As G20 host, SA cannot afford to allow whistle-blower protection to remain rhetorical
This issue has been consistently prioritised at the G20 level since the Seoul Summit in 2010, with Japan's 2019 presidency placing particular emphasis on strengthening whistle-blower protection frameworks.
Under Japan's leadership, the G20 endorsed the High-Level Principles for the Effective Protection of Whistle-blowers, drawing upon existing standards developed by the United Nations and regional bodies. These principles provide governments with a road map for legislation and policies that safeguard individuals who courageously expose corruption, maladministration and other unlawful conduct.
For South Africa, the timing could not be more fortuitous — or more pressing. Our existing whistle-blower ecosystem, anchored in the Protected Disclosures Act of 2000 and related statutes, is manifestly inadequate.
While the act sought to create a legal shield for employees who disclose misconduct in good faith, its scope and implementation has fallen short, with glaring gaps in anonymity, physical safety, financial support and legal assistance.
Too often, those who step forward in the public interest face intimidation, job losses, harassment and, tragically, even assassination.
The euphoria sparked by the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development's 2023 discussion document on strengthening whistle-blower protection quickly dissipated, replaced by characteristic inertia. Draft proposals have not translated into legislative reform, while real lives remain in peril.
With South Africa now in the international spotlight as G20 host, the government has both an opportunity and an obligation to demonstrate leadership by urgently overhauling our whistle-blower protection framework in line with the G20 High-Level Principles.
The G20's work on this issue is not abstract. The Anti-Corruption Working Group explicitly tasked the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development in 2011 with preparing a 'Study on Whistle-blower Protection Frameworks, Compendium of Best Practices and Guiding Principles for Legislation'.
Since then, several G20 presidencies have reinforced the importance of robust protections, culminating in Japan's 2019 High-Level Principles. These principles reaffirm the collective commitment of the world's most powerful economies to ensuring that whistle-blowers are not left to bear the burden of public accountability alone.
The principles are not a prescriptive checklist. Instead, they encourage states to:
Ensure safe and confidential reporting channels.
Provide external avenues for disclosure.
Protect whistle-blowers from retaliation, dismissal and blacklisting.
Offer remedies such as compensation and reinstatement.
Extend protection to contractors, suppliers and witnesses.
Foster a culture of integrity where whistleblowing is an ethical duty, not a betrayal.
South Africa has endorsed these principles, yet the gap between aspiration and reality remains cavernous.
The stakes for our country are extraordinarily high. Corruption continues to siphon billions from public coffers, depriving communities of basic services. The Zondo Commission laid bare the extent of State Capture and the indispensability of whistle-blowers in exposing it.
Yet many who bravely came forward continue to face economic ruin, psychological trauma and threats to their lives.
The tragic assassinations of whistle-blowers in recent years underscore the urgency of the moment. When witnesses and whistle-blowers are silenced through violence or intimidation, the justice system itself is imperilled. If potential whistle-blowers conclude that silence is safer than speaking truth to power, the fight against corruption collapses at its foundation.
Hosting the G20 provides South Africa with a singular opportunity to demonstrate tangible commitment to the principles it has endorsed on the global stage. Aligning our frameworks with the G20 High-Level Principles would send a powerful signal that we are serious about rooting out corruption and protecting those who act in the public interest.
Concrete steps are available:
Amend and strengthen the Protected Disclosures Act to broaden its scope, enhance anonymity and guarantee remedies and whistleblowing incentives.
Implement the National Anti-Corruption Advisory Council's recommendation to establish an Office of Public Integrity as part of the legislative overhaul. This office could serve as an independent authority to receive disclosures, ensure follow-up action and provide direct support to whistle-blowers. President Cyril Ramaphosa should act with urgency to translate this recommendation into law.
Introduce whistle-blower protection funds to provide financial, legal and psychosocial support.
Institutionalise independent reporting channels outside employer structures to guard against retaliation.
Prioritise security for high-risk whistle-blowers and witnesses, including relocation or protective services where threats exist.
Foster a cultural shift that affirms whistle-blowers as defenders of democracy, not traitors.
These measures are neither novel nor unattainable. They are drawn directly from international best practice and from South Africa's own advisory bodies and civil society. What is required is political will, not more deliberation.
If South Africa were to emerge from its G20 presidency having taken decisive steps to align its whistle-blower protections with the High-Level Principles and implement the National Anti-Corruption Advisory Council's recommendation for an Office of Public Integrity, it would represent a crowning glory for our international engagement.
Such a move would not only bolster our credibility abroad, but also strengthen our democratic fabric at home.
Conversely, continued inertia risks deepening cynicism among citizens and reinforcing perceptions of state complicity in corruption. The cost of inaction will not be measured merely in reputational terms, but in human lives.
South Africa stands at a pivotal juncture. As host of the G20 Summit, it cannot afford to allow the protection of whistle-blowers to remain rhetorical. The time for discussion papers has passed. What is needed now is bold, urgent reform — anchored in the G20 High-Level Principles and complemented by the creation of an Office of Public Integrity.
To do less is to betray those who, often at great personal cost, have chosen to serve the public interest by exposing wrongdoing. To act decisively is to affirm the principles of integrity, accountability, and justice at the heart of our democracy.
The government must seize this moment with vigour and pace. In doing so, it can make South Africa's G20 presidency not merely a diplomatic exercise, but a milestone in our nation's unfinished journey toward ethical governance. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
5 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Madlanga Commission to sit at Brigette Mabandla Justice College in Pretoria
JOHANNESBURG - A decision for the Madlanga Commission of inquiry to sit in Pretoria has been taken as a cost-effective move to save the taxpayer. The inquiry looking into political interference and corruption in the criminal justice system will begin its work on 1 September 2025, to probe serious allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner, Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, in July. The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development has estimated the commission will cost close to R148 million. ALSO READ: Madlanga inquiry: Application for evidence to be heard in-camera won't be granted easily The commission's spokesperson, Jeremy Michaels, said after considering several venue options in Gauteng, the Brigette Mabandla Justice College came out tops as it came at no cost to the commission. "It really was a no-brainer because the venue is available to the commission free of charge. And so, cognisant of the fact, particularly for media houses that are based in Johannesburg, it is quite inconvenient, but then again, very cognisant of the conscience of the cost to the taxpayer."
Eyewitness News
8 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Calls for African unity can't override countries' laws, say civil society leaders
JOHANNESBURG - Some civil society leaders have warned that calls for unity in Africa cannot supersede any country's laws as the continent discusses challenges on migration. This is part of efforts to find solutions to common challenges in Africa and globally. The C20 tabled its initial policy draft brief in Pretoria on Wednesday, which also features contributions from African countries not represented at the G20. The latest meeting of the grouping of civil organisations – including non-governmental organisations (NGOs) – comes amid tensions between some lobby groups, some political parties and foreign nationals at hospitals and clinics. ALSO READ: Civil society leaders criticise slow uptake of transformation policies by global govts Operation Dudula is among the groups that believe foreign nationals are putting strain on the country's already stretched resources. The C20 chairperson, Thulani Tshefuta, said a pro-African agenda cannot come at the risk of flouting the country's laws. 'The pan-African approach does not suspend the law. There is no country that can agree to be lawless in any society. We stand firm, like any other country would do, that entry into South Africa must be regulated in the manner in which any other country would do.' But Tshefuta added that there is a line to draw. 'What we might not support it's illegal attacks, assaults and burning of people. When we raise those, we say there are things that must be done to solve our migration challenge, and they must be done by government and its agencies.'
IOL News
10 hours ago
- IOL News
South Africa's G20 Presidency: Strategic diplomacy in a shifting global order
South Africa has taken the G20 Presidency at a time when the global order is in flux, with experts saying that President Cyril Ramaphosa will have to engage in the kind of strategic diplomacy witnessed during his visit to the White House. Image: GCIS South Africa, as chair of the G20 Summit 2025, at a time when the international system is plagued by uncertainty due to the shifting global order, needs to manage its relationships with various powers strategically, balancing its interests with the West and the East to achieve desired outcomes, experts say. The Group of Twenty (G20) is an international forum of both developing and developed countries that seeks to find solutions to global economic and financial issues, and its Presidency rotates annually among the members. Dr Sonja Theron, a lecturer in Security Studies at the University of Pretoria's Department of Political Sciences, said as the chair of the G20, South Africa is given an agenda-setting role and can influence which topics make it to the table. 'The G20 is ultimately a forum – a place for conversation. The directions those conversations take will be influenced by existing relationships and power dynamics, where South Africa holds some, but not extensive, agency and power. And ultimately, conversation may or may not lead to action,' Theron said. She noted that the international system is plagued with uncertainty due to the shifting global order. To navigate this to achieve desired outcomes, South Africa will have to carefully understand what leverage it does and does not have, and use this in directed and intentional efforts, and engage in the kind of strategic diplomacy witnessed during President Cyril Ramaphosa's visit to the White House, Theron said. She added that South Africa has often tried to position itself as a bridging actor between multiple forums and global camps such as the G7 and BRICS members within the G20, but this has often led to having to walk a fine line between partners, and Russia and the USA are prime examples. 'It is crucial that South Africa not overplay its hand and focus on where it has influence to exercise agency. This does not mean that South Africa needs to abandon its goals or principles but rather think strategically on where and how these can be advanced. 'We are witnessing a global withdrawal from multilateral processes and solutions. As such, South Africa should focus on incremental but transformative steps towards a more equitable world order. This could include initiatives that focus on more effective information gathering, sharing, and analysis, such as the Common Carbon Credit Data Model, the Borrowers' Forum, and a Panel of Technical Experts to uncover the barriers to development in the global debt and finance system,' Theron said. On South Africa's presidency push for a more robust and transparent funding mechanism for countries affected by climate change, she said, such a large-scale initiative would be difficult to achieve in the current global climate. 'Not only are global powers less inclined to multilateralism, they are also less interested or incentivised to provide financial assistance. To achieve this, South Africa would need to build or leverage its relationships with the Global South and with global powers to ensure that the issue is championed across multiple forums and decision-making platforms,' Theron added. On the de-dollarisation as a central theme in the BRICS, she said, 'Taking a hard stance on de-dollarisation, in line with the BRICS agenda, will alienate the US further. South Africa's options are then to either take a more moderate stance or prepare for the fallout of a strong position.' Professor Fulufhelo Netswera, the executive dean for the Faculty of Management Sciences at the Durban University of Technology, said the G20's participation of South Africa and its leadership will not yield anything substantive. 'The president of the US is not going to come here. So that in itself tells us that they don't care about South Africa's Presidency of the G20, and they are not going to care about the outcomes of that gathering,' Netswera said. He highlighted that he doesn't think that the G20 has ever done anything meaningful, if 'we' go historically by resolutions taken. 'Not much has been implemented coming from this group. It's a good group. I think big nations need to sit now and again, remind themselves about their commitment to humanity and to not destroy each other, and trade fairly, which is all good and nice,' he said. On the reform of the Bretton Woods institutions, he said all the countries, including BRICS nations, have been talking about the lack of reform of the United Nations, the Security Council, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the World Trade Organisation.
