
Managers think employees should take a break from work—but they don't promote the ones who do
Researchers behind a new study looking at the phenomenon are calling this 'the detachment paradox.'
'We were only looking at stuff that happens when the worker is not supposed to work, such as evenings, weekends, and vacations,' says Elisa Solinas, an assistant professor of marketing at IE University in Spain and one of the paper's coauthors. 'What we still see is that the more the worker detaches, the more harshly they get evaluated.'
Managers both value and punish time off
The researchers split managers into two groups and gave each the same fictitious story about a hypothetical employee, only for one group the protagonist took a small action to detach from work during their off hours.
Managers perceived the employee who enforced some relatively minor work-life boundaries as more focused, less stressed out, and less likely to experience burnout. However, they also perceived that employee as less dedicated to work.
'The same people who said that [the workers] are going to be more productive also said that they were going to be less promotable,' says coauthor Eva Buechel, an assistant professor of marketing at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. 'So even the people who say this is really important and even encourage work-life balance penalize them [for detaching].'
The researchers also came up with nearly identical results when they replaced the hypothetical workers with the managers' real team members in those fictitious scenarios.
Finally, researchers asked participants to describe members of their staff, including their ethnicity, age, tenure, job performance, collegiality, commitment, and whether they enforce work-life boundaries.
In the end, workers who took even small actions to detach from work during their designated time off were broadly seen as less committed and less promotable by their managers.
'There's significant literature on how people are evaluated differently based on things like age, ethnicity, and gender, and we didn't really find any of that,' Buechel says. 'I can comfortably say this [detachment] penalty has equal, if not more significance than those other worker-related biases.'
Give me a break
With work-related stress and burnout rates on the rise, employees need more time to rest and recover, but research suggests they're getting less of it.
According to a recent survey of 2,000 American workers conducted by book summary app Headway, two-thirds of workers struggle to switch off on vacation, and more than half have experienced conflicts with loved ones over their inability to unplug while away.
'Just 4% of workers are left alone on vacation; the rest get bombarded with emails, messages, and calls,' says Thalia-Maria Tourikis, a health coach and burnout prevention and recovery expert for Headway. 'Workers are encouraged to take time off, then pestered with emails and messages the moment they do, to the point of guilt, anxiety, insomnia, and burnout.'
Thanks to technology, there are few physical barriers between employees and their increasingly digital workplaces. As a result, Tourikis says, many struggle to mentally detach from work, even when they're far from the office.
'Taking time off shouldn't feel like a sin,' she says. 'If we want to be healthier and happier, we have to stop glorifying constant availability and start respecting annual leave.'
Small breaks can make a big difference
Vacations have traditionally been considered an employee indulgence that came at the expense of their employers, but new research suggests the benefits are mutual, and more significant than previously understood.
'The prevailing assumption was vacation offers small benefits for well-being, and they fade quickly when you get back to work,' says Ryan Grant, a doctoral student in psychology at the University of Georgia who recently coauthored a meta-analysis on vacations and employee well-being. 'We found the benefits were pretty huge.'
Grant explains that the energizing effects of time off are actually 85% greater than previously suggested, and those effects persisted much longer, fading gradually over an average of about 43 days.
According to the study, the most significant factor in determining the size and longevity of that post-vacation well-being boost was the ability to detach from work while away.
'It was the only recovery activity that had a strong positive association with well-being both during and after the vacation,' Grant says. 'That suggests the more you psychologically detach during vacation—the less you check your email, communicate with coworkers, and just think about work generally—the better your vacation is going to be, and the larger your well-being benefits are going to be after.'
Detachment offers a win-win for employees and managers
But this isn't just about enjoying that week in the sun or on the slopes. When workers can fully detach from work, their employers often benefit in the form of higher employee morale, resilience, and productivity, as well as lower healthcare costs, absenteeism, and turnover rates.
'[Managers] are trying to improve the organization's bottom line and improve employee performance, but not allowing people the time to detach and recover directly opposes that goal,' Grant says. 'They're actually doing things that run directly counter to what they're trying to accomplish.'
While the occasional late-night email or Saturday phone call may seem inconsequential in the moment, Grant says such actions leave workers in constant fear of having their downtime interrupted, making it harder to fully recharge while away from work.
'In the short term, you're like, 'Well, I need this thing done today, so I'm going to email my subordinate and say I want them to do this thing tonight,'' he says. 'But if you look at things in the longer term, the more you're not allowing people to detach on a daily basis, the more the negative effects on their health and performance are going to increase over time.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
17 hours ago
- Medscape
When Medicine Meets Philosophy: A New SEC Series
Medicine and Philosophy, a new roundtable series by the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC) in collaboration with Madrid's Círculo de Bellas Artes, aims to facilitate discussions between medical, science, and humanities experts. The series, which took place in May and June, was recorded and can be viewed online at the SEC's channel. Organizers and Topics The Hippocratic Chapter of the SEC, along with organizers from the Círculo de Bella Artes, decided on three healthcare topics to explore in the series. The session titles were "The Doctor-Patient Relationship in the Era of Artificial Intelligence," "Who Wants to Live Forever?", and "Is Boredom a Medical Problem? AI in Medicine: Pros and Cons AI's role in medicine was the first session's focus. Panelists discussed how AI saves time by streamlining data interpretation, allowing more time spent with patients. Ironically, the extra time results in the expectation that patient load should increase. The importance of physician input in AI advancement for medical use, as well as educating future clinicians on AI, were discussed. A Long Life The concept of living a longer life was discussed in the second session. A balanced approach to the topic by medical professionals and philosophers created a crossover of biological facts with existential questions about the meaning of life. Is Boredom Treatable? The last session featured panelists talking about boredom, whether it is a medical issue, and the social and medical repercussions of labeling these normal emotional life experiences as treatable conditions. Were These Roundtables Successful? Yes. All sessions sold out and this success has prompted the organizers to brainstorm future topics for collaboration. Also, expanding this series outside of Madrid is a possibility. Bottom line: Viewing healthcare topics through scientific and philosophical lenses can foster thought-provoking discussions, as shown by the success of the Medicine and Philosophy roundtable series. The full list of panelists can be found on the Círculo de Bellas Artes page for the roundtable series.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Scientists found cut marks on a 850,000-year-old human neck bone. Was it ... cannibalism?
A toddler's neck bone discovered with clear cut-marks dating to about 850,000 years ago may be evidence that an ancient hominin species, Homo antecessor, cannibalized a child, according to archaeologists in Spain. The researchers say the finding, announced July 24, is further indication of Paleolithic cannibalism at Gran Dolina cave in Spain's Sierra de Atapuerca, where signs of ancient humans butchering one another have been found for decades. "This is direct evidence that the child was processed like any other prey," says Palmira Saladié, an archaeologist with the Catalan Institute of Human Paleoecology and Social Evolution (IPHES-CERCA) and one of the leaders of the excavations where the neck bone was unearthed. Decapitation did not always mean meat from the dead individual was consumed, she says. But in the case of this child, who was between two and four years old, she believes it was almost certain the individual was also eaten. The toddler's vertebra was found along with bones from nine other individuals, in a layer of sediment within the cave dated to about 850,000 years ago. Many of the bones also had cut marks, as well as fractures the researchers say seem to have been made to reach the marrow inside. But not everyone agrees with the team's conclusions. Homo antecessor's cave Gran Dolina and the Atapuerca site near the northern Spanish city of Burgos were uncovered in the 1890s, when a route for a new railway was cut through nearby mountains. Excavations since the 1960s have revealed broadly accepted evidence of cannibalism among the Homo antecessor group that lived there from about 900,000 years ago until their species went extinct, possibly a little more than 100,000 years later. Scientists disagree on whether Homo antecessor was a direct ancestor of anatomically modern humans—Homo sapiens—or if it was a related species that died out. Regardless, evidence from prehistoric archaeological sites—including the Mesolithic Gough's Cave in the west of England and the Neolithic Herxheim site in Germany—indicates that early Homo sapiens, too, were sometimes cannibals. Signs of cannibalism among earlier human species, such as Neanderthals, have been found at archaeological sites all over the world, including some of the earliest evidence from Kenya. In a few cases, what was once thought to be evidence of hominin cannibalism might actually be something else: stripping flesh from bones for a "reburial" perhaps, which has been suggested for Neolithic remains in France. Cannibal controversy Some experts disagree if the newfound cut-marks are evidence the child was cannibalized. "Cannibalism is very rare," says Michael Pante a paleoanthropologist from Colorado State University, who was not involved in the discovery. "It's just not a common thing that we see." He says that although scientists claim to have found evidence of cannibalism from remains at several archaeological sites, and especially at Atapuerca, direct evidence of it is uncommon. "This decapitation doesn't mean they consumed that individual," says Pante. "They were obviously cutting up a child for some reason, but there are a number of reasons they may have done that." A funeral ritual is one possibility. Pante also disagrees with a suggestion made by the researchers that early humans at Atapuerca hunted rival humans as a food resource. "There is not a lot of evidence of that," he says. Cannibalism among humans—even very early humans like these—was unusual for nutritional purposes and may have only occurred in rituals, he adds. Other researchers are more convinced, however. James Cole, an archaeologist and expert in early human cannibalism who was also not involved in the work, says the first evidence for cannibalism at Atapuerca was found almost 30 years ago. "The new find in this respect is perhaps unsurprising,' he says, 'but it is absolutely fascinating and hints at the rich story about our evolutionary past that the site still has to tell.'


CNN
3 days ago
- CNN
Roman-era ‘church' in Spain may have been a synagogue
Archaeologists working at a site in Spain say they have uncovered evidence of what may have been a synagogue used by a hitherto unknown Jewish community. While excavating the site, previously believed to be a church dating from the 4th century, experts found materials and architectural evidence that led them to hypothesize that the building was, in fact, a synagogue, according to a study published earlier this month. Artifacts such as fragments of oil lamps and a piece of roof tile decorated with menorahs were found during excavations in Cástulo, a former Roman settlement in southern Spain, whereas no materials that have a clear association with the Christian faith have been found at the site. In contrast, archaeologists have found evidence of Christian worship at another site in the town, study author Bautista Ceprián, an archaeologist with the Cástulo Sefarad Primera Luz project, told CNN on Wednesday. The building also has a squarer shape than Christian churches, which tend to be more rectangular, and archaeologists found what could have been a hole for supporting a large menorah, as well as the foundations of a central raised platform, or bimah, which is common in synagogues but not in churches, he added. In addition, no tombs were discovered at the building, which was built near an abandoned Roman temple — something that would have been feared by Christian residents because of its association with paganism, he added. 'It's a hidden, discreet and isolated spot that would not have been visited often by the Christian majority,' Ceprián said. Taken together, this evidence points to the existence of a previously unknown Jewish community in the town, the study authors argue. 'The reinterpretation of the building from a church to possibly a synagogue followed a process of logical reasoning based on the historical and archaeological data in our possession,' Ceprián said. Nonetheless, the lack of written records of a Jewish community in Cástulo leaves room for some doubt, as the study authors acknowledged. Speculating about the daily life of the community would be 'a very dangerous exercise,' Ceprián said, but they would have lived alongside their fellow Roman citizens in the town. The population is then thought to have disappeared, as it is not named in the anti-Jewish law enacted by Visigoth King Sisebut, who ruled what is now Spain from 612 to 621, whereas the Jewish communities in other nearby towns are specifically named. As for what would have happened to them, 'it is difficult to know,' Ceprián said. One possible explanation is that the Christian clergy feared the local population would convert to Judaism, given the 'close and friendly relations' between the two groups in the region at the time, he said. This concern drove Christian leaders, who were becoming increasingly influential in the Roman Empire, to foment fear of and opposition to Jewish communities, said Ceprián. This culminated in episodes starting around the end of the 4th century in which Jewish citizens were pressured to convert to Christianity, with those who refused 'amicably invited' to leave their hometowns, he said, adding that this kind of incident could have plausibly occurred in Cástulo sometime between the end of the 5th century and the beginning of the 7th century. Now the team will work to protect the site and excavations will continue, Ceprián said. They aim to allow the public to visit at some point in the future, he added. 'We can't rule out the possibility of finding more definitive evidence that allows us to update our hypothesis of a possible synagogue to an actual synagogue,' he said. Sign up for CNN's Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more.