logo
How AI Can Help Save Our Oceans

How AI Can Help Save Our Oceans

At this week's U.N. Oceans Conference in the south of France, delegates need only glance outside the conference hall at the glittering Mediterranean for a stark reminder of the problem they are trying to solve. Scientists estimate there are now about 400 ocean 'dead zones ' in the world, where no sea life can survive—more than double the number 20 years ago. The oceans, which cover 70% of Earth and are crucial to mitigating global warming, will likely contain more tonnage of plastic junk than fish by 2050. And by 2100, about 90% of marine species could be extinct.
But for all the grim talk among government officials, scientists, and investors, there is also much discussion about something that might help: Artificial intelligence.
AI has been used by oceanographers for many years, most commonly to gather data from robots sitting deep underwater. But scientists and environmentalists say breakthroughs just in the past few years—first, with generative AI, and since this year with vastly more sophisticated agentic AI—open possibilities for which they have long been waiting.
'What is very new today is what we call the 'what if' scenarios,' says Alain Arnaud, head of the Digital Ocean department for Mercator, a European Union intergovernmental institution of ocean scientists who have created a ' digital twin of the ocean' —a forensic baseline examination of the global seas.
Depicted on a giant live-tracking monitor mounted in the conference's public exhibition space, the 'digital twin' shows dots of 9 billion or so data points beamed up to satellites from underwater cameras. While that type of data is not necessarily new, innovation in AI finally allows Mercator to game out dizzyingly complex scenarios in split-second timing. 'Is my tuna here? If I fish in this area, at this period, what's the impact on the population? Is it better in that area?' Arnaud says, standing in front of the live tracker, as he described just one situation.
Until now, turning vast quantities of data into policy and actions has been dauntingly expensive and lengthy for most governments, not to mention the nonprofit environmental organizations and startups that have poured into Nice this week.
But now, some say the focus on oceans could open a whole new tech front, as countries and companies try to figure out how to reduce their environmental impact and as AI applications proliferate.
'The potential is immense,' says investor Christian Lim, who heads the ocean investment fund for Swen Capital Partners, an asset manager in Paris. 'You're investing in innovations which transform massive industries,' he says, citing the $300 billion global seafood industry, and the global shipping industry, which transports more than 80% of the world's cargo. Lim, an ardent free-diver (he dived near the conference site this week) quit his finance job in 2018 to launch his own ocean venture-capital company, before joining Swen. 'I looked around and realized no one was doing this,' he says. 'I decided to do it myself.'
Lim is among many in Nice this week discussing how to launch money-making ideas to help oceans regenerate.
The Norwegian startup OptoScale, for example, launched in 2018 to tackle a major problem in the region's oceans: industrial salmon fishing. A single OptoScale AI-enabled camera dropped into a cage with about 200,000 fish calculates each salmon's weight in real time, and beams it back to the office computer to calculate the exact amount of food to provide the fish—a huge savings in cost, waste, and ocean pollution. The startup now has contracts with big fishing companies, and Lim, an early investor, sold out last month to New York investment firm Insight Partners.
Water pollution is being tackled by Swedish firm Cognizant, which harnesses agentic AI to help companies track the water quality of rivers and water networks in the U.K.—a persistent issue for which utilities companies have been fined. 'Three months ago we discovered two sewage networks that were supposed to be closed off in the 1970s,' Stig Martin Fiskaa, who heads Cognizant's ocean program, told a conference panel on Tuesday. The company plans to make its AI application freely available this week. 'It has only been tested in the U.K.,' Fiskaa says. 'We are pretty confident it can work anywhere in the world.'
Meanwhile, OnDeck Fisheries AI, a Vancouver startup, captures video footage from fishing vessels, then uses AI to identify specific species caught or thrown into the ocean. This helps crack down on rampant illegal fishing. It can also avoid companies and countries posting people on-board to monitor fishing; several have been murdered for exposing large-scale violations. 'It is one of the most dangerous jobs in the world,' says Ronald Tardiff, ocean innovation lead for the World Economic Forum's center for nature and climate in Geneva. 'OnDeck can have AI spot every instance where someone threw something overboard and identify exactly what it is.'
Some say that if small-scale AI ideas show they will make money, big companies could well rush in.
'Build a prototype that proves itself, work out a business model, and then bang, it's investable,' Frederick Tsao, chairman of Singapore's TPC shipping giant, told TIME in Nice on Wednesday; he has spent days meeting with top officials and scientists, and says he has found many potential collaborators for ocean regeneration projects. 'The money is here,' he says.
Until those investable ideas gel, many in Nice say ocean regeneration is severely lacking in investments—compared to on-land climate projects.
'The technology is here, and it's powerful,' Stephen Keppel, president of Pvblic Foundation, a Miami nonprofit funder, told a panel in Nice on Tuesday. 'We are not lacking data. We're lacking interoperability, and the way to turn it into action.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Caught by a Camera: When Biometrics Replace Visas
Caught by a Camera: When Biometrics Replace Visas

Time Business News

timea day ago

  • Time Business News

Caught by a Camera: When Biometrics Replace Visas

VANCOUVER, BC — The sight of a passport being stamped may soon be as nostalgic as flipping through paper maps. As of 2025, dozens of countries have begun phasing out traditional visas and replacing them with biometric entry systems. A camera, not a consular officer, now determines who crosses international borders. With biometric systems—such as face scans, iris recognition, and fingerprints—becoming the global standard, the question for travellers, journalists, and privacy advocates alike is straightforward: What happens when your body becomes your visa? Amicus International Consulting, a global leader in second citizenship programs, identity transformation, and legal relocation, issues this press release to unpack the implications of biometric visas, explore real-world cases, and explain how individuals can still maintain legal mobility and privacy in a world increasingly defined by surveillance. The Rise of the Biometric Visa System Biometric data, which includes facial geometry, fingerprints, iris patterns, and voice profiles, is no longer limited to security agencies or intelligence operations. It now forms the backbone of global travel systems. The replacement of traditional visa procedures with biometric scans is accelerating rapidly. Governments around the world now use biometric systems to: Replace or supplement visa paperwork Confirm identities at e-gates and customs Detect false identities or document forgeries Flag individuals on international watchlists Enforce no-fly lists and cross-border risk assessments The biometric systems are passive, unlike traditional visa processes that require an application; today's systems scan without needing permission or even awareness. Global Leaders in Biometric Border Control As of this year, more than 80 nations have adopted biometric-based entry systems. These include: United States: The Department of Homeland Security's Biometric Entry-Exit Program is active at nearly all international airports. The Department of Homeland Security's Biometric Entry-Exit Program is active at nearly all international airports. European Union: The Entry/Exit System (EES) now scans all non-EU travellers using facial recognition and fingerprints. The Entry/Exit System (EES) now scans all non-EU travellers using facial recognition and fingerprints. China: With its Skynet program, China monitors and records the movement of citizens and foreigners using over 600 million AI-linked cameras. With its Skynet program, China monitors and records the movement of citizens and foreigners using over 600 million AI-linked cameras. United Arab Emirates: Dubai and Abu Dhabi airports utilize biometric e-gates equipped with iris recognition technology. Dubai and Abu Dhabi airports utilize biometric e-gates equipped with iris recognition technology. India: The Aadhaar-linked eVisa system ties biometric identity to mobile numbers and tax records. The Aadhaar-linked eVisa system ties biometric identity to mobile numbers and tax records. South Korea and Singapore: Known for early adoption, these nations now operate fully touchless biometric gates that identify and clear travellers in under ten seconds. Even visa-free nations now require biometric pre-clearance, quietly redefining what it means to be a 'free traveller.' Case Study: The Journalist Flagged by Algorithm In early 2024, a Russian journalist who had previously sought asylum in France attempted to visit Germany using a passport from a Caribbean country acquired through a legal citizenship-by-investment program. At Munich Airport, a biometric gate matched her face to a historic Eurodac asylum database entry. Within minutes, she was detained, questioned, and placed on a return flight—not because her documents were invalid, but because her biometric footprint had been digitally preserved, resurrected, and weaponized. No paper visa was ever denied. No formal notification was issued. Just a camera, a database match, and a door that stayed shut. The Silent Shift: From Application to Algorithm This marks a fundamental shift in global mobility: Old Visa System Application forms Physical interviews Transparent rejections Legal appeals Biometric Visa System Passive enrollment via CCTV or e-gate Invisible watchlists and scoring algorithms Automated denials without explanation Little to no recourse or legal clarity The biometric visa process reverses the burden of proof: travellers must now prove they are not a threat, often without knowing they have been categorized as one. Hidden Triggers: How Biometrics Flag You Facial recognition systems don't just read your face—they interpret behavior, prior travel patterns, and associations. Common biometric triggers include: Re-entry after applying for asylum Previously used aliases, even if legally abandoned Visits to politically controversial countries Association with flagged phone numbers or social media Multiple identities used across jurisdictions Such data is shared through complex networks like PRUM (EU), INTERPOL's facial data program, and the Five Eyes intelligence alliance. Case Study: The Whistleblower Trapped in Transit A Central American cybersecurity contractor exposed evidence of human rights abuses in 2022 and sought safe harbor. He legally obtained a second passport through an investment program in the Caribbean. When flying to Geneva in 2023, the EU's biometric visa system flagged him as a match to a historic INTERPOL Red Notice issued under questionable political grounds. He was held in Zurich airport for 72 hours before being quietly returned to his departure point. His documentation was valid. His face was not. When Biometric Data Goes Wrong Biometric systems are not infallible. Facial recognition algorithms have been criticized for significant error rates, especially among ethnic minorities and women. A 2023 MIT study found that commercial biometric systems had: A 34% higher false-positive rate for Black women compared to white men A 21% error rate for individuals under age 25 due to changing facial features Significant difficulty distinguishing between identical twins or family members One incident in 2024 saw a Dutch student wrongly detained in Turkey due to a false biometric match with a wanted Balkan fugitive. Human Rights Concerns Legal scholars and human rights groups have raised red flags over biometric visa programs: Lack of consent: Biometric collection often occurs without informed permission. Biometric collection often occurs without informed permission. Due process violations: Travelers have no way to appeal or understand denials. Travelers have no way to appeal or understand denials. Surveillance creep: Border technologies are being repurposed for domestic monitoring. Border technologies are being repurposed for domestic monitoring. Chilling effect: Journalists, activists, and dissidents restrict movement out of fear. Journalists, activists, and dissidents restrict movement out of fear. Biometric permanence: Unlike documents, biometrics can't be revoked or reissued. The concern is that biometric systems silently enforce ideological, political, or economic restrictions under the guise of technological efficiency. Amicus International's Biometric Risk Services Amicus International Consulting offers legally compliant solutions for those affected by biometric systems: Second Citizenship Programs: Diversify legal identity options for safer travel Diversify legal identity options for safer travel Facial Recognition Advisory: Evaluate current biometric risks and exposure Evaluate current biometric risks and exposure Secure Relocation Planning: Choose jurisdictions with limited biometric data sharing Choose jurisdictions with limited biometric data sharing Case-Based Identity Strategy: Build documentation to reflect current, lawful identity Build documentation to reflect current, lawful identity Digital Privacy Services: Reduce biometric footprint in global registries Amicus operates exclusively within legal frameworks and does not engage in document forgery or facial spoofing technologies. Case Study: Rebuilding After Biometric Surveillance In 2021, a Middle Eastern human rights advocate living in exile in Malaysia was added to a biometric watchlist following leaked border surveillance documents. Despite holding valid passports, he faced repeated entry refusals. Amicus reviewed his digital trail, prepared a comprehensive dossier of legal name change documentation, and assisted in obtaining a second passport through Grenada's citizenship-by-investment program. Through strategic planning, he relocated to a non-sharing jurisdiction and resumed work under a legal identity with full travel rights. Today, he moves without incident. What the Future Holds By 2026, global travel will look radically different: Over 150 countries will maintain biometric border databases Most eVisas will be auto-issued based on biometric risk scoring Visas may become invisible—issued or denied entirely by algorithm Biometric-only travel corridors will exclude those with privacy concerns or mismatched histories Countries like Estonia, Singapore, and UAE already issue digital 'e-citizenships' tied to biometric blocks on the blockchain—blending identity and surveillance into a single package. Final Thoughts: No Papers, Just Patterns Biometric technology is replacing the passport, the visa, and perhaps even the identity card. The camera is no longer a passive observer—it is the gatekeeper. To travel freely in 2025 and beyond, individuals must understand the systems tracking them, the data fueling decisions, and the legal routes available to reclaim autonomy. Amicus International Consulting remains committed to helping clients navigate this new world—not by dodging the law, but by understanding it better than those who write it. Contact InformationPhone: +1 (604) 200-5402Email: info@ Website:

Exclusive-Crypto giants set for EU green light amid growing regulatory rift, sources say
Exclusive-Crypto giants set for EU green light amid growing regulatory rift, sources say

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Exclusive-Crypto giants set for EU green light amid growing regulatory rift, sources say

By Elizabeth Howcroft and John O'Donnell PARIS/FRANKFURT (Reuters) -Two of the world's largest cryptocurrency companies are poised to secure licences granting them access to operate across the European Union, as a rift grows among regulators over the speed and rigour of some countries' approvals, according to sources familiar with the matter. Under the EU's new Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, which came into force earlier this year, member states can issue licences that allow crypto companies to operate throughout the 27-nation bloc, but some have raised concerns in closed-door meetings about the speed with which licences are being granted, two people familiar with those discussions said, asking not to be named because of the sensitivity of the matter. At stake is the oversight of the multi-trillion-dollar crypto industry, which regulators have long warned could facilitate fraud, market instability and illicit financial flows if it is not properly supervised. MiCA aims to bring crypto under the same regulatory umbrella as traditional finance, but some fear that uneven enforcement could undermine its goals. Gemini, a crypto trading platform founded by billionaire twins Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, is on the verge of receiving a licence to operate from Malta, the smallest country in the European Union, two people said. This follows Malta's earlier approvals of OKX and granted within weeks of the new regime's introduction. The pace of Malta's approvals has drawn scrutiny from other national regulators, who meet under the umbrella of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). France's AMF has publicly warned that ESMA's lack of direct authority could lead to a "regulatory race to the bottom". Another senior regulatory official, who did not wish to be identified, said that they were concerned about accepting licences granted in countries where regulators had fewer staff, citing Malta as one example. ESMA has scrutinized Malta's licensing process, with a report due to be circulated in the near future, said one of those people. A spokesperson for the Malta Financial Services Authority said it had granted four crypto licences so far and was able to move fast due to its past experience, adding that "expedited processing" was due to its "in-depth understanding acquired over these years". It said its local money laundering standards were strict. ESMA declined to comment. OKX said its application was "rigorous" and that compliance was a priority. SELF INTEREST? The regulatory debate has intensified with expectations that Luxembourg will soon grant a licence to Coinbase, the first U.S. crypto-focused company to join the S&P 500, one of the people said. While the application has been in progress for several months, one person pointed to the relatively modest size of Coinbase's planned operation in Luxembourg. A Coinbase spokesperson did not comment on its application but said it employed 200 in Europe and that it invested in staff to ensure operations were safe. The spokesperson said Luxembourg was a "high-bar, well respected global financial centre" and that Coinbase would hire more than 20 people there by the end of the year. Luxembourg's financial watchdog declined to comment. One person familiar with Luxembourg's thinking dismissed any suggestion that the country was lax and said some critics were rather motivated by self interest in a race to attract crypto firms. Coinbase's anticipated approval is seen as a setback for Ireland, where relations with the crypto industry have cooled. In 2023, Central Bank Governor Gabriel Makhlouf compared crypto to a Ponzi scheme, warning that 'most of the time when you gamble, you're actually losing.' The global cryptocurrency market is currently valued at roughly $3.3 trillion but it has seen crises, such as the collapse and fraud of top U.S. exchange FTX in 2022. The European Union has long had to contend with divergence between its members. The dispute is unfolding as European politicians consider granting greater powers to regulator ESMA. While the European Union is united as a trading bloc and writes much regulation centrally in Brussels, countries vie with each other to attract international businesses. ESMA head Verena Ross has also pushed publicly for more powers to oversee crypto, although one person familiar with discussions among EU politicians said several countries were sceptical. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

'We're done with Teams': German state hits uninstall on Microsoft
'We're done with Teams': German state hits uninstall on Microsoft

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

'We're done with Teams': German state hits uninstall on Microsoft

At a time of growing concern over the power of the world's mighty tech companies, one German state is turning its back on US giant Microsoft. In less than three months' time, almost no civil servant, police officer or judge in Schleswig-Holstein will be using any of Microsoft's ubiquitous programs at work. Instead, the northern state will turn to open-source software to "take back control" over data storage and ensure "digital sovereignty", its digitalisation minister, Dirk Schroedter, told AFP. "We're done with Teams!" he said, referring to Microsoft's messaging and collaboration tool and speaking on a video call -- via an open-source German program, of course. The radical switch-over affects half of Schleswig-Holstein's 60,000 public servants, with 30,000 or so teachers due to follow suit in coming years. The state's shift towards open-source software began last year. The current first phase involves ending the use of Word and Excel software, which are being replaced by LibreOffice, while Open-Xchange is taking the place of Outlook for emails and calendars. Over the next few years, there will also be a switch to the Linux operating system in order to complete the move away from Windows. - 'Digital dependencies' - The principle of open-source software is to allow users to read the source code and modify it according to their own needs. The issue of the power wielded by American tech titans has been thrown into sharper relief by Donald Trump's return to the White House and the subsequent rise in US-EU tensions. In the case of Microsoft, there have long been worries about the dominant position it enjoys thanks to it owning both the Windows operating system and a suite of programs found in offices the world over. In 2023, the European Union launched an antitrust investigation against Microsoft over the way it tied Teams to its other programs for businesses. "The geopolitical developments of the past few months have strengthened interest in the path that we've taken," said Schroedter, adding that he had received requests for advice from across the world. "The war in Ukraine revealed our energy dependencies, and now we see there are also digital dependencies," he said. The government in Schleswig-Holstein is also planning to shift the storage of its data to a cloud system not under the control of Microsoft, said Schroedter. He explained that the state wants to rely on publicly owned German digital infrastructure rather than that of an American company. - Taken 'by the throat' - Experts point to economic incentives for the sort of shift Schleswig-Holstein is making, as investing in open-source alternatives and training staff to use them often costs less than the licences for Microsoft's programs. This is particularly the case when businesses and public bodies find themselves taken "by the throat" when hit by unexpected extra costs for mandatory updates, said Benjamin Jean from consulting firm Inno3. Schleswig-Holstein hopes that its move away from Microsoft will eventually save it tens of millions of euros. But organisations considering this sort of change have to reckon with resistance from staff who fear upheaval. "If people aren't guided through it, there's an outcry and everyone just wants to go back to how it was before," warned Francois Pellegrini, an IT professor at Bordeaux University. - Pioneer administrations - The potential pitfalls can be seen in the experience of Munich, whose city administration was a pioneer in using open-source programs in the 1990s. In 2017, the city announced an about-turn, citing a lack of political support and the difficulty of interacting with other systems. But other public bodies are staying the course: France's gendarmerie, around 100,000 strong, has been using the Linux operating system since the 2000s and India's defence ministry was in 2023 reported to have launched a homegrown system called "Maya OS". Across the border from Schleswig-Holstein, in Denmark, reports say that the local governments of Copenhagen and Aarhus are also looking into ditching Microsoft. Another factor that could push the trend is the EU "Interoperable Europe Act", which came into effect last year and encourages the use of open-source software. According to Jean, "Within the space of two or three years" there could be a number of pioneer administrations who will be able to give feedback on their experiences and inspire others to make the switch. lep/smk/jsk/fz/rmb/sco

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store