logo
‘We Have Not Heard From My Brother': The Missing Bhutanese Deportees

‘We Have Not Heard From My Brother': The Missing Bhutanese Deportees

New York Times01-05-2025
The news of deportations arrived as a trickle. A member of the Bhutanese community in Texas was taken away. Another picked up in Idaho. Then, one in Georgia.
'People started calling us in a panic to let us know ICE arrests have started,' said Robin Gurung, a community leader in Harrisburg, Pa., a major center of life for Bhutanese refugees in America.
Given the limited information from immigration officials and a cultural reluctance within the Bhutanese community to discuss the loss of loved ones, Mr. Gurung could only estimate the number of people detained and deported from his area and the rest of the state.
'At least 12 from here,' he said during a recent interview at a dumpling house near the Pennsylvania State Capitol. He paused, emphasizing the uncertainty, before continuing. A dozen 'that we know of.'
As the Trump administration accelerated its controversial deportation program, primarily targeting undocumented immigrants from Mexico and Central and South America, confusion became a common theme. What is happening in the community from Bhutan, a sliver of a country near India and Nepal, has a similar opaque uncertainty, and its own set of vexing circumstances.
The Bhutanese who have been caught in this dragnet since March are not undocumented, but they all reportedly have criminal records with offenses that range from driving under the influence to felony assault. They are refugees who arrived legally in the United States through a humanitarian program initiated under former President George W. Bush. Beginning around 2007, the United States offered shelter to tens of thousands of mostly Nepali-speaking, Bhutanese Hindus who had fled ethnic cleansing in the kingdom of Bhutan, which is predominantly Buddhist.
Information from the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement about the recent deportations has been sparse. The lack of transparency has left community leaders, politicians and grieving families in Harrisburg and the surrounding Central Pennsylvania region — which has taken in some 40,000 Bhutanese refugees over two decades — grappling for answers and consumed by fear.
'The community was not prepared for this,' said Mr. Gurung, a co-executive director of the local nonprofit Asian Refugees United. 'We came though the formal refugee resettlement program, which means the U.S. government, they agreed to bring us to this country. The understanding was the government, they're not going to come after us.'
Precise nationwide figures remain difficult to confirm because of the lack of information from the federal government. But it is believed that as many as 60 Bhutanese refugees have been detained in immigration facilities, and at least two dozen have been deported, initially to Bhutan.
From there, the situation becomes even more opaque.
Advocates argue that the deported men, many of whom had served probation or time in prison and had been permitted to remain in the United States on work permits, were denied a proper opportunity to appeal their deportation orders or argue against being sent back to a country they or their families fled in fear.
These deportees are stateless. Although they resided legally in the United States, none had attained full citizenship. Bhutan does not recognize them as citizens, nor does Nepal, where many were born and raised in refugee camps. Upon arriving in Bhutan, they were quickly turned away. Advocates said they weren't surprised that the men were then sent 'ping-ponging' between India and Nepal.
Many families in the United States report that their deported loved ones are either in hiding or in unknown locations.
'We have not heard from my brother,' said Devi Gurung, whose brother, Ashok Gurung, was deported. 'For all we know, he could be dead.'
'The United States is sending people to countries where they have no citizenship, no right to be,' said Craig Shagin, a lawyer in Harrisburg, who is representing a deportee named Indra. He asked that his client's surname name be withheld out of concerns for his safety.
Mr. Shagin's client was convicted of driving while intoxicated on two occasions. The second conviction, in 2018, included a charge for evading the police. A judge deemed it a crime of moral turpitude, an offense that could make him subject to deportation.
But Pennsylvania courts vacated and dismissed the evasion charge, Mr. Shagin said. He added that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, covering Pennsylvania, has since ruled that evading arrest during a D.W.I. stop is not a deportable offense. Despite Mr. Shagin's efforts to meet his client in custody, immigration officials delayed the meeting a week, rejected an emergency stay and deported him.
Most of the Bhutanese who immigrated to America are historically from the south of Bhutan, and have deeper ancestral ties to Nepal and India than to Bhutan's Buddhist majority. In the early 1990s, the Bhutanese government began a campaign to forge a single national identity. Many residents from the south were reclassified as illegal immigrants. Dress codes were enforced, and teaching Nepali in schools was banned. Facing violent crackdowns, over 100,000 people fled to refugee camps in Nepal.
The international community eventually intervened. Starting in 2007, a majority resettled in Europe and in countries including Canada, Australia, and the United States. Pennsylvania, particularly the Harrisburg area with its rolling hills reminiscent of Bhutan, became a primary destination.
Today, the Bhutanese community in the Harrisburg area is spread across neighborhoods and townships. South Asian groceries and spices fill strip mall shops. Incense fills a former cinder-block school repurposed as a Hindu temple. The aroma of curry and steamed dumplings draws people to Mom's Momo and Deli, a local favorite that features exhibits on life in refugee camps and Nepal.
'People came to Harrisburg because the land reminds them of home and for the support system created here,' Mr. Gurung said, picking at noodles in the restaurant. This system includes access to jobs in nursing homes and the region's numerous warehouses.
'Many residents found their way here even after starting lives elsewhere in America,' Mr. Gurung noted. At 36, he is one such example, having lived most of his life in a refugee camp before passing his citizenship test in San Francisco and living in Oakland, Calif., for years. Drawn by the growing community, he moved to Harrisburg in 2020, during the pandemic.
The deportations had triggered a pervading fear, Mr. Gurung said. Even naturalized citizens worry the crackdown could extend to them. People now carry documentation everywhere to prove their identity and legal status. Many elderly Bhutanese are re-traumatized as their family members disappear, he said, their memories jolted back to the repression and disappearances in Bhutan. 'This is opening the old wounds again,' Mr. Gurung said. 'It is a form of widespread PTSD.'
In this community, mention of President Trump elicits shudders, frowns or blank stares. Shop owners, cooks and students are hesitant to speak to reporters or provide their names, fearing repercussions should they appear in print.
'Anxiety is something you can feel everywhere now,' said one Bhutanese Uber driver, who asked for anonymity out of fear. Even though he's a U.S. citizen, his wife is afraid for him to leave home without proof that he belongs in the country, and insists he carry documentation. He is not alone.
'Will Trump come for people who have done nothing wrong, who are not green card holders but actual citizens?' the driver asked. 'Nobody seems to know what is happening.'
The initial group of deportees was flown from the United States to India, landing briefly in New Delhi, according to Gopal Siwakoti, a human-rights activist in Kathmandu who is tracking the situation. Indian authorities then sent them to Bhutan. Mr. Siwakoti said that Bhutanese officials interrogated the men, confiscated their identifications, provided them with roughly $300 and arranged taxis to drive them out of Bhutan to the Indian border with Nepal.
From there, at least four men took a smuggler's route into Nepal, where about 1,000 Bhutanese people still live in refugee camps. Mr. Siwakoti confirmed these four men were arrested in Nepal and remain there.
Of the remaining deportees, most are in hiding, have limited contact with family or are unaccounted for.
Mr. Shagin's client is now somewhere in India, according to the client's brother, who requested anonymity because of concerns for his safety. 'My brother has no family in India, no connections there,' the brother said. 'What will be his future? I worry about suicide.'
The exact whereabouts of another deportee, Ashok Gurung, are also unknown, his sister, Devi Gurung, said in a recent interview. She has not heard from him since ICE agents arrested him one morning in March. 'For all I know, he might be dead,' Ms. Gurung said through an interpreter.
She spoke openly about her brother's past, including his criminal history. Mr. Gurung was born and raised in Nepalese refugee camps before arriving in the United States. In 2013, while living in Georgia, he was involved in a fight where he cut a man with a knife. Georgia court records corroborate this account. A judge found him guilty of aggravated assault, and he served three years in prison. Since his release, Ms. Gurung said her brother had been living with her family in their small Harrisburg home, staying out of trouble and working at a local warehouse.
Ms. Gurung and her husband are U.S. citizens and have a young daughter who was born in the United States. Yet, she said, their family now lives in fear.
'Bhutan kicked us out,' she said, recounting her family's journey. 'We lived over 20 years in Nepal. We couldn't belong there. We came to the United States with ultimate hope. Now there is fear again.'
'Where,' she wondered, 'do we belong?'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court upholds order barring DHS from immigration sweeps based on language, job
Appeals court upholds order barring DHS from immigration sweeps based on language, job

The Hill

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Appeals court upholds order barring DHS from immigration sweeps based on language, job

A federal appeals court upheld a lower ruling on Friday barring the Trump administration from solely considering race, language or employment as reasonable suspicion to detain migrants. Their decision blocks Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials from conducting 'indiscriminate immigration operations' as alleged by the plaintiffs in court filings. A group of five immigrants and four civil rights organizations filed a filed a lawsuit in early July alleging that immigration operations are based on racial bias, reporting harassment as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents flooded street corners, bus stops, parking lots, agricultural sites, day laborer corners and other places with checkpoints. On July 12, Judge Maame E. Frimpong, a Biden appointee, issued the temporary restraining order after he said he was presented with a 'mountain of evidence' proving ICE's arrests and stops were unconstitutional, according to The Associated Press. A day before Frimpong's ruling, 200 California farm workers were arrested resulting in at least one death. Communities in the Golden State have been protesting the deportation raids and arrests, citing cruelties. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said if the Trump administration is not purposefully targeting individuals and communities, Frimpong's order should not block their efforts. 'If, as Defendants suggest, they are not conducting stops that lack reasonable suspicion, they can hardly claim to be irreparably harmed by an injunction aimed at preventing a subset of stops not supported by reasonable suspicion,' the panel of three judges wrote, per the AP. A future hearing for the order is slated for September as reported by the newswire. For now, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D-Calif.) celebrated the ruling as a protective covering for local residents. 'The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now,' she said in a Friday statement.

Cory Booker's pathetic stunts reveal the sad state of the Democratic Party
Cory Booker's pathetic stunts reveal the sad state of the Democratic Party

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Cory Booker's pathetic stunts reveal the sad state of the Democratic Party

Sen. Cory Booker's latest stunt offered yet another eye-opener about the Democratic Party's current dead-endism. Booker went bananas on the Senate floor Tuesday, demanding that Democrats join him in voting NO — on a bipartisan bill — to supposedly prove that they aren't 'bending the knee' to Donald Trump. That is, it was a 'grand gesture' utterly unrelated to the cause he claimed to be serving. Advertisement Booker almost made Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) cry when he thundered that the humdrum package of bills (to improve police staffing and give cops more access to mental-health treatment) would represent 'complicity with an authoritarian leader.' These bills — which, as Klobuchar pointed out, passed unanimously out of a committee Booker sits on — were classic feel-good, no-brainer legislation. But Spartacus 2.0 still paced the Senate floor like a caged Colosseum lion, shouting, 'Don't question my integrity!' when Klobuchar noted that Booker had actually skipped the hearing at which he could have raised any objections. Advertisement Why not question his integrity, or at least his devotion to actually stopping a bill he was treating as the essence of Trumpism? This isn't the first time kooky Cory has gone in big on empty performance art. In July, he staged a walkout during Emil Bove's judicial confirmation hearing — as if his absence would change anything. Advertisement Then there was his record-breaking 25-hour 'filibuster,' without any actual bill on the floor to filibuster against. This posturing isn't new for Booker: As a lowly Newark city councilman, he years ago went on a 10-day hunger strike — in a tent, no less — to 'protest crime.' (It's safe to say that this awakened not a single criminal's conscience, nor anyone else's.) Senator Stuntman is plainly gearing up for another presidential run. 'The Democratic Party needs a wake-up call!' he thundered amid Tuesday's tantrum, practically begging for activists to make the moment viral. The sad part is that Booker's antics are only a bit cheesier than other Democrats' performative 'resistance,' whether it's sit-ins at ICE facilities, kumbaya-style teach-ins on the steps of the Capitol, holding up grumpy signs at the State of the Union address, or filming cringy TikToks. Advertisement It's not simply that Democrats are out of power, but that they're out of ideas (unless you count unpopular ones). Which leaves Booker and all the rest desperately trying to feign passion about . . . absolutely nothing.

ICE is recruiting agents with incentives, massive ad campaigns. Sheriffs aren't happy.
ICE is recruiting agents with incentives, massive ad campaigns. Sheriffs aren't happy.

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

ICE is recruiting agents with incentives, massive ad campaigns. Sheriffs aren't happy.

ICE just made it more attractive to become an immigration agent, with a $50k signing bonus. But are they hurting local law enforcement in the process? Get ready for ICE to flood your social media feeds. Dangling bonuses of up to $50,000, federal officials are launching a massive recruitment campaign to hire more than 14,000 immigration agents, attorneys and other workers to help execute President Donald Trump's border crackdown. The president is newly flush with billions in funding and wants to deport 1 million people annually with the help of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. "America needs you," reads one of the ICE recruiting ads, featuring a finger-pointing Uncle Sam, evoking WWI recruiting posters. "America has been invaded by criminals and predators. We need YOU to get them out." The federal spending plan funds the hiring of 10,000 new ICE agents, making ICE the single-largest law enforcement agency in the country, larger than the FBI, DEA, ATF and other agencies combined. For comparison, the FBI only has about 13,700 special agents, according to the Department of Justice. Even before the new hires take their posts, the dramatic expansion of public ICE operations has upset communities from coast to coast, and raised questions about the tactics agents have used as they've chased suspects across Home Depot parking lots, farm fields and into medical buildings. The aggressive recruitment efforts have also angered local sheriffs worried that deputies in already understaffed offices will be lured away by the big bonuses and higher pay. "It is tone deaf and reflects a total lack of judgment and character on their part," Jonathan Thompson, the executive director and CEO of the National Sheriff's Association, said of a recruiting offer emailed to local deputies nationwide. "This is either galactically stupid or purposefully malicious. You're just robbing Peter to pay Paul. And in this case, you're robbing the poorest of Peter to pay the richest of Paul." Massive media blitz, incentives and job offers Bolstered by new staffing, federal officials have promised to further flood Democrat-run cities with deportation officers in response to a lack of cooperation in executing Trump's get-tough approach that has targeted undocumented immigrations with or without criminal records. The Department of Homeland Security has already begun hiring for the new jobs. Federal officials are planning a massive social media blitz to reach recruits, potentially advertising on YouTube and SnapChat, but also on connected TVs via Hulu and Amazon Prime. In addition to the signing bonuses, ICE is offering up to $60,000 in student loan forgiveness, although applicants don't need to have college degrees to be considered for some of the jobs. ICE officials on July 31 announced they've made 1,000 job offers since Trump signed the funding law. Among those receiving job offers are retired ICE agents who quit during the Biden administration, said acting ICE Director Todd M. Lyons in a statement. "They couldn't do the jobs they signed up to do," Lyons said. "Now, people are lining up to work with us because they know our officers and agents are allowed to enforce immigration law fairly and across the board, and that's a cause people really believe in." Applicants 'should expect a certain level of risk' White House officials say there's been an 830% increase in assaults against agents through July 14th, compared with the same period last year, and the recruiting materials say applicants "should expect a certain level of risk," but that they will be trained to take "every precaution" in remaining safe. How quickly ICE can bring aboard the new employees remains uncertain. U.S. Customs and Border Protection has long struggled to hire Border Patrol agents, who typically take more than 300 days to bring aboard, according to a 2024 GAO study. Joe Gamaldi, the national vice president of the Fraternal Order of Police union, said he suspects ICE will face the same recruiting challenges as local departments. He said years of demonizing law enforcement by some politicians, activists and media has created a "toxic cocktail" that will make hiring challenging. "Truth be told, all police agencies are competing for a small pool of people who are still willing to serve and literally die for their communities," he said. "Bonuses and better pay will help, but ultimately police officers, and those interested in police work, want to serve for an agency and communities that appreciate them and don't treat them like scum." Local sheriffs furious about ICE recruitment efforts The aggressive hiring efforts have frustrated local law enforcement leaders who worry their officers will flock to better-paying federal jobs. Without telling local sheriffs in advance, ICE officials directly emailed recruitment offers to hundreds of deputies across the country. Thompson, of the National Sheriff's Association, said sheriffs feel betrayed by the move. Thompson said sheriffs agreed to send deputies to special immigration enforcement training designed for local police, only to then have ICE try to simply poach them away. "It's become a wildfire of discontent, and not how partners treat partners," he said. "This is an embarrassment to this president, and it's sad." Thompson said some sheriff's offices currently have vacancies of 40% and predicted the ICE hiring spree could further winnow the ranks of local law enforcement. Other policing experts have raised concerns about the risks of hiring so quickly. National-security expert and commentator Garrett Graf, who investigated Border Patrol hiring surges after 9/11, said in a Substack post that ICE risks a surge of applications from Americans "specifically attracted by the rough-em-up, masked secret police tactics, no-holds-barred lawlessness that ICE has pursued since January." Graff added: "If you're excited to dress up like you're taking Fallujah for a raid of hard-working roofers in the Home Depot parking lot, working for ICE or CBP shouldn't be for you."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store