Buyers win their first home in Newport, pay $1.21m to beat downsizers
The double-fronted Victorian three-bedroom house at 1 Peel Street sat on about 326 square metres, within walking distance of Greenwich Reserve, Westbourne Grammar's campus, Hall Street shops and Newport station.
The home was listed with a quoted price range of $1 million to $1.05 million. The reserve was set at $1.05 million.
The three bidders included a downsizer with a buyers' advocate and a young couple from Seddon buying their first home; the third bidder was knocked out early on. The first home buyers ended up outbidding the downsizers after a rapid bidding war.
'Their attraction to this property was because it had been subdivided ... you have this opportunity to buy a grand Victorian home,' said Noah Lautman-Wurt from The Agency.
'The [buyers] are going to live in it, renovate it, and enjoy the amazing location.'
Lautman-Wurt said homes in this pocket of Newport rarely came up for sale.
'The location's really rare ... my colleague has worked in Williamstown and Newport for 25 years, and has only sold one property in that pocket,' he said. 'The neighbour's been there for 74 years.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
13 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
High Court battle looms for state Labor's work-from-home push
A High Court showdown is looming over a Victorian plan to legislate a right to work from home, as legal experts warn the Allan government's move would unconstitutionally encroach on federal industrial relations powers. Premier Jacinta Allan has maintained that the government could enshrine a right for public and private sector employees to work from home two days a week via state anti-discrimination laws, but lawyers warn the move directly challenges federal workplace law. 'The advice we have is that when it comes to the federal workplace arrangements, there is the Fair Work Act and there is explicit provision in the Fair Work Act for state-based anti-discrimination laws to continue to apply,' Allan told ABC radio on Monday. 'The Fair Work Act provides us with the floor, and what we're choosing to do here in Victoria is build on that floor to protect working from home as a right.' Allan's comments put her at odds with lawyers and other legal experts who have cast deep doubt on the government's ability to legislate the right to work from home as most workplace laws are under the jurisdiction of the federal government. In Victoria, the state has even fewer powers because of a 1996 Kennett government deal that handed powers to regulate employment conditions to the Commonwealth. Loading This means that unlike other states, Victoria does not even have the ability to create workplace laws for its own public sector employees. Stephen Smith, principal at ACTUS Workplace Lawyers, said Victorian legislation to enact a broad right to work from home would be a major constitutional issue.
The Age
13 minutes ago
- The Age
High Court battle looms for state Labor's work-from-home push
A High Court showdown is looming over a Victorian plan to legislate a right to work from home, as legal experts warn the Allan government's move would unconstitutionally encroach on federal industrial relations powers. Premier Jacinta Allan has maintained that the government could enshrine a right for public and private sector employees to work from home two days a week via state anti-discrimination laws, but lawyers warn the move directly challenges federal workplace law. 'The advice we have is that when it comes to the federal workplace arrangements, there is the Fair Work Act and there is explicit provision in the Fair Work Act for state-based anti-discrimination laws to continue to apply,' Allan told ABC radio on Monday. 'The Fair Work Act provides us with the floor, and what we're choosing to do here in Victoria is build on that floor to protect working from home as a right.' Allan's comments put her at odds with lawyers and other legal experts who have cast deep doubt on the government's ability to legislate the right to work from home as most workplace laws are under the jurisdiction of the federal government. In Victoria, the state has even fewer powers because of a 1996 Kennett government deal that handed powers to regulate employment conditions to the Commonwealth. Loading This means that unlike other states, Victoria does not even have the ability to create workplace laws for its own public sector employees. Stephen Smith, principal at ACTUS Workplace Lawyers, said Victorian legislation to enact a broad right to work from home would be a major constitutional issue.
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'Lawyers' picnic' looms over right to work from home
An Australian-first plan to legislate the right to work from home could become a "lawyers' picnic", experts warn. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 to create a right for employees to work from home two days a week. The laws are yet to be drafted but the right is slated to apply to all Victorian public and private sector workers who can reasonably do their job from home. Carve-outs in the Fair Work Act allowed for protections under state anti-discrimination laws, employment lawyer Daniel Victory said. But how wide the state Labor government cast the net could open the proposed laws to legal challenge, particularly from the private sector. "The broader they make the right the greater the possibility of a challenge," Mr Victory told AAP. Employers trying to "squeeze" staff to return to the workplace after the COVID-19 pandemic was a major "bone of contention", Maurice Blackburn's principal lawyer of employment and industrial law in Melbourne said. He described working from home as a "fact of life" and said enshrining it as a right would help make it a "cultural norm" for businesses to reflect. Industrial relations laws are set by the federal government and regulated by the Fair Work Commission. Section 109 of the constitution dictates that if a state law conflicts with a Commonwealth law, the latter prevails. Joellen Riley Munton, an expert in labour law at the University of Technology Sydney, noted the commission assessed working-from-home clauses in awards and enterprise bargaining agreements. "It would be a very easy thing for someone who objects to the state law to just say 'I only have to abide by the federal laws'," Professor Munton told AAP. "That will be the obstacle for the effectiveness of any Victorian law." Former Fair Work Commission vice president Graeme Watson agreed the proposed right, if as general as initially described, was headed for a clash with federal laws. If Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act was chosen as the vehicle to legislate the right, he said the laws would have to establish what discrimination they were guarding against. "Then you're proceeding into a bit of maze," the King & Wood Mallesons strategic counsel told AAP. "It's either going to be clearly invalid or likely unworkable, but probably both." Mr Watson said arbitration existed for disputes over flexible work arrangements and argued a need to change that remedy had not been demonstrated. He compared the proposal to Victoria's wage theft laws, which were subject to High Court challenge before their repeal after the Albanese government instituted federal legislation. "This is a lawyers' picnic," Mr Watson said. "Why are you creating all this work for lawyers?" She defended her claim Liberals across the country were "drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office". Opposition Leader Brad Battin denied it was a touchy subject internally after Peter Dutton backflipped on ending working from home for public servants during the Liberals' disastrous 2025 federal election campaign. The state Liberal leader is waiting to see the detailed legislation before the party decides its stance. Senior federal minister Tanya Plibersek said the Albanese government wasn't going to give its Labor colleagues' plan a "tick or a cross" when asked if it would step in to overrule the state. An Australian-first plan to legislate the right to work from home could become a "lawyers' picnic", experts warn. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 to create a right for employees to work from home two days a week. The laws are yet to be drafted but the right is slated to apply to all Victorian public and private sector workers who can reasonably do their job from home. Carve-outs in the Fair Work Act allowed for protections under state anti-discrimination laws, employment lawyer Daniel Victory said. But how wide the state Labor government cast the net could open the proposed laws to legal challenge, particularly from the private sector. "The broader they make the right the greater the possibility of a challenge," Mr Victory told AAP. Employers trying to "squeeze" staff to return to the workplace after the COVID-19 pandemic was a major "bone of contention", Maurice Blackburn's principal lawyer of employment and industrial law in Melbourne said. He described working from home as a "fact of life" and said enshrining it as a right would help make it a "cultural norm" for businesses to reflect. Industrial relations laws are set by the federal government and regulated by the Fair Work Commission. Section 109 of the constitution dictates that if a state law conflicts with a Commonwealth law, the latter prevails. Joellen Riley Munton, an expert in labour law at the University of Technology Sydney, noted the commission assessed working-from-home clauses in awards and enterprise bargaining agreements. "It would be a very easy thing for someone who objects to the state law to just say 'I only have to abide by the federal laws'," Professor Munton told AAP. "That will be the obstacle for the effectiveness of any Victorian law." Former Fair Work Commission vice president Graeme Watson agreed the proposed right, if as general as initially described, was headed for a clash with federal laws. If Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act was chosen as the vehicle to legislate the right, he said the laws would have to establish what discrimination they were guarding against. "Then you're proceeding into a bit of maze," the King & Wood Mallesons strategic counsel told AAP. "It's either going to be clearly invalid or likely unworkable, but probably both." Mr Watson said arbitration existed for disputes over flexible work arrangements and argued a need to change that remedy had not been demonstrated. He compared the proposal to Victoria's wage theft laws, which were subject to High Court challenge before their repeal after the Albanese government instituted federal legislation. "This is a lawyers' picnic," Mr Watson said. "Why are you creating all this work for lawyers?" She defended her claim Liberals across the country were "drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office". Opposition Leader Brad Battin denied it was a touchy subject internally after Peter Dutton backflipped on ending working from home for public servants during the Liberals' disastrous 2025 federal election campaign. The state Liberal leader is waiting to see the detailed legislation before the party decides its stance. Senior federal minister Tanya Plibersek said the Albanese government wasn't going to give its Labor colleagues' plan a "tick or a cross" when asked if it would step in to overrule the state. An Australian-first plan to legislate the right to work from home could become a "lawyers' picnic", experts warn. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 to create a right for employees to work from home two days a week. The laws are yet to be drafted but the right is slated to apply to all Victorian public and private sector workers who can reasonably do their job from home. Carve-outs in the Fair Work Act allowed for protections under state anti-discrimination laws, employment lawyer Daniel Victory said. But how wide the state Labor government cast the net could open the proposed laws to legal challenge, particularly from the private sector. "The broader they make the right the greater the possibility of a challenge," Mr Victory told AAP. Employers trying to "squeeze" staff to return to the workplace after the COVID-19 pandemic was a major "bone of contention", Maurice Blackburn's principal lawyer of employment and industrial law in Melbourne said. He described working from home as a "fact of life" and said enshrining it as a right would help make it a "cultural norm" for businesses to reflect. Industrial relations laws are set by the federal government and regulated by the Fair Work Commission. Section 109 of the constitution dictates that if a state law conflicts with a Commonwealth law, the latter prevails. Joellen Riley Munton, an expert in labour law at the University of Technology Sydney, noted the commission assessed working-from-home clauses in awards and enterprise bargaining agreements. "It would be a very easy thing for someone who objects to the state law to just say 'I only have to abide by the federal laws'," Professor Munton told AAP. "That will be the obstacle for the effectiveness of any Victorian law." Former Fair Work Commission vice president Graeme Watson agreed the proposed right, if as general as initially described, was headed for a clash with federal laws. If Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act was chosen as the vehicle to legislate the right, he said the laws would have to establish what discrimination they were guarding against. "Then you're proceeding into a bit of maze," the King & Wood Mallesons strategic counsel told AAP. "It's either going to be clearly invalid or likely unworkable, but probably both." Mr Watson said arbitration existed for disputes over flexible work arrangements and argued a need to change that remedy had not been demonstrated. He compared the proposal to Victoria's wage theft laws, which were subject to High Court challenge before their repeal after the Albanese government instituted federal legislation. "This is a lawyers' picnic," Mr Watson said. "Why are you creating all this work for lawyers?" She defended her claim Liberals across the country were "drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office". Opposition Leader Brad Battin denied it was a touchy subject internally after Peter Dutton backflipped on ending working from home for public servants during the Liberals' disastrous 2025 federal election campaign. The state Liberal leader is waiting to see the detailed legislation before the party decides its stance. Senior federal minister Tanya Plibersek said the Albanese government wasn't going to give its Labor colleagues' plan a "tick or a cross" when asked if it would step in to overrule the state. An Australian-first plan to legislate the right to work from home could become a "lawyers' picnic", experts warn. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 to create a right for employees to work from home two days a week. The laws are yet to be drafted but the right is slated to apply to all Victorian public and private sector workers who can reasonably do their job from home. Carve-outs in the Fair Work Act allowed for protections under state anti-discrimination laws, employment lawyer Daniel Victory said. But how wide the state Labor government cast the net could open the proposed laws to legal challenge, particularly from the private sector. "The broader they make the right the greater the possibility of a challenge," Mr Victory told AAP. Employers trying to "squeeze" staff to return to the workplace after the COVID-19 pandemic was a major "bone of contention", Maurice Blackburn's principal lawyer of employment and industrial law in Melbourne said. He described working from home as a "fact of life" and said enshrining it as a right would help make it a "cultural norm" for businesses to reflect. Industrial relations laws are set by the federal government and regulated by the Fair Work Commission. Section 109 of the constitution dictates that if a state law conflicts with a Commonwealth law, the latter prevails. Joellen Riley Munton, an expert in labour law at the University of Technology Sydney, noted the commission assessed working-from-home clauses in awards and enterprise bargaining agreements. "It would be a very easy thing for someone who objects to the state law to just say 'I only have to abide by the federal laws'," Professor Munton told AAP. "That will be the obstacle for the effectiveness of any Victorian law." Former Fair Work Commission vice president Graeme Watson agreed the proposed right, if as general as initially described, was headed for a clash with federal laws. If Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act was chosen as the vehicle to legislate the right, he said the laws would have to establish what discrimination they were guarding against. "Then you're proceeding into a bit of maze," the King & Wood Mallesons strategic counsel told AAP. "It's either going to be clearly invalid or likely unworkable, but probably both." Mr Watson said arbitration existed for disputes over flexible work arrangements and argued a need to change that remedy had not been demonstrated. He compared the proposal to Victoria's wage theft laws, which were subject to High Court challenge before their repeal after the Albanese government instituted federal legislation. "This is a lawyers' picnic," Mr Watson said. "Why are you creating all this work for lawyers?" She defended her claim Liberals across the country were "drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office". Opposition Leader Brad Battin denied it was a touchy subject internally after Peter Dutton backflipped on ending working from home for public servants during the Liberals' disastrous 2025 federal election campaign. The state Liberal leader is waiting to see the detailed legislation before the party decides its stance. Senior federal minister Tanya Plibersek said the Albanese government wasn't going to give its Labor colleagues' plan a "tick or a cross" when asked if it would step in to overrule the state.
