logo
The Commissioner of Canada Elections releases preliminary statistics on complaints received during the 45th federal general election Français

The Commissioner of Canada Elections releases preliminary statistics on complaints received during the 45th federal general election Français

Cision Canada4 hours ago

GATINEAU, QC, June 25, 2025 /CNW/ - For the purposes of transparency for Canadians, the Commissioner of Canada Elections (CCE or Commissioner), Caroline J. Simard today, released preliminary statistics on complaints received during the 45 th federal general election, which took place between March 23 to April 28, 2025.
The CCE is the independent officer responsible for ensuring compliance with and enforcement of the Canada Elections Act (the Act). As such, she may receive complaints from anyone, including the public and political entities, who believes they have witnessed a contravention of the Act at any time, including during an election period and a by-election.
The Commissioner has sole jurisdiction for compliance and enforcement activities carried out under the Act.
Preliminary Statistics on the 45th General Election
During the election period, the Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections (OCCE) received a total of 16,115 complaints. Taking into account the amplification phenomenon, which occurs when a single issue generates several thousand complaints in a matter of hours, the OCCE received seven times more complaints than in the previous two elections. Anecdotally, towards the beginning of the campaign period, the OCCE was receiving up to 650 complaints per hour.
Absent this amplification, the number of distinct issues raised with the office was two times greater than what was observed in 2019 and 2021.
This high volume of complaints received by the OCCE over the course of the 45 th federal general election demonstrates an exceptional level of engagement from Canadians concerned about the integrity of elections.
To-date, 2,330 complaint files have been processed and closed. Some were resolved informally thanks to the work of the OCCE's investigators. Others simply fell outside of the Commissioner's mandate.
Complaints relating to Foreign Interference, Artificial Intelligence and other issues
In the months and weeks leading up to the election, the OCCE made sustained efforts to prepare for the challenges posed by foreign interference, artificial intelligence, disinformation, and voter intimidation. To date, preliminary data shows that the number of complaints related to these types of allegations remains below predictions made prior to the election campaign. It is important to note, however, that the complexity of certain cases may only become apparent upon closer review. Should those issues materialize, the OCCE is well prepared to address them.
Furthermore, several complaints submitted to the Commissioner highlight the difference between the public's perception of the law and the legal interpretation of what may constitute a contravention of the Act.
It is also common that, after a thorough review of the information provided by and discussions with complainants, some complaints may reveal contraventions of the Canada Elections Act that differ from the allegations initially raised with the office.
For that reason, it is important to note that these preliminary figures represent raw data that are subject to change over time. The OCCE continues to receive complaints or files referred by other organizations regarding potential contraventions of the Act. It is therefore still too early to draw general conclusions. However, based on the OCCE's initial observations, there is no evidence to suggest that the election results were affected by these issues.
Ongoing Assessment and Investigative Work
The work of the Commissioner and her team does not end on election day. While the office was able to achieve immediate compliance in some cases during the election period, others will require more in-depth review, and some may be subject to formal investigations. The triage, assessment, and review of complaints and information received during the election period will continue in the coming months. The timeframe may be longer for particularly complex cases that require the initiation of an investigation.
To its existing caseload, the OCCE must also address the influx of referrals from other Government of Canada department and agencies, particularly Elections Canada. These referrals will be sent to the OCCE in the coming months and will all be reviewed through the lens of the Act.
Formal compliance and enforcement measures related to the 45 th general federal election will be made public.
As is the OCCE's customary practice, all final data related to the 2025 general election will be published in its 2025–2026 annual report.
For reference:
Quotes
"While my office did receive complaints regarding allegations related to foreign interference, the use of artificial intelligence, and disinformation, it was certainly not of the magnitude we anticipated in most cases. So far, based on our initial observations and the information we have, there is no evidence to suggest that the election outcome was affected in any way."
"The volume and diverse nature of the complaints we received demonstrates Canadians' engagement and awareness of the Act, as well as their confidence in our ability to help ensure the integrity of the electoral process."
"Our compliance and enforcement work under the Act is an ongoing process that extends well beyond a federal election. Our operational efforts will continue for the foreseeable future and will be carried out in accordance with our guiding principles: rigor, independence, transparency, and fairness."
– Caroline J. Simard, Commissioner of Canada Elections
Quick facts
The Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections is the sole organization responsible for ensuring compliance with the rules of the Canada Elections Act. The Commissioner also has the power to investigate contraventions of the Act and may, where appropriate, take appropriate compliance measures.
The OCCE, made up of nearly 100 employees and contractors, received 16,115 complaints during the election period, from March 23 to April 28, 2025. As of April 28, the OCCE had already closed 2,330 cases, and 13,781 were still under review.
To date, based on initial observations, the Commissioner has found no evidence to suggest that the election results were affected.
The number of complaints received by the OCCE during the general election is more than double the number recorded during the 2019 and 2021 general elections. Taking into account amplification, this number increases to nearly seven times more complaints than what was received during the two previous general elections.
The amplification phenomenon is largely attributed to the use of social media, which can increase the reach of information and facilitate its mass transmission.
Several complaints alleging foreign interference and artificial intelligence have been submitted to the OCCE, but it is too early to determine whether there has been a contravention of the Act.
The categories of complaints received by the OCCE include:
alleged attempts to prevent or alter the broadcast of election advertising;
the distribution of photographs or videos of a ballot;
the publication of false statements about candidates.
For complaints and non-media-related enquiries, please use our online form.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tariff uncertainty could cause ‘modest recession,' new summer outlook warns
Tariff uncertainty could cause ‘modest recession,' new summer outlook warns

Global News

time30 minutes ago

  • Global News

Tariff uncertainty could cause ‘modest recession,' new summer outlook warns

The uncertainty around the tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump on Canada could cause a 'modest recession' in 2025, a new report by Deloitte says. The report noted that Canada's economy will grow by 1.1 per cent by the end of 2025, accelerating to 1.6 per cent by next year. However, the uncertainty around Trump's tariffs will continue to cause economic damage. Deloitte chief economist Dawn Desjardins said in the report that 'the extreme rise in policy uncertainty' in Canada's relationship with its largest trading partner, the United States, 'now exceeds levels experienced during the pandemic.' She said this 'is taking a toll on confidence with consumer and business confidence measures falling to the lowest levels outside the pandemic.' Desjardins said the uncertainty will delay business investment in Canada and hiring will be hit. Story continues below advertisement 'A modest recession is likely to occur this year,' Desjardins said. 5:42 What the looming recession could mean for your wallet Tariff impact The report said that while Canada's exposure to Trump's tariffs has been less than the average tariffs on other countries, with Canadian exporters complying with the Canada-US-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) escaping the 25 per cent Trump tariffs, the uncertainty is hurting trade with the U.S. Story continues below advertisement 'Recent data however showed a sharp drop in Canadian exports to the US which may continue over the months ahead especially for products, like steel and aluminum and finished autos, that continue to face steep tariffs,' the report said. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Ontario will be particularly hard hit given its exposure to industries with large tariffs in place, the report said, with B.C. and Quebec also expected to take a hit. Canada's growth will largely be led by energy-exporting Alberta, as well as Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador, the report said. 1:08 Canadians cut back on charity as economic pressures mount Will the Bank of Canada cut rates? During its last interest rate announcement earlier this month, the Bank of Canada held interest rates steady. While the economy may continue to soften, the central bank has indicated that its focus will turn to keeping prices low. Story continues below advertisement The Deloitte report forecasts only two more interest rate cuts for the rest of the year from the central bank. 'With tariffs set to nudge inflation higher over the coming months, the Bank is likely to cut interest rates only two more times in July and September, when the economy is contracting mildly, before pausing and turn the stimulus baton over to government,' the report said. 1:59 Major policy win for Carney as major projects bill passes in Canada's House The Mark Carney government's 'One Canadian Economy' bill, which aims to knock down federal barriers to interprovincial trade and remove some regulatory measures for big projects, will also likely give the economy some boost by the end of the year, the report said. 'Many provinces are following suit to reduce interprovincial trade barriers and build more infrastructure, boding well for our economic resilience and long-term prosperity,' the report said. Story continues below advertisement 'Overall, we expect to see modest growth in fiscal operational spending and a ramp up in government investment starting in the final quarter of this year,' it added. 1:48 Carney to increase U.S. steel, aluminum tariffs if trade talks with Trump stall Jobs and household spending The report notes that employment has already taken a hit in Canada's manufacturing sector, which has been impacted by U.S. tariffs on steel, aluminum, softwood lumber and cars. Story continues below advertisement This is likely to hit hiring across the broader economy, it said. 'We are seeing that weakness spill into other industries with transportation and warehousing and business services also recently reducing their workforces,' the report said. Deloitte forecasts unemployment to be around 7.3 per cent in the third quarter of 2025, but drop below seven per cent by early next year. Weak job numbers will also mean Canadians are likely to spend less. Lower immigration numbers will also contribute to lower household spending, the report said.

GUNTER: No public safety benefit from Liberals' plan to confiscate 'assault-style' firearms
GUNTER: No public safety benefit from Liberals' plan to confiscate 'assault-style' firearms

Toronto Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

GUNTER: No public safety benefit from Liberals' plan to confiscate 'assault-style' firearms

They could just let the whole scheme expire and save themselves and law-abiding gun owners a lot of time and expense. Jim Osadczuk, owner of a gun shop named Sebarms Guns and Gear, holds an AR-15 variant rifle at his shop in Edmonton on May 2, 2020. Photo by Larry Wong / Postmedia, file During his campaign to become Liberal leader and again during the federal election, Mark Carney promised to follow through with his party's five-year-old plan to confiscate 'assault-style' firearms from law-abiding Canadians. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account This is yet another way the Carney government is very much like the Trudeau government. Below I'll get into the insanity of a government thinking it can stop criminals from using firearms illegally by forcing non-criminals to give up their legal property. This is the logical equivalent of forcing all non-drinking Canadians to surrender their cars to the government because drunk drivers are causing death and mayhem on our roads. But apart from the intellectual fallacies of confiscation, there is a practical problem looming for the gun-loathing Liberals. Their confiscation program is set to end on Oct. 31 and they haven't collected a single firearm from a private citizen. They claim to have taken 12,000 from the inventories of gun shops at a cost of about $70 million, but not one from an individual. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. More importantly, they have no idea of how they will collect 200,000 or more guns in the time remaining. They could just let the whole scheme expire and save themselves and law-abiding gun owners a lot of time and expense that isn't going to make Canada one whit safer. But they're Liberals. So of course they're going to extend their confiscation deadline. Whatever new deadline they choose will be their fourth (April 2022, October 2023, October 2025 and whenever). The fact they have had more than five years since they announced this 'assault weapons' ban and they still have been unable to come up with a method for seizing Canadians' property and compensating those who will lose their guns, is probably a sign of just how futile this whole exercise is. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The parliamentary budget officer estimates completing the confiscation will cost more than $700 million more. And the truth of the matter is all that money and all that anguish on the part of hunters, sport shooters and farmers will lead to no safer streets. Think of it this way: Police estimate that upwards of 90 per cent of guns used in crimes in Canada are brought in illegally from the U.S. That means even if the 200,000 scary-looking guns are grabbed by the Liberals, the guns used most often to commit violent crimes will still be on our streets. Scads of taxpayer money will be spent and no public good will be achieved. Also consider the illogic of it. Criminals with guns are the problem – people who are prepared to break laws against murdering, robbing, assaulting and so on. Yet somehow, Liberal politicians and bureaucrats have convinced themselves that when the government makes it illegal to own 'assault-style weapons,' dangerous criminals will suddenly turn into law-abiding rule followers. It's ridiculous. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. I expect the Liberals will extend their current deadline by cabinet decree over the summer while Parliament isn't sitting. When they do, keep three things in mind. First, the Nova Scotia shooter, Gabriel Wortman, did not acquire his weapons legally. Even if the Liberals' ban had been in place before he killed 22 people, he still would have had his guns. No one would have been saved. Second, despite calling them 'assault-style,' none of the banned guns are machineguns. Those have been illegal in Canada for decades. And third, there are lots of rifles and shotguns that have exactly the same firepower are the banned models. In many cases, they are the same gun with different appearances. The banned ones are no more deadly, they just have cladding, paint jobs or metal finishes that make them look more militaristic. In short, the Liberals are judging guns by their superficial appearances, not their lethality. Talk about books and their covers. lgunter@ Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don't miss the news you need to know — add and to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters . You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber. Subscribers gain unlimited access to The Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun, National Post and 13 other Canadian news sites. The Edmonton Journal | The Edmonton Sun Toronto & GTA NHL Toronto Maple Leafs Toronto & GTA MLB

The Commissioner of Canada Elections releases preliminary statistics on complaints received during the 45th federal general election Français
The Commissioner of Canada Elections releases preliminary statistics on complaints received during the 45th federal general election Français

Cision Canada

time4 hours ago

  • Cision Canada

The Commissioner of Canada Elections releases preliminary statistics on complaints received during the 45th federal general election Français

GATINEAU, QC, June 25, 2025 /CNW/ - For the purposes of transparency for Canadians, the Commissioner of Canada Elections (CCE or Commissioner), Caroline J. Simard today, released preliminary statistics on complaints received during the 45 th federal general election, which took place between March 23 to April 28, 2025. The CCE is the independent officer responsible for ensuring compliance with and enforcement of the Canada Elections Act (the Act). As such, she may receive complaints from anyone, including the public and political entities, who believes they have witnessed a contravention of the Act at any time, including during an election period and a by-election. The Commissioner has sole jurisdiction for compliance and enforcement activities carried out under the Act. Preliminary Statistics on the 45th General Election During the election period, the Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections (OCCE) received a total of 16,115 complaints. Taking into account the amplification phenomenon, which occurs when a single issue generates several thousand complaints in a matter of hours, the OCCE received seven times more complaints than in the previous two elections. Anecdotally, towards the beginning of the campaign period, the OCCE was receiving up to 650 complaints per hour. Absent this amplification, the number of distinct issues raised with the office was two times greater than what was observed in 2019 and 2021. This high volume of complaints received by the OCCE over the course of the 45 th federal general election demonstrates an exceptional level of engagement from Canadians concerned about the integrity of elections. To-date, 2,330 complaint files have been processed and closed. Some were resolved informally thanks to the work of the OCCE's investigators. Others simply fell outside of the Commissioner's mandate. Complaints relating to Foreign Interference, Artificial Intelligence and other issues In the months and weeks leading up to the election, the OCCE made sustained efforts to prepare for the challenges posed by foreign interference, artificial intelligence, disinformation, and voter intimidation. To date, preliminary data shows that the number of complaints related to these types of allegations remains below predictions made prior to the election campaign. It is important to note, however, that the complexity of certain cases may only become apparent upon closer review. Should those issues materialize, the OCCE is well prepared to address them. Furthermore, several complaints submitted to the Commissioner highlight the difference between the public's perception of the law and the legal interpretation of what may constitute a contravention of the Act. It is also common that, after a thorough review of the information provided by and discussions with complainants, some complaints may reveal contraventions of the Canada Elections Act that differ from the allegations initially raised with the office. For that reason, it is important to note that these preliminary figures represent raw data that are subject to change over time. The OCCE continues to receive complaints or files referred by other organizations regarding potential contraventions of the Act. It is therefore still too early to draw general conclusions. However, based on the OCCE's initial observations, there is no evidence to suggest that the election results were affected by these issues. Ongoing Assessment and Investigative Work The work of the Commissioner and her team does not end on election day. While the office was able to achieve immediate compliance in some cases during the election period, others will require more in-depth review, and some may be subject to formal investigations. The triage, assessment, and review of complaints and information received during the election period will continue in the coming months. The timeframe may be longer for particularly complex cases that require the initiation of an investigation. To its existing caseload, the OCCE must also address the influx of referrals from other Government of Canada department and agencies, particularly Elections Canada. These referrals will be sent to the OCCE in the coming months and will all be reviewed through the lens of the Act. Formal compliance and enforcement measures related to the 45 th general federal election will be made public. As is the OCCE's customary practice, all final data related to the 2025 general election will be published in its 2025–2026 annual report. For reference: Quotes "While my office did receive complaints regarding allegations related to foreign interference, the use of artificial intelligence, and disinformation, it was certainly not of the magnitude we anticipated in most cases. So far, based on our initial observations and the information we have, there is no evidence to suggest that the election outcome was affected in any way." "The volume and diverse nature of the complaints we received demonstrates Canadians' engagement and awareness of the Act, as well as their confidence in our ability to help ensure the integrity of the electoral process." "Our compliance and enforcement work under the Act is an ongoing process that extends well beyond a federal election. Our operational efforts will continue for the foreseeable future and will be carried out in accordance with our guiding principles: rigor, independence, transparency, and fairness." – Caroline J. Simard, Commissioner of Canada Elections Quick facts The Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections is the sole organization responsible for ensuring compliance with the rules of the Canada Elections Act. The Commissioner also has the power to investigate contraventions of the Act and may, where appropriate, take appropriate compliance measures. The OCCE, made up of nearly 100 employees and contractors, received 16,115 complaints during the election period, from March 23 to April 28, 2025. As of April 28, the OCCE had already closed 2,330 cases, and 13,781 were still under review. To date, based on initial observations, the Commissioner has found no evidence to suggest that the election results were affected. The number of complaints received by the OCCE during the general election is more than double the number recorded during the 2019 and 2021 general elections. Taking into account amplification, this number increases to nearly seven times more complaints than what was received during the two previous general elections. The amplification phenomenon is largely attributed to the use of social media, which can increase the reach of information and facilitate its mass transmission. Several complaints alleging foreign interference and artificial intelligence have been submitted to the OCCE, but it is too early to determine whether there has been a contravention of the Act. The categories of complaints received by the OCCE include: alleged attempts to prevent or alter the broadcast of election advertising; the distribution of photographs or videos of a ballot; the publication of false statements about candidates. For complaints and non-media-related enquiries, please use our online form.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store