Why China remains world's best chance for peace in Ukraine
The
International Organisation for Mediation launched in Hong Kong late last month, counting 32 countries as founding signatories. An institution designed to supplement and actualise Article 33 of the United Nations Charter is something the world increasingly needs as Russia's
invasion of Ukraine drags into its fourth year.
Advertisement
Recent peace talks in Istanbul produced
no appreciable progress , while swings on the battlefield have long since given way to a grinding impasse. Neither side appears capable of achieving peace, much less victory on the battlefield. Meanwhile, sanctions,
weapons deliveries and
rhetorical escalation continue to deepen global fragmentation.
However, peace could still be in reach if the thorniest issues are addressed. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has expressed openness to direct negotiations with Russian President Vladimir Putin. At the same time, Russia's ambassador to the United Nations Vassily Nebenzia has reiterated Moscow's willingness to support a UN-centred peace initiative for Ukraine, suggesting there is at least an opening.
Both parties remain deeply divided. US-led efforts to push the two into accepting a ceasefire have so far failed, and it is little wonder why, given the challenges remaining.
Nato does not hold the answer, and neither does the presence of US troops. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has
made it clear that deploying US forces to Ukraine in a peacekeeping role is unacceptable. 'Instead, any security guarantee must be backed by capable European and non-European troops,' he told a gathering of transatlantic alliance members in Brussels.
Advertisement
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Numbers have to add up when deciding on closure of Hong Kong schools
Hong Kong's dwindling school-age population and low birth rate continue to put the education sector to the test. This is reflected in a growing number of schools losing government subsidies and having to be merged or axed because of insufficient enrolment. Given the trend is unlikely to turn around any time soon, more institutions may well shut in the coming years. Therefore, authorities should work with stakeholders to ensure a soft landing for the schools and students affected. Critics fear the new class-size regulations may well accelerate the demise of some disadvantaged schools. The Education Bureau has also raised the minimum number of students required to operate a class and scrapped alternative options that may give struggling schools a reprieve. As a result, the pupil threshold for a secondary school operating a Form One class will be raised from 25 to 27 starting in September. The requirement will be further tightened to 29 in 2026-27. Currently, secondary schools need to have at least two Form One classes, or a total of 26 students, to continue operating. With the changes, a school will have to enrol at least 28 students to run two classes to survive the coming academic year, and 30 pupils in 2026-27. Class sizes will also be subject to closer monitoring. Instead of a so-called annual headcount to ascertain numbers for Form One and Form Four every September, the exercise will be conducted in two other junior grades from September 2027-28, when the minimum two-class requirement for Form One will be extended to Form Two and Form Three. With the number of 12-year-olds estimated to drop from 58,800 this year to 49,800 in 2031, the challenges facing schools are unavoidable. The Education Bureau said the new rules aimed to offer quality education and address the needs of parents. But the shrinking population and higher threshold are also bound to make enrolment more difficult for some schools, especially those that are already struggling. Schools already on the brink of closure or merger may be excused for feeling dismayed and perplexed as to why the authorities are seemingly making it more difficult for them to survive. There are also concerns that popular schools will be able to enrol additional students and run extra classes, while even more schools for those not so good academically will be axed or merged at a quicker pace.
South China Morning Post
7 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Britain ready to implement US tariff deal on cars and steel, trade minister says
Britain is ready to implement its side of a tariff deal with the United States and is hopeful for a proclamation from US President Donald Trump to put the agreement into effect in the coming days, trade minister Jonathan Reynolds said on Thursday. Advertisement British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Trump on May 8 agreed to reduce tariffs on UK imports of cars and steel to the US, with Britain agreeing to lower tariffs on beef and ethanol, but implementation of the deal has been delayed. Reynolds met US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday and discussed the implementation of the deal. Asked on Thursday if there would be an update by the end of the week, Reynolds said he was 'very hopeful'. 'We're ready to go, and as soon as the president and the White House are ready to go on their side, we'll implement [our] part of the deal,' Reynolds told reporters. Reynolds said he would issue a government order known as a statutory instrument to implement the changes to reciprocal tariffs. Officials said that the update on implementation was likely to come early next week. Advertisement
South China Morning Post
11 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Why Europe must end its strategic drift by working with China
As the United States grows more unpredictable under President Donald Trump, some European nations are considering a pragmatic partnership with China . Could this lead to a new triangular balance, or will it deepen Europe's isolation? Under a second Trump presidency, Europe finds itself caught in a geopolitical no man's land. Washington's increasingly erratic foreign policy , Russia's protracted invasion of Ukraine and the failure to craft a unified European Union strategy towards either Russia or China have left the continent adrift. If trust in Russia and its President Vladimir Putin is irreparably damaged and the US proves too volatile a partner, Europe could soon be forced to reconsider its global alignments. The question is not whether to choose between Washington and Beijing but how to reassert strategic agency in a rapidly shifting world order. Despite the potential appeal of closer EU-China ties – from economic diversification to diplomatic leverage – Europe is hesitating. The default response has been inward retreat rather than outward recalibration. The EU had an opportunity to hedge its risks by deepening ties with Beijing, thereby regaining leverage with the US while securing alternative markets, yet no such move materialised. That hesitation has come at a cost. Europe now finds itself increasingly alone, struggling to articulate a coherent alternative to reliance on the US . With Trump back in the White House, the EU must decide whether continued strategic drift is tenable.
