California Democrats Push Reforms to Prevent Refinery Shutdowns
A group of California Democrats is looking to ease the state's gasoline standards and streamline permitting for refineries in a bid to prevent more fuelmakers from shutting down and raising costs for the state's drivers.
A bill introduced by seven of the state's Democratic senators would require the energy commission to transition by 2027 to a less-stringent gasoline specification that's in line with other western states, replacing California's unique Carbob fuel. Nearer term, the measure would suspend rules requiring more environmentally friendly, but more expensive, fuel to be sold in the warmer months.
The bill marks a reversal from years of regulatory scrutiny by Governor Gavin Newsom and the California Energy Commission that contributed to plans by Phillips 66 and Valero Energy Corp. to shut refineries that account for about one-fifth of the state's crude-processing capacity. The shutdowns prompted Newsom to adjust course in April and urge the state's energy regulator to collaborate with fuel makers to ensure affordable and reliable supply.
'Details of the policy are up for negotiation, but I will be fighting to ensure that we get needed change for Californians who are fed up with our fuel economy,' Senator Tim Grayson, one of the seven democrats who introduced the bill, said in an emailed statement.
The limited number of refineries that can make California's artisan gasoline grade is one reason why the state's drivers pay more at the pump than the rest of the country. Among those were Phillips 66's Los Angeles refinery, which the company said in October that it would shut later this year, and Valero's San Francisco Bay Area plant, which the company said in April it is looking to close within a year.
Bill SB 237 was introduced in January, passed the California Senate in May and is working its way through the state's assembly with a mid-September deadline of the current legislative session. If approved, it would pass to Newsom's desk to be signed into law.
The bill would also establish a 'one-stop shop' for air, water and hazardous waste permitting for the state's refiners, who have long argued that a glacial permitting process and heavy regulation have raised costs and dissuaded companies from operating in the state. The bill's streamlined permitting process would be available to refiners only if they commit in a 'binding and enforceable agreement to continue to operate and to provide transportation fuels at an affordable price to consumers for the duration of the permits' issued through the process.
To be sure, California's fuel makers are still making solid profits. The latest data from the California Energy Commission shows refiners made $1 a gallon gross margin in April, down from 2024 but well above the US average.
Risser writes for Bloomberg.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
22 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' clears key Senate hurdle after high drama
The Senate on Saturday cleared a key procedural hurdle to advance President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," bringing the massive spending legislation one step closer to passage after weeks of painstaking negotiations. The Senate vote delivered a boost for Republican Majority Leader John Thune's bid to get the bill to Trump's desk by July 4. But it was not without drama. The vote on the motion to proceed was open for hours on Saturday night, and only passed after three Republican holdouts gave in and voted yes. The hours of uncertainty underscored the tricky path forward for the massive package. The procedural vote tees up a final vote on the megabill in the Senate likely sometime Sunday or Monday. Democrats, led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, are forcing the 940-page bill to be read out loud once it heads to full debate on the Senate floor Sunday. "We will be here all night if that's what it takes to read it," Schumer wrote Saturday on X. While the package cannot officially pass the upper chamber until the final vote, the procedural vote was considered a big test for Thune. The vote comes after weeks of turmoil and tension over the massive package that exposed bitter policy disputes and emboldened some firm Republican holdouts. The sweeping domestic policy package will also have to be passed again in the House, which just narrowly passed its own version of the bill last month. Some House Republicans have already expressed opposition to key elements of the Senate version of the bill — most notably deep cuts to Medicaid — likely foreshadowing a close vote in the lower chamber. Both Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson hold narrow majorities in their respective chambers, meaning they can only afford to lose the support of a small number of Republican lawmakers to pass the package in a party-line vote. Meanwhile, Trump continues to urge lawmakers to get the package passed before Republicans' self-imposed July 4 deadline. "President Trump is committed to keeping his promises, and failure to pass this bill would be the ultimate betrayal," the White House said in a statement of administration policy on Saturday. This is breaking news. Check back for updates.
Politico
30 minutes ago
- Politico
Senate Republicans put megabill on track for likely Monday passage
Senate Republicans on Saturday took a crucial step toward passing their sweeping domestic policy bill, voting 51-49 to start debate on the legislation. Two GOP senators — Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina — joined Democrats to oppose advancing the cornerstone of President Donald Trump's second-term agenda. But several others came around after hours of last-ditch negotiations to keep the bill moving forward. The vote came after a daylong scramble by GOP leaders to win over several Republican senators who were viewed as undecided or had vowed to block debate over their opposition to pieces of the bill — including an extended negotiating session that unfolded withvarious senatorswhile the vote was underway. Now the chamber is on track to pass the bill sometime Monday. Democrats are forcing Senate clerks to first read the legislation out loud, which is expected to happen overnight, before a maximum 20 hours of debate plus a marathon series of amendment votes.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Michael Goodwin: Mamdani's mayoral primary victory sealed a headache for Dems – and proved they can't win no matter what
Here's how you know Democrats are cursed: They lose even when they win. In a week where President Trump kept his promise to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities, forged a cease-fire in its war with Israel, scored a huge victory at the Supreme Court and saw the stock market hit a new historic high, Dems won . . . another giant headache. His name is Zohran Mamdani and his victory in New York's mayoral primary is already proving to be more of a problem than a solution to the Dems' woes. Advertisement His uber-progressive platform is so extreme that he's driving leading lefties to pretend to be moderates! Normally, winning the mayoral nomination is cause for party celebration because the Dem nominee usually prevails in deep blue Gotham, meaning more power, prestige and patronage. Besides, the 33-year-old Queens assemblyman routed bogeyman Andrew Cuomo and others with a campaign that boosted turnout among the kind of young voters who have been drifting away from the party. Top Dems dismayed Advertisement The hitch is that Mamdani's ideas, including giving away lots of free stuff, are so extreme that New York's Dem leaders are giving him the cold shoulder — and a slapdown. He's a true socialist who wants to freeze the rents on a million privately owned apartments and favors taxing homes owned by whites at higher rates than those owned by nonwhites. He promises government supermarkets, called for defunding the police and — naturally — taxing the 'rich.' If that weren't trouble enough, Mamdani is also a proven antisemite. Advertisement His history and agenda are prompting an outcry among even some fellow Dems and a budding effort to defeat him in the general election. They believe a Mamdani mayoralty would be good only if the goal is to boost Trump's popularity and help Republicans sweep next year's elections. In fact, some see Mamdani as so radioactive that they are refusing to endorse him, lest they get tarred with his brush. Zohran Mamdani's victory in New York's mayoral primary is already proving to be more of a problem than a solution to the Dems' woes. Derek French/UPI/Shutterstock Advertisement Gov. Hochul is rejecting a central promise of his platform, which is to impose big tax hikes on New York's highest earners and corporations. Hochul has rarely met a tax she doesn't want to raise, but the state's out-of-whack tax-and-spend structures already are making the Empire State the No. 1 exporter of residents to other states, a fact she cited in rejecting his tax plan. Hochul is facing a tough re-election campaign next year and obviously fears that throwing her lot in with Mamdani would be political suicide in the rest of the state, which is more moderate than the city. Another hurdle for many Dems is Mamdani's refusal to recognize Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people. He recently compounded that long-standing position, which includes support for the BDS movement, by defending the phrase 'globalize the intifada.' He claims it reflects 'a desperate desire for equality and equal rights and standing up for Palestinian human rights,' but that's nonsense, and the condemnations haven't stopped. The Washington Holocaust Museum called his argument 'outrageous and especially offensive' and Jonathan Greenblatt, chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League, said the phrase is an 'explicit incitement to violence.' Manhattan Rep. Dan Goldman said the word 'intifada' is 'well understood to refer to the violent terror attacks against innocent Israeli civilians that occurred during the First and Second Intifadas.' Advertisement He added that 'if Mr. Mamdani is unwilling to heed the request of major Jewish organizations to condemn this unquestionably antisemitic phrase, then he is unfit to lead a city with 1.3 million Jews — the largest Jewish population outside of Israel.' Resistance by default Even Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who is normally as quiet as the proverbial church mouse, denounced Mamdani. 'The global intifada is a statement that means destroy Israel and kill all the Jews,' she said. Perhaps most important, the two New Yorkers who lead congressional Dems have withheld their support. Advertisement Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries congratulated Mamdani, but said only they looked forward to meeting him to discuss his ideas. Oh, to be a fly on the wall! At home and abroad, Trump has delivered big-ticket reforms that will have lasting benefits for America and its allies. From a national perspective, the larger problem is that Mamdani represents another manifestation of the left's compulsion to be rabidly against whatever Trump is for. Advertisement The recent resistance featured such bone-headed plays as Dems defending Central American gangsters Joe Biden let into the country and trying to undercut Trump's magnificent success against Iran by citing a leaked 'deep state' report that said damage to the nuclear facilities was minimal. Only later did we learn that the leakers said they had 'low confidence' in the accuracy of the report. Yet with each of these clashes, Dems in Congress and their media megaphones shout and pound the table as if the end of the world as we know it is near unless Trump is stopped. Like the boy who cried wolf, their hysteria is leading to national exhaustion — and now comes Mamdani's absurd agenda. Advertisement Perhaps his radicalism represents peak madness, but even if not, Trump Derangement Syndrome is losing much of its ability to shape the national mood. A prime example involves the many federal and state judges who jumped on the resistance bandwagon with rulings that are nakedly political efforts to thwart the president. They got a dramatic comeuppance with the Supreme Court decision last week that curtailed their overreach in most instances. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Bumps in the road None of this is to suggest Trump's tenure has been without flaws. His tariff zigzags have caused trade disruptions, anxiety over household budgets and led the Federal Reserve to hold off on lowering interest rates, a move that would benefit many in the beleaguered middle class he aims to help. Similarly, the president's promise to deport dangerous illegal aliens has seen its popularity undercut by cases where some of those rounded up had no criminal records. Still, these are relative bumps on the road for a presidency that already has had a string of extraordinary successes. At home and abroad, Trump has delivered big ticket reforms that will have lasting benefits for America and its allies. For example, getting NATO members to realize he was right about the need for them to pay more for the common defense is one thing, but getting them to agree to more than double their annual pledge, to 5% of their GDP, is extraordinary. Among other benefits, it's a huge rebuke to Russia's Vladimir Putin. At home, the violations of Jewish students' civil rights by elite universities would have persisted without Trump in the White House. The same can be said for his assault on the issue of biological men participating in women's sports and his effort to end public funding for the leftist indoctrination outfits known as PBS and NPR. Trump did not discover these and other cultural rots, which were long ago identified. His genius lies in having the courage to actually do something about them. For that reason alone, history will be on his side.
