Midland Rape Crisis and Children's Advocacy Center announces Fifth Annual Women of Courage Luncheon
Apr. 17—MIDLAND — The Midland Rape Crisis and Children's Advocacy Center is excited to announce the Fifth Annual Women of Courage Luncheon, scheduled for 11:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. April 29 at the Midland Country Club. The event aims to raise awareness of sexual assault and provide support for those who have been victimized while also promoting prevention and strengthening the center's coordinated efforts.
Each year, the Women of Courage Luncheon honors the voices of survivors and highlights the ongoing work to protect vulnerable children. This year, they welcome Rachael Denhollander as the keynote speaker. Denhollander is a trailblazer in the fight for justice, known for being the first woman to publicly speak out and pursue criminal charges against USA Gymnastics' team doctor Larry Nassar. Her courageous stand not only led to her own personal healing but also to a movement in which more than 300 women, including Olympic medalists, came forward with their own stories of abuse. Denhollander's bravery in holding Nassar accountable helped expose systemic failures, a news release said.
Denhollander has extensive experience working with corporate boards, executive leadership, and politicians to help them understand how to lead with courage and integrity through crisis, how to communicate their values within their organizations and to the public, and how to properly respond to reports of abuse. She has advised the boards of some of the nation's largest universities as they seek to address failures to adequately respond to abuse on their campuses. With extensive experience in the political realm, she has proven an effective advocate in helping push through vital legislative changes at the state level to make it easier for survivors of abuse to obtain justice.
For her work as an advocate and educator on sexual assault, Denhollander was named one of TIME Magazine's "100 Most Influential People in the World" and one of Glamour Magazine's "Women of the Year" in 2018. Additionally, she received the "Inspiration of the Year" award from Sports Illustrated, was a joint recipient of ESPN's "Arthur Ashe Courage Award," and was named a "Michiganian of the Year" by the Detroit News, along numerous other awards and recommendations.
"We are deeply honored to have Rachael Denhollander as our keynote speaker for the Fifth Annual Women of Courage Luncheon," Michelle Estes, Board President of the Midland Rape Crisis and Children's Advocacy Center, said in a news release. "Her unwavering commitment to justice and her tireless advocacy for survivors has not only brought about change in the sports world but also sparked a national conversation about accountability, healing, and prevention. Rachael's story is one of profound courage, and we are privileged to have her share it with our community."
Women of Courage serve as ambassadors for children affected by abuse, working to increase community awareness, promote prevention efforts, and financially support the Midland Rape Crisis and Children's Advocacy Center's vital work.
For ticket information, click here.
Proceeds from the luncheon will directly benefit the center's efforts to provide life-saving services and support to children and families affected by abuse.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 days ago
- USA Today
Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie launches Lurie Autism Institute in Philadelphia
Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie launches Lurie Autism Institute in Philadelphia Show Caption Hide Caption Greg Olsen expresses excitement for upcoming Olympic flag football Former TE Greg Olsen is excited for some NFL players to showcase their skills in the upcoming 2028 Summer Olympics and the debut of flag football. Sports Seriously Philadelphia Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie is donating $50 million to the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine to create a joint initiative of autism spectrum disorder research, the three parties announced Tuesday, June 10. According to a press release, the $50 million gift that will launch the Lurie Autism Institute (LAI) is "the largest single donation to U.S. academic medical centers focused on autism research across the lifespan." The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), perhaps obviously, focuses its efforts in autism research with children, while Penn largely works with the adult community. One of LAI's main goals is to combine the work of CHOP and Penn and aid researchers in painting a broader picture of autism's effects over a lifetime. As LAI Interim Director Dr. Dan Rader put it, the work they do will help researchers "better understand the condition, the heterogeneity, and how we can actually ultimately use the research to make a difference in their lives." In addition, the new institute and its funding will aim to incentivize other doctors and researchers — those not currently working on autism-related work — to join in supporting the work of CHOP and Penn Medicine. To that end, LAI will launch a certificate program from PhD trainees and postdocs called the "Next-Generation Program in Autism Bioscience," the press release said. What are the goals for the Lurie Autism Institute? "This is a time when we've seen so many advances in neuroscience, genetics, imaging, molecular pathways, processes and artificial intelligence," Lurie told USA TODAY in an exclusive interview. "It's opening up an entirely new world of possibilities for autism research." Both Rader and Lurie emphasized that a big part of LAI's work will be determining how translational therapeutics might be effective in treating individuals on the spectrum, in part with the aid of the latest in artificial intelligence. In other words, LAI's efforts will consist of collecting data from existing and ongoing research and then, using new technology and AI, figuring out how that data can be translated into a form of treatment. That treatment, according to Lurie, could consist of repurposing certain drugs or gene editing. "The complex part of autism is there's no single gene, there's no single reason," Lurie said. "So it's very research-based in order to get to the therapeutics." As LAI focuses largely on research, the clinical efforts at CHOP and Penn will continue and "likely expand" in the wake of LAI's launch, Rader said. Then, as those two organizations diagnose and work with more individuals on the spectrum, they could "recruit" those individuals as "partners in the research to better understand this complex condition." In addition, Lurie said one of the main visions he has for LAI is to become a "catalyst" for more worldwide funding and research to tackle the complexities of understanding autism. As part of those efforts, the institute will host an annual international symposium and award a prize for autism research, according to the press release. Lurie family has long history of autism research philanthropy Lurie and his family are not newcomers to advocating for autism research and awareness. 'My brother is autistic. So for my family and me, we've been supporting the autism community for ... decades," Lurie said. "That's really where it all originated from. "My mother has really led the way over all these decades as the primary investor in autism research, and the rest of the family has followed suit. What I've done is just re-emphasize that over the decades, over the years." Lurie's mother, Nancy Lurie Marks, founded the Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation (NLMFF) in 1977 to aid individuals with autism. In 2009, the NLMFF established the Lurie Center for Autism at Massachusetts General Hospital. In 2018, Jeffrey Lurie started the Eagles Autism Foundation. And in 2019, the Eagles, the NFL team Lurie has owned since 1994, opened the NFL's first in-stadium sensory room, "a dedicated space designed by medical professionals for those who may need a quieter and more secure environment," according to the team's official website. "And wherever we go, whether it's Brazil or the Super Bowl, we bring it along with us," Lurie said. "And (sensory-inclusive efforts have) become adopted by so many sports teams. It's gratifying." Indeed, many sports teams across various leagues — MLB, MLS, the NBA and the NHL — have adopted similar sensory rooms and other tools. The Buffalo Bills, for example, offer sensory inclusion kits that include things like noise-canceling headphones and fidget toys to help make their games and events more inclusive to their neurodiverse fans. Said Lurie: "I've always grown up in an atmosphere of acceptance and inclusivity, so when we have done things with the Eagles like we do with different organizations ... we want to try to create inclusive atmospheres for autistic people no matter if they're young or old." Increased efforts in autism research now 'more important than ever' The topic of autism research on a national level has gained steam in recent months. That has been inspired in part by U.S. health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — who in the past has promoted scientifically discredited theories that autism is linked to childhood vaccines — declaring in April that the U.S. will find the cause of autism by September. As part of those efforts, Kennedy announced "a massive testing and research effort" that will "involve hundreds of scientists from around the world." An HHS official told USA TODAY in late April that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is using $50 million to invest in autism research. Other efforts headed by NIH — namely launching a real-world data platform using public data from federal agencies and data collected from private sector sources like smart watches and fitness trackers — and lack of clarity surrounding those efforts have resulted in heightened privacy concerns. "The use of registries and registry data in general can be a valuable tool in helping to understand the causes of diseases and disorders, but in this case, the lack of clarity around how data will be collected, shared, maintained and tested for accuracy raises red flags," a statement from the Autism Science Foundation read. Despite the relevant timing, the launch of the LAI is not an event that is happening in response to Kennedy and the HHS's recent initiative, Lurie clarified. "This notion of merging CHOP and Penn — I've been looking for where to do this for about three years," he said. "It just came to be probably about two years ago, and we've been talking ever since of how to make this great. So, no, it had nothing to do with anything else but trying to impact the lives of those with autism with all these new technologies and discoveries as best as possible." That doesn't take away from the significance of the timing, says Rader. "There's a lot of confusion right now about what are the causes of autism, what should we be doing about it, how might we better prevent it," he said. "It's more important than ever to bring this information together in a synthetic way that allows us to really better understand this complex condition. "So, I think, yes, the rationale for this got even greater over the last few months." Kinsey Crowley contributed to this report.
New York Post
4 days ago
- New York Post
Doctor explains why you're making ‘old people' noises — even if you're not elderly
Welcome to Ask Doctor Zac, a weekly column from This week, Dr. Zac Turner explores a common issue impacting millions of Australians. QUESTION: Dear Dr. Zac, I don't know what is happening to me but in the last 12 months I've started to make what my partner is describing as old people noises. Why is it every time I bend over to put my shoes on I groan? And why is it whenever I get up from the couch, I make a noise? Why is it when I get out of the bed? I make a noise? It's really annoying. I don't need to make these noises, and if I concentrate I can do the activity without the noise -but they creep back in later uncontrollably. Why don't I have the same energy that I used to have? What options are there for me to have more energy as I approach my 50s? – Justin, 46, Woy Woy, NSW ANSWER: Dear Justin, Ah yes, the bitter symphony of middle age – the creaks, the cracks, the groans. You wanted a silent retreat, but your body booked you front row seats to the percussion-heavy matinee of 'Man vs. Gravity'. Many people experience 'old people noises' when getting up or putting on their shoes. PRPicturesProduction – Let me reassure you: you're not falling apart, you're just … audibly adapting. And you're not alone. Millions of us hit our mid-40s and suddenly discover that bending down to tie a shoelace now comes with a full soundscape. It's like your spine has joined a garage band and didn't tell you. So why do we suddenly sound like a haunted rocking chair? Let's break it down. The vocal noises: Groans, grunts, sighs These are your internal sound effects. They're caused by diaphragmatic bracing, which is your body's natural way of stabilizing your core when it anticipates effort – like standing up, sitting down, or lifting anything heavier than your dignity. As we age, key postural muscles like the diaphragm, pelvic floor, and deep abdominals weaken. That means the body has to try harder to stabilise, and that extra effort escapes as noise – especially if you're not regularly training those muscles. Think of it like a rusty hinge: it still works, but it's going to let everyone in the room know about it. Add to that reduced joint mobility, less efficient breathing, and the fact that your brain's motor coordination is no longer at Olympic levels – and boom! Every movement gets its own acoustic commentary. And here's the kicker: sometimes we start making these noises even when we don't need to. Why? Because your brain's picked it up as a learned behaviour. It's the same reason tennis players grunt – except yours is involuntary, and usually accompanied by socks and a bit of swearing. The mechanical noises: Clicks, cracks, and creaks This is the rhythm section of the band you didn't audition for. Clicks and pops? That's usually gas bubbles in your joints collapsing. It's called 'cavitation', and while it sounds like something that needs antibiotics, it's mostly harmless. The noises are caused by diaphragmatic bracing, which is your body's natural way of stabilizing your core when it anticipates effort. Volodymyr – Creaks? That's known as crepitus, and it happens when the cartilage in your joints thins out with age. Snapping and shifting? That's your tendons and ligaments becoming a little less stretchy, like an old pair of Speedos. None of this means your body's falling apart – but it is asking you (rather loudly) to pay more attention. What to do: Quiet the chorus You don't have to accept this as your new normal. You can get your groove (and silence) back with a few smart moves: 1. Move daily Motion is lotion. Gentle but consistent movement keeps joints lubricated and tissues elastic. Squats, lunges, shoulder rolls – whatever gets your body grooving again. 2. Breathe like a boss Your diaphragm isn't just for sighing dramatically – it's your secret stabilizer. Singing, swimming, even doing planks will train it to hold strong without screaming for help. 3. Strength & mobility Add 15–20 minutes of strength work into your routine a few times a week. Resistance bands are your friend. And don't forget to stretch. Flexibility is your anti-creak. Final thoughts: You're not breaking down – you're getting feedback These groans and cracks aren't signs of doom. They're your body's way of saying: 'Hey mate, a little maintenance down here please?' It's a myth that we move less because we age. In truth, we age because we move less. Staying active – or even increasing your activity – is one of the most powerful things you can do for your energy, joints, and general vibe. If you need inspiration, look up Professor Belinda Beck right here in Australia. Her work proves that heavy resistance training (yes, even lifting!) is not only safe for people in their 50s and beyond – it's essential for reversing things like osteoporosis and keeping you strong and upright. So next time your partner rolls their eyes at your getting-up grunt, tell them: 'That's elite performance bracing, thank you very much.' You've got this. – Dr. Zac
Yahoo
05-06-2025
- Yahoo
From 'nude parades' to Imane Khelif: The problematic history of gender verification at the Olympics
Algeria's Imane Khelif celebrates during a medals ceremony after winning gold in the women's 66 kg final boxing match at the 2024 Summer Olympics. Less than a week before Imane Khelif was poised to return to competitive women's boxing, the sport's new global governing body set up a potential roadblock. World Boxing announced last Friday that Khelif cannot participate in any future women's events unless the Olympic champion takes a gender verification test to prove that Khelif is biologically female. Advertisement The International Olympic Committee ignited global outcry in Paris last summer when it allowed Khelif to march to a gold medal in the women's welterweight division. Only a year earlier, Khelif was disqualified before the gold-medal bout of the International Boxing Association's world championships. The IBA, then recognized as amateur boxing's global governing body, claimed that a sex test showed the presence of Y chromosome and ruled Khelif ineligible to compete against women. Three months later, the IOC stripped the IBA of its governing status for multiple reasons, after which IOC leaders chose to overlook Khelif's alleged failed gender test because they had questions about the fairness of the IBA's process. That turned the IOC into a piñata for critics at last summer's Olympic Games as Khelif pummeled an overmatched Italian fighter into quitting in 46 seconds, then toyed with her remaining opponents while displaying superior reach and punching power. In February, the IOC recognized World Boxing as its new governing body for the sport — and assessing how to be fair to Khelif and her potential female opponents instantly moved atop World Boxing's to-do list. The solution that World Boxing chose was making sex testing mandatory for all boxers who compete in events it sanctions. The organization announced the policy change ahead of this week's Eindhoven Box Cup to get ahead of the tournament Khelif was targeting for her potential return. 'This decision reflects concerns over the safety and well-being of all boxers, including Imane Khelif,' World Boxing said in last Friday's statement. 'It aims to protect the physical and mental health of all participants in light of some of the reactions that have been expressed in relation to the boxer's potential participation at the Eindhoven Box Cup.' Advertisement The Khelif controversy exemplifies why dividing athletes into male and female categories for competition isn't always straightforward. Gender policing has existed in women's sports for nearly a century as administrators have grappled with deliberate cheating, transgender athletes and complex medical conditions resulting in ambiguous development of sex organs. Sports governing bodies have used anything from invasive visual examinations, to testosterone tests, to chromosome analyses in their long-running attempts to distinguish men from women. The most common outcome has been humiliation for female athletes confronted for the first time with the possibility that their genitalia, internal anatomy, hormones or chromosomes developed differently than most of their peers. That presents a conundrum for sporting governing bodies: How should they treat an athlete who was classified female at birth and identifies as a woman yet possesses a Y chromosome? How should they handle it when that athlete's differences in sexual development offer a potential advantage in sporting performance over other female competitors? Dr. Richard Holt, professor of endocrinology at the University of Southampton, describes that decision as a 'minefield.' Advertisement Says Holt, 'There is no easy solution — all have potential pitfalls.' Helen Stephens smiles for the cameraman after setting a world record in the 100 meter finals at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin. (Getty Images) (Bettmann via Getty Images) 'The nude parade' The desire to define who counts as a woman for the purpose of sports dates back to Hitler's Olympics. On the night of Aug. 4, 1936, 18-year-old Helen Stephens of Fulton, Missouri, went to bed the newly crowned fastest woman in the world. The next morning, Stephens awoke to an international firestorm. A Polish newspaper correspondent could not accept that Stephens had defeated famed Polish sprinter Stella Walsh to win Olympic gold in the 100-meter dash. He published a story discrediting Stephens' world record performance by alleging that the tall, muscular American with an unusually deep voice was really a man masquerading as a woman. Advertisement Rather than dismissing the Polish sportswriter's accusation as sour grapes, Olympic officials responded by revealing that they had anticipated such a controversy. They told reporters they had Stephens examined before the Olympics and cleared her to compete after confirming she was female. At least one U.S. media outlet reached out to Stephens' mother seeking her response to the speculation about her daughter's gender. 'Helen is absolutely a girl,' Bertie May Stephens told the reporter by telephone from Missouri, adding that she better not say what she thinks of 'anyone who would charge that she is anything else.' The scandal reflected the growing unease at the time over the physical appearance of female athletes enjoying success in sports once deemed too strenuous for women. They were often perceived as suspiciously masculine because they didn't conform to the era's notion of femininity. Advertisement In early 1936, American Olympic Committee chairman Avery Brundage wrote to IOC colleagues expressing concern about 'various female (?) athletes in several sports' who seemed to possess 'apparent characteristics of the opposite sex.' 'Perhaps some action has already been taken on this subject,' Brundage added. 'If not, it might be well to insist on a medical examination before participation in the Olympic Games.' The first known gender verification rule in women's sports took effect less than a week after Stephens' gold medal win in Berlin. Track and field's international governing body implemented a policy requiring female athletes to submit to physical examination should any protest be filed regarding their sex. When the Olympics first became a stage for Cold War tensions in the 1950s, familiar concerns about female athletes deemed too man-like suddenly were seen through a geopolitical lens. Rumors flew that the brawniest female athletes from the Soviet Union and other Eastern-bloc nations were taking performance-enhancing drugs or were actually men in disguise. Advertisement Soviet track and field stars Irina and Tamara Press, sisters who combined to claim five Olympic gold medals and set 26 world records, aroused the most suspicion. Western media outlets derisively labeled Irina and Tamara 'the Press brothers.' In 1964, a New York Times reporter wrote that Tamara 'was big enough to play tackle for the Chicago Bears' and that 'they could probably use her, too.' In 1966, international track and field officials responded by enforcing a mandatory sex testing policy often referred to by athletes as 'the nude parade.' Every female participant at that year's Commonwealth Games had to undress on-site before the meet and display themselves to doctors for visual inspection. Irina and Tamara Press hung up their track spikes and retired. Other athletes gritted their teeth and endured the humiliation. In an interview with NPR's 'Tested' podcast last year, Canadian discus thrower Carol Martin described being taken into a large room underneath the stands and having 'to pull my pants down in front of this woman so she could see I had a vagina.' 'I remember thinking, 'What the [expletive] is this?'' Martin told the podcast. 'And I was a nice person. I never said that at the time, but I remember thinking, 'Whoa, this seems a little invasive. This seems a little inappropriate. I mean, can't you see I'm a girl?'' Advertisement Nude parades, unsurprisingly, proved deeply unpopular. Athletes successfully campaigned to abolish the practice after only two years. Algeria's Imane Khelif, right, defeated Italy's Angela Carini in their women's 66 kg preliminary boxing match at the 2024 Summer Olympics. Carini abandoned the fight after just 46 seconds. (AP Photo/John Locher, File) (ASSOCIATED PRESS) 'There's definitely not an easy solution' Modern methods of sex testing may only require a swab to the cheek or a few drops of blood, but critics contend they're still traumatic. Athletes rights advocate and Humans of Sport founder Payoshni Mitra has worked on behalf of numerous high-profile athletes revealed to have unusually high testosterone levels. Some battled through severe depression, Mitra said. One family even lost their daughter to suicide. About a decade and a half ago, Caster Semenya became the unwilling face of a complex, emotionally charged debate over what to do with athletes who don't fit neatly in the 'male' or 'female' category. The muscular South African middle-distance star blew away the women's 800 meters field at the 2009 World Championships, but she couldn't outrun the whispers and innuendo that followed. Advertisement 'For me she is not a woman,' said one beaten fellow finalist, Italy's Elisa Cusma Piccione. Another overmatched rival, Russia's Mariya Savinova, sneered, 'Just look at her.' At the request of track and field's governing body, Semenya submitted to a gender verification test and found out along with the rest of the world that she was different. While Semenya was born with a vagina and assigned female at birth, her test results showed XY chromosomes, no uterus and unusually high testosterone levels. Stunned and devastated, Semenya weighed her options. Either she had to quit track at age 18 on the heels of winning World Championship gold or consent to hormone treatment to lower her testosterone to a predetermined level. Advertisement The hormones felt like 'poison,' Semenya wrote in her 2023 memoir 'The Race To Be Myself,' but she fought through panic attacks, night sweats and nausea to keep flourishing. Second place finishes at the 2011 World Championships and the 2012 Olympics were later upgraded to gold medals when Savinova was found guilty of doping. Semenya also led a podium sweep by DSD runners at the 2016 Olympics after the Court of Arbitration for Sport temporarily forced World Athletics to suspend its testosterone regulations. On the eve of the 2016 Olympic final in the women's 800, Yahoo Sports asked American 800-meter runner Ajee' Wilson how she felt about Semenya. Should Semenya be free to compete without being forced to take testosterone suppressants? Or should her basic rights be infringed on to avoid unfairly disadvantaging the other female competitors? 'There's definitely not an easy solution,' Wilson conceded. 'There's a saying that says you shouldn't really come hard at a problem unless you have a solution. I don't have one at this point, so I have to go with the flow of things.' While World Athletics now administers gender tests to all female athletes, from 1999 to 2024, track and field's governing body tested only targets of suspicion. Human Rights Watch condemned that approach in 2020, pointing out that the athletes being ensnared by sex testing were 'overwhelmingly women of color from the Global South.' Advertisement Among those is Annet Negesa, a promising Ugandan middle-distance runner targeted under sex testing regulations and found to have unusually high testosterone levels. Negesa agreed to undergo what she was told was minor surgery in late 2012 in hopes of altering her body and saving her career. When she awoke in a hospital bed, she told Human Rights Watch in 2020 that she had scars on her belly and discharge papers mentioning an orchiectomy — a procedure to remove testicles. The recovery from the surgery was long and painful. Never again did Negesa regain her previous fitness levels. Her manager dropped her and her university yanked away her scholarship. Today Negesa lives in Germany, where she was granted asylum in 1999. The athlete ambassador to Humans of Sport shares her story as often as possible in hopes that it can help others. She has been following Imane Khelif's story from afar. 'I am extremely disappointed to see how another athlete from a different sport is being made to face such a public trial,' Negesa said this week in a statement to Yahoo Sports. 'It is devastating for the athlete. Federations must act responsibly. They have played with our lives for too long.' Both IOC president Thomas Bach (R) and IOC spokesman Mark Adams defended the IOC's decision to allow Imane Khelif to participate in the Paris Olympics, calling tests that showed Khelif has a male karyotype not legitimate. (Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images) (FABRICE COFFRINI via Getty Images) IOC has egg on its face Thirty-six hours after World Boxing ruled that Khelif would need to pass a gender verification test to be eligible to fight against women again, the document at the heart of this entire saga may have surfaced. Advertisement American sportswriter Alan Abrahamson, formerly of the Los Angeles Times, published to his website what appears to be a leaked image of Khelif's sex-test results from the 2023 IBA world championships in New Delhi. The chromosome analysis says that Khelif has a 'male karyotype' (an individual's complete set of chromosomes). IBA officials had previously alleged without offering proof that Khelif was XY. It's unclear how Abrahamson attained the apparent leaked document or whether it is legitimate. Neither Khelif nor anyone with the Algerian Boxing Federation have publicly addressed the report or World Boxing's mandatory sex testing policy. The test results carry the letterhead of Dr. Lal Path Labs in New Delhi, accredited by the American College of Pathologists and certified by the Swiss-based International Organisation for Standardisation. That appears to fly in the face of claims made last August by IOC spokesman Mark Adams, who during a news conference at the Paris Olympics took the stance that any test administered by the IBA was essentially fruit from a poison tree. Advertisement 'The tests themselves, the process of the tests, the ad hoc nature of the tests, are not legitimate,' Adams said. Also left with egg on his face is IOC president Thomas Bach, who several times insinuated that the Khelif test results were part of a Russian disinformation campaign. The IBA is run by Umar Kremlev, a Russian businessman with close ties to the Kremlin. "This was part of the many, many fake news campaigns we had to face from Russia before Paris and after Paris," Bach told Reuters last March. If the leaked test results put pressure on IOC officials to explain why they believe they're illegitimate, they also increase the burden on Khelif to make a public comment. Advertisement When speaking to reporters in Paris after her gold-medal match victory last summer, Khelif brushed aside questions about her gender. "I am a woman, like any other woman,' Khelif said. 'I was born a woman. I have lived as a woman. I compete as a woman.' Khelif has previously said she wants to win a second gold medal at the 2028 Los Angeles Games. For now, the notion of her receiving clearance to fight against women again at a future Olympics is becoming more difficult to envision.
