Sponge pill test for diagnosing cancer rolled out in Halifax
"It was just a quick pull and a very slim amount of discomfort and that was it."Mr Coyle said he had suffered from indigestion throughout his life and had tried a number of remedies."Heartburn has been a lifelong problem for me, but it has soothed recently as I've been drinking cabbage juice," he said."It's one of these things you hear about. I don't know whether I heard about it online but it isn't a magical solution. It's a mind thing really, but it seems to soothe it a bit."He said he was pleased to have been asked to take part in the trial. "If there's any positive signs of cancer of the oesophagus, the team book you in for an endoscopy and if not they'll keep monitoring you."I would recommend it to anybody. It's a harmless procedure and it's all for the good."
According to Cancer Research UK there are around 9,300 new cases of oesophageal cancer in the UK every year. The sponge test takes 10 minutes and can be done by a nurse, meaning it is faster and less expensive than an endoscopy, said researchers.The patient swallows the pill, the coating dissolves and the sponge inside it expands to the size of a cherry tomato.The sponge collects cells from the oesophagus as it is pulled out from the stomach. The cells are then tested for two proteins which tell doctors if someone has Barrett's oesophagus or oesophageal cancer.The trial was funded by Cancer Research UK and the National Institute for Health and Care Research.Over the next three years researchers aim to recruit 120,000 people who take medication for heartburn.Prof Rebecca Fitzgerald, inventor of the capsule sponge test and co-principal investigator of the study, said the trial was changing how the disease was detected."Catching it earlier can save lives by reducing the need for chemotherapy and surgery to remove the oesophagus," she said."This trial could fundamentally transform the lives of people affected by oesophageal cancer by providing the crucial evidence needed to make it a viable screening programme, rolled out to every part of the UK."The Halifax mobile screening follows initial trials in Cambridgeshire in November 2024.
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
3 minutes ago
- The Sun
Obesity runs in the family – but one parent's genes have more influence on a child's weight, study finds
OBESITY does get passed down through families, but one parent's genes may play a bigger role in children's weight, scientists say. UCL researchers looked at the body mass index (BMI), diet and genetic data of over 2,500 families. They found that kids whose parents were obese were more likely to be obese themselves. But children's weight was more heavily impacted by the genes of a specific parent. A mum's genetics may play a bigger role in determining whether a child becomes overweight than a dad's - even if those genes aren't passed down. Lead author Dr Liam Wright, from the UCL Social Research Institute, said: 'Mothers' genetics appear to play an important role in influencing her child's weight over and above the child's genetics. 'In addition to the genes mums directly pass on, our findings suggest that maternal genetics are instrumental in shaping the environment in which the child develops, therefore indirectly influencing the child's BMI too.' Published in PLOS Genetics, the study analysed genetic and health data from 2,621 UK families. Researchers investigated how parents' BMI and related genes influenced their children's weight and diet from birth to age 17. To do this, the team looked at the kids' weight, BMI, and diet at six key points during childhood and adolescence, at the ages of three, five, seven, 11, 14, and 17. They focused on how these were linked to the parents' BMIs. Children's diets were assessed through self-reported records of how often and how much they consumed different food groups, including fruit, vegetables, fast food, and sugary drinks. The 7 ways you're making your kids fat without knowing it - and why it might be time to bin your By measuring both children's and their parents' genes, the researchers were able to separate how inherited genes affected the kids, versus the indirect effect of genes that were not inherited. Non-inherited genes can still influence children's outcomes by influencing their development environment, researchers explained. For example, conditions that babies are exposed to in the womb and parenting techniques can all be shaped by parents' genes. Researchers found that both parents' BMI was linked to their child's BMI. But a dad's influence could mostly be attributed to direct genetic inheritance. Meanwhile, a child didn't need to inherit their mum's genes for their weight to be influenced by hers. For example, a mum's genes might influence her own weight, eating habits, or behaviours during pregnancy, which in turn affect her child's development and long-term health. This suggests, that genetic nurture - where a parent's genes shape the environment they create for their child - is a big factor in children's weight, researchers said. Dr Wright stressed: 'This isn't about blaming mothers, rather, supporting families to make a meaningful difference to children's long-term health. 'Targeted interventions to reduce maternal BMI, particularly during pregnancy, could reduce the intergenerational impacts of obesity." Childhood obesity is a continuing problem in the UK - as well as other countries - with NHS data from 2024 showing 27 per cent of children aged between two and 15 were either obese or overweight.
BBC News
3 minutes ago
- BBC News
Parents told jury daughter was 'let down' by the system
A father has told an inquest how his teenage daughter who died after being left unsupervised at a mental health hospital was "treated like a naughty child".Mark Szymankiewicz said his daughter Ruth was "punished not helped or supported" while at Huntercombe Hospital, near 14-year-old, from Salisbury, was being treated for an eating disorder and should have been under constant supervision when she self-harmed and later died, the inquest hospital, which has since shut down, was rated inadequate and later requires improvement by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in 2021. Ruth was unaccompanied for about 15 minutes and left alone to walk around the hospital and to her room, assistant coroner Ian Wade KC afterwards, she was found unconscious and died at the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford two days was initially cared for on the children's ward at Salisbury Hospital, before being transferred to was then moved to Huntercombe Hospital, which Mr Szymankiewicz said "managed her but did not help her with her issues or problems".The inquest heard that in a letter to one of the psychologists, Ruth wrote that she went to Huntercombe for help but they did not help her, and that staff "never listened" to Szymankiewicz said her daughter was "isolated" due to the restrictions on family visits and without her family she had "no emotional support system".She said: "The system really did fail her, the team of doctors tried to help but she was let down."Dr Szymankiewicz said she "repeatedly asked the team at Huntercombe to allow for more family visitors and requested to take her out, as she loved being outside"."But all of these were refused, isolating Ruth more," she told the inquest she had been informed her daughter was only allowed 20 minutes outside a day, which she found "hard to believe" as "even prisoners get one hour".It previously heard Ruth was being cared for by a member of staff on his first shift, who was subsequently found to have false inquest, at Buckinghamshire Coroner's Court in Beaconsfield, is expected to last for about two weeks. You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Telegraph
3 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Psychedelics have gone mainstream – don't buy into it
It's hardly unusual for a radio station to invite the listener to turn on and tune in, but Radio 4 has been encouraging us to drop out too. All throughout this week and next, Tim Hayward is taking The Trip (Radio 4, Mon-Fri; all episodes on BBC Sounds), a deep dive into the world of psychedelics, while on Tuesday night Ed Prideaux was Trip Shocked (Radio 4, Tues), which covered much of the same territory. A quick Google of the word ' psychedelics ' tells you why there is such a glut of interest. The first three headlines: 'Can psychedelic therapy go mainstream?', 'Psychedelic medicine could revolutionise how we treat mental illness' and 'Psychedelics may offer hope for treatment of eating disorders.' The next few hundred headlines are similar. The psychedelics are coming for your mental health. Psychedelics, as Prideaux said, have had a 'reputational glow-up' in recent years, transforming in the public mind from bogeyman life-destroyers favoured by opt-out beatniks to miracle drugs for all and any mental health conditions. Prideaux – who took LSD on four occasions 10 years ago when he was 17 and, among the enjoyable moments, suffered from violent stomach pains and HPPD (hallucinogen persisting perception disorder) – is both surprised at the surge in popularity of psychedelics and concerned about their spread as a medical cure-all. It hardly needs stating that Prideaux found that not nearly enough research or clinical trials have been done around the medical use of the drugs – the question is, why then are they being pushed so aggressively towards the mental health sector? The answer was depressingly obvious. In the first quarter of 2025, more than $350m was invested in psychedelic biotech companies. Like the opiate industry before it, the psychedelic lobby in the US has been evangelical about promoting its products, roping in veterans suffering from PTSD (as they did with opioids and veterans living with pain). Side-effects, malpractice and even deaths have been unreported or brushed under the carpet as a booming new market seeks to take advantage of a sea change in public and political opinion (one of those hundreds of headlines reads: 'How MAGA learnt to love psychedelics'). Instead there exists a mushy atmosphere of woowoo, with phrases such as 'net-zero trauma' and 'inner healer' bandied around among the easy-win headlines about magic mushrooms curing depression. They'll change your life, man. Well, yes, quite possibly, but could we have a few more double-blind clinical trials first? Prideaux did not deny that psychedelics seem to work incredibly well, and incredibly quickly, for some people suffering from a broad spectrum of mental health conditions. Hayward's series, meanwhile, uncovered another depressing truth – in the 'pre-prohibition era of psychedelics', in the early to mid-20th century, research was booming, but the whole industry was driven underground when the societal winds changed in the 1960s. Only now are we starting to scratch at the surface of what psychedelics might be capable of. Hayward wanted, in particular, to find out what was going on in a brain altered by psychedelic drugs, which led to some extremely entertaining segments about drug users chatting to superintelligent gnomes and the idea that the key to understanding human consciousness lies in the venom gland of the Colorado River toad. Yet while both programmes hinted that humanity is on the cusp of unlocking all sorts of exciting things via the substances that led to Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, the overall effect was a little dispiriting. Political fear brought about the suppression of research into psychedelics more than half a century ago, and now the allure of private financial gain is getting that research moving again. I lost count of the amount of times a neuroscientist ended a sentence with 'but we just don't know enough yet' or 'but the evidence isn't here yet'. 'Journalists look for simple narratives,' said one researcher to Prideaux. I tried looking for one, but these trips messed with my mind. More research is needed.
