Trump order ends grant to help Vermont's local historical societies preserve the past
The Vermont Historical Society says funding for a statewide program to train and support volunteer staffs at local historical societies has been terminated by the Trump Administration.
The $175,000 grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services would help Vermont's 190 small historical societies and museums care for and organize their collections. VHS said it learned the grant had been terminated in an April 8 letter from Keith Sonderling, acting director of IMSL.
'Upon further review, IMLS has determined that your grant is unfortunately no longer consistent with the agency's priorities and no longer serves the interest of the United States and the IMLS Program,' Sonderling said. 'IMLS is repurposing its funding allocations in a new direction in furtherance of the President's agenda.'
The grant for the Activating 21st Century Local History Training Program paid for one staff member to provide 'direct, hands-on' assistance to local societies. VHS says that person will be laid off.
Amanda Gustin, VHS's director of collections at the Vermont Historical Society, told ABC22/FOX44's Lauren Maloney last month that the grant may be at risk after Trump's signed an executive order defunding seven government agencies, including the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
'We've done some great work on it already,' she said. 'We think right now we have until about mid-April, but we haven't yet received any answers on whether that grant will be honored after that.'
Most of the funding from the grant — about $140,000 — is unspent, and VHS says it has been unable to secure funding from other sources to continue the project.
'Tragically, this move deprives Vermont's local historical societies of the resources and programming designed to support their operations as the nation prepares for the 250th anniversary of the founding of the country,' VHS said.
Last year, VHS's Director of Service & Outreach Eileen Corcoran said the grant 'has the potential to be a game changer for Vermont community history and beyond.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Fulbright scholarship board members resign over ‘unprecedented actions' by the Trump administration
Nearly all of the members of the Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board resigned on Wednesday, claiming the Trump administration is taking 'unprecedented actions' they believe are 'impermissible under the law.' The board said the Trump administration denied a 'substantial number' of Fulbright awards to people who had already been selected for the 2025-2026 academic year and included 'an unauthorized review process' for an additional 1,200 foreign Fulbright recipients who could now be rejected from the program, according to a statement posted online. 'We believe these actions not only contradict the statute but are antithetical to the Fulbright mission and the values, including free speech and academic freedom, that Congress specified in the statute,' they write. The resignations are the latest development in the saga between President Donald Trump and educational institutions that has seen the administration target colleges and universities across the country, threaten funding over political ideology and revoke scores of student visas. The Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board consists of 12 members appointed by the president and was established by Congress in 1961. The members select students, scholars, teachers and others to participate in the cultural exchange program. Carmen Estrada-Schaye is the only remaining board member after the resignations, according to the Associated Press. She is also the only member currently listed on the State Department's website. CNN has reached out to the State Department for comment. The award's 'proud legacy has depended on one thing above all: the integrity of the program's selection process based on merit, not ideology, and its insulation from political interference. That integrity is now undermined,' the former board members wrote in their statement. New Hampshire Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the move will 'change the quality of Fulbright programming.' 'While I understand and respect the bipartisan Fulbright Board for resigning en masse rather than grant credibility to a politicized and unlawful process, I'm painfully aware that yesterday's move will change the quality of Fulbright programming and the independent research that has made our country a leader in so many fields,' Shaheen said in a statement. The scholarship board said they have raised legal issues and objections with senior officials in the Trump administration on multiple occasions but claim the officials have failed to respond or attempt 'good faith efforts to course correct.' The Trump administration has recently made moves that could deter international students from studying in the US. Trump signed a proclamation earlier this month to suspend international visas for new students at Harvard University, and the State Department instructed US embassies and consulates around the world to pause new student visa appointments as it moves to expand 'social media screening and vetting.' A Fulbright scholar and Columbia University student left the country after she was told she faced immigration action as part of Trump's crackdown on international students who participated in protests against the Israel-Hamas war. The Trump administration's statements and actions aimed at curtailing the number of international students in the US have already sent a chill of uncertainty through higher education institutions, and a drop-off in international students could reverberate through the US labor market and broader economy in years to come.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Why Israel May Be Considering an Attack on Iran
Israel has long envisioned a military attack on Iran's nuclear enrichment sites in an attempt to halt what it considers an existential threat. But any such military strike would risk igniting a major conflict that could draw in the United States. Many in the Middle East are now wondering whether that moment has arrived, as tensions between the two countries rise. On Wednesday, The New York Times reported that officials in the United States and Europe believed that Israel seemed to be gearing up for a potential strike, even as Trump administration is seeking a deal with Tehran to curb its nuclear program. The following day, the International Atomic Energy Agency declared that Iran was not complying with its nuclear nonproliferation obligations — the first such censure in two decades. It is unclear how extensive an attack Israel is considering. But the United States has withdrawn diplomats from the region over concerns about the attack and any Iranian retaliation. Many experts say Israel would struggle to destroy Iran's main nuclear facilities without American military support. And it is unclear if the heightened tensions were the result of saber-rattling as both sides seek leverage in the negotiations. Here's what we know. Why might Israel attack now? Iran's nuclear program has advanced considerably over the past decade, analysts say. Iran is on the brink of being able to manufacture enough nuclear material to fuel 10 nuclear weapons, although producing a usable bomb would likely take many more months. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Fulbright scholarship board members resign over ‘unprecedented actions' by the Trump administration
Nearly all of the members of the Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board resigned on Wednesday, claiming the Trump administration is taking 'unprecedented actions' they believe are 'impermissible under the law.' The board said the Trump administration denied a 'substantial number' of Fulbright awards to people who had already been selected for the 2025-2026 academic year and included 'an unauthorized review process' for an additional 1,200 foreign Fulbright recipients who could now be rejected from the program, according to a statement posted online. 'We believe these actions not only contradict the statute but are antithetical to the Fulbright mission and the values, including free speech and academic freedom, that Congress specified in the statute,' they write. The resignations are the latest development in the saga between President Donald Trump and educational institutions that has seen the administration target colleges and universities across the country, threaten funding over political ideology and revoke scores of student visas. The Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board consists of 12 members appointed by the president and was established by Congress in 1961. The members select students, scholars, teachers and others to participate in the cultural exchange program. Carmen Estrada-Schaye is the only remaining board member after the resignations, according to the Associated Press. She is also the only member currently listed on the State Department's website. CNN has reached out to the State Department for comment. The award's 'proud legacy has depended on one thing above all: the integrity of the program's selection process based on merit, not ideology, and its insulation from political interference. That integrity is now undermined,' the former board members wrote in their statement. New Hampshire Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the move will 'change the quality of Fulbright programming.' 'While I understand and respect the bipartisan Fulbright Board for resigning en masse rather than grant credibility to a politicized and unlawful process, I'm painfully aware that yesterday's move will change the quality of Fulbright programming and the independent research that has made our country a leader in so many fields,' Shaheen said in a statement. The scholarship board said they have raised legal issues and objections with senior officials in the Trump administration on multiple occasions but claim the officials have failed to respond or attempt 'good faith efforts to course correct.' The Trump administration has recently made moves that could deter international students from studying in the US. Trump signed a proclamation earlier this month to suspend international visas for new students at Harvard University, and the State Department instructed US embassies and consulates around the world to pause new student visa appointments as it moves to expand 'social media screening and vetting.' A Fulbright scholar and Columbia University student left the country after she was told she faced immigration action as part of Trump's crackdown on international students who participated in protests against the Israel-Hamas war. The Trump administration's statements and actions aimed at curtailing the number of international students in the US have already sent a chill of uncertainty through higher education institutions, and a drop-off in international students could reverberate through the US labor market and broader economy in years to come.
