinks live-action remakes are unnecessary. But he believes his is different, because it creates a new pathway for remakes that keep the franchises' "soul intact," he said. DeBlois said during an online Q&A at the 2020 Annecy International Animation Film Festival that he is not interested in re-dos and thought studios were being "lazy." While DeBlois hasn't changed his mind, he told BI: "I still see a lot of live-action remakes as being unnecessary, and you could argue that this one is unnecessary. "It is being delivered as a love letter to the fans, and it is being made with a lot of care and a lot of heart from everyone on the production." He added: "I would say that maybe if it's done by the original filmmakers, it warrants a little more respect and praise than perhaps the 'let's knock 'em all off' kind of attitude." The new film, out Friday, is DeBlois' first live-action movie after co-directing the original animated "How to Train Your Dragon" franchise, which made $1.6 billion across three films. He also co-directed the "Lilo & Stitch" animated movies, but the recent live-action remake was not directed or written by the original team. Although fans of the original "Lilo & Stitch" movie criticized the new film, it has become the third-highest-grossing movie of the year following its release last month. "How to Train Your Dragon" is Universal's first foray into live-action remakes, after Disney's including "Lilo & Stitch," grossed over $8 billion at the box office. DeBlois said that after Universal Studios contacted him about potentially commissioning a new "How to Train Your Dragon," he instantly wanted to direct it. "I'm not that big of a fan of the trend of remaking animated movies into live action," he said. "I want to be in charge of this one so I can preserve its integrity and pay tribute to the fans as well." But DeBlois ultimately hopes studios still pursue original stories. "I do hope that in the live-action space, with enough financial success, we can start to take a few more risks on establishing new original stories that could pay off to become great franchises for studios," DeBlois said. "But at the moment, I think we all understand it's a bit risk-averse when you talk about big movies that are expensive to make, nobody wants to be sort of left with a flop on their hands," he added. Read the original article on Business Insider
Business Insider
6 hours ago
- Business Insider
'How to Train Your Dragon' director says most live-action remakes seem unnecessary — except his
Dean DeBlois, the director of the "How to Train Your Dragon" live-action remake, told Business Insider that he thinks live-action remakes are unnecessary. But he believes his is different, because it creates a new pathway for remakes that keep the franchises' "soul intact," he said. DeBlois said during an online Q&A at the 2020 Annecy International Animation Film Festival that he is not interested in re-dos and thought studios were being "lazy." While DeBlois hasn't changed his mind, he told BI: "I still see a lot of live-action remakes as being unnecessary, and you could argue that this one is unnecessary. "It is being delivered as a love letter to the fans, and it is being made with a lot of care and a lot of heart from everyone on the production." He added: "I would say that maybe if it's done by the original filmmakers, it warrants a little more respect and praise than perhaps the 'let's knock 'em all off' kind of attitude." The new film, out Friday, is DeBlois' first live-action movie after co-directing the original animated "How to Train Your Dragon" franchise, which made $1.6 billion across three films. He also co-directed the " Lilo & Stitch" animated movies, but the recent live-action remake was not directed or written by the original team. Although fans of the original "Lilo & Stitch" movie criticized the new film, it has become the third-highest-grossing movie of the year following its release last month. "How to Train Your Dragon" is Universal's first foray into live-action remakes, after Disney's including " Lilo & Stitch," grossed over $8 billion at the box office. DeBlois said that after Universal Studios contacted him about potentially commissioning a new " How to Train Your Dragon," he instantly wanted to direct it. "I'm not that big of a fan of the trend of remaking animated movies into live action," he said. "I want to be in charge of this one so I can preserve its integrity and pay tribute to the fans as well." But DeBlois ultimately hopes studios still pursue original stories. "I do hope that in the live-action space, with enough financial success, we can start to take a few more risks on establishing new original stories that could pay off to become great franchises for studios," DeBlois said. "But at the moment, I think we all understand it's a bit risk-averse when you talk about big movies that are expensive to make, nobody wants to be sort of left with a flop on their hands," he added.
