logo
Nissan May Consider Deal With Foxconn to Save Japanese Car Plant

Nissan May Consider Deal With Foxconn to Save Japanese Car Plant

Miami Herald07-07-2025
According to new reports published by Nikkei and Reuters, Taiwanese electric vehicle upstart and electronics contract manufacturer Foxconn (Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.) is said to be in talks with Japanese automaker Nissan to build EVs in an arrangement that could potentially save one of the Yokohama-based automaker's factories from closure.
Sources familiar with the matter told the newswire and the Japanese business publication that these discussions revolve around Foxconn producing electric vehicles at Nissan's Oppama plant in Yokosuka, a plant that employs around 3,900 people and a facility that is seen as a primary target for shutdown under Nissan CEO's ambitious Re:Nissan restructuring plan.
According to Nikkei, the partnership would be part of a bigger EV collaboration and possibly incorporate a joint venture between the Taiwanese and Japanese firms. If successful, Nissan's Oppama plant would be spared from closure, as its excess capacity would be turned over to Foxconn.
One source who spoke with Nikkei said that Nissan is currently talking with multiple partners, including Foxconn, on various ways they could accelerate the automaker's ambitious restructuring plan aimed at "right-sizing" the company. In a statement seen by Reuters, Nissan said the Nikkei report was not based on information released by the automaker.
The reports involving Foxconn come nearly two months after reports of the potential closure of the Oppama plant surfaced in May, triggering a sizable response from local government officials.
Opened in 1961, the Oppama plant holds some historical weight for the Yokohama-based automaker. It was the first Nissan plant to mass produce electric vehicles, and is also a popular tourist attraction in the area. According to the automaker, it has an annual production capacity of around 240,000 vehicles and employs 3,900 people in manufacturing and research roles. However, MarkLines data shows that the plant's utilization rate has been low due to the automaker's sluggish sales. Last year, it was just 40%, which is far below its break-even point of 80%.
Despite this, a potential shutdown of the Oppama plant would devastate Nissan and the area. Many of Nissan's important parts suppliers are located near the plant, which is also a key research and development facility for Nissan. Within its 170 hectares, Oppama is home to a research center, testing facilities, and a wharf for car carriers. Losing the plant would force Nissan to build new test courses and facilities elsewhere, which could additionally burden the company's tight books.
Though a potential Foxconn deal could help Nissan offload unused capacity and save jobs, and preserve its contracted supplier network, such a deal could help the iPhone and Xbox manufacturer become a legitimate contract producer of electric vehicles.
Jun Seki, a former Nissan executive and Foxconn's EV chief strategy officer, has been eying partnerships with established automotive brands, although it aims to sell its own EVs in the U.S. Previously, Seki said that the company plans to start delivering the Model C SUV to a North American customer by the end of 2025. Back in May, Foxconn secured a deal to make EVs when it signed an agreement to supply Mitsubishi with a new product starting next year. The vehicle in question is expected to be a compact crossover and will be made in Taiwan for export to Australia and New Zealand.
The talks come as Espinosa's Re:Nissan restructuring plans call for reducing worldwide car production capacity from 5 million cars to around 2.5 million cars, with some allowance to increase to 3 million with overtime and even as high as 4 million with products from partner companies.
Although Nissan is a global company, the data shows that the largest chunk of its sales is to customers in the U.S. According to a publicly available document on Nissan's global website, 76,977 Nissan and Infiniti brand vehicles were sold in the U.S. in May 2025, while it moved just 27,736 cars in Japan.
As I have said before, Nissan's C-Suite has more than just a bloated production capacity when it comes to saving itself. In its largest market, the Trump Administration is keen on cementing its tariff-heavy trade policies with those who do not want to play ball. For now, we can only hope that things will go well for the Japanese automaker and that a U.S.-Japan trade agreement can surface during the ongoing discussions.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

XIFR INVESTOR ALERT: Kirby McInerney LLP Alerts XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a NextEra Energy Partners, LP Investors of Important Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit
XIFR INVESTOR ALERT: Kirby McInerney LLP Alerts XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a NextEra Energy Partners, LP Investors of Important Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit

Business Wire

timean hour ago

  • Business Wire

XIFR INVESTOR ALERT: Kirby McInerney LLP Alerts XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a NextEra Energy Partners, LP Investors of Important Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP alerts investors of the imminent September 8, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action filed on behalf of investors who acquired XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a NextEra Energy Partners, LP ('XPLR' or the 'Company') (NYSE:XIFR) securities during the period from September 27, 2023 and January 27, 2025 ('the Class Period'). The firm encourages investors to contact the firm as soon as possible to be appointed lead plaintiff. [ LEARN MORE ABOUT THE CLASS ACTION ] On January 28, 2025, XPLR announced that it would suspend cash distributions to common unitholders entirely and essentially abandon its yieldco model. In a press release, XPLR revealed a strategic repositioning and stated that the Company was moving from a business model that focused almost entirely on raising new capital to acquire assets while distributing substantially all of its excess cash flows to unitholders to a model in which XPLR Infrastructure utilizes retained operating cash flows to fund attractive investments. In addition, XPLR announced that the Company's CEO and CFO had both resigned and been replaced. On this news, the price of XPLR's common units declined by $5.31, or approximately 33.6%, from $15.80 per unit on January 27, 2025 to close at $10.49 per unit on January 29, 2025. The lawsuit alleges that XPLR made materially false and/or misleading statements regarding the Company's: (i) struggle to maintain its operations as a yieldco; (ii) financing arrangements which were made while downplaying the attendant risks; (iii) inability to resolve those financings before their maturity date without risking unitholder dilution, and (iv) plan to halt cash distributions to investors and redirect funds to resolve those financings. If you purchased or otherwise acquired XPLR securities, have information, or would like to learn more about this investigation, please contact Thomas W. Elrod of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at investigations@ or fill out the contact form below, to discuss your rights or interests with respect to these matters without any cost to you. [ CONTACT FORM ] Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs' law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation. The firm's efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars. Additional information about the firm can be found at Kirby McInerney LLP's website. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Lake County Council unanimously approves amended ordinance for data centers
Lake County Council unanimously approves amended ordinance for data centers

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Lake County Council unanimously approves amended ordinance for data centers

The Lake County Plan Commission will be ahead of the curve when it comes to addressing any future data center requests that may come before it. The Lake County Council on Tuesday unanimously approved an amended ordinance, which was given a favorable recommendation by the plan commission at its July 16 meeting. Councilman Randy Niemeyer, R-7th, urged fellow council members to approve the ordinance, which was compiled by a diverse group of nine members on the plan commission who supported it. 'If we don't have a policy, this whole thing will swallow us up,' Niemeyer said. 'Proactive' was a word both county officials and two residents, Caroline McCrady and Terry Steagall, used before and after the vote. Both McCrady and Steagall spoke briefly before the vote was taken. 'It will be nice to have something in place,' said Steagall, who spoke of his environmental concerns if a data center is approved. McCrady called data centers 'vampires of electrical and water use.' 'There's so many things to be concerned about,' McCrady said. The ordinance, now that it is approved, will provide guidance as department heads and local boards consider data center proposals for unincorporated areas of Lake County, Niemeyer said. Niemeyer said that in his 17 years of public service, he has found that 'if you have no policy, you have a bad policy.' 'This gives the public and staff a chance to evaluate the scope and scale,' he said. Though Porter County communities have so far been reticent about approving any data center proposals, several Lake County municipalities are more open to the idea. Last year, Merrillville changed zoning for some 180 acres on 101st Avenue east of Deep River for a data center after four companies approached the town about building them. On Thursday, the Hobart Plan Commission voted unanimously in favor of the rezoning for 400 acres on 61st Avenue, east of Colorado and north of 69th Avenue, after a request by Wylie Capital, a Chicago-based real estate developer that builds data centers. The zoning change next goes before the Hobart City Council for its approval. Lake County Plan Commission Director Ned Kovachevich said the ordinance is comprehensive and will help answer any questions when a data center proposal is submitted. He said that his department has had discussions with no less than three groups that are looking for areas to establish data centers. 'The scary thing is not having something in place,' Kovachevich said. He told those residents with concerns to provide him with their emails so that if a data center request is made that he can let them know. The law only requires him to notify those living adjacent to the project, he said. The ordinance defines a data center as a facility used for the storage, management, processing and transmission of digital data and that houses computer or network equipment, systems, servers, appliances and other associated components related to digital data storage, processing and related operations. Data center uses included data storage facilities, server farms, artificial intelligence training or processing, image processing, cloud computing, email servicing and other uses, according to the ordinance. Under the ordinance, all equipment and buildings within the data center must be set back at least 200 feet from all property lines near agricultural or residential-zoned areas. The maximum sound levels associated with the data center cannot exceed 55 decibels, according to the ordinance. All on-site utility lines have to be placed underground, and perimeter fencing has to be 6 feet tall, according to the ordinance. Data centers that remain inactive for more than 15 consecutive months have to be decommissioned, according to the ordinance. The data centers would be prohibited in business zoning districts, and a special exception in light industrial and heavy industrial zoning districts, according to the ordinance. When applying for special exception approval, company officials will have to submit a site plan — including property lines, setback lines and right-of-way lines and physical features — a proposed construction schedule, and proposed access routes for emergency response vehicles and large semi-tractor trailers. The approval would also require written verification from the Northern Indiana Public Services Company verifying adequate capacity in the supply lines and sufficiently sized utility supply equipment to safely accommodate the proposed data center. The letter would also have to verify that the data center wouldn't cause electrical interference or fluctuations in line voltage, according to the ordinance. Additionally, the approval request would have to include an energy efficiency plan, a water management plan, a visual screening report, a preliminary operation and maintenance plan, and a decommission plan, among other components, according to the ordinance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store