DEI's undoing: How Walmart, McDonald's, and more are adapting to Trump
In recent years, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) has become a key focus for global corporations.
However, as societal and political pressures intensify under President Donald Trump, companies including Walmart, McDonald's, and others are reevaluating their DEI strategies. While some, such as Costco, are holding firm, Google, Meta, and Zoom (ZM), for example, are scaling back. This presents both challenges and opportunities as Corporate America tries to adapt to evolving market and regulatory realities.
'DEI is in the crosshairs because of poor execution and identity politics,' said TaChelle Lawson, founder of Fig Strategy & Consulting. 'However, it is evolving.' Lawson believes that companies are either overcommitting or retreating altogether – both of which are problematic.
After the murder of George Floyd in 2020, many companies made sweeping DEI commitments. For example, Target (TGT) promised a 20% increase in its Black workforce over three years. However, Target recently scrapped its DEI goals and stopped reporting to external groups such as the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index. The company also ended its program to stock more products from Black or minority-owned businesses. Earlier this month, Target's shareholders sued the company, accusing it of deceiving investors by not disclosing risks associated with its diversity program.
This undoing of DEI programs comes amid broader corporate and political shifts, particularly following the Supreme Court's ruling against affirmative action and increased scrutiny of corporate diversity efforts. The pressure increased with Trump's executive order to challenge federal-level DEI programs.
It seems the legal battle over DEI has begun. In a recent lawsuit filed by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey against Starbucks, the company is accused of prioritizing the hiring of women and people of color over qualifications. 'Starbucks (SBUX)' U.S. workforce was 70.9% women and 28.4% men [...] In other words, since 2020, Starbucks' [workforce] has become more female and less white,' reads page 29 of the lawsuit.
Noa Gafni, a faculty member at Columbia University, told Quartz in an interview that, while these efforts were well-intentioned, companies lacked the strategies needed to create lasting change. 'DEI [became] a priority over night,' she said. 'But the lack of comprehensive plans led to frustration.'
Five years later, Gafni suggests companies now have an opportunity to re-think their DEI efforts in a more sustainable way. She recommends aligning DEI initiatives with core business goals, driving cultural change through middle management, and building cross-country partnerships to tackle systemic issues. 'A diverse workforce that is engaged and heard will lead to innovation and growth,' Gafni added.
As companies upend their DEI programs, Lawson from Fig believes metrics will shift to avoid legal and reputational risks. 'Hiring quotas will be eliminated, ERGs will be scaled back, and diversity training will become less mandatory,' she predicted. The focus will move way from visible diversity metrics toward internal assessments of culture and inclusion.
Despite these shifts, DEI remains a top priority for many employees and consumers. According to data from market research firm Reputation Leaders, 63% of Americans consider DEI policies important for U.S. companies in 2025, reinforcing its continued significance.
'The key is always planning ahead and thinking about how changes will be received,' said Gafni. She stresses the importance of anticipating backlash from stakeholders, whether that's shareholders, employees, or external political groups.
'Transparent communications are key to a healthy, diverse corporate culture,' Gafni explained.' Companies that thoughtfully approach DEI will be better positioned to lead in the years ahead.
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
28 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Today in History: June 16, Valentina Tereshkova becomes first woman in space
Advertisement In 1903, the Ford Motor Company was incorporated in Detroit, Mich. In 1963, the world's first female space traveler, Valentina Tereshkova, 26, was launched into orbit by the Soviet Union aboard Vostok 6. Tereshkova spent 71 hours in flight, circling the Earth 48 times before returning safely. In 1976, thousands of Black students in Johannesburg's Soweto township demonstrated against the imposition of the Dutch-based Afrikaans language in schools; police opened fire on the students, killing at least 176 and as many as 700. In 1978, President Jimmy Carter and Panamanian leader Omar Torrijos signed the instruments of ratification for the Panama Canal treaties during a ceremony in Panama City. In 2015, real estate mogul President Trump launched his successful campaign for the presidency of the United States with a speech at Trump Tower in Manhattan, N.Y. Advertisement In 2016, Walt Disney Co. opened Shanghai Disneyland, its first theme park in mainland China. In 2022, witnesses testified to the Jan. 6 committee that President Trump's closest advisers viewed his last-ditch efforts to pressure Vice President Mike Pence to reject the tally of state electors and overturn the 2020 election as 'nuts,' 'crazy,' and even likely to incite riots.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Costco Just Brought Back the Perk Fans Have Been Begging For
Grocery shopping, especially on the weekends, can feel overwhelming. Not to mention, long lists and never-ending lines aren't exactly how you want to spend your free time. But while you might not feel like getting out of bed early just to beat the crowd, it's usually worth sacrificing a little sleep. For years, Walmart has designated 8 a.m. to 10 a.m. as sensory-friendly hours, which include no music and low lighting to promote a calmer environment. And Sam's Club Plus members have been able to start shopping two hours before the store opens to all members, giving you plenty of space to browse the aisles and load up on all the best new finds. Now, Costco is bringing back a popular member perk that will help you beat the crowds and polish off your to-do list in record time. Costco recently announced that beginning June 30, those with an Executive Membership can shop as early as 9 a.m., which is an hour earlier than regular public hours. According to a Reddit post, which included a screenshot of an email from Costco, Executive members can also look forward to additional benefits such as a $10 monthly credit on Instacart orders over $150, and even more savings on Costco services. If your Costco already opens at 9 a.m., it's not yet clear how the update will affect your location. One social media user who claims to be an employee said that the first hour will slowly transition to executive-only hours, with a grace period for adjustment. Costco has not confirmed this information. This isn't the first time Executive members have been treated to this perk. Years ago, Costco did away with early shopping hours, but those with the black card say they're excited to see it finally return. 'Thankful this is coming back. Was originally why I got the Executive Membership in the first place,' wrote one user on Costco's Instagram post announcing the change. 'This is the best news I've heard all year,' added another thrilled shopper. Not everyone is pleased with the change, though. Some felt that the new hours were still not early enough and others said they would prefer additional evening hours instead. 'I would rather have it stay open an hour later…Why would I wake up to rush to Costco earlier? Not a perk,' wrote one person. Another chimed in to say Costco's upgraded benefits still fall short compared to its biggest competitor. 'Honestly, I can get into Sam's Club at 8 o'clock in the morning and they also have curbside pick-up service! Costco needs this too!' they wrote. Shoppers will be happy to know that, along with the new Executive tier benefits, the retailer is also extending evening hours for all membership levels. You'll be able to grab your favorite Costco finds and hit the food court until 7 p.m. every Saturday. So, even if you aren't an early bird, you may still be able to beat the crowd. Read the original article on ALLRECIPES

2 hours ago
North Carolina redistricting trial begins over racial gerrymandering claims
RALEIGH, N.C. -- North Carolina congressional and legislative districts drawn by Republicans that helped them retain majorities in Raleigh and Washington are in court, as federal lawsuits accuse mapmakers of illegally eroding Black voting power in the process. A trial scheduled by a three-judge panel will start Monday in Winston-Salem over allegations that GOP legislative leaders violated federal law and the U.S. Constitution when they enacted new electoral maps in the ninth-largest state in October 2023. Republican leaders counter that lawfully partisan — and not racial — considerations helped inform their decision-making. The lines were used in the 2024 elections, after which Republicans kept General Assembly majorities and flipped three U.S. House seats held by Democratic incumbents who didn't seek reelection because they decided the recast district made winning impossible. Those seat flips, which turned a 7-7 delegation into one with a 10-4 Republican advantage, helped the GOP keep narrow control of the House, which has helped advance President Donald Trump's agenda. Favorable rulings for the plaintiffs could force Republicans to redraw maps for the 2026 elections, making it harder to retain their partisan advantage. Otherwise, the districts could be used through the 2030 elections. The trial involves two lawsuits filed in late 2023. In one lawsuit, the North Carolina NAACP, Common Cause and several Black residents originally sued over redrawn state House and Senate maps and U.S. House districts. The other lawsuit filed by nearly 20 Black and Latino voters focused on the new congressional districts, four of which they argue are illegal racial gerrymanders. Pretrial rulings this spring and amended litigation dismissed challenges to the state House map and narrowed state Senate arguments to a handful of districts. Still, both lawsuits claim that lines are so skewed for GOP candidates that many Black voters cannot elect their preferred candidates, violating the Voting Rights Act. They allege the mapmakers submerged or spread out Black voting blocs, which historically have favored Democrats, into surrounding districts with white majorities — benefiting Republicans. They point to a region where the cities of Greensboro, High Point and Winston-Salem are located. They said Republicans split the region's concentrated Black voting population within multiple U.S. House districts. Then-Rep. Kathy Manning, a Greensboro Democrat, decided not to run again because her district shifted to the right. The plaintiffs also allege Republican mapmakers intentionally discriminated against Black and Latino voters. In a pretrial brief, lawyers for Republican leaders say the lawmakers used mapmaking rules that prohibited using data identifying the race of voters, in keeping with rulings on previous North Carolina redistricting maps in which judges chided them for emphasizing race. Instead, Republicans were able to lawfully use partisan data — like statewide election results — in drawing the new maps, the lawyers said. They cite a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court decision and an April 2023 state Supreme Court decision that neutered legal claims of illegal partisan gerrymandering. The plaintiffs counter that the 'racial sorting' within the challenged districts can't be explained by politics alone. The three judges were all nominated to the bench by Republican presidents: 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Allison Rushing (Donald Trump) and District Judges Thomas Schroeder (George W. Bush) and Richard Myers (Trump). The panel has set aside several days for a trial that won't end until July 9. Likely witnesses include individual plaintiffs, state legislators, redistricting experts and historians. No immediate decision is expected — the legal sides have until early August to file additional briefs. The court's ruling can be appealed. With candidate filing for the 2026 election starting Dec. 1, any required remapping would have to be completed by late fall to avoid election disruptions. North Carolina has a long history of redistricting litigation in federal courts. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in landmark cases in the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s involving racial bias and the extent to which racial considerations could be used in forming districts that favored the election of Black candidates. The court's 2019 decision on partisan gerrymandering stemmed from a North Carolina case. The current maps were drawn after the state Supreme Court, with a Republican seat majority, essentially struck down rulings the court made in 2022 when it had a Democratic majority. Two other lawsuits challenging the 2023 district boundaries are pending. Statewide races in North Carolina are close, and Democrats have held the governor's mansion for most of the past 30 years. But Republicans have controlled the General Assembly — and thus redistricting — since 2011. Redistricting maps can't be blocked by a governor's veto.