
Crime bill with stronger bail, sentencing provisions coming in fall: justice minister
The Liberal government will table a bill this fall introducing stricter bail conditions and sentencing for some crimes, particularly those involving organized crime, human trafficking, home invasion and car theft, Justice Minister Sean Fraser said in an interview.
"It's perhaps obvious, given the tenor around the criminal justice system, that reforms are in order," Fraser told The Canadian Press.
The government will consider including additional reforms but "at minimum" will implement the crime policies the Liberals promised during the spring federal election, Fraser said.
Fraser was named justice minister by Prime Minister Mark Carney in May, following an election campaign which saw Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre blame the Liberals for a wave of violent crime.
In their campaign platform, the Liberals in turn promised to make bail more difficult to get for some offences, including car thefts involving violence or organized crime, home invasions, and some human trafficking and smuggling offences.
They also promised tougher sentencing guidelines for repeat car thieves and violent and organized crime, and to allow for consecutive sentencing for some cases of car theft and for serious and violent offences.
Fraser said some parts of the country have seen an increase in certain kinds of criminal activity.
"Auto thefts, though they may be down in the GTA this year compared to last, we have seen a trend where it was becoming a bigger problem," he noted, adding some of that was driven by organized crime.
The changes to the law will establish a stronger deterrent, Fraser said.
"It's not just a reaction to something you read about in a headline," he said. "It's meant to send a signal to deter problematic behavior that you want to address, to help people feel safe."
Fraser said the government will consult on its plans and he's open to suggestions based on expertise and evidence.
This bail reform plan comes two years after the Liberals introduced other bail-reform legislation in 2023. That came after calls from provincial leaders and many police chiefs to make bail more difficult to access for repeat violent offenders.
The bill, which took effect in January 2024, made changes to bail for some firearms and weapons offences, and some circumstances in which the alleged crime involves intimate partner violence.
The plan to introduce tougher measures comes after years of Conservatives accusing the Liberals of taking a "soft" approach to crime.
Asked whether the coming legislation amounts to an admission the Conservatives had a point, Fraser said he views it "differently."
"We hear from Canadians more broadly that there is a challenge with the criminal justice system," he said. "There is a challenge with the bail system."
Fraser said that while he takes issue with what he called the Conservatives' "simplistic" slogans, Canadians across the country have "real concerns" that can't be dismissed "just because it's being raised in the House of Commons in a way that some may find inconvenient."
He said that while there are areas where the federal government can do more, provincial governments — some of which have called for federal bail reform — have a big role to play.
That role includes making sure judges and justices of the peace who make bail decisions have proper training, and detention centres have enough capacity, Fraser said.
"We want to come into this conversation knowing that we've taken care of the challenges that fall within the federal government's purview, but we also want to enter a conversation with provinces and territories to say that we are not the only cook in the kitchen," he said.
Fraser added the federal government also wants to bring provinces and territories together to work on gathering the data needed to address crime and justice issues at the local level.
"The circumstances in rural Nova Scotia may not reflect the circumstances in downtown Toronto or in Canada's North," he noted.
The federal government wants to take a wider approach to crime prevention that also addresses mental health, addictions, youth employment and affordable housing, Fraser said.
"We also want to make sure that we go upstream and prevent fewer people from falling into a criminal lifestyle," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Former B.C. finance minister says Conservative nomination process needs examination
OTTAWA – A longtime British Columbia MLA who was rejected as a candidate by the federal Conservatives in the April election is calling on the party to examine its nomination process. Michael de Jong, who was B.C.'s finance minister from 2012 to 2017, planned to run for the Tories in the riding of Abbotsford-South Langley this spring. He prepared a run for more than a year, was endorsed by the former MP Ed Fast and says the local riding association unanimously recommended him as the party's candidate. He says he was shocked when the Conservative party's leadership in Ottawa stepped in to block him from seeking the nomination, telling him in an email that he was not qualified. De Jong ran as an Independent in the riding but lost to Conservative MP Sukhman Gill. He says the situation is a symptom of 'the broader disease' of over-centralization of power in the federal party and he doesn't believe leader Pierre Poilievre or members of his inner circle want to do a deep dive into the party's recent election loss. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025.


Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Nova Scotia won't buy air conditioners for low-income people with health issues
A Nova Scotia woman on income assistance who succeeded in forcing the province to pay for her air conditioner says she's sad other low-income people won't get the same relief. Last October Julie Leggett from New Glasgow, N.S., won an appeal to receive provincial funding for an air conditioner because of a chronic health condition. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy But the decision by the income assistance appeal board didn't force the province to cover the cost of air conditioners for other low-income people with health issues. Leggett raised her concerns during the November provincial election campaign, arguing government policy should be changed to help people cope during heat waves. Progressive Conservative Leader Tim Houston, whose party won the election, had said on the campaign trail that he would look into adding air conditioners to a list of special needs covered by the social assistance program. Story continues below advertisement But a spokesperson for the Department of Social Development said on Tuesday that the government was not planning on changing the policy. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025.


Cision Canada
2 hours ago
- Cision Canada
The Commissioner of Canada Elections releases preliminary statistics on complaints received during the 45th federal general election Français
GATINEAU, QC, June 25, 2025 /CNW/ - For the purposes of transparency for Canadians, the Commissioner of Canada Elections (CCE or Commissioner), Caroline J. Simard today, released preliminary statistics on complaints received during the 45 th federal general election, which took place between March 23 to April 28, 2025. The CCE is the independent officer responsible for ensuring compliance with and enforcement of the Canada Elections Act (the Act). As such, she may receive complaints from anyone, including the public and political entities, who believes they have witnessed a contravention of the Act at any time, including during an election period and a by-election. The Commissioner has sole jurisdiction for compliance and enforcement activities carried out under the Act. Preliminary Statistics on the 45th General Election During the election period, the Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections (OCCE) received a total of 16,115 complaints. Taking into account the amplification phenomenon, which occurs when a single issue generates several thousand complaints in a matter of hours, the OCCE received seven times more complaints than in the previous two elections. Anecdotally, towards the beginning of the campaign period, the OCCE was receiving up to 650 complaints per hour. Absent this amplification, the number of distinct issues raised with the office was two times greater than what was observed in 2019 and 2021. This high volume of complaints received by the OCCE over the course of the 45 th federal general election demonstrates an exceptional level of engagement from Canadians concerned about the integrity of elections. To-date, 2,330 complaint files have been processed and closed. Some were resolved informally thanks to the work of the OCCE's investigators. Others simply fell outside of the Commissioner's mandate. Complaints relating to Foreign Interference, Artificial Intelligence and other issues In the months and weeks leading up to the election, the OCCE made sustained efforts to prepare for the challenges posed by foreign interference, artificial intelligence, disinformation, and voter intimidation. To date, preliminary data shows that the number of complaints related to these types of allegations remains below predictions made prior to the election campaign. It is important to note, however, that the complexity of certain cases may only become apparent upon closer review. Should those issues materialize, the OCCE is well prepared to address them. Furthermore, several complaints submitted to the Commissioner highlight the difference between the public's perception of the law and the legal interpretation of what may constitute a contravention of the Act. It is also common that, after a thorough review of the information provided by and discussions with complainants, some complaints may reveal contraventions of the Canada Elections Act that differ from the allegations initially raised with the office. For that reason, it is important to note that these preliminary figures represent raw data that are subject to change over time. The OCCE continues to receive complaints or files referred by other organizations regarding potential contraventions of the Act. It is therefore still too early to draw general conclusions. However, based on the OCCE's initial observations, there is no evidence to suggest that the election results were affected by these issues. Ongoing Assessment and Investigative Work The work of the Commissioner and her team does not end on election day. While the office was able to achieve immediate compliance in some cases during the election period, others will require more in-depth review, and some may be subject to formal investigations. The triage, assessment, and review of complaints and information received during the election period will continue in the coming months. The timeframe may be longer for particularly complex cases that require the initiation of an investigation. To its existing caseload, the OCCE must also address the influx of referrals from other Government of Canada department and agencies, particularly Elections Canada. These referrals will be sent to the OCCE in the coming months and will all be reviewed through the lens of the Act. Formal compliance and enforcement measures related to the 45 th general federal election will be made public. As is the OCCE's customary practice, all final data related to the 2025 general election will be published in its 2025–2026 annual report. For reference: Quotes "While my office did receive complaints regarding allegations related to foreign interference, the use of artificial intelligence, and disinformation, it was certainly not of the magnitude we anticipated in most cases. So far, based on our initial observations and the information we have, there is no evidence to suggest that the election outcome was affected in any way." "The volume and diverse nature of the complaints we received demonstrates Canadians' engagement and awareness of the Act, as well as their confidence in our ability to help ensure the integrity of the electoral process." "Our compliance and enforcement work under the Act is an ongoing process that extends well beyond a federal election. Our operational efforts will continue for the foreseeable future and will be carried out in accordance with our guiding principles: rigor, independence, transparency, and fairness." – Caroline J. Simard, Commissioner of Canada Elections Quick facts The Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections is the sole organization responsible for ensuring compliance with the rules of the Canada Elections Act. The Commissioner also has the power to investigate contraventions of the Act and may, where appropriate, take appropriate compliance measures. The OCCE, made up of nearly 100 employees and contractors, received 16,115 complaints during the election period, from March 23 to April 28, 2025. As of April 28, the OCCE had already closed 2,330 cases, and 13,781 were still under review. To date, based on initial observations, the Commissioner has found no evidence to suggest that the election results were affected. The number of complaints received by the OCCE during the general election is more than double the number recorded during the 2019 and 2021 general elections. Taking into account amplification, this number increases to nearly seven times more complaints than what was received during the two previous general elections. The amplification phenomenon is largely attributed to the use of social media, which can increase the reach of information and facilitate its mass transmission. Several complaints alleging foreign interference and artificial intelligence have been submitted to the OCCE, but it is too early to determine whether there has been a contravention of the Act. The categories of complaints received by the OCCE include: alleged attempts to prevent or alter the broadcast of election advertising; the distribution of photographs or videos of a ballot; the publication of false statements about candidates. For complaints and non-media-related enquiries, please use our online form.