logo
How America Losing Religion Is Hurting the Birth Rate

How America Losing Religion Is Hurting the Birth Rate

Newsweek2 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The United States is one of many countries struggling with declining birth rates and this is partly because more people are abandoning religion, population and religion experts told Newsweek.
There are many reasons for people all over the world having fewer babies, and Newsweek has reported on the economic pressures making parenthood difficult, the policy changes advocates believe will help encourage more children and the major cultural shifts which have changed society for young people, couples and families.
But "there's no question that growing secularization is another factor in falling fertility, both here in the United States and across much of the globe," demographer William B Wilcox, director of the National Marriage Project and professor of sociology at the University of Virginia, told Newsweek.
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva
America's fertility rate (the average number of children a woman has in her lifetime) is now projected to average 1.6 births per woman over the next three decades, according to the Congressional Budget Office's latest forecast released this year. That is below the replacement rate of 2.1 births per woman required to maintain a stable population without immigration.
Meanwhile, the number of nonreligious people is growing. Last year, "religiously unaffiliated" people (atheists, agnostics or "nothing in particular") accounted for 29 percent of the national population, according to Pew's 2024 Religious Landscape Study, which surveyed more than 35,000 Americans in all 50 states. This is a 13 percent increase from 2007. Newsweek has created a map showing where in the U.S. religion is disappearing fastest here.
Meanwhile, 62 percent describe themselves as Christian and 7 percent belong to other religions, including 2 percent who describe themselves as Jewish and 1 percent as Muslim.
Analysis by the Institute for Family Studies shows a connection, finding that fertility rates among weekly-attending religious Americans have never dropped much below 2 children per woman.
Comparatively, fertility rates among less-than-weekly-attending Americans drops to around 1.7 and below 1.5 for nonreligious Americans, based on data from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) from 1982 to 2019 and data from four waves of the Demographic Intelligence Family Survey (DIFS) from 2020 to 2022.
The frequency of attendance matters because the link between religion and fertility is about the practical ways religion impacts people's lives, not just religion's ideological values, family sociologist Nicholas H. Wolfinger said.
"Families and fertility are featured in the doctrine of all Abrahamic faiths [which include Christianity, Judaism and Islam]," he told Newsweek. "But for religion to affect family behavior (finding a partner, having kids) you have to walk the walk: What matters is that you participate regularly in your faith by attending services. It matters less when people simply say they're religious."
"So religion has declined in the developed world, just as fertility has declined below replacement levels," said Wolfinger, a professor of family and consumer studies and adjunct professor of sociology at the University of Utah.
But he added that "correlation is not causation" and cited other major reasons which Newsweek has covered here.
How Religion Impacts Fertility
Family economist Kasey Buckles also spoke about the practical way religion impacts fertility.
"One thing that faith communities do for their members is provide support systems that make it easier to raise children," she told Newsweek. "When the number of nuns declined dramatically in Europe in the latter half of the 20th century, the hospitals, schools and family support services that those nuns provided disappeared, and this led to a big decrease in fertility among European Catholics."
"If young people are less likely to be a part of faith communities for whatever reason, then they may also find it too costly to have children without that support—especially if other institutions like neighborhoods or public education are also weak," said Buckles, a professor of economics and gender studies at Indiana's University of Notre Dame.
She cited Nobel Prize winner Claudia Goldin who published a paper in April that noted fertility is lowest in places where women have strong labor market prospects but are still bound to gender roles in family life.
"In this situation, many women see motherhood as a bad deal—they work full time like their partners, but then end up working a 'second shift' at home with very little help," Buckles said.
"In both of these cases, the reasoning is the same. Raising children is hard work, and most people need help to do it."
"When that help isn't available—whether that's because the person isn't part of a faith community, isn't getting help from their spouse or family, or for other reasons—parenthood can seem like a bad idea," she said.
Demographer Lyman Stone, director of the Institute of Family Studies' Pronatalism Initiative, broke down another practical way in which religion impacts fertility rates.
"Religious people marry earlier and sort into relatively high-quality matches, because religion opts as a strong coordinating device for young people," he told Newsweek. "Marriage, in turn, generates higher odds of births. Beyond this, religious people also get a lot more help with their kids: from family, friends, coreligionists."
"Religious community is very helpful for parents, reducing the burden of parenting, providing role models of larger families and helping parents exchange ideas and practices," Stone added.
Can Secular Societies Sustain Birth Rates?
Stone said that it would not be possible for secular societies to encourage birth rates the same way religious ones do.
"The reason religious communities work is because they see themselves as quasi-kin bound in transcendent communities: they have 'stakes' in each other," he said.
But Stone said there are some examples of high fertility nonreligious groups, such as the Roma population, which are "bound by strong, hard-to-replicate ethnic ties."
Indeed, Roma populations in central and Eastern Europe typically exhibit total fertility rates at or above replacement level (2.1) and the majority population average, according to Comparative Population Studies research done in 2021.
Stone also cited communism, "which did manage to boost birth rates partly via highly solidaristic/communitarian messaging, but all aimed at state/class solidarity."
Many advocates have called for more family-friendly policies so that people have access to the support they need to have families, regardless of whether they are religious or not.
These include more parental leave, accessible child care and gender equality. "Countries that have sustained or moderately increased birth rates—like France or the Nordic nations—have done so by investing in affordable child care, paid parental leave, gender-equal workplaces and housing support," Poonam Muttreja, executive director of the Population Foundation of India, previously told Newsweek.
"These create an enabling environment where people feel secure in having children," she said. "Fertility decisions are shaped by long-term confidence.
Theodore Cosco, a research fellow at the Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, echoed her remarks, telling Newsweek previously that "addressing declining birth rates would require comprehensive support mechanisms, such as affordable child care, paid parental leave, health care access and economic stability."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Red states lead push for MAHA soda bans
Red states lead push for MAHA soda bans

The Hill

time17 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Red states lead push for MAHA soda bans

Republican-led states are leading the charge to ban soda and candy from their food stamp programs, as Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) movement flips traditional partisanship on its head. Colorado is the only blue state to seek and have a soda ban waiver approved, and the only waiver state to propose expanding SNAP benefits in conjunction with limiting its scope. Both parties at times have expressed interest in eliminating soda from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), but the Trump administration is the first to encourage states to do so. Recent attempts at soda regulation have mostly been concentrated in blue cities. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (D) infamously tried to ban the sale of supersized sugary drinks in 2013, prompting Republicans to decry his 'nanny state' tactics. With the healthy-eating push now under the MAHA branding, GOP states are jumping aboard. Kennedy doesn't run SNAP — that falls under the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). But as the face of MAHA, Kennedy has been alongside Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins to promote soda and candy bans. In just the first six months of the new administration, 12 state waivers have been approved by USDA that restrict SNAP recipients from purchasing some combination of soft drinks, sugary beverages, energy drinks and candy 'We all believe in free choice, we live in a democracy … if you want to buy sugary soda, you ought to be able to do that. The U.S. taxpayer should not pay for it,' Kennedy said during a recent press conference. The states that have claimed waivers are Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and West Virginia. SNAP dollars can be used to buy any food or beverage from a grocery store except alcohol, nutritional supplements or hot food. The idea of policing the shopping carts of low-income Americans has never sat well with anti-hunger advocates, who've argued it's paternalistic and stigmatizing for low-income Americans. Additionally, while federal data show sugary drinks are the leading source of added sugars in the American diet, nutrition experts said there is limited evidence that shows SNAP soda bans lead to better health outcomes. There's even less evidence that banning candy and dessert foods from SNAP can positively impact a person's diet. 'Claiming that implementing these restrictions will absolutely lead to a curb in diet-related diseases, you cannot confidently say that. There is no evidence to support that statement,' said Joelle Johnson, the deputy director for Healthy Food Access at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a group that advocates for stronger nutrition regulation. The SNAP waivers are for pilot programs only, so they won't immediately lead to long-term policy changes. They are a chance for states to conduct the research that's been missing — if they want to find out. Barry Popkin, a professor of nutrition at the University of North Carolina School of Global Public Health, said he thinks waivers are toothless ways for states to show their MAHA bonafides. 'None of these states are doing more than pleasing MAHA, doing what's easy. They can do this internally. They don't have to go to the politicians [and pass laws],' Popkin said, 'Waivers do nothing except allow a state to say you can't buy junk food.' Experts said historically, Republicans who have wanted to ban soda from SNAP also viewed it as a way to trim spending on the program. Some advocates continue to view the latest push with skepticism. One of the groups pushing hard for state SNAP waivers is the Foundation for Government Accountability, a conservative think tank based in Florida that's been working for over a decade to reshape the nation's public assistance programs and significantly cut spending. Johnson said she is worried about a slippery slope. If fewer items are eligible for SNAP, she's concerned GOP leaders will use that as an excuse to cut back on people's monthly benefits. Priya Fielding-Singh, director of policy and programs at the George Washington University's Global Food Institute, said there could be benefits in trying to focus SNAP purchases on healthy food. But it's hard to look at a soda-and-candy ban in isolation, she said. The Agriculture Department slashed about $1 billion in funding that let schools and food banks buy food directly from local farms and ranchers. The White House is proposing deep cuts to fruit and vegetable benefits under the WIC program (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children). The GOP's new tax cut law is projected to cut $186 billion from SNAP in the next decade and disqualify millions from eligibility. 'It's hard to separate the soda ban from the larger political efforts to shrink SNAP overall. So are these bans about promoting health or are they about shrinking SNAP? And I think the distinction really matters,' Fielding-Singh said. She added that any moves to restrict what people can buy with SNAP should be paired with efforts to give people the 'means and access and resources to eat more healthfully.' But so far, none of the red state waivers does that. Gov. Jared Polis (D) in a statement on Colorado's waiver, called it 'a big step towards improving the health of Coloradans, and reducing obesity rates, diabetes, and tooth decay' that 'will help to ensure that more Coloradans participating in SNAP have access to healthy foods.' The Trump administration has not yet given them the green light on a separate waiver to cover hot foods from grocery stores like rotisserie chicken or soup. Democratic Govs. Laura Kelly (Kan.) and Katie Hobbs (Ariz.) each vetoed bills that called for their states to submit waivers to ban candy and soda. 'I support the idea that Kansans should eat healthier. However, changes to the SNAP food assistance program should be made at the federal level, not on a patchwork, state-by-state basis,' Kelly wrote in her veto message. She also noted the language in the bill would have mandated businesses to stop accepting food assistance benefits for 'healthy' items like protein bars and trail mix while continuing to allow Twix, Kit Kat, and Twizzlers. Kennedy this week said he expects more blue states to be filing waivers. 'I was at the governors' conference in Colorado last week, and I met with a whole string of Democratic governors and they all committed to filing SNAP waivers,' Kennedy said. Kennedy also said those governors also committed to put forward other 'MAHA legislation' but he acknowledged they may not want to be associated with the term because it's become 'kind of a partisan brand.' As she signed Colorado's waiver, Rollins said healthy eating should be bipartisan. 'This is not red or blue, Republican or Democrat,' Rollins said. 'We are discussing and working with every state, so really excited to continue to work with Gov. Polis.'

Nightclub Shooting in Ecuador Kills 8 As Violence Plagues Country
Nightclub Shooting in Ecuador Kills 8 As Violence Plagues Country

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Nightclub Shooting in Ecuador Kills 8 As Violence Plagues Country

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A shooting at a nightclub in rural Ecuador resulted in the deaths of eight people, with three others injured, in the latest incident that authorities allege has broken out due to conflicts in the world of organized crime. Why it Matters Mass killings and high-profile violent incidents have plagued authorities and officials in Ecuador since 2023, when the country experienced unprecedented year of violence. A total of 8,008 homicides – a rate of 47 per 100,000 inhabitants - were recorded that year, a sharp increase from the previous rate of 6.7 per 100,000 inhabitants recorded in 2020, according to the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (USCRI). Ecuador's homicide rate now outpaces Mexico, El Salvador, and Honduras, making it the highest in South America, the USCRI reported earlier this year. This wave of violence resulted in Executive Decree 111, which declared an "internal armed conflict" between 22 identified criminal groups operating in the country, which the country labeled "terrorists" in order to justify using military operations to try and neutralize the groups. El Salvador, once nicknamed the "murder capital of the world," similarly used its military in 2022 to apprehend thousands of people to drive down its crime rate. However, Ecuador has not seen the same success, and violence remains a rampant issue across the country. Military personnel patrols the streets during an operation against gangs and violence on February 9, 2024 in Los Rios, Ecuador. Military personnel patrols the streets during an operation against gangs and violence on February 9, 2024 in Los Rios, Ecuador. Carlos Arias/AgenciaWhat To Know Authorities said that heavily armed suspects arrived at the club in Santa Lucia, in Guayas province, on motorcycles and in two other vehicles before they opened fire, resulting in eight deaths and injuring at least three people. The victims in the most recent shooting were between 20 and 40 years old. Seven of the victims died at the club and an eighth died after being transported to a hospital. This adds to the dozens of deaths that have occurred in similar shootings over recent months, with most of the attacks occurring in four of the country's coastal provinces, all of which remain under a state of emergency: El Oro, Guayas, Manabí and Los Ríos. Officials have reported that over 4,600 people have died in violent crimes this year – down from 7,000 killings in 2024 and just over 8,000 in 2024. Authorities have not yet determined a motive, but they have speculated that it is linked to transnational drug cartels that have expanded their operations into the Pacific region. Authorities believe that rival criminal groups are vying for control of drug-trafficking routes in those regions. What Happens Next Investigations were ongoing into the nightclub shooting, and authorities had not announced arrests or identified responsible groups as of the latest reports. This article contains reporting by The Associated Press.

Iran sends surviving nuclear scientists into hiding after 14 killed in Israeli strikes, report says
Iran sends surviving nuclear scientists into hiding after 14 killed in Israeli strikes, report says

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Iran sends surviving nuclear scientists into hiding after 14 killed in Israeli strikes, report says

Iran has sent its remaining nuclear scientists deep into hiding after the 12-day conflict in June that saw at least 14 killed by Israeli strikes, according to a new report. The more than 15 top scientists who survived the attack have left their homes and universities to hide in secure locations in Tehran or along the northern coast, a senior Iranian official told The Telegraph. But Israeli experts warned that whoever stands poised to inherit the work of the slain scientists — no matter where they choose to hide — are already 'dead men walking,' according to the UK outlet. 3 Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaking at a mourning ceremony for Iranian military leaders and scientists that were killed during the war with Israel in Tehran on July 29, 2025. via REUTERS 'Those who are left will be at the forefront of any Iranian attempt to reach a nuclear bomb, hence they will automatically become targets for Israel as Israel has shown in the past,' said Danny Citrinowicz, the former head of the Iranian strategic desk in Israeli Defense Intelligence agency. 'I have no doubt about it. Any scientist that deals with the nuclear issue will be eliminated or will be threatened with elimination,' he said. Israel has allegedly put together a total list of about 100 Iranian scientists who may be future targets to halt Tehran's nuclear ambition, according to the Telegraph. At least 14 of Tehran's top atomic experts were killed during Iran's 12-day war with Israel for their alleged personal role in developing highly enriched uranium, which the Jewish state maintains would be used for a nuclear weapon. 3 Smoke rising from an Israeli strike in Tehran on June 16, 2025. PhotoAmong them were Fereidoun Abbasi, a former head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, and Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi, head of the Islamic Azad University in Tehran. The deadly strikes prompted Tehran to issue the new security measures for its surviving leading scientists, the Iranian official told The Telegraph. Iran also has reportedly replaced its atomic experts teaching in colleges 'with people who have no connection with the nuclear program.' Universities where some of the targets worked were hit and damaged by Israeli airstrikes during the war. 3 A residential building in Tehran destroyed in an Israeli strike seen on June 29, 2025. Footage byThe report of Tehran's efforts to bolster security for its scientists comes just days after Iran convicted and executed Rouzbeh Vadi, a reactor engineer accused of spying for Israel and helping facilitate the attack on his colleagues. Iran has undertaken a massive espionage crackdown after the war, arresting hundreds of people across the country and expelling more than a million Afghani refugees branded as possible spies for Israel. Hostage Air Worldwide, a nonprofit that works to help political captives and their families, said that at least four Iranian-Americans are among the hundreds detained in the espionage raids.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store