Trump order ends grant to help Vermont's local historical societies preserve the past
The $175,000 grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services would help Vermont's 190 small historical societies and museums care for and organize their collections. VHS said it learned the grant had been terminated in an April 8 letter from Keith Sonderling, acting director of IMSL.
'Upon further review, IMLS has determined that your grant is unfortunately no longer consistent with the agency's priorities and no longer serves the interest of the United States and the IMLS Program,' Sonderling said. 'IMLS is repurposing its funding allocations in a new direction in furtherance of the President's agenda.'
The grant for the Activating 21st Century Local History Training Program paid for one staff member to provide 'direct, hands-on' assistance to local societies. VHS says that person will be laid off.
Amanda Gustin, VHS's director of collections at the Vermont Historical Society, told ABC22/FOX44's Lauren Maloney last month that the grant may be at risk after Trump's signed an executive order defunding seven government agencies, including the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
'We've done some great work on it already,' she said. 'We think right now we have until about mid-April, but we haven't yet received any answers on whether that grant will be honored after that.'
Most of the funding from the grant — about $140,000 — is unspent, and VHS says it has been unable to secure funding from other sources to continue the project.
'Tragically, this move deprives Vermont's local historical societies of the resources and programming designed to support their operations as the nation prepares for the 250th anniversary of the founding of the country,' VHS said.
Last year, VHS's Director of Service & Outreach Eileen Corcoran said the grant 'has the potential to be a game changer for Vermont community history and beyond.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
42 minutes ago
- CBS News
Transcript: Rep. Jason Crow on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," Aug. 17, 2025
The following is the transcript of an interview with Democratic Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado that aired on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on Aug. 17, 2025. MARGARET BRENNAN: And we're joined now by Colorado Democratic Congressman Jason Crow. Good to see you in person. Before we start talking about Ukraine, I want to pick up on something, since you sit on the Intelligence Committee. The Secretary of State just said that lawmakers had come to the Trump administration with information that they've been granting visas to individuals with ties to Hamas, or with organizations with ties to Hamas. That's a pretty stunning accusation. Israel controls who enters and exits Gaza. The United States screens all visas. So, is there really a blind spot that you are aware of? REP. JASON CROW: I'm not aware of that. But if that's true, actually, that is concerning. That would be a problem. I mean, Hamas is a brutal terrorist organization. They should not be traveling anywhere. So, if that's happening, it should be stopped immediately. And, you know, the Intelligence Committee has a role to play in that. MARGARET BRENNAN: But the Intelligence Committee wasn't behind the information presented to the Secretary of State. SPEAKER: I have not been briefed on that. I have no information about it. MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, on Ukraine: You know that the U.S. intelligence assessment is that the battlefield is turning in Russia's favor, despite the fact that Putin has to rely on Iran and North Korea to keep this thing going. If neither President Biden nor President Trump were ever willing to commit troops, doesn't the secretary have a point that it has to be hammered out at the negotiating table? REP. CROW: You know, this absolutely will end at a negotiating table, like most conflicts will. But what happened on Friday was a historic embarrassment for the United States. There's no other way to put it. Right? You listen to what Marco Rubio and the president have said. They keep on saying they're dedicating time. They're making it a priority. They're focusing their attention on it. In any negotiation, when you're trying to end an armed conflict, there's nothing more important than understanding what motivates your adversary. What is making Vladimir Putin tick, in this instance. Vladimir Putin does not care about the amount of time that we're nego- we're allocating to this, does not care about a B-2 bomber flyover, does not care about a lineup of F-22 fighters rolled out. He doesn't care about any of that. What Vladimir Putin cares about is basically three things. He cares about economic pressure in the form of sanctions. He cares about political, diplomatic isolation, being a pariah state. And he cares about military defeat. Those are the three things that will end this conflict if he feels pressure on all of those three fronts. And this administration continues to be unwilling to do anything to assert pressure in any of those three areas. MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, they have put in place some secondary sanctions, at least on India here, and they haven't pulled back. They need Congress to help them repeal a lot of these sanctions. But bigger picture, in hindsight, do you think the United States to date has been too hesitant to actually help Ukraine win this war? President Obama did not send offensive weapons to Ukraine. President Biden was criticized for being perhaps too slow in delivery of certain weapons. REP. CROW: There's no doubt. As you know, I was one of the members of Congress that, on a bipartisan basis, pushed really hard in the first two years of this war, under the Biden administration, to do more, to do more quicker. And I was concerned that we were doing just enough to prevent Ukraine from losing and not doing enough to help them win. And I do believe that had we done more, and we had done it faster, and that we were willing to be more aggressive in providing aid and support for Ukraine, then they would be in a different position on the battlefield today. But compare that to what this administration has done, which has relieved almost all pressure. Like look at what happened on Friday. U.S. military personnel in uniform, literally, were on their hands and knees, rolling out a red carpet for the most murderous dictator of the 21st century. Somebody who has kidnapped and is holding prisoner tens of thousands of Ukrainian children. Somebody who started this whole war, right? This both-sides-ism that the administration is engaging in, that both sides need to come to the table and negotiate. Ukraine is the victim. They are the victim. They didn't start this war. Russia did. And somehow we keep on acting like Vladimir Putin deserves to be brought out into the open like any other head of state. This is a historic embarrassment and defeat for U.S. foreign policy. MARGARET BRENNAN: You have served this country in uniform. I wonder, since you sit on the Armed Services Committee, how comfortable you would be with the United States giving this, whatever the Article Five-like security guarantee would look like. Is that something you should see boots on the ground to do? REP. CROW: I don't think boots on the ground would be the way to go. But, certainly, the United States has assets and capability that I think are essential to any type of security guarantee. I think Europe has to come forward with the forward presence of military. But we can provide intelligence. We can provide economic support, diplomatic support. One of the most important things that we can do right now is actually seize Russian assets. This would be huge. This would be a game-changing thing that put pressure on Vladimir Putin. And actually create security guarantees and reconstruction for Ukraine. There's over $150 billion of seized Russian assets, and the United States could lead a coalition to seize that money. Allocate it towards reconstruction, allocate it towards security, allocate it towards the building of a Ukrainian military that could actually resist Russia going forward. But this administration is unwilling to do it. MARGARET BRENNAN: Last administration was too, they-- REP. CROW: --That's right. MARGARET BRENNAN: They did agree to the legislation. But on the immigration front, you and your fellow Democratic lawmakers are now trying to challenge the Trump administration's policy that requires notice to be given before you visit an immigration facility. You just did visit some. What did you see, and how does that compare to the last visit? REP. CROW: Well, there's an ICE detention center in my district, in Aurora, Colorado. I have visited that center 10 times now over the last five years, six years. And oversight of federal facilities is one of the most important things that any member of Congress does. Air Force bases, military bases, VA hospitals and ICE detention centers. This administration just tripled the budget of ICE. Made it the largest federal law enforcement agency in the history of the United States. Bigger than the FBI, ATF, DEA, all others combined. And they are putting in roadblocks to prevent oversight, to prevent transparency because they were trying to hide what they are doing. That is unacceptable. So we filed a lawsuit to force them to abide by federal law that guarantees us access. MARGARET BRENNAN: And we'll see where that heads next. Jason Crow, thank you. We'll be right back.
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
Trump Administration Live Updates: Three Republican-Led States Pledge More National Guard Troops for D.C.
Scores of demonstrators took to the streets of Washington on an oppressively hot and humid Saturday to protest the Trump administration's deployment of National Guard troops. Hundreds gathered at Dupont Circle for a march through Washington to protest the deployment, which the Trump administration has claimed was meant to clamp down on crime and homelessness in the city. Many of the demonstrators dismissed that pretext and said the National Guard deployment was an abuse of power. An activist group called Refuse Fascism led the demonstrators as they marched down Connecticut Avenue to the National Mall, filling the road and blocking traffic. Many were wearing bright orange bandannas and holding signs with slogans, including 'Trump Must Go Now' and 'No ICE! No National Guard!' Metropolitan Police officers on bicycles looked on from afar as the group marched in what was a largely peaceful, upbeat protest. Marchers sang, danced and blew brightly colored whistles. One blasted music — by D.C.-based artists only — from a portable speaker. The crowd chanted and cheered at drivers who honked in support. Many marchers were residents of Washington and its suburbs, and they said they showed up to to defend of the region they call home. Robin Galbraith, 61, said she hoped the current moment would underscore the need for statehood in the District of Columbia. She said that, too often, federal lawmakers, particularly Republicans, have used the district as a pawn 'for their own agenda.' 'Trump is attacking my city to distract from everything that's going bad in his administration,' said Ms. Galbraith, a retired schoolteacher who has lived in the area all her life. Sam Luban, 29, who has lived in the nation's capital for almost six years, said she had embraced the city as her own and thought it was sometimes unfairly maligned by those who don't understand its beauty. She said this week had been a tense time in the district, whose residents were overwhelmingly liberal. 'It's a city that hates the current administration, but it has to survive under it,' Ms. Luban said. 'It's being attacked right now.' As Ms. Luban marched down Connecticut Avenue, she carried over her head a painted cardboard sign that read, 'I did it. I threw the sandwich,' quoting Sean C. Dunn, a Justice Department employee who hurled a 'sub-style' sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection officer last weekend. Mr. Dunn, who was fired from his job and charged with assaulting a federal officer, has become something of a folk hero for some residents, Ms. Luban said. 'He's become like a local legend, and that's what D.C.'s all about,' she said. Sandwiches appeared to be a motif of sort in the protest. Some demonstrators, like Ms. Luban, drew them on signs. Others opted for the real deal: At least two marchers held aloft actual sandwiches, much to the amusement of some and befuddlement of at least one passerby who wondered aloud why someone would bring a baguette to a protest. As demonstrators passed between the White House and the Washington Monument, the mood briefly turned tense as some berated National Guard troops standing in front of a military vehicle. Some marchers shouted expletives and yelled 'traitor' at the Guard members. Police officers who had been following the protest intervened, forming a barrier between the crowd and the troops with bicycles. The tension dissipated, and the protest moved on, joining forces with a handful of demonstrators who had been at the White House. Among them was Robin Matthewman, a 68-year-old retired foreign service officer who carried a sign declaring that she was 'proud to protest a police state.' At least one person was detained by the U.S. Park Police and U.S. Secret Service officers outside the White House. It was not clear what may have caused the arrest. Saturday's march was one of several over the past week in the city organized by liberal groups like the Free D.C. Project. There were more protests by Democrats on Saturday elsewhere in the country, including Austin, Texas, New York and Chicago. They rallied against a redistricting proposal in Texas designed to deliver Republicans five extra congressional seats. Eric Lee and Anushka Patil contributed reporting from Washington.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tim Walz's Response To Trump's Depressing Smithsonian Audit Plans Is Going Viral
ABC News reports that Donald Trump is conducting a review of the Smithsonian Museum to make sure it aligns with his views of American History. Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said, "The Smithsonian is supposed to be a global symbol of American strength, culture and prestige. A place for families and children to celebrate American history and greatness. Instead, the exhibits have clearly been taken over by leftwing activists who have used the Smithsonian as yet one platform to endlessly bash America and rewrite / erase our magnificent story. These activists have obscenely defaced this beloved institution. The Trump Administration will proudly and diligently restore the patriotic glory of America and ensure the Smithsonian is a place that once more inspires love and devotion to this nation, especially among our youngest citizens." Needless to say, people aren't comfortable with this audit! And now, Tim Walz's response to the news is going viral: "If you're trying to erase history, you're on the wrong side of it." Tim Walz/Facebook: govwalz "Is he going to add planes to the revolutionary war section?" one person asked. Tim Walz/Facebook: govwalz "…later this week he plans on personally surveying the museum and will be placing a McDonald's golden arches 'M' sticker of approval on every piece and or exhibit he approves of…" another person joked. Tim Walz/Facebook: govwalz And this is my personal favorite: "I'm excited for the interactive drinking bleach exhibit." Tim Walz/Facebook: govwalz As this person said, "He must have read 1984 and got inspired." Andrew Harnik / Getty Images I guess we'll have to see what passes the Trump American history test. Trump Floats Alternative After Failing To Secure Russia-Ukraine Ceasefire Deal: 'Lives Will Be Saved' 'I'm Fine!': CNN's Jake Tapper Awkwardly Caught On Hot Mic Amid Trump-Putin Summit Multiple Men Have Impersonated ICE Agents To Kidnap And Assault Women
