Trump trains his fire on GOP allies, and worries Republicans
The president this week publicly excoriated Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) over upholding the 'blue slip' tradition and pushing a congressional stock trading ban, respectively.
While Trump has long had a tendency of airing his grievances out in public — especially toward those he views as disloyal — the latest barbs about staunch backers are raising eyebrows, and drawing questions about whether the strategy will continue to be effective in advancing his agenda.
President Trump is increasingly directing his ire at individual Senate Republicans, turning his fire in recent days on key allies.
The president this week publicly excoriated Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) over upholding the 'blue slip' tradition and pushing a congressional stock trading ban, respectively.
While Trump has long had a tendency of airing his grievances out in public — especially toward those he views as disloyal — the latest barbs about staunch backers are raising eyebrows, and drawing questions about whether the strategy will continue to be effective in advancing his agenda.
'I don't think it's helpful for the president … to get in a tit for tat with other Republican members,' said Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), a member of GOP leadership. 'He needs every single one of us, and we need him.'
Trump has repeatedly tangled with Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.), a libertarian-minded Republican who is not shy about voting against the president's priorities, as well as Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the former Senate GOP leader who once spoke out against Trump, has voted against several of his nominees, and has become a leading voice in favor of the Ukraine aid Trump often rails against.
Earlier this summer, he put off some Senate Republicans by attacking Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) over his opposition to Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' A number of Republicans indicated they were not big fans of the way the president went after a vulnerable incumbent seen as a team player, and one who had helped advance key Trump nominees. Tillis announced his retirement shortly after.
But Trump seemingly crossed another line with Republican lawmakers this week by not only calling to eliminate the 'blue slip' process — which gives veto power to senators for district judge and U.S. attorney picks for their individual state — but by going after Grassley personally. The 91-year-old Iowa Republican is the most senior member of the Senate GOP conference and is both well-liked respected in the Capitol.
Trump posted on Truth Social that he got Grassley reelected to the Senate 'when he was down by a lot,' then reposted other commenters who urged followers to 'light up Grassley's office' and called Grassley a 'RINO,' the acronym for Republican in name only, 'sneaky' and 'good at playing the good guy instead of being the good guy.'
'They're very angry about how Grassley was treated because he's one of the fairest people that's walked these halls,' one Senate GOP member told The Hill. 'It was the wrong fight to pick.'
Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) said the attack on Grassley surprised him.
'I think the president may have gotten some bad information from somebody,' he said.
Trump also found a dearth of support in the Senate GOP conference for ending the 'blue slip' tradition, which hands the minority party some control over the process.
Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), an ardent Trump backer, noted that he used them to block judges in his home state during former President Biden's White House tenure.
'I know that Sen. Grassley has worked really hard to defend the president's nomination, and we all support the blue slip process,' Rounds said. 'That is one power and one authority that the Senate will give up. We are not going to turn that over to the Executive Branch alone.'
Two days later, Trump went after Hawley personally on TruthSocial over him siding with Democrats to back a congressional stock trading ban that also extends to presidents and vice presidents.
'Why would one 'Republican,' Senator Josh Hawley from the Great State of Missouri, join with all of the Democrats to block a Review, sponsored by Senator Rick Scott, and with the support of almost all other Republicans, of Nancy Pelosi's Stock Trading over the last 25 years. The information was inappropriately released just minutes before the Vote — Very much like SABOTAGE!' Trump wrote on Truth Social.
Although Hawley's level of support in the conference isn't near Grassley's, he is still a fan favorite of the MAGA base.
The Missouri Republican on Thursday said he spoke with Trump on Wednesday night after the social media broadside and made clear to him that he wasn't targeting him by siding with Democrats. While the stock ban he proposed would affect presidents, it wouldn't go into effect until 2029, meaning it wouldn't be imposed against Trump himself.
Hawley added Trump was under the impression from other Senate Republicans that he would be affected.
In total, Senate GOP sources believe the more Trump goes after individuals who are largely supportive of his legislative and nomination efforts, the less effective they get over time.
'It dilutes the threat of him criticizing people for actually opposing his agenda if he's criticizing people for Republican mainstream positions,' said one Senate GOP aide, specifically pointing to the Iowa Republican.
The Senate Republican agreed.
'I think that he's dropping a couple of more proverbial straws and he probably needs to proceed with caution,' the Senate GOP member said. 'You reach a point where if you go after so many people, the people you haven't gone after start wondering if they're next — and that's when maybe institutional protection becomes a priority here.'
Trump, however, has also shown restraint at times. He has notably not publicly attacked Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) despite her vote against the 'big, beautiful bill' and the bill clawing back public media and foreign aid funding, along with a couple of his high-priority nominees.
And some top allies believe that Trump's barbs are effective.
'That's his forte. … He is spreading the wealth,' Tuberville said with a laugh. 'He is holding back on nobody. He knows his gameplan and he's going to implement it and he thinks he needs more help.'
Others believe it's yet another sign that it's time for the chamber to recess for the August break as members become increasingly cranky. Capito specifically pointed to the war of wards between Hawley and Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) over the stock trading ban at the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee on Wednesday, and Sen. Cory Booker's (D-N.J.) diatribe against his Democratic colleagues —on top of Trump's attack on Grassley.
'Everybody's going after everybody,' Capito said. 'It's the hot summer. I think it's just indicative that it's time to take a breath.'
'It's the reason why August is a miserable time here in D.C.,' she added. 'We're exemplifying it.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Old Trump speech falsely linked to South Korea trade deal
Social media posts have recirculated an old video of US President Donald Trump and falsely presented it as depicting him calling South Korean leader Lee Jae Myung a "bad negotiator" after their countries agreed a trade deal. The clip in fact shows Trump criticising then president Barack Obama as he launched his presidential campaign in June 2015. "Trump mocks Lee Jae Myung as a bad negotiator," reads a Korean-language post featuring the clip on Naver Band, a South Korean forum, on July 31, 2025. "[Trump] mocked Lee as soon as the tariff negotiations finished. [Lee] has become a total pushover," it continues. The video shows Trump saying, "The people negotiating don't have a clue. Our president doesn't have a clue. He's a bad negotiator." But its Korean subtitles mistranslate "our president" as "their president". The clip was also shared in similar posts on multiple right-wing South Korean circles on Facebook, as well as on YouTube. "The way that fool Lee acted as he did, no wonder he is being mocked," read a comment on one of the posts. Another said: "An international embarrassment to be used like that, then mocked by the US president." Under the trade deal, the United States will impose a 15 percent tariff on South Korean imports -- down from the previously threatened 25 percent -- in exchange for $350 billion in South Korean investments in US industries and $100 billion in energy purchases (archived link). A keyword search on Google found the clip corresponds to a part of a speech Trump gave on June 16, 2015, when he announced his bid for the presidency (archived link). At around the 18:50 mark of the speech posted in full by CSPAN, Trump makes the comment: "The people negotiating don't have a clue. Our president doesn't have a clue. He's a bad negotiator." This was part of a broader tirade against the Obama administration's trade and foreign policies. Trump then references a prisoner swap involving US soldier Bowe Bergdahl to illustrate his criticism of Obama's negotiating skills. Bergdahl was a US Army sergeant who was captured by the Taliban in 2009 after walking off his post in Afghanistan and was released in 2014 in exchange for five Taliban detainees held at Guantanamo Bay (archived link). "We get Bergdahl. We get a traitor. We get a no-good traitor, and they get the five people that they wanted for years, and those people are now back on the battlefield trying to kill us. That's the negotiator we have," Trump said. A full transcript of the speech published by Time magazine also shows Trump was referring to Obama (archived link). Nowhere in the video or transcript does Trump mention South Korea or Lee Jae Myung. AFP has previously debunked similar instances of Trump remarks and social media posts being misrepresented as references to South Korea.
USA Today
7 minutes ago
- USA Today
Senate confirms Trump's pick to oversee higher ed, a man tied to for-profit colleges
The Senate confirmed President Donald Trump's pick to oversee higher education policy, a man with deep ties to the for-profit college industry, by a 50-to-45 vote on August 1. Senate Majority John Thune filed cloture on Kent's nomination earlier in the week. And the education committee had already advanced Kent on a 12-11 vote without a hearing in late May. The undersecretary at the Department of Education oversees billions in federal financial aid and is charged with ensuring America's colleges provide a quality education. Education Secretary Linda McMahon had previously told USA TODAY that Kent is a 'natural leader' whose experience and concern for students 'make him the ideal selection for under secretary of education." He had won the support of several prominent university trade groups who are opposed to Trump's attacks on universities, but said they supported Kent's nomination. His confirmation comes as the Trump administration seeks to reshape higher education and has launched numerous investigations into high profile universities. Kent had already been working at the agency on the administration's initiatives like K-12 school choice. But prior to working in the government, Kent had a long history working for or close to for-profit colleges. From 2008 to the end of 2015, Kent worked for Education Affiliates, a for-profit college company. When he left, he was a vice president of legislative and regulatory affairs. In 2015, the Department of Justice announced the company had agreed to a $13 million settlement to settle accusations it had gamed the federal financial aid system. The company told USA TODAY Kent was not involved in the settlement or the allegations of fraud. Critics, including student advocacy groups and teacher unions, had called on the Senate education committee to put Kent through a public hearing to answer questions about his time working for the company. And one of the original whistleblowers tied to that case, Dorothy Thomas, expressed concern about someone from the company's leadership holding the under secretary position. Kent had also worked for Career Education Colleges and Universities, a for-profit college trade group. He developed a reputation for deep policy knowledge while speaking against regulations geared toward the for-profit college industry. That group's CEO, Jason Altmire, said Kent was not driven by partisan politics and would bring an unbiased view to the under secretary position. He then went to work for Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin's administration as a deputy secretary of education. Youngkin, in a prepared statement, said Kent improved how Virginia manages colleges and made them more accountable to students and families through increased transparency. Chair of the Virginia Senate's education committee, Democrat Ghazala Hashmi, told USA TODAY Kent had tried to destabilize accreditation in the state and he was aligned with efforts to dismantle consumer protections. In a departing message to the commonwealth, Kent said he was proud of reducing costs while pushing for free speech and accountability at Virginia's colleges. Chris Quintana is an investigative reporter at USA TODAY. He can be reached at cquintana@ or via Signal at 202-308-9021. He is on X at @CQuintanaDC
The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Navarro on jobs report: ‘It's either incompetence or political interference'
White House trade adviser Peter Navarro on Friday slammed the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) for a series of reports on job growth he deemed inaccurate. The longtime Trump adviser said the BLS had an 'unsettling pattern' of presenting the public with the wrong information. 'The BLS doesn't seem to be able to get that jobs number right. This has been going on for over a year,' Navarro said during a Friday appearance on NewsNation's 'The Hill.' 'It's either incompetence or political interference, either way ahead, roll today, and that's appropriate, because this simply isn't right,' he told anchor Blake Burman. The BLS reported that 73,000 jobs were created last month after correcting May's report to reflect the creation of 19,000 jobs compared to an initial report of 144,000. The Bureau also corrected the number from June to 14,000 job adds after an initial report of 147,000. President Trump on Thursday fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, alleging she inflated job reports for the Biden administration ahead of the 2024 election. He said she 'faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election to try and boost Kamala's chances of Victory.' 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump in a Friday Truth Social post. Navarro told Burman on Friday that Trump's move was 'healthy.' The BLS did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment. The bureau often revises jobs report, but the scale of Friday's changes surprised experts. Navarro, in his Friday interview, said the revisions cost the Fed much needed inflationary cuts, which held rates steady on Wednesday. 'It's is that if we had gotten that data when, when we should have got that data, the Federal Reserve yesterday would have lowered interest rates by at least 50 basis points. So you think so kind of incompetence or political no question about it,' Navarro told Burman. 'I mean, look, you had three months that were two months that revised significantly downward, one which was lower than expectations. I mean, the Fed, that's a completely different picture. I mean, there was a strong case for a 50 day there's an overwhelming case for a 50 basis point cut,' he added. Trump and his allies have pushed Fed Chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates to reset the economy for months. The president has threatened to fire Powell who has refused to shift course under pressure. 'The Economy is BOOMING under 'TRUMP' despite a Fed that also plays games, this time with Interest Rates, where they lowered them twice, and substantially, just before the Presidential Election, I assume in the hopes of getting 'Kamala' elected – How did that work out?' Trump wrote on Friday. 'Jerome 'Too Late' Powell should also be put 'out to pasture.; Thank you for your attention to this matter,' he added. Later in the day, he walked back his stance when Newsmax's Rob Finnerty asked if the Fed chair would remain in place for now during an interview. 'Well, it's very disruptive if you fire,' he told him. 'So, I would say most likely, yeah.'
