Ramaphosa's White House blunder: Chaos and missed chances
South Africa's diplomatic blunder: A missed opportunity at the White Housee
Image: GCIS
South Africa's diplomatic outing to the White House on Wednesday has been widely criticised as a humiliating chapter in the country's international relations, exposing a lack of preparation, coordination, and strategic messaging.
The visit, led by President Cyril Ramaphosa, was meant to defend South Africa's reputation amid unfounded allegations of genocide and to counter growing US criticism. Instead, it has become a symbol of diplomatic disarray.
On Wednesday, Ramaphosa met with US President Donald Trump in the White House, a session marred by awkward moments and uncoordinated responses.
The meeting followed Trump's provocative claims linking South Africa to 'genocide' and his controversial decision to offer refugee status to minority white farmers, claiming they faced persecution.
Ramaphosa's delegation included a curious mix of officials and personalities.
Minister of International Relations and Cooperation Ronald Lamola, Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, Minister of Trade Parks Tau, and Minister of Agriculture John Steenhuisen, who is also the leader of the Democratic Alliance.
Alongside them, golf legends Ernie Els and Retief Goosen, business leaders Johann Rupert and Adrian Gore, and COSATU President Zingiswa Losi sought to bolster South Africa's image.
However, the delegation's performance was widely regarded as ineffective. At one point, Trump turned to the golfers, prodding Goosen for his opinion.
The golfer responded that his relatives on farms lived behind electric fences in fear of crime - an anecdote that only reinforced the perception of chaos and violence rather than dispelling it.
Silent Diplomacy and Missed Opportunities
Political analysts observed that what stood out most was the absence of clarity from South African officials in the core diplomatic team.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Lamola, Ntshavheni, and Tau remained silent during the exchanges, failing to articulate South Africa's official stance or challenge false narratives.
Losi attempted to shift the conversation by emphasising that crime is a universal issue, not racially targeted. Still, analysts felt her remarks lacked depth and impact as they only painted the country as a violent nation.
Steenhuisen sought to defend the country by highlighting his party's coalition role and opposition to the parties representing predominantly black Africans, the EFF and the MK party.
According to political pundits, this strategic misstep did little to highlight that the Constitution allows for political participation and freedom of speech.
Meanwhile, the delegation's ineffective approach and clarity left many observers questioning whether South Africa was adequately prepared.
Analysts Criticise the Lack of Strategy
Geopolitical analyst Joe Mhlanga criticised the delegation's approach.
'This visit was a missed opportunity. The fact that even the President said Trump asked the golfers to be brought along with this delegation showed a lack of seriousness.
'Trump perceives South Africa as run by a white minority, and the delegation failed to articulate South Africa's true position effectively.'
Mhlanga further pointed out that the delegation appeared to be reacting on the spot rather than presenting a unified, strategic front.
'They should have had prepared responses, especially regarding the false claims about genocide and land reform,' he added.
'Instead, they gave weak answers, and the foreign minister said nothing substantive.'
Failure to Defend South Africa's Reputation
Professor Christopher Isike from the University of Pretoria highlighted the delegation's failure to clarify key issues.
'There was an opportunity to state clearly that there's no evidence linking political songs or land reform to violence or genocide,' he noted.
'The absence of such clarifications only allowed false narratives to gain traction.'
He argued that the delegation also failed to demonstrate South Africa's demographic and social realities, neglecting to provide visuals or data that could dispel misconceptions.
He said that they appeared passive and unprepared instead of showcasing the country's progress and diversity.
Contradictions and Lack of Cohesion
Adding to the diplomatic chaos, just days earlier, Minister of Mineral Resources Gwede Mantashe declared during the minerals briefing in parliament that South Africa would not hand over critical minerals to the US.
Yet, during the White House meeting, President Ramaphosa suggested cooperation—highlighting a disconnect within the government.
This internal lack of coordination was further underscored by the absence of clear messaging on crucial issues like land reform and economic inequality, which are central to South Africa's national discourse.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Words on wealth: the importance of financial regulation in protecting consumers
This article explores the critical role of financial regulation in protecting consumers from exploitation and ensuring fair market practices, highlighting recent challenges faced by regulatory bodies. Image: Ayanda Ndamane / Independent Newspapers. It shocked me to learn that the Trump administration in the United States, with the assistance of Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency, had dismembered and severely impeded the function of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). This US government agency was established in 2011 under President Barack Obama in the aftermath of the global financial crisis of 2008. According to the US Treasury Department, the bureau is tasked with the responsibility to 'promote fairness and transparency for mortgages, credit cards, and other consumer financial products and services'. On its website, the CFPB says its central mission 'is to make markets for consumer financial products and services work for Americans – whether they are applying for a mortgage, choosing among credit cards, or using any number of other consumer financial products'. Wikipedia notes that many thousands of consumer complaints about financial services providers, including banks and credit card issuers, have been received and attended to by the CFPB. The CFPB is not the only US agency acting against unfair practices by financial services providers; there is the longer-running and more established Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which has wide-ranging powers across business sectors that include enforcing antitrust laws. This has also been targeted by President Trump, who in March fired two of the FTC's Democratic commissioners, although the legitimacy of those firings is now being questioned in court. Which brings me to the topic of financial regulation generally. Force for good I strongly believe that regulation that levels the playing field, protects consumers from exploitation, and enables them to make better financial decisions is good for society as a whole, including the industry it regulates. Advocates of free markets would argue that companies in a competitive environment are self-regulating. I disagree. Competition is a powerful and vital force, but its nature is such that you will always have someone trying to make a quick buck by pushing the boundaries of what is normal or ethical. This is a big enough problem in a regulated environment; imagine how bad it would be in an unregulated one. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ A supreme example of pushing the boundaries is, of course, in sport - specifically those sporting codes that primarily test physical prowess, such as athletics, swimming, weight-lifting, and cycling. Before these sports became commercialised, there was little monetary incentive for athletes to cheat. Perhaps a small amount of cheating went on behind the scenes, but public perception was that the winners represented the pinnacle of human strength, speed, and endurance, and the sports codes were popular because people believed the competition was real and the winners genuine. That's not the case anymore. When I watch an athlete win a race, there's always the nagging question in the back of my mind: did he or she win on natural ability, or did performance-enhancing drugs contribute to the win? In which case, why am I wasting my time watching someone cheat? It started with a couple of risk-takers pushing the boundaries. Eventually, just to remain competitive, everyone was doping, inventing more and more elaborate schemes to evade detection. Moving targets Regulators typically struggle to keep up with the novel ways people find to push the boundaries. I like to think that the financial regulators have had more success than the sports regulators. In financial circles, there's a recent push by those on the fringes to market private equity investments, which invest in private, rather than publicly listed, companies. I have nothing against seasoned, wealthy investors putting their money into private ventures – they know the risks. I do have a problem when private equity investments are marketed to consumers who are not aware of the risks. There are currently at least two companies I know of that are marketing private equity products, including a living annuity, to the public, making out as if they are just regular products. Well, they are not regular. They carry a far higher risk for the investor than publicly listed equity. Pension funds, which have substantial assets and expertise behind them, are restricted by law to invest no more than 15% of their portfolio in private equity. And yet these fringe providers are asking consumers to trust them with their life savings.
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Illicit financial flows are derailing Africa's future
Illicit financial flows (IFFs) continue to undermine the future of Africa, hampering the ability of governments to adequately fund education, healthcare and development projects essential for lifting people out of poverty and fostering sustainable economic growth. As business leaders, politicians, academics and citizens, we cannot sit back. We must help curb the illegal flow of money out of our country through a cohesive effort by all stakeholders, both local and international, to ensure safeguards are put in place, laws are harmonised, and all enforcement agencies work together to address the problem. At the same time, we must not do anything that will deter investment. Ahead of G20 summit in Johannesburg in November, as well precursor meetings — such as the G20 finance ministers' and central bank governors' meeting and the T20 midterm conference held this month — we must formulate proposals that integrate the perspectives of public and private sector institutions, nonprofit organisations, think-tanks and universities. Together we can make valuable policy recommendations, such as using AI to turn vast amounts of data into information for developing strategic interventions. Working alongside each other, we can identify gaps in current legal frameworks and areas where greater co-operation is required. We must seek ways to stem illicit money flows. When individuals or companies evade their tax obligations, deliberately falsify import or export documents, or misappropriate funds intended for development projects, they are not committing victimless crimes. These outflows not only weaken our reputation in the eyes of the international markets, but also make it harder for the government to raise capital at manageable interest rates. We already owe too much: the National Treasury predicts that debt on our national balance sheet will be 77% of GDP this year. IFFs directly undermine economic growth, costing the South African economy the equivalent of almost 5% of annual collected tax revenue — losses of about R92.5bn. On the African continent, the numbers are more alarming, with between $50bn (about R889bn) and $90bn stolen annually, according to the UN. A 2020 report from a UN conference on trade and development states that IFFs represent as much as 3.7% of Africa's GDP. This figure has almost certainly grown since then, given that those who break laws will keep doing so if they are not held accountable. We recently convened a G20 multi-stakeholder dialogue to better understand this challenge, quantify its impact, assess current solutions, and identify new ones . One of our speakers, deputy minister of international relations and co-operation Alvin Botes, spelt out what this theft means: countries with high IFFs spend at least 25% less on healthcare and 50% less on education compared with their peers. IFFs wipe out any good the $65bn in aid Africa receives each year might do. They reduce progress made in making people's lives better. There are initiatives under way to address IFFs. For example, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) collaborates with the UN to strengthen countries' financial systems and prevent illicit outflows. While South Africa's inclusion on the FATF's grey list is viewed by some as an embarrassment, it enables us to strengthen our legal and regulatory frameworks, as well as enhance our anti-money-laundering capabilities. While South Africa's inclusion on the FATF's grey list is viewed by some as an embarrassment, it enables us to strengthen our legal and regulatory frameworks, as well as enhance our anti-money-laundering capabilities. We are also seeing prosecutions of high-level fraudsters, especially those who use dubious accounting methods to move money around and avoid paying their fair share of taxes. It is gratifying to see that action has been taken in this regard. Other UN entities have developed discussion platforms and measurement systems. There are 10 asset-recovery inter-agency networks that have 178 member countries, allowing illicit money flows to be traced across borders. In addition, Interpol supports national and international law enforcement agencies to investigate, trace and prosecute those responsible for these crimes. We must all strive towards expanding such interventions, as well as advocate for and enable closer alignment between government departments and between local law enforcement agencies and their international counterparts. However, our solutions must not cause more harm than good by discouraging legitimate investment. We should not, for example, implement unfair tax regimes that could result in capital flight. We must also not inhibit international investment inflows by making it nearly impossible to comply with legislation and regulations. Such a state of affairs would merely encourage companies to operate businesses in sectors such as import and export under the radar. Through working together by sharing data, harmonising laws and holding those responsible for IFFs accountable, we can strengthen the economy by plugging the holes through which money leaks and encouraging investment. Our people deserve nothing less.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
The urgent need to reskill South Africa's youth for the AI future
If India can aggressively reposition its education system to meet the demands of AI and automation, surely we can join this race. Image: Sizwe Dlamini/Ron AI From: The Centre for Alternative Political and Economic Thought Date: 06 June 2025 Dear Chairperson, Honourable Tebogo Letsie India, a fellow BRICS nation with socio-economic challenges comparable (if not greater) to South Africa, is expected to reach its 1 million demand for its artificial intelligence (AI) professionals by 2026. If India can aggressively reposition its education system to meet the demands of AI and automation, surely we can join this race. This recent development from India, compounded by a global demand for Indian AI professionals, presents a critical avenue for South Africa. South Africa faces similar inequality; the country's Gini coefficient is forecast to amount to 0.60 in 2025, while India's Gini coefficient is forecast to be 0.35. (Statista, Global data and business intelligence platform). What is evident is that India's trajectory proves that technological transformation can occur alongside, and even help mitigate, deep structural inequality. Now the world's fifth-largest economy in the world and projected to take over Japan and Germany in 2030, India still contends with extreme disparity, yet over the past decade, it has achieved remarkable 4IR progress by deliberately targeting inequality as a developmental lever. India proves that inequality need not delay 4IR readiness, it can actually drive more inclusive innovation when made a policy priority. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Consequently, as South Africa commemorates 'Youth Month under the theme Skilling and Empowering Youth for the Future' we are compelled to sound the alarm on an existential crisis facing South Africa's young people. 4.9 million South African youth aged 15-34 are currently unemployed according to The Quarterly Labour Force Survey. 58% of unemployed graduates are under 35 according to StatsSA. Over 45% of existing jobs face high risk of AI displacement. A 2024 report by Investec also reveals a critical disconnect between industry and curricula stating that; while South African private sector firms scramble to compete in the AI race, with a majority reporting severe shortages of AI and data science skills, our education system produces fewer qualified graduates annually to meet this demand. Basic and higher education institutions remain dangerously misaligned with industry needs, forcing companies to either import foreign talent or lose ground technologically. Surely, without urgent curriculum reforms, expanded technical training, credible and competent deployees at our SETA's and public-private partnerships to bridge the AI skills revolution, South Africa faces a crisis of monumental structural unemployment. Systemic failures in education, skills development, and economic policy would leave millions permanently excluded from meaningful participation in the modern workforce. Especially young people who are already unemployed and unemployable. The latest reports from Goldman Sachs predict that: 'AI could displace 300 million jobs globally by 2030, while McKinsey warns that 375 million workers worldwide will need to switch careers entirely due to automation.' These staggering figures take on terrifying significance, as Paul Colmer, starkly warned in his recent TechCentral article (2 June 2025): 'The question isn't whether AI will transform our world, it's whether we will build the infrastructure and social frameworks necessary to navigate this transformation successfully.' Facing similar challenges of youth unemployment and inequality, India has engineered one of the most remarkable transformations in modern education history. As we submit this report to your committee, there is currently a Global Scramble for Indian AI Talent. Microsoft has just announced its plans to invest over $3 billion in India as it affirms it's interest to acquire Indian Tech and talent. The critical importance of India's AI strategy becomes evident when examining how global tech giants are competing for Indian engineering talent. A January 2025 investigation by 'The Ken', a respected Asian tech business analysis publication, titled 'Microsoft targets Nvidia's AI-chip empire with an army of Indian engineers', revealed how Microsoft is recruiting entire teams of Indian AI engineers from companies like Nvidia to build competitive AI chip architectures. This mirrors similar talent raids by Google, Amazon, and Meta, who have collectively hired over 15 000 Indian AI specialists in the past three years alone. For perspective, Nvidia stands as the preeminent global supplier of advanced processing units specifically engineered for artificial intelligence applications across industries. At the same time, the Top 500 Fin/tech Fortune companies are spearheaded by Indians. This global demand underscores a painful paradox for South Africa: our own tech sector remains critically dependent on Indian expertise, while the country is failing to develop homegrown talent. The Indian government has, however, moved decisively to counter its own brain drain. Through initiatives like the $1 billion IndiaAI Mission and tax incentives for returning diaspora experts, India is transforming from being the world's tech back office to becoming a self-sufficient AI innovator. Where Indian engineers once powered America's Silicon Valley's growth, they now develop cutting-edge AI solutions for India's economy in India. Under Prime Minister Modi's leadership, the country is projected to produce over 1 million AI professionals by 2026 through: Complete overhaul of technical education at the Indian Institutes of Technology According to a report by Gartner, the year 2025 will see 2 million new jobs generated by AI and Machine learning in India A joint study conducted by Microsoft and the Internet and Mobile Association of India revealed that India's AI market is expected to witness a growth of 20% over the next five years, the second fastest rate globally behind only China. The 'FutureSkills Prime' platform to reskill over 50% of the Indian professional workforce annually. Startup incubators focused on healthcare, agriculture and climate tech 40% of seats reserved for rural students in top programs, including an affirmative action reservation policy that proactively reserves seats for disadvantaged castes to study technology and related studies The National AI Marketplace which is a Government-funded platform connecting 50,000 AI startups with industry. And projected to add over $500 billion to GDP by 2030 The Semiconductor Mission with $10 billion investment to make India self-reliant in chip design • A 2024 report by American software company, ServiceNow, predicts that India would have created close to 3 million new tech jobs by 2028. While India surges ahead despite its challenges, we face painful contradictions as articulated by various experts and academics: Media, Information and Communication Technologies Sector Education and Training Authority (MICT SETA) is embroiled in SIU investigations, with the current and former board chairs embroiled in various scandals, while seemingly those deployed to lead this SETA are not appropriately qualified to lead South Africa's AI Race. Our universities produce fewer AI and tech graduates annually than industry demand. A 2024 information and communication technology (ICT) skills survey reveals a shortfall of around 77 000 high-value digital jobs in South Africa, with an additional 300 000 technology positions being outsourced abroad. Despite having 24 public higher education institutions, South Africa's education system is struggling to keep up with the demands of an expanding technology ecosystem. African Business Quarterly, Tania Griffin 2024. South Africa's ICT skills gap is further exacerbated by 'skills recycling' and the shortage of teachers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Institute of Information Technology Professionals South Africa's (IITPSA's) ICT Skills Survey 2024. The SETA deployment system also exacerbates our crisis. Of course, all political parties practice Cadre Deployment. The ANC, which is leading the GNU, has produced enough capable, progressive experts, black, coloured, Indian and white. The ANC must ensure that its cadre deployment policy prioritises truly committed professionals and experts who understand and can implement the party's vision of 'People's Education for People's Power'. This Youth Month, we therefore implore the committee to: Declare AI/tech Education Emergency Convene a National Indaba on AI Readiness to assess our education system's capacity for 4IR and jobs of the future, and audit government support for tech research and R&D Declare 2026 as the year of Youth Skilling and partner with BRICS Plus countries like India, China and Saudi Arabia, including countries in the Global North and Advanced Asia Collaborate with Unions to ensure their members are reskilled to mitigate against a job blood bath. Honourable chair, India, with its own challenges similar to ours, proves that sustainable transformation is possible if there is Political will. Their youth unemployment rate has dropped 12 percentage points since launching these AI reforms across the board. As we celebrate Youth Month, we must remember the words of Isithwalandwe /Seaparankwe Oliver Tambo, who opined there follows: 'The children of any nation are its future. A country, a movement, a person that does not value its youth and children does not deserve its future.' We encourage the committee to remember these profound words by OR Tambo this Youth Month. Yours in urgent solidarity, Phapano Phasha, Executive Director, Centre for Alternative Political and Economic Thought. * The views expressed here do not reflect those of the Sunday Indepedent, IOL, or Independent Media.
