Letters: Pride has taken a nasty turn
Sir: Gareth Roberts's piece ('End of the rainbow', 31 May) gave me pause to reflect. It's not that Pride has become irrelevant; after all, same-gender relationships are still criminalised in 64 countries – and in eight of those the death penalty is applicable. Rather, since the pandemic, it seems to have taken a rather nasty and unpleasant turn, with those dissenting from whatever ludicrous party line happens to be in vogue routinely heckled and vilified.
Placards emblazoned with slogans such as 'If you see a Terf [trans-exclusionary radical feminist] then smash them in the face' are often to be spotted on Pride marches. Those producing such placards seem to forget that it was the first- and second-wave feminists (as well as early LGBT activists) who've brought us to the relatively benign state of affairs we now enjoy – in this country at least.
As Lionel Shriver pointed out elsewhere in the issue ('The war on normal'), it's curious, if not downright laughable, how these and other such revolutions manage to eat themselves in the end.
Bernard Jennings
London SE11
Lionel is wrong
Sir: Lionel Shriver does precisely what she accuses gay people of doing. She reduces relationships to mere sex and then equates sex with only reproduction (or lack of it). Does she not know that both 'heteronormative' and homosexual people have sex for pleasure? Most sexual activity in the world is for this hedonistic purpose, not reproduction. She also repeats the fallacy that homosexual couples cannot reproduce. I can assure her they can, if not with each other, and play their part in advancing human evolution.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
a day ago
- Spectator
Deluded Americans are descending on Ireland
The American girl was listing her reasons for moving to Ireland in protest at Donald Trump. 'I cannot stay in a country where Roe vs Wade has been overturned. Did you know abortion is restricted in a lot of states? Oh no, I cannot wait to live in Ireland.' We are becoming used to Americans staying at our B&B while they are house-hunting in Ireland during a fit of pique. We let it all go over our heads. But the question remains. Why are these migrating anti-Trumpers so daft? They are flouncing out of America to come to Ireland in a reverse ferret of how the journey across the Atlantic has been done for centuries. When they explain their reasoning, they couldn't bark up a wronger tree if they tried. Although I would say, in their defence, the way Ireland markets itself is very misleading, with all the rainbow Pride flags and Palestinian embassies. But liberal Americans don't seem to understand that this is the image, tailored for tourism and EU grants, I suspect. The practical reality is very different. As wonderful as the Emerald Isle is, they're going the wrong way across the Atlantic. 'From Galway to Graceland' is the song title. There is no song entitled 'From California to Carlow'. Or Cork. Or Kerry. No young person living in New York or Los Angeles has ever dreamed of leaving the lights, the shops, the theatres and the endless opportunities to get on a boat to Rosslare to begin working on a cattle farm and going down the chipper for their dinner. But a whole load of overprivileged Yanks are descending on Ireland in a huff, invoking their Irish ancestry and sitting in the rain declaring 'This will show Trump!' – while Trump is enjoying White House room service and sunning himself in Palm Beach. I call it the Rosie O'Donnell syndrome. The actress and comedian makes no sense when explaining why she has moved from New York and Hollywood to Dublin, allegedly because she doesn't 'feel safe' surrounded by people who voted for Trump. I often amuse myself during the long, dark West Cork summer evenings by imagining Ms O'Donnell trying to call out a plumber. 'I wonder if she's had a blocked loo yet, or an overflowing gutter,' I remark to the builder boyfriend. 'No bother!' says the BB, impersonating a plumber who is not going to turn up. Ms O'Donnell keeps insisting it's all fantastic. Maybe the locals are saying 'Top of the morning to you, Rosie!' to amuse themselves. But at some point she's going to have someone say the following to her, very impatiently: 'So do you want to go on the waiting list for a call-out for a quote for a new bathroom in six months' time or not?' When the two girls from California came to stay at our B&B, they burst through the kitchen doors as we were eating our dinner and launched into a gushing speech about how much they loved Ireland and felt at home in Ireland, having been here a day. Yeah, all right, I thought. We don't tend to get five-star reviews from people who've just landed that morning. We get five-star reviews from people who've been on the road a week or two, and who fall into our red-hot, full pressure showers with a gratitude that's bordering hysteria. These two were at the idealistic stage. It only took them two minutes to get on to Trump and a pro-choice rant which we could have done without, for we were eating a plate of linguine. One girl stood outside smoking and asked if we had any weed, while the other girl made herself comfortable on the kitchen sofa and started explaining what happens to women in southern US states where abortion is restricted. She could not live in that kind of country. She wanted to live in a society where there was completely unfettered freedom for women in the pro-choice arena. That's why they were in Ireland on a mission to investigate relocating here… The BB looked at me, pausing the forking of linguine into his mouth. 'Er,' I said. And I put my fork down. 'Are you sure we can't offer you some pasta?' No, they said, they had just had pizza. 'Ice cream?' I said. 'Go on. Have some ice cream.' They said that would be nice. So I got five flavours of ice cream out of the freezer and set them on the table with bowls and spoons and the girls sat down at the table. I said: 'You do know Ireland is Catholic, don't you?' They looked blank, then started gushing again. 'We just love it here! We feel right at home, don't we?' 'We do! The people are wonderful! So welcoming! We're going to be so happy here!' While one puffed on a vape and the other ate ice cream, they told us how much they despaired for their country. They said there was some hope for women's rights and liberal ideology, though, because of the nice Muslim Democratic candidate being lined up for mayor of New York. By now, the BB and I were sitting there with our mouths slightly ajar, saying nothing. What was spilling out of their brains made no more sense than if they'd told us they were going to put the raspberry ripple in the oven to keep it frozen. They finished slagging off America, then went to bed saying they had to be up at 7.30 a.m. to go to Blarney Castle. The next day they came down at noon and said they might give the Blarney Stone a miss. They were going just to get in the car and drive and see where the road took them. 'That sounds like an excellent plan,' I said, wondering if the road would be so good as to take them back to the airport.
Metro
2 days ago
- Metro
Inside the split over trans women that's threatening to drive a wedge through Labour
The Labour party has been left split in two over the rights of trans women within women's-only spaces, new polling has revealed. A poll for Labour news site LabourList, shared exclusively with Metro, asked 1,300 people who identified themselves as party members if they agreed with the government's approach to the decision. While 42.7% of members said they believed trans women should be excluded from women-only spaces – the stance taken by Sir Keir Starmer's government – 40.2% did not agree. Just over 17% said they don't know. It was an even closer result among men – just 0.6% separated men who agreed with the position and the slightly higher number who disagreed. The polling comes months after the Supreme Court announced in a landmark decision that the words 'sex' and 'women' in the Equality Act 2010 should be defined in biological terms. That meant trans women could legally be barred from women-only spaces, whether or not they possessed a gender recognition certificate. The government immediately welcomed the ruling, saying it brought clarity to an issue at the centre of an often aggressive debate. But in the months since Lord Hodge's ruling, it appears the issue is far from settled. With thousands of members from all over the world, our vibrant LGBTQ+ WhatsApp channel is a hub for all the latest news and important issues that face the LGBTQ+ community. Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications! The results from the Survation poll also found that the age groups of party members – of which there are around 309,000 in total – are split on the debate, with the majority of members aged 18 to 44 believing that the government's stance was wrong, while members aged 45 to 65+ believe it was correct. Trans people involved with LGBT+ Labour, the party's queer member group, told Metro the divide is all too clear. Georgia Meadows is LGBT+ Labour's trans officer and the only trans person on the group's National Committee. Labour's landslide election victory, which decisively swept the Conservatives out of power, gave her 'hope'. That hope didn't last long. 'They [the voters] really put their trust in us. They were hoping we'd be different, but a lot of what we've done is what the Tories would have,' she told Metro. Georgia, who has been a Labour member for three years, added: 'A lot of the membership is trans-supportive, or at the least, neutral on the issue. 'The few who are overtly transphobic are loud and well-funded.' She described post-ruling comments from a No 10 spokesperson, saying explicitly Starmer does not believe trans women are women, as 'disgusting and wholly against commitments [the PM] made to LGBT+ Labour'. Steph Richards, a trans woman who serves as the chief executive of the advocacy group TransLucent, was put forward in July as a candidate for LGBT+ Labour's women's officer by the Trans Rights Alliance, a bloc of pro-trans members, only to face criticism from a gender-critical members group called LGB Labour. She said: 'I speak to lots of MPs, none of them that I've spoken to are happy, where we're going at the moment, on numerous issues, Gaza in particular, but around benefits, around the cap benefit, winter fuel payment. What a disaster. 'I think it reflects also where the party's gone, from a socialist party to a light blue Tory.' In the wake of the Supreme Court announcement, both the LGBT+ Labour annual general meeting (AGM) and the party's annual Women's Conference were suspended. The decision to postpone the two events – which Labour's governing body the National Executive Committee said was out of concern for the potential legal implications of the ruling – has been met with backlash from figures on both sides of the issue. Labour Women's Declaration, which describes itself as backing 'sex-based rights', said the postponement of the Women's Conference was a 'knee-jerk reaction'. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Reacting to the new poll, the group said the government's response was 'a complete vindication for us, although there can be no compensation for the years of abuse and vilification we have experienced within the party'. They added: 'We call on our Labour government to show leadership in this matter to those vocal Labour parliamentarians who are still refusing to accept the legal clarity of the ruling and have been demonstrating a clear ignorance of the law.' Georgia, who is aiming to become co-chair of LGBT+ Labour's committee, suggested the AGM was suspended to prevent a slate of pro-trans candidates from being voted in. An email from organisers, reported by LabourList, said they were waiting for 'clear, practical, and workable guidance' from the Equality and Human Rights Committee (EHRC). That guidance is now being developed 'over the summer', the equality watchdog said, after a consultation into the plans generated more than 50,000 responses. Katie Kneeves, 56, an ambassador at Cool 2b Trans, said she voted for Labour in 2024 for the first time in years. She said: 'I felt hopeful that trans people would not be treated as a political football. I even joined the Labour Party. How wrong I was. 'I will never vote for Labour again while Keir Starmer is the Prime Minister and while Wes Streeting is the Health Secretary.' In December, Streeting banned trans young people from being prescribed puberty blockers, which pause puberty, a move that one parent of a trans teen told Metro she 'begged' Streeting not to do. Kneeves added: I'm excited by Your Party, as I hope it will put enough pressure on Starmer to stop chasing Reform voters and bring it back to being a left-wing party.' Heather Herbert, 49, the trans officer for LGBT+ Scottish Labour until 2021, said she quit Labour for the party's 'inaction on transphobia'. 'I did not expect the pandering to the far-right we have seen,' she added. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Its publication will mark the start of a new reality for the UK's trans community, when the full ramifications of April's ruling finally become clear. Baroness Kishwer Falkner, the current head of the EHRC, is expected to oversee the rollout of the guidance before handing over her role to Dr Mary-Ann Stephenson at the beginning of December. Stephenson's appointment was criticised jointly by Parliament's women and equalities committee and the joint committee on human rights, who say her experience was not extensive enough in the areas of protected characteristics such as race and disability. Committee chairs Sarah Owen and David Alton told the equalities minister Bridget Phillipson they could not endorse the move, writing: 'Our reasons relate to our concerns about vision and leadership, about breadth of expertise across the wide remit of the EHRC, and about rebuilding trust.' More Trending In her response to the Supreme Court ruling in April, Phillipson said the government would 'will support the rights of women and trans people, now and always'. She told MPs: 'This government will offer trans people the dignity that too often they were denied by the party opposite, too often a convenient punch bag, too often the butt of jokes made in this place by the party opposite.' The Labour Party said it did not comment on polling, but pointed towards Phillipson's statements when asked to comment. LGBT+ Labour has also been approached for a comment. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Corbyn vs Starmer, modern manners, and a crumbling NHS MORE: Drag queens being loaded into police cars after storytellers protest sets 'terrible precedent', RuPaul star MORE: UK and France's migrant deal comes into force – here's what it means
The Herald Scotland
4 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Business must support LGBTQIA+ people
While in Scotland and the wider UK the rollback has not been as extensive, there have still been challenging moments for marginalised communities – not least the Supreme Court ruling on the legal definition of women a few months ago. Whatever you think of that decision, it would be fair to say that it has left some communities feeling more excluded than they already were. Read more Some say the backlash against DEI has been of its proponents' own making – they have pushed the issue too far and the pendulum needs to be swung back the other way. Inevitably there are some extreme voices on either side in any debate, but that does not mean there isn't a worthwhile point to address. And it is up to leaders of all descriptions to champion a middle ground, a balanced position, that will work for as many people as possible and help bring underrepresented groups into the fold. The starting point for that has to be one question: if we don't want a society that is diverse, equal, and inclusive, then what do we want? Surely, a world based on the inverse of these values isn't a world anyone would want to live in? Even at an individual business level, few people would want to work in an environment that championed uniformity, inequality, and exclusion and encouraged these types of behaviours. So, in the face of what's happening here and elsewhere, I believe it's more important than ever to support the LGBTQIA+ community year-round, building on our work as a Pride Hub at The Social Hub Glasgow, which saw us commit to a week of educational events and provide spaces for workshops for these groups, and the Better Society Academy, our initiative to support changemakers delivering social impact through a series of masterclasses across Europe. To that end, we are doubling down on our support for underrepresented groups with a range of new initiatives. This will start with Shout It From Our Roof in Glasgow – following the Pride celebrations in the city and Amsterdam – inviting the trans community to metaphorically and literally proclaim their identity by 'shouting it from the roof' of The Social Hub in Merchant City and at our other locations in Europe. On top of that, in the months ahead we plan to donate 99 hours of meeting and event spaces to local initiatives and activists supporting the LGBTQIA+ community across our Glasgow and Amsterdam hubs, as resistance to diversity and inclusion grows. Through the donation of these spaces, we want to create meaningful connections, with opportunities to meet, listen, and understand the needs of the community, working together to drive change. Read more It is all part of our ongoing commitment to social impact and diversity, which includes achieving B Corp certification and the launch of our non-profit TSH Talent Foundation back in 2024. Our ultimate aim is to be welcoming to a global community of guests and team members, inclusive of every identity – or none at all – and our purpose has always been to help build a better, more inclusive society. We know we are stronger when everyone is seen, heard and empowered. Of course, I talk about all of this as a privileged, educated, straight, white, able-bodied man. I've had many of the advantages our society can offer at my feet, but that only makes it more important that people like me stand up for those who have not had the same opportunities to help their voices be heard and their views understood. But, for my part, I want to proudly stand up and say that we will continue to weave DEI and support for the LGBTQIA+ community through everything we do in The Social Hub – at our sites in Glasgow and across Europe. And what we have going on over the next few months is just a taster of more to come. There is a lot happening in the world at the moment, much of which is no doubt causing many people a lot of worry. But I truly believe it's at times like these that we should look outward rather than in, opening doors wider rather than closing them – particularly to those who have been pushed to the side for far too long. Charlie MacGregor is CEO of The Social Hub
