US' Rubio to welcome Asian ‘Quad' back to Washington
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio will welcome his counterparts from Australia, India and Japan to Washington on June 24. PHOTO: AFP
US' Rubio to welcome Asian 'Quad' back to Washington
WASHINGTON - US Secretary of State Marco Rubio will welcome counterparts from the 'Quad' – Australia, India and Japan – to Washington on June 24, in an at least brief re-focus on Asia, the State Department announced.
Mr Rubio had welcomed Quad foreign ministers on Jan 21 in his first meeting after President Donald Trump's inauguration, seen as a sign that the new administration would prioritise engagement with like-minded countries to counter China.
Since then, much of Mr Rubio's attention has been on the Middle East, with the United States bombing Iranian nuclear sites in support of Israel, and on Ukraine, as Mr Trump unsuccessfully seeks a ceasefire in Russia's invasion.
'The Secretary's first diplomatic engagement was with the Quad, and next week's summit builds on that momentum to advance a free, open and secure Indo-Pacific,' State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott said, using the US phrasing against Chinese domination of Asia.
'This is what American leadership looks like – strength, peace and prosperity,' Mr Pigott told reporters.
Mr Trump campaigned vowing a tough line on China but has sent different messages since taking office.
Mr Trump earlier in June hailed relations with China as 'excellent' after the world's two largest economies reached a framework agreement to calm a trade war.
Mr Rubio is a longtime hawk on China and has vowed to 'aggressively' revoke visas for Chinese students in the United States. AFP
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
38 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
No known intelligence that Iran moved uranium, US defence chief says, World News
WASHINGTON - US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from US strikes, amid continuing questions about the state of Iran's nuclear programme. US military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities early Sunday local time using more than a dozen 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. The results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far they may have set back Iran's nuclear programme, after President Donald Trump said it had been obliterated. "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Hegseth told an often fiery news conference. Trump, who watched Hegseth's exchange with reporters, echoed his defence secretary, saying it would have taken too long to remove anything. "The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of (the) facility," Trump wrote on his social media platform, without providing evidence. Several experts have cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of the deeply buried Fordow site before the strikes, and could be hiding it in unknown locations. They noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing "unusual activity" at Fordow on Thursday and Friday, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance to the facility. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the 60 per cent highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the attack. WHEREABOUTS OF URANIUM The Financial Times, citing European intelligence assessments, reported that Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile remains largely intact since it was not concentrated at Fordow. Hegseth's comments denying such claims came at the news briefing where he also accused journalists of downplaying the success of the strikes following a leaked preliminary assessment from the Defence Intelligence Agency suggesting they may have only set back Iran by months. He said the assessment was low confidence, and, citing comments from CIA Director John Ratcliffe, had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear programme was severely damaged and would take years to rebuild. US senators briefed later on Thursday by Ratcliffe, Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said it was clear the strikes had damaged Iran's nuclear facilities, though it would take time to assess by how much. "I will say it was not part of the mission to destroy all their enriched uranium or to seize it or anything else," Republican Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton of Arkansas told reporters after the classified briefing, adding that he was confident the mission was "extraordinary." Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Intelligence Committee Democrat, said the only way to be certain about Iran's nuclear capabilities was to have inspectors on the ground. "It was clear, and again, this is long before this brief, that some of the enriched uranium was never going to be taken out by a bunker-buster bomb, so some of that obviously remains," Warner said. Tulsi Gabbard, who normally would conduct such briefings as director of national intelligence, did not participate. Trump said last week that she was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence Iran was building a nuclear weapon. The four officials were due to brief the House of Representatives on Friday. Senators are expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval for strikes against Iran, which is not expected to be enacted. At the Pentagon news conference, Hegseth described the strikes as "historically successful." His comments came after Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Iran would respond to any future US attack by striking American military bases in the Middle East. Khamenei claimed victory after 12 days of war, and promised Iran would not surrender despite Trump's calls. MEDIA 'HATRED' During the news conference, Hegseth criticised the media, without evidence, for having an anti-Trump bias. "It's in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad," Hegseth said. "There are so many aspects of what our brave men and women did that ... because of the hatred of this press corps, are undermined," he said. Trump praised Hegseth's news conference as: "One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' News Conferences I have ever seen!" On X, Hegseth thanked Trump for his praise. During the press conference, Caine, the top US general, largely stuck to technical details, showing a video testing the bombs on a bunker like the ones struck on Sunday. Caine declined to provide his own assessment of the strike, deferring to the intelligence community. He denied being under pressure to present a more optimistic view of the US strikes and said he would not change his assessment due to politics. Uniformed military officials are supposed to remain apolitical. "I've never been pressured by the president or the secretary to do anything other than tell them exactly what I'm thinking, and that's exactly what I've done," Caine said.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
US says deal with Beijing will expedite rare earth exports from China
[WASHINGTON] The United States has reached an agreement with China on how to expedite rare earth shipments to the US, a White House official said on Thursday, amid efforts to end a trade war between the world's biggest economies. President Donald Trump earlier said the United States had signed a deal with China on Wednesday, without providing additional details, and that there might be a separate deal coming up that would 'open up' India. During US-China trade talks in May in Geneva, Beijing committed to removing non-tariff countermeasures imposed against the United States since April 2, although it was unclear how some of those measures would be walked back. As part of its retaliation against new US tariffs, China suspended exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets, upending the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world. 'The administration and China agreed to an additional understanding for a framework to implement the Geneva agreement,' a White House official said on Thursday. The understanding is 'about how we can implement expediting rare earths shipments to the US again', the official said. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up A separate administration official said the US-China agreement took place earlier this week. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was quoted as saying by Bloomberg: 'They're going to deliver rare earths to us' and once they do that 'we'll take down our countermeasures.' China's embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. While the agreement shows potential progress following months of trade uncertainty and disruption since Trump took office in January, it also underscores the long road ahead to a final, definitive trade deal between the two economic rivals. China has been taking its dual-use restrictions on rare earths 'very seriously' and has been vetting buyers to ensure that materials are not diverted to US military uses, according to an industry source. This has slowed down the licensing process. The Geneva deal had faltered over China's curbs on critical minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls of its own preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, aircraft and other goods to China. In early June, Reuters reported China had granted temporary export licenses to rare-earth suppliers of the top three US automakers, according to two sources familiar with the matter, as supply chain disruptions began to surface from export curbs on those materials. Later in the month, Trump said there was a deal with China in which Beijing would supply magnets and rare earth minerals while the US would allow Chinese students in its colleges and universities. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump's threat of more tariffs makes US trade partners wary of signing deals
SYDNEY – Tariff negotiations with the Trump administration are running into roadblocks, as partners including Japan, India and the European Union balk at signing deals without knowing how badly they'll be hit by separate industry-specific levies on exports including chips, drugs and steel. The US Commerce Department is set within weeks to announce the outcomes of its investigations into sectors deemed vital to national security, including semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and critical minerals. The probes are widely expected to result in levies applied under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act on a range of foreign-made products in those industries. Problem is, governments seeking agreements to whittle down country-by-country tariffs US President Donald Trump announced on April 2, and then suspended till July 9, have no idea where those sectoral levies will land. For many, industry-specific tariffs may be more damaging than the broader levies. 'Imagine you're a Vietnam or Japan or Korea, and you've just agreed to some potentially painful compromises on reciprocal tariffs, and the very next day after this is announced, they turn around and levy new 232s against you,' said Deborah Elms, head of trade policy at the Hinrich Foundation. 'The last thing you want is to agree to a deal only to be hammered the next day.' A cautionary tale for many countries is the partial deal Britain accepted. That pact left key details about bilateral steel trade subject to further negotiation on a quota system and stronger origin requirements. In the meantime, the Trump's tariffs of UK steel remain at 25 per cent – failing to meet the British government's goal of lowering them to zero. 'There is no clarity in how all of these tariffs would interplay, which is also causing major concerns among our partners,' said Wendy Cutler, a former senior US trade negotiator who's now vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute. The UK framework showed there is some wiggle room with the US on sectoral tariffs, but other nations should not view it as a template for their own negotiations, according to a White House official. The 232 tariffs are meant to reshore manufacturing of goods viewed as critical to national security, which is separate from the aims of the April 2 tariffs, the official said. Among the difficulties for many countries is understanding how the Trump administration can at times view the tariffs – and the threat of them – in a transactional way. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, testifying before the Senate earlier in June, gave an example of how 232 tariffs could be used in negotiations to induce commercial deals. Part of the UK's deal was no American tariffs on aerospace products – which are subject to a pending 232 investigation. 'In exchange for us doing a zero tariff – I mean think of Donald Trump – he then gets an agreement by British Airways to buy US$10 billion,' Mr Lutnick said. 'They were competing with Airbus, and in part of that agreement, they committed to buying Boeing aircraft of US$10 billion.' Mr Lutnick added that 'if other countries play ball with us, I would expect that's an offer we make provided they're buying our aircraft.' For the EU, which is already getting hit hard by 25 per cent auto tariffs and 50 per cent on steel, talks around the sectoral levies have made less progress and are unlikely to be solved before July 9, according to people familiar with the process. Officials in Brussels see an agreement on broad principles to allow negotiations to continue as the best-case scenario at this stage in the EU-US talks, the people said. Japan is keen on settling all potential US tariffs – from duties on cars, auto parts and metals to Trump's country-specific levies – in one go. But a sticking point in negotiations has been the 25 per cent tariffs on cars and car parts imposed by the Trump administration. Washington is focused on autos because it's the sector that's responsible for most of its trade deficit with Japan. But Tokyo sees that industry as a key economic pillar, since it employs about 8.3 per cent of Japan's workforce and generates around 10 per cent of gross domestic product. 'For Japan, automobiles are truly a matter of national interest. We will do whatever it takes to protect that,' Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told reporters in Canada earlier in June, shortly after he failed to reach a deal with Trump in their in-person meeting on the sidelines of the Group of Seven summit. His hand-picked trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, has said Japan won't fixate on the July 9 tariff deadline as he continues talks with his US counterparts. Akazawa has said he expects a deal with the US will spare Japan from higher auto tariffs, even if Trump increases them against other nations. India has dug in its heels on the issue and is unwilling to sign a trade deal with Washington that doesn't address both sectoral and reciprocal tariffs for its exports, people familiar with the matter said. When it comes to potential sectoral tariffs, Indian officials are pushing for a commitment from Washington that any deal matches the best agreement offered to any other nation it's in talks with, they said. Any deal with the US has to be defensible in the eyes of domestic stakeholders and the US insistence on retaining these additional levies will render Indian producers uncompetitive, the people said, requesting anonymity to disclose private discussions. Indian officials are also reluctant to sign a tariff deal amid uncertainty over their legality after a US federal court deemed illegal last month, the people said. A higher court later gave Trump a temporary reprieve of that order. Amid the legal uncertainty, some Trump administration officials believe the 232 levies could effectively supplant the country-by-country duties, Bloomberg News has reported. Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminum, automobiles and the expected levies on pharmaceuticals have raised concerns among Indian exporters that have been urging the government to not ink a deal that will adversely impact their shipments. Exporters say the US move to raise levies on metals and autos are a huge setback for them. 'These duties impact India's engineering exports to the US, which are valued at overUS $20 billion annually,' said Pankaj Chadha, chairman of Engineering Exports Promotion Council. 'We hope that these sectoral tariffs will be suitably addressed in the bilateral trade agreement. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
