logo
Florida lawmakers weigh school grading reform to reflect real student outcomes

Florida lawmakers weigh school grading reform to reflect real student outcomes

Yahoo15-04-2025
A bill before the Legislature this year would adjust the way Florida's public schools are graded. That's because a school's grade of "A" doesn't necessarily mean what would traditionally be considered an A.
The Schools Committed to Outstanding Results and Excellence, or SCORE, Act (HB 1483), sponsored by Rep. Susan Valdes, R-Tampa, would move the Florida Department of Education's A-F grading scale to match the usual percentages used for grading student performance in school. The shift would take place over a 10-year period.
During a PreK-12 Budget Subcommittee meeting in the Florida House of Representatives on Monday afternoon, Valdes said there were about 260 schools that are graded an A where less than 50% of the students are meeting grade-level benchmarks.
"So that means that there's some students that we're not capturing, that we're still not wrapping our arms around them with their needs in order for them to prosper," Valdes said.
Currently, a school's rating is based on different criteria, including graduation rates and English language arts, math and science exams. But an elementary school but can still get an A even if the school receives a 62% achievement score from the state's Department of Education, for example. Such a percentage normally would be deemed a "D."
The SCORE Act would, over a decade, shift those percentages to match the traditional grading scale, so that by the 2033-34 school year, schools graded an A would have to achieve at least a 90%. According to a staff analysis, 1,299 schools – or 38% – were given an A grade in 2024.
Rep. Erika Booth, R-St. Cloud, acknowledged the change in school grade percentages would be "hard for a community to absorb."
"But wouldn't you rather know? Wouldn't you rather know that you're driving your beautiful child to a school that is actually a C grade, instead of patting yourself on the back and thinking that you've school-choice'd into an A-rated school?" Booth asked during debate.
"Don't put an A in the window of a school when it's actually at 60% and tell me to be happy about it, whether I'm a teacher, a parent or community leader," she added.
Rep. Allison Tant, D-Tallahassee, said this could pose a problem for turnaround schools, like Jefferson County K-12 in her district. The Jefferson County School District was taken over by the state after years of being rated as a failing district. Almost a quarter of the county's residents live in poverty, according to U.S. Census data.
"How are we making sure that in this grading system we're also bringing those kids that aren't similarly resourced to some of their peers, (that) don't have anybody reading to them at home, are hungry, maybe come to school with health issues. How are we addressing that?" she asked Valdes during the subcommittee meeting.
Valdes said the bill also expands the interventions provided for children who do not perform on grade level from VPK to eighth grade. It also expands the eligibility for the summer bridge program for VPK and creates a grant program for classroom libraries in Title I schools.
The bill passed 12-2, with Tant and Rep. Jervonte Edmonds, D-West Palm Beach, opposed.
The House bill heads to the Education & Employment Committee, its fourth committee of reference. There is no Senate version. The legislative session is scheduled to end May 2.
Ana Goñi-Lessan, state watchdog reporter for the USA TODAY Network – Florida, can be reached at agonilessan@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: School grading overhaul aims to reveal true student achievement gaps
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Flags raised by patriotism campaigners removed by London council
Flags raised by patriotism campaigners removed by London council

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Flags raised by patriotism campaigners removed by London council

A second council has vowed to remove English or British flags that have been attached to lampposts by patriotism campaigners. Tower Hamlets in east London said it would take down the St George's flags 'as soon as possible' after they were put up in recent days as part of the 'Operation Raise the Colours' patriotism campaign that has been gathering momentum online. It come days after Birmingham council ordered the removal of hundreds of Union and St George's flags flying from street lampposts in the city, which were raised in the past fortnight in a 'patriotic outpouring'. The Labour-run authority claimed the flags put the lives of pedestrians and motorists 'at risk' despite being up to 25ft off the ground. But Lee Anderson, the Reform UK MP, was furious, telling The Telegraph: 'This is nothing short of a disgrace and shows utter contempt for the British people.' British or English flags have been raised on streets across England including in Swindon, Bradford, Newcastle and Norwich. Now Tower Hamlets council, which is run by the pro-Gaza Aspire Party, has confirmed it will remove any St George flags from council property including lampposts 'as soon as possible'. A spokesman told The Telegraph: 'We are aware members of the public have been putting up St George's flags on various structures. 'While we recognise people wish to express their views, we have a responsibility to monitor and maintain council infrastructure. 'Where flags are attached to council-owned infrastructure without permission, they may be removed as part of routine maintenance.' Lutfur Rahman, the mayor of Tower Hamlets, ordered the removal of Palestine flags from council buildings and lampposts in March 2024 after Jewish families said the 'oppressive and intimidating' symbols made them feel unwelcome in the borough for the first time. Critics accused the council of 'two-tier bias' because the Palestine flags were not taken down for months after popping up in the aftermath of the start of the Israel-Hamas war. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, accused Tower Hamlets council of 'absurd national loathing'. He told The Telegraph: 'Tower Hamlets council have allowed Palestinian flags to be publicly displayed on lampposts but not the flag of our country. 'This absurd national self-loathing must end. This is yet more two-tier bias against the British people. We must be one country united under the Union flag.' Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former Conservative leader, asked: 'Why would we leave [Palestinian flags] up and take down flags that represent one of the countries of the UK?' Critics pointed out that Palestinian flags have flown elsewhere on the streets of the city, where 29.9 per cent of residents are Muslim, since the war in Gaza began in 2023. Suella Braverman, a former home secretary, said our national flags 'are a great source of pride and patriotism', adding that 'they should be flown from as many places as possible as often as possible'. Government guidance first published in 2021 states: 'Flags are a very British way of expressing joy and pride.' It goes on to say that: 'The Government wants to see more flags flown, particularly the Union flag.' The guidance warns however that flags must not 'obscure, or hinder the interpretation of official road, rail, waterway or aircraft signs, or otherwise make hazardous the use of these types of transport'. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword

100 days of Pope Leo XIV: A calm papacy that avoids polemics is coming into focus
100 days of Pope Leo XIV: A calm papacy that avoids polemics is coming into focus

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

100 days of Pope Leo XIV: A calm papacy that avoids polemics is coming into focus

VATICAN CITY (AP) — When Pope Leo XIV surprised tens of thousands of young people at a recent Holy Year celebration with an impromptu popemobile romp around St. Peter's Square, it almost seemed as if some of the informal spontaneity that characterized Pope Francis' 12-year papacy had returned to the Vatican. But the message Leo delivered that night was all his own: In seamless English, Spanish and Italian, Leo told the young people that they were the 'salt of the Earth, the light of the world.' He urged them to spread their hope, faith in Christ and their cries of peace wherever they go. As Robert Prevost marks his 100th day as Pope Leo this weekend, the contours of his pontificate have begun to come into relief, primarily where he shows continuity with Francis and where he signals change. Perhaps the biggest takeaway is that after 12 sometimes turbulent years under Francis, a certain calm and reserve have returned to the papacy. Leo seems eager above all to avoid polemics or making the papacy about himself, and wants instead to focus on Christ and peace. That seems exactly what many Catholic faithful want, and may respond to what today's church needs. 'He's been very direct and forthright … but he's not doing spontaneous press hits,' said Kevin Hughes, chair of theology and religious studies at Leo's alma mater, Villanova University. Leo has a different style than Francis, and that has brought relief to many, Hughes said in a telephone interview. 'Even those who really loved Pope Francis always kind of held their breath a little bit: You didn't know what was going to come out next or what he was going to do,' Hughes said. An effort to avoid polemics Leo has certainly gone out of his way in his first 100 days to try to heal divisions that deepened during Francis' pontificate, offering messages of unity and avoiding controversy at almost every turn. Even his signature issue — confronting the promise and peril posed by artificial intelligence — is something that conservatives and progressives alike agree is important. Francis' emphasis on caring for the environment and migrants often alienated conservatives. Closer to home, Leo offered the Holy See bureaucracy a reassuring, conciliatory message after Francis' occasionally authoritarian style rubbed some in the Vatican the wrong way. 'Popes come and go, but the Curia remains,' Leo told Vatican officials soon after his May 8 election. Continuity with Francis is still undeniable Leo, though, has cemented Francis' environmental legacy by celebrating the first-ever ecologically inspired Mass. He has furthered that legacy by giving the go-ahead for the Vatican to turn a 430-hectare (1,000-acre) field north of Rome into a vast solar farm that should generate enough electricity to meet Vatican City's needs and turn it into the world's first carbon-neutral state. He has fine-tuned financial transparency regulations that Francis initiated, tweaked some other decrees to give them consistency and logic, and confirmed Francis in deciding to declare one of the 19th century's most influential saints, John Henry Newman, a 'doctor' of the church. But he hasn't granted any sit-down, tell-all interviews or made headline-grabbing, off-the-cuff comments like his predecessor did. He hasn't made any major appointments, including to fill his old job, or taken any big trips. In marking the 80th anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki last week, he had a chance to match Francis' novel declaration that the mere possession of nuclear weapons was 'immoral.' But he didn't. Compared to President Donald Trump, the other American world leader who took office in 2025 with a flurry of Sharpie-penned executive decrees, Leo has eased into his new job slowly, deliberately and quietly, almost trying not to draw attention to himself. At 69, he seems to know that he has time on his side, and that after Francis' revolutionary papacy, the church might need a bit of a breather. One Vatican official who knows Leo said he expects his papacy will have the effect of a 'calming rain' on the church. Maria Isabel Ibarcena Cuarite, a Peruvian member of a Catholic charismatic group, said it was precisely Leo's quiet emphasis on church traditions, its sacraments and love of Christ, that drew her and upward of 1 million young people to Rome for a special Jubilee week this month. Ibarcena said Francis had confused young people like herself with his outreach to LGBTQ+ Catholics and approval of blessings for same-sex couples. Such gestures went beyond what a pope was supposed to do and what the church taught, she thought. Leo, she said, has emphasized that marriage is a sacrament between men and woman. 'Francis was ambiguous, but he is firm,' she said. An Augustinian pope From his very first appearance on the loggia of St. Peter's Basilica, Leo has insisted he is first and foremost a 'son of St. Augustine. ' It was a reference to the fifth century theological and devotional giant of early Christianity, St. Augustine of Hippo, who inspired the 13th century religious Augustinian order as a community of 'mendicant' friars. Like the other big mendicant orders of the early church — the Franciscans, Dominicans and Carmelites — the Augustinians spread across Christian Europe over the centuries. Today, Augustinian spirituality is rooted in a deep interior life of prayer, living in community, and journeying together in search of truth in God. In nearly every speech or homily since his May 8 election, Leo has cited Augustine in one way or another. 'I see a kind of Augustinian flavor in the way that he's presenting all these things,' said Hughes, the theology professor who is an Augustine scholar. Leo joined the Augustinians after graduating from Augustinian-run Villanova, outside Philadelphia, and was twice elected its prior general. He has visited the Augustinian headquarters outside St. Peter's a few times since his election, and some wonder if he will invite some brothers to live with him in the Apostolic Palace to recreate the spirit of Augustinian community life there. A missionary pope in the image of Francis Leo is also very much a product of the Francis papacy. Francis named Prevost bishop of Chiclayo, Peru, in 2014 and then moved him to head one of the most important Vatican jobs in 2023 — vetting bishop nominations. In retrospect, it seems Francis had his eye on Prevost as a possible successor. Given Francis' stump speech before the 2013 conclave that elected him pope, the then-Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio essentially described Prevost in identifying the church's mission today: He said the church was "called to go outside of itself and go to the peripheries, not just geographic but also the existential peripheries.' Prevost, who hails from Chicago, spent his adult life as a missionary in Peru, eventually becoming bishop of Chiclayo. 'He is the incarnation of the 'unity of difference,' because he comes from the center, but he lives in the peripheries,' said Emilce Cuda, secretary of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America. Cuda said during a recent conference hosted by Georgetown University that Leo encapsulated in 'word and gesture' the type of missionary church Francis promoted. That said, for all Leo owes to Bergoglio, the two didn't necessarily get along. Prevost has recounted that at one point when he was the Augustinian superior, the then-archbishop of Buenos Aires expressed interest in assigning an Augustinian priest to a specific job in his archdiocese. 'And I, as prior general, said 'I understand, Your Eminence, but he's got to do something else' and so I transferred him somewhere else,' Prevost told parishioners in his home state of Illinois in 2024. Prevost said he 'naively' thought the Francis wouldn't remember him after his 2013 election, and that regardless 'he'll never appoint me bishop' due to the disagreement. Bergoglio not only made him bishop, he laid the groundwork for Prevost to succeed him as pope, the first North American pope following the first South American. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. Nicole Winfield, The Associated Press

Harrison: As Texas and California talk redistricting, there's no fight in Mississippi
Harrison: As Texas and California talk redistricting, there's no fight in Mississippi

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Harrison: As Texas and California talk redistricting, there's no fight in Mississippi

Don't look for Mississippi to get involved in what appears to be an escalating redistricting war where states redraw their U.S. House districts to aid Republicans or Democrats ahead of a hotly contested 2026 national election. Mississippi most likely will not engage in the redistricting battle because Republicans already have been helped about as much as possible in the Magnolia State. Here, there are three safe Republican U.S. House districts and one safe Democratic district. In theory, the Mississippi Legislature could draw the congressional districts in such a manner as to make all four districts favor Republicans. But to do so, Black voters, who generally are more prone to vote Democratic, would have to be diluted to such an extent that the redraw would conflict with long-held federal court rulings. From a legal standpoint and even from an ethical and moral standpoint, it would be difficult to justify no Black-majority districts in Mississippi, where the non-white population is nearing 40%. Unsurprisingly, Texas fired the first shot in what is shaping up as a nationwide redistricting battle. The Texas Legislature, at the behest of President Donald Trump, who fears his Republican Party will lose the U.S. House in the 2026 midterm election, is trying to redraw the Longhorn State's 38 congressional districts to give the Republicans five more seats. They currently have 25. In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom is threatening to retaliate by creating more Democratic districts. California currently has 43 Democratic districts and nine Republican districts. There have been rumblings of blue New York and red Florida also going back to the redistricting drawing board to create more seats to help their respective party. Normally, redistricting is conducted every 10 years after the release of the U.S. Census. The last redistricting occurred after the 2020 U.S. Census. But it should be no surprise that Trump, fearing that Republicans will lose the House in 2026, asked Texas to eschew the norms and conduct a mid-decade redistricting. Both Democrats and Republicans are guilty of gerrymandering or of drawing districts to benefit their political party. The courts, generally, have said that is OK. But the courts — at least in the past — have also said their minority populations must be given opportunities to elect candidates of their choice. While the courts have said gerrymandering is allowed, a recent Economist/YouGov poll found an overwhelming 69% oppose the partisan drawing of districts, compared to only 9% who support it and 22% of respondents who are unsure. A plurality of 35% support states retaliating if another state draws districts to support one particular party. The retaliation is opposed by 30%, while 36% of respondents are unsure. A plurality also opposes Trump's call for the FBI to hunt down Texas Democratic lawmakers who have fled the state to prevent the Legislature from having the quorum needed to draw new congressional districts. For what it's worth, a study by the Princeton Gerrymandering Project found 15 states with failing grades in terms of non-partisan redistricting. Nine of those states failed because of their strong Republican tilt, while five failed because of strong Democratic leanings. Two — Tennessee and Louisiana — failed because of racial unfairness. Through court rulings, a new Black-majority district has been created in Louisiana since the Princeton study was conducted. Texas and Florida were among the states receiving failing grades. New York and California were not. Another large Democratic stronghold, Illinois, did get a failing grade. Mississippi is unique because of its racial makeup and voting patterns. Most white Mississippians vote Republican, but the large Black minority — the largest percentage of Black voters in the nation — tends to vote Democratic. While Republicans have won all statewide elections since 2016, the elections often are relatively close. In the latest redistricting, Democrats argued that because of the strong pro-Democratic minority population, one of the three heavily Republican congressional districts should be drawn in a manner to make it more competitive. But the majority-Republican Legislature rejected that argument. Hence, there is no need for the Republicans in the Mississippi Legislature to undertake redistricting now. This column was produced by Mississippi Today, a nonprofit news organization that covers state government, public policy, politics and culture. Bobby Harrison is the editor of Mississippi Today Ideas.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store