New York to build new nuclear plant to power upstate factories
New York will develop a state-of-the-art nuclear power plant to electrify data centers and microchip factories coming to upstate, Gov. Kathy Hochul announced Monday, June 23.
The 1-gigawatt plant will generate enough power for one million homes and will be built by the New York Power Authority, either alone or with private partners, at an upstate site to be selected in the months ahead.
During an announcement at NYPA's Niagara County Power Project, Hochul said nuclear power has emerged as a clean-energy solution that will help New York achieve its climate goals at a time when the energy grid is facing increased demands from electrification of buildings and vehicles.
Indian Point: Hochul: Indian Point closed without a backup plan. How will NY cover clear energy gap?
She cited the 2021 shutdown of the Indian Point nuclear plant in Westchester County, which accelerated the use of polluting fossil fuels downstate, as an outcome she would rather avoid.
'You don't get cleaner air or lower asthma rates for kids by burning fossil fuels,' Hochul said. 'You get there by using more clean power and nuclear is today's answer to that.'
Hochul's full-throated support for an energy source vilified by left-leaning environmentalists places her at odds with a portion of her Democratic base that would prefer the state build out more solar and wind power. It's a stance that aligns more closely with a Trump Administration that wants to fast-track approval of nuclear power projects.
The environmental group Food & Water Watch, a leader in the campaign to ban the fracking of natural gas in New York, blasted Hochul's plan as misguided.
'Governor Hochul's nuclear gamble is a reckless distraction from the clean, affordable energy New Yorkers actually need,' said Alex Beauchamp, the nonprofit's northeast region director. 'Nuclear power is dirty, dangerous, and wildly expensive — and this project will leave New Yorkers footing the bill while delaying urgently needed progress on renewables. Hochul needs to stop chasing false solutions and start delivering real climate action.'
But, Hochul said Monday, nuclear power has emerged as a reliable, around-the-clock source of power that cuts across political divisions. 'I want to show this nation that blue states like New York can dream big and build big,' she said.
She said the 21st-century reactors the state plans to develop will be safer and more reliable than traditional reactors, which in years past stoked fears of nuclear disaster.
'This is not your grandparents' nuclear reactor,' she said. 'You're not going to see this in a movie starring Jane Fonda. Only the really old people caught that. And I wouldn't want that. I don't want to live in a world where people are afraid.'
It was an allusion to Fonda's role in 'The China Syndrome,' a 1979 film that debuted less than two weeks before a meltdown at Pennsylvania's Three Mile Island nuclear power plant heightened national anxiety over nuclear power and stifled its advancement in the decades to come.
Pipelines: Trump pushes for more gas pipelines in NY: Anti-gas activists urge Hochul to block them
The state has in mind an advanced nuclear reactor, smaller in size than traditional water-cooled reactors, which can be built and developed more quickly.
Hochul said she met last week with Tom Ford, the premier of Ontario, who has plans to build four advanced reactors. 'They're going to work with us,' she said.
Micron: Schumer: Micron's investment in Central New York 'signed, sealed, and delivered'
She said nuclear power will help the state keep and attract companies by promising a reliable source of energy. Tech giant Micron is developing a $100 billion manufacturing hub in Central New York to disrupt China's dominance of the global supply chain for semiconductors.
'Why are people like Bill Gates investing in advanced reactors?' Hochul said. 'Why is Microsoft bringing Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania back online to power its cloud computing and AI services? Why are companies like Google and Amazon supporting nuclear capacity around the world? My friends, it's coming and it's back and if we don't jump on or lead this, they're going to pass us by. These companies will go elsewhere.'
A new nuclear plant would generate 1,600 jobs during construction and another 1,200 to operate. Upstate New York already has three nuclear power plants — one near Rochester and two others on Lake Ontario in Oswego.
The tale of two NY nuclear plants: Oswego rescued a nuclear power plant and thrived. A downstate village may not be as lucky.
Joining Hochul at Monday's announcement were several union leaders, including James Slevin, the president of the Utility Workers Union of America.
'Advanced nuclear energy technology has come a long way,' Slevin said. 'It is without a doubt the right choice to power New York's future in a way that will create family and community-supporting union jobs and benefit the economy.'
Thomas C. Zambito covers energy, transportation and economic growth for the USA Today Network's New York State team. He's won dozens of state and national writing awards from the Associated Press, Investigative Reporters and Editors, the Deadline Club and others during a decades-long career that's included stops at the New York Daily News, The Star-Ledger of Newark and The Record of Hackensack. He can be reached at tzambito@lohud.com.
This article originally appeared on Rockland/Westchester Journal News: Kathy Hochul plans for new NY nuclear plant, alarming environmental groups
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Warning for Trump as Surprise Poll Offers Harsh Verdict on Iran Strike
If any political commentators or Democratic politicians are tempted to see the political battle over President Trump's bombing of Iran through the prism of the run-up to the Iraq War two decades ago, here's a tip: Don't. For politicians and pundits of a certain age, it's normally assumed that military action will unleash a 'rally around the flag' effect, leading the public to reflexively approve of the decisions by the 'commander in chief'—particularly if he's a Republican—and automatically see criticism of him as unpatriotic. But it's unlikely that we'll see a similar dynamic this time around. A surprising new CNN poll shows why. It finds that 56 percent of Americans disapprove of Trump's bombing of Iran, while only 44 percent approve. Strikingly, 60 percent of independents disapprove, suggesting the middle of the country is not with Trump on any of this. On Tuesday, while leaving for the NATO Summit, Trump erupted at Israel and Iran for violating a ceasefire he'd announced on Truth Social, fuming that they 'don't know what the fuck they're doing.' Iran launched a strike after the ceasefire. But Israel's response appeared deliberately limited, suggesting both countries want a lasting truce, which Trump highlighted to claim victory. Trump's anger—combined with the new CNN poll—illustrates a complicated tension about this moment. On the one hand, if the truce holds, it's very possible that the CNN polling (which was conducted before the ceasefire) could flip and the public may end up approving of his handling of the situation. Yet the poll also constitutes a clear warning to Trump. Majorities have zero appetite for any kind of drawn-out conflict, and it's likely that this partly is rooted in perceptions that on complicated national security matters, well, Trump has no bleeping idea what the bleep he's doing. Note the CNN poll's remarkable finding that 55 percent of Americans don't trust Trump to make the right decisions on the use of force in Iran. This includes 62 percent of independents. That's a stunning verdict on public perceptions of Trump's competence, or lack thereof. (Meanwhile a Reuters poll finds only 36 percent back the bombing.) It's no accident that the CNN poll also finds that 58 percent of Americans say Trump's bombing will make Iran more of a threat to the U.S. Those two things may be connected: Voters appear unwilling to reflexively grant deference to the commander in chief's declaration that military force is essential to preserving the security of the homeland. Especially if that commander in chief is Donald J. Trump. This will surprise those who were snakebit by George W. Bush's popularity in the run-up to the Iraq War and Karl Rove's political warfare at the time. The grounds for that war were visibly thin. Yet it's hard to convey to people who didn't live through it how unshakable Bush's grip on public opinion seemed after September 11, 2001; how rampant war fever and rank Islamophobia were in this country; and how deeply it all penetrated into every crevice of American life. It's not hard to see why things are different now. Obviously, we've lived through two 'forever wars' since then, and this time, there was no September 11 to rally the public. But there are other reasons too. Bush was more popular (due to September 11) than Trump is now. And public skepticism of Trump's fitness to make decisions like these—again, 55 percent seem skeptical, per the CNN poll—runs so deep that he is ascribed little credibility on these matters, leaving no room to maneuver on them. That latter dynamic probably won't change much even if the truce holds. Consider the run-up to the bombing: Trump's own intelligence officials said Iran's nuclear program didn't pose an imminent threat, which he impulsively dismissed. His warmongering tweets in real time likely alerted Iran in ways that allowed it to move and secure its enriched uranium. As national security analyst Jeffrey Lewis usefully details, the stated American objective of ending Iran's nuclear program has probably not been achieved. If the ceasefire remains, paint-by-numbers pundits will forget all that and robotically declare the entire saga a smashing political triumph for Trump. But there's no need to assume up front that the public will view things this simplistically. Something big is at stake here: Trump and propagandists like Vice President JD Vance want to use this moment to show that a new Trump doctrine has taken hold, and that it will be persuasive to the public. The idea, as Politico's Nahal Toosi shows, is basically that it doesn't count as 'war' if the objective is narrowly drawn and accomplished with quick, overwhelming force and no lengthy quagmires. But the case that diplomacy as opposed to force could have achieved a more lasting solution to the deeper Iran-Israel problem, which Stephen Wertheim explained well before the bombing, remains just as true now as a week ago. So does the case that we would have been better off under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which Trump sabotaged. My suspicion is that the public will conclude something similar: That 58 percent say the bombing will make Iran more of a threat hints at a preference for diplomacy to war that will endure. The stakes are also huge here because Trump and Vance surely hope their showcasing of the Trump doctrine will also seduce voters into accepting quick military actions without congressional authorization. But the new CNN poll finds that a whopping 65 percent say Trump should seek such authorization going forward. And I'm even more persuaded that this will hold even if the ceasefire remains. Here's the bottom line: As of now, majorities don't trust Trump to make complicated national security decisions in the best interests of the country and want Congress deeply involved in them. We should hope the truce holds. But either way, the absence of a reflexive public endorsement of Trump's warmaking is a positive development—and a sign, whether he knows it or not, that he remains on a very short political leash indeed.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hampton's Carleigh Beriont launches campaign for NH 1st District seat in US House
HAMPTON — Selectwoman Carleigh Beriont has entered the 2026 race for New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District, setting up a competitive Democratic primary showdown that currently includes Stefany Shaheen and Maura Sullivan. Beriont, a Harvard University lecturer and vice chair of the Hampton Select Board, made her announcement on June 4 at a press conference in front of the Hampton town offices. She said she was entering the race to 'fight for working families,' describing herself as 'not a career politician,' but 'a mom, an educator, a neighbor.' 'I've spent my life standing up for people who don't always have a voice in the room,' Beriont said in a press release ahead of her press conference. 'Now I'm ready to bring that same fight to Washington – not for the powerful, but for the rest of us.' U.S. Rep. Chris Pappas, D-NH, previously announced he is running for U.S. Senate in 2026 when current U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen's term is set to end. Shaheen is planning to retire after serving three terms. Shaheen's daughter, Stefany Shaheen, a former Portsmouth city councilor, and Maura Sullivan, vice chair of the New Hampshire Democratic Party, have already announced their candidacy to fill Pappas' seat. Beriont says her campaign will focus on building a grassroots coalition across the district 'grounded in listening, local engagement, and bold, people-first solutions.' She is hoping her message will help her defeat candidates with name recognition and better funding. 'I want my kids and all the kids in this district to grow up knowing that there is a seat at the table for them regardless of their last name or how much money they have,' Beriont said. Beriont described herself at her press conference before a small crowd as a mother with concerns like other families in CD1, from rising costs to challenges with insurance companies. 'I worry a lot about whether we are even going to be able to keep living in Hampton, this community that we love so much,' Beriont said. 'Like so many of us, a lot of mornings I wake up angry.' Beriont spoke about her concerns regarding President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. An adjunct lecturer at the Harvard Kennedy School, she voiced concern her students could be targeted by ICE over their political statements, citing instances in which Harvard students were detained for social media posts and essays expressing support for Palestinians. 'I worry about whether one of my students is going to be picked up by ICE and deported because of something they wrote in the campus paper or posted on Instagram,' Beriont said. Beriont is optimistic Democrats will be able to win seats in 2026 following the Republicans winning the presidency and the majority of both chambers of Congress in 2024. She believes cultural divides between the parties can be bridged by her approach as a local elected official. She said Hampton is 'purple,' much like CD1. 'I sit at a table every Monday night with people from very different political parties, and we get together and we make things better for people in this community,' Beriont said. 'I think that's what I want to see down in D.C.' Other potential candidates have expressed interest in running for CD1. State Rep. Alice Wade, D-Dover, announced June 4 she launched an exploratory committee to consider a run for Congress. Wade, a transgender woman, has been a vocal advocate in Concord against legislation Democrats argue restricts trans rights. She is considering a congressional run to champion affordable housing, accessible healthcare, and representation for "everyday people." 'Washington is broken. Too many Granite Staters are working harder than ever but still falling behind,' Wade said in a press release. 'I'm exploring this campaign because our district deserves a representative… who will fight every day to make life better for regular people.' State Sen. Debra Altschiller, D-Stratham, said in April constituents encouraged her to run for CD1 and she was considering it. On June 4, she announced she would not be running for Congress and instead will pursue her third term in the state Senate in 2026. She said she plans to fight budget cuts that will harm community mental health centers, education and the fund supporting the victims of the youth center sexual assaults. 'As I look toward my tenth year of public service, I've spent time reflecting on where I can make the greatest impact - and I am incredibly grateful for the encouragement and support from my colleagues, community members, and supporters throughout this process,' Altschiller said in a press release. 'At this time, my work remains here in the Granite State.' Editor's note: State Sen. Debra Altschiller, D-Stratham, is the wife of Howard Altschiller, Seacoast Media Group's executive editor. This article originally appeared on Portsmouth Herald: Hampton's Carleigh Beriont running for NH 1st District US House seat
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP chair asks RFK Jr. to retract claim against Democrat in hearing
A House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health hearing came to a brief halt Tuesday as the Republican chair asked Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to retract his accusations that a Democratic member's stance on vaccines was influenced by campaign contributions from pharmaceutical companies. Kennedy appeared before the subcommittee to defend the Trump administration's budget request, which includes steep cuts to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), ranking member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, used his time to blast the firings at HHS and the apparent lack of transparency under Kennedy's tenure so far. He and other Democrats said many of their letters to the HHS have gone unanswered, with Pallone counting 10 of his letters receiving no response. Pallone said this lack of transparency extended to Kennedy's changes to the federal vaccine approval process. 'You have made a number of major decisions about vaccines. And … there's been no public comment process or public accountability on that either. What are you afraid of?' he asked Kennedy. 'I mean, with regard to vaccines, are you just afraid of receiving public comments on proposals where you just think these are fringe views that are contrary to the views of most scientists?' 'The bottom line is here, we have no transparency. We have no response. You feel no responsibility to Congress whatsoever, and you just continue this ideology that's anti science, anti vaccine. That's all I see. I see nothing else,' Pallone added. The questioning then moved on to Rep. Neal Dunn (R-Fla.), vice chair of the health committee, who asked Kennedy how he planned to restore public trust in health institutions. With only a brief response to Dunn's question, Kennedy quickly returned his focus to Pallone's criticisms. 'Congressman Pallone, 15 years ago, you and I met. You were, at that time, a champion of people who had suffered injuries from vaccines. You were very adamant about it. You were the leading member of Congress on that issue,' said Kennedy. 'Since then, you've accepted $2 million from pharmaceutical companies in contributions, more than any other member of this committee,' he continued. 'And your enthusiasm for supporting the old [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices], which was completely rife and pervasive with pharmaceutical conflicts, seems to be an outcome of those contributions.' Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), ranking member of the health subcommittee, immediately raised a point order, saying Kennedy was 'impugning Mr. Pallone.' Subcommittee Chair Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) asked that the clock be paused. After a brief back and forth with committee members and staffers, he acknowledged it was a valid point of order and asked Kennedy to retract his remarks about Pallone. Kennedy retracted his words. According to OpenSecrets, Pallone has received roughly $2.2 million from the pharmaceutical/health products industry since 1988, when he first joined Congress. Kennedy was likely referring to Pallone having previously raised concerns in the 90s about the presence of mercury in products approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In 1997, Pallone added an amendment to the FDA reauthorization bill at the time that directed the agency to compile a list of foods and drugs that contain 'intentionally introduced mercury compounds.' Mercury exposure and poisoning have long been issues of concern for Pallone's district. Kennedy and other vaccine skeptics have long pointed to thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative in vaccines, as a potential cause for harm. Though studies have backed the safety of thimerosal-containing vaccines, the preservative was removed from almost all childhood vaccines a few decades ago as a precautionary measure due to public uncertainty. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.