‘Fordow nuclear site seriously, heavily damaged': Iran minister acknowledges damage at nuclear site in US bombing
During an interview with CBS News broadcast on Tuesday, Araghchi said 'No one exactly knows what has transpired in Fordow. That being said, what we know so far is that the facilities have been seriously and heavily damaged.'
However, a Washington Post report quoting four people familiar with classified intelligence circulating within the US government, stated that intercepted Iranian communications downplayed the damage caused by the American strikes on three key nuclear sites of Iran.
FM @araghchi in an interview with CBS:
The damage inflicted on the #Fordow nuclear site has been extensive and very serious.#Iran's nuclear program remains peaceful; we have no intention of moving toward nuclear weapons. pic.twitter.com/SNOx6CkdtJ
— Iran's Today (@Iran) July 2, 2025
Detailing the Iranian report on strikes, Araghchi said 'The Atomic Energy Organization of the Islamic Republic of Iran… is currently undertaking evaluation and assessment, the report of which will be submitted to the government.'
US President Donald Trump, while addressing the nation after the American military bombed Tehran's nuclear facilities, said the strikes 'completely and totally obliterated' Iran's nuclear program. Though the US officials acknowledged last weekend that it'll take time to form a complete assessment of the damage caused by the American military strikes.
The United States on June 22 joined Israel's offensive against Iran and launched operation 'Midnight Hammer' to target three nuclear facilities of Iran, namely Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan and the operation involved 125 US military aircraft, including seven B-2 Stealth bombers.
About two dozen cruise missiles were also launched at the Isfahan nuclear site from a submarine by the US military. One of the major strikes by the United States was on Fordow nuclear enrichment facility buried deep below a mountain outside Tehran, and is considered vital to Iran's nuclear ambitions. At least 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOPs) were dropped at the Fordow site.
After the strikes, Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire brokered by the United States and Qatar and the 12-day conflict between the two warring nations came to a pause on June 24.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Trump is shocked by insult from best friend': Indian-origin venture capitalist says India should be nice to him; 'Promise to buy...'
Indian-American venture capitalist says India should be nice to Trump to get tariffs lowered. Indian-origin venture capitalist Asha Jadeja Motwani, who offered to help read US President Donald Trump's mind as the largest Indian-American donor of the Republican Party, said New Delhi must be nice to Trump if it wants to reduce tariffs. Listing down five things that New Delhi needs to do to be in Trump's good books, the Indian-origin entrepreneur said that Trump will reduce tariffs as soon as "we melt him". "Will Trump reduce tariffs on India? Yes! But this is dependent on how FAST we melt him. He is hurt, humiliated and shocked that his best friend insulted him in public on the ceasefire fiasco (justified or not). He will come around, but SHOW him the warmth that we genuinely have for our bestie US, a fellow democracy, a fellow free country and a fellow market economy. With a 6 million strong diaspora," Motwani said. — ashajadeja325 (@ashajadeja325) The entrepreneur said Trump wants Indian's top business houses to come together and announce an MOU of between $100 billion to $500 billion investment in the US. The second step will be to close on the purchase of Styker and Javelin. The third will be a promise to buy more energy from the US and reduce dependence on Russian crude. Fourth is to thank Trump, if possible, for "his behind-the-scenes work on controlling Chinese military equipment, and support in Pakistan". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 11 Foods That Help In Healing Knee Pain Naturally | Zen Life Mag Undo "BE NICE TO TRUMP. He knows we love him, but we must show it more actively. American culture is different from India. Be more expressive," Motwani wrote. Trump imposed a 25 per cent penalty on India in addition to 25 per cent tariff for buying Russian oil. The new tariffs are set to come into effect on August 27 and US negotiators are expected to go to India on August 25. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned that Washington could increase secondary tariffs on India. "We've put secondary tariffs on Indians for buying Russian oil. And I could see, If things don't go well, then sanctions or secondary tariffs could go up," Bessent said in an interview to Bloomberg TV on Wednesday.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Friends with benefits? The seesaw relationship between Trump and Putin
Donald Trump is set to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska for a summit this Friday. While the two leaders were close during the US President's first term, the second term started on a sour note US President Donald Trump and with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin. Reuters File Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, the two leaders whose relationship has swung between warm handshakes and cold shoulders over the years, will meet in Alaska on Friday. While the two were close to a bromance during the US President's first term (2017-2021), their relationship has cooled during his second term. Now, they'll meet face to face later this week, each trying to outmanoeuvre one another over how to end Russia's invasion of Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump has previously voiced anger at the Russian president for pressing on with the brutal three-year-old war in Ukraine, which he calls 'ridiculous.' The summit, he says, is 'really a feel-out meeting' to gauge Putin's willingness to negotiate an end to the conflict. 'I'm going to be telling him, 'You've got to end this war,'' the US president has said. Here's how the talks could set the tone for the next chapter in a relationship that has never been straightforward. 'Face to face' Referring to Trump's meeting with Putin, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Tuesday that Trump needs 'to see him face to face…to make an assessment by looking at him.' Trump praised Putin for accepting his invitation to come to the US state of Alaska, which was once a Russian colony. 'I thought it was very respectful that the president of Russia is coming to our country, as opposed to us going to his country or even a third place,' Trump said Monday. It will be only the second one-on-one meeting between the men since the 2018 Helsinki summit. U.S. President Trump gestures during a joint news conference with Russia's President Putin after their meeting in Helsinki. File image/Reuters Trump calls Putin smart and insists he's always 'had a very good relationship' with the Kremlin leader. But when Russian missiles pounded Kyiv earlier this year, Trump accused him of 'needlessly killing a lot of people,' adding in a social media post: 'He has gone absolutely CRAZY!' For his part, Putin has praised the Republican billionaire's push to end the Ukraine war. 'I have no doubt that he means it sincerely,' Putin said last year when Trump was running for president. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD U.S. President Trump receives a football from Russian President Putin as they hold a joint news conference. File image/ Reuters Since returning to the White House in January, the American president has forged a rapprochement with Putin, who has been sidelined by the international community since the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Trump and Putin, aged 79 and 72 respectively, spoke for 90 minutes by phone in February, both expressing hope for a reset of relations. But after a series of fruitless talks and continued deadly Russian bombing of Ukrainian cities, Trump has appeared increasingly frustrated. 'I am very disappointed with President Putin,' Trump told reporters last month. 'I thought he was somebody that meant what he said. And he'll talk so beautifully and then he'll bomb people at night. We don't like that.' Remembering Helsinki Trump and Putin have met six times, mostly on the sidelines of international events during Trump's first term. In his recent book 'War,' Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward wrote that Trump spoke to Putin seven times between leaving the White House in 2021 and returning there earlier this year. The Kremlin denies this. But the defining moment in their relationship remains the July 16, 2018, summit in the Finnish capital Helsinki. After a two-hour one-on-one meeting, Trump and Putin expressed a desire to mend relations between Washington and Moscow. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD President Donald Trump participates in an expanded bilateral meeting with Russia's President Vladimir Putin. File image/Reuters But Trump caused an uproar during a joint press conference by appearing to take at face value the Russian president's assurances that Moscow did not attempt to influence the 2016 US presidential election, even though US intelligence agencies had unanimously confirmed that it did. 'I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today,' Trump said. 'He just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be.' Given this history, Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen is worried about what could happen at the Trump-Putin summit. 'I am very concerned that President Putin will view this as a reward and another opportunity to further prolong the war instead of finally seeking peace,' she said. With input from AFP
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
What Trump team doesn't get about India and Pakistan
In international diplomacy, subtlety, mutual respect and an understanding of geopolitical nuance are key to building lasting partnerships. Under President Donald Trump, however, these principles often take a backseat to a transactional, ego-driven approach. Nowhere is this more evident than in the frayed relationship between the US and India, marked by a breakdown in trust, growing strategic divergences, and a misreading of India's geopolitical red lines. Independence Day 2025 Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji gave India its own currency Swadeshi 2.0: India is no longer just a market, it's a maker At the center of this deterioration is Trump's fixation on projecting himself as a global dealmaker and peacemaker, a strategy driven in part by his not-so-subtle ambition to win the Nobel Peace Prize. This personal aspiration, combined with a heavy-handed use of economic pressure via tariffs, pose a formidable threat to America's ties with its allies as shown in the case of India. Misreading India's strategic autonomy A telling incident reflecting a grave India-US disconnect occurred in New Delhi, as reported by Washington Post, when Trump's top adviser on India, Ricky Gill, was having dinner in New Delhi with former Indian diplomats. "Though he was in town for a global security conference, the conversation turned, inevitably, to Trump's souring relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi , according to two people familiar with the matter. Indian officials were expressing frustration that trade negotiations had been upended; they were also angry that Trump kept claiming credit for resolving the country's recent military confrontation with Pakistan," Washington Post reported. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo "Indian officials were expressing frustration that trade negotiations had been upended; they were also angry that Trump kept claiming credit for resolving the country's recent military confrontation with Pakistan," Washington Post reported. "Gill, the National Security Council's senior director for South and Central Asia, tried to assuage the former diplomats, assuring them Washington still viewed New Delhi as a crucial partner, according to the two people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations. But Gill noted there was one thing irritating Trump's team: Why were the Indians still obsessing over how the conflict in May had ended? The diplomats were 'surprised' by the question, the people familiar said. India has made no secret of its long-standing position that issues with Pakistan, its nuclear arch-rival, should be handled bilaterally." Also Read | Trump-Putin meet: Trump's aide warns India of more tariffs if peace bid fails Live Events Trump has repeatedly boasted that it was his intervention that de-escalated the India-Pakistan conflict during Operation Sindoor. This isn't just a case of diplomatic overreach. It is a miscalculation that strikes at the core of India's doctrine on handling Pakistan bilaterally. For decades, India has insisted that it permits no third-party mediation in India-Pakistan affairs. By inserting himself into the narrative, Trump not only ignored this long-held position but also risked undermining India's sovereignty in the eyes of its own population and strategic community. India was livid at Trump equating Pakistan, a perpetrator of terror, with India, a victim of that terror. Trump's narrow personal agenda is ruining India-US relations Parallel to this geopolitical misunderstanding is Trump's habitual use of tariffs to achieve foreign policy aims. For Trump, this is part of his broader strategy of economic coercion, a belief that tariff threats would compel nations to yield to any kind of US demands. However, the assumption of the Trump team that nations and their leaders are driven solely by economic motivations has proved to be wrong as India has refused to flatter Trump by agreeing to his false claim of brokering peace between India and Pakistan. India is not easily bullied. With a long-standing tradition of non-alignment and strategic autonomy, Indian policymakers were deeply offended by the assumption that trade threats could dictate foreign policy shifts. Trump's belief that India could be pressured into acknowledging his version of the Pakistan ceasefire, or into other concessions, with an economic stick only widened the rift. The fallout is real and immediate. Rather than drawing India closer, Trump's approach is pushing it to hedge its bets. India has begun recalibrating its foreign policy, getting even closer to Russia and improving limited coordination with China. These shifts signal a reversal in long efforts that have gone into forging of India-US partnership. Also Read | Why the Trump-Putin Alaska meeting may not ease tensions between India, US, and Russia Moreover, Trump's overtures to Pakistan, culminating in the unprecedented lunch with Pakistan's army chief Asim Munir, sent shockwaves through New Delhi. For Indian officials, this was not just bad optics; it was a betrayal. After years of building a shared Indo-Pacific vision with the US, and deepening military and intelligence cooperation, India saw itself being sidelined in favour of a short-term public relations win. Underlying all of this is Trump's desire to portray himself as a global statesman. His repeated claims of resolving conflicts, from North Korea to the Middle East, often bear little resemblance to reality. In South Asia, the disconnect was especially stark. By claiming he "coerced" India into peace, Trump not only dismissed India's strategic autonomy but also tried to rewrite regional history to serve a narrow personal narrative. Such distortion isn't just diplomatically clumsy, it is also strategically dangerous. It has led Indians to question the reliability of the US as a strategic partner. For a relationship that had taken decades to mature -- spanning defense, intelligence and economic cooperation -- this erosion of trust is a serious setback.
