logo
From chic to outcast: Europe's smoking heartlands finally catch up

From chic to outcast: Europe's smoking heartlands finally catch up

Until recently, French efforts to combat tobacco were more symbolic than structural. Smoking rates have barely budged in years, with around 12 million adults lighting up daily. Disposable vapes – known locally as puffs – have surged in popularity among teenagers, driven by candy-coloured packaging and syrupy flavours. The government has promised a ban, but legislation is still in process.
In Spain, where the left-wing coalition government announced its anti-smoking plan more than a year ago, progress has also moved at a stately pace. Health Minister Mónica García now says the legislation is ready, and the country is awaiting EU review before implementing the changes.
The people seem ready, even if the politics aren't.
France's new plan also includes tax hikes, with the price of a cigarette pack – already among the highest in Europe at €11 ($19.40) – rising to €12 in 2025 and €13 by 2027. Anti-smoking advocates say it doesn't go far enough. Public health experts argue however they should be talking about €16 a pack.
Spain's upcoming law is more aggressive on location. It targets the ambiguous zones where smoke still lingers – outdoor terraces, public pools, even bus stops. Heated tobacco and e-cigarettes will be treated the same as traditional cigarettes under the new framework. The goal, García says, is to create a 'shared right to breathe clean air', especially for children, workers, and those unable to opt out of public exposure.
Loading
And while these efforts fall short of Australia's zero-tolerance approach – or the UK's move to phase out cigarette sales for future generations – they represent a real shift in tone. For the first time, health policy is beginning to override cultural exceptionalism.
Still, the resistance runs deep. The tobacco lobby in France remains influential, and enforcement of smoking bans is often inconsistent. A law without teeth, critics warn, is just smoke and mirrors.
'There's no question that the tobacco lobby has more influence than it should,' Professor Loïc Josseran, president of the anti-smoking Alliance Contre le Tabac, told Le Monde. 'Until we deal with that, we'll keep falling short.'
What's changing now is not just the law, but the mood. In both countries, smoking is increasingly seen as out of step with modern life – less stylish than selfish, less cultural than costly. It still kills more than 75,000 people annually in France alone.
Loading
So while the terrace culture lives on – between the clink of glasses and the scratch of a lighter – the sands are shifting. France's beaches will be smoke-free this summer. Spain's pool decks and stadiums won't be far behind.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judgment day for Brittany Higgins
Judgment day for Brittany Higgins

Perth Now

time2 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Judgment day for Brittany Higgins

A judgment in the long running defamation suit launched by former senator Linda Reynolds against her former junior staffer Brittany Higgins will be handed down next week. Justice Paul Tottle will deliver his verdict in the defamation case against Ms Higgins and her husband David Sharaz in the WA Supreme Court next Wednesday. Ms Reynolds sued the pair over a series of social media posts they made in 2022 and 2023, claiming they damaged her reputation. Ms Higgins relied on the truth defence claiming the social media posts were substantially true during the defamation proceedings. A verdict in former senator Linda Reynolds' defamation case against Brittany Higgins and David Sharaz will be handed down in the WA Supreme Court on August 27. NewsWire / Sharon Smith Credit: News Corp Australia Former senator Linda Reynolds brought the defamation proceedings after social media posts made by Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz. NewsWire / Sharon Smith Credit: News Corp Australia The posts were critical of Ms Reynolds' handling of Ms Higgins' allegation she was raped in the senator's office at Parliament House in 2019 by her then-colleague Bruce Lehrmann. He was charged with rape and faced trial in 2022, but the trial was aborted due to juror misconduct. The charge was dropped and Mr Lehrmann continues to maintain his innocence. Mr Lehrmann lost a subsequent civil defamation case in April last year when the Federal Court determined, on the balance of probabilities, that Mr Lehrmann had raped Ms Higgins at Parliament House. He is appealing the decision. Private text messages and emails between federal ministers, senators, staffers, press gallery journalists and lawyers were laid bare during the five-week blockbuster trial last year. Ms Higgins' defence team called for the action to be dismissed entirely at the end of the high-stakes legal battle. Brittany Higgins and David Sharaz sold the French chateau they called home to pay for legal fees. Credit: Supplied Ms Reynolds, who has retired from politics, mortgaged her home in a bid to clear her name. Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz sold their French home to pay for legal fees, as she maintained her version of events about what happened to her at Parliament House. It was revealed Ms Reynolds was seeking more than half a million dollars in damages. Her lawyer Martin Bennett asked the court to 'nail the lies' Ms Higgins allegedly perpetuated after making her rape allegation public in 2021. The court was told Ms Higgins 'grossly defamed' her former boss in social media posts shared years later. Ms Higgins' defence lawyer Rachael Young said it was a series of events in 2021 that led to the then-Senator Reynolds' distress and reputational damage, not social media posts created by her client two years later. Ms Young argued Ms Reynolds' decline was caused by backlash from her referring to Ms Higgins as a 'lying cow', a senate grilling over the allegations, her hospitalisation, losing the defence ministry and missing out on a shadow ministry under Peter Dutton. Ms Higgins' defence lawyer Rachael Young argued it was a series of events in 2021 that led to Ms Reynolds distress and reputational damage, not social media posts created by her client two years later. NewsWire / Sharon Smith Credit: News Corp Australia She said the former senator tried to besmirch the people she blamed for her political demise, namely Ms Higgins, who continued to face the heaviest burden in all this. Two dozen witnesses were called to give evidence including former prime minister Scott Morrison. A who's who of the nation's parliament, media and legal circles were dragged into the proceedings as diary entries, minutes and communications between senators, staffers, journalists, police officers and lawyers were exposed in court. The trial centred around what happened in the aftermath of Ms Higgins speaking out about her alleged rape in a article and The Project interview that were published on February 15, 2021, two years after the alleged incident. Ms Reynolds' lawyer Martin Bennett argued in court statements that Ms Higgins made in those media interviews and in her personal injury claim were wrong and that she had lied. Former senator Linda Reynolds lawyer Martin Bennett argued every fairytale needs a villain. NewsWire / Sharon Smith Credit: News Corp Australia He said his client had been cast as a villain in Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz's fictional story that alleged Ms Reynolds had tried to cover-up a rape. 'Every fairytale needs a villain, and in 2020 or 2021, Ms Higgins and her then-partner and now-husband, Mr Sharaz, cast Ms Reynolds in that role for their fictional story of a cover-up of the rape,' Mr Bennett told the WA Supreme Court. 'The fact she had been raped was traumatic and terrible but it needed something more to attract the attention, to attract media interest, to attract the promotion of Ms Higgins, so she made it a political sex scandal.' Ms Young argued the matter was not, and never had been, a 'fairytale' for her client saying the comments were misplaced, harassing and retraumitising. Ms Young told the court Ms Reynolds had picked the 'wrong target' for the hurt and distress and that her reputation was already 'baked in' when her client posted to social media in the years that followed.

Five takeaways from Trump's Ukraine summit (and his post-mortem on Fox News)
Five takeaways from Trump's Ukraine summit (and his post-mortem on Fox News)

Sydney Morning Herald

time11 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Five takeaways from Trump's Ukraine summit (and his post-mortem on Fox News)

On Fox, he said it was 'insulting' for Ukraine to have sought to join NATO. As for wanting to regain Crimea, a large territory Putin annexed in 2014, Trump said this was impossible because Putin got it in a 'good deal'. 'That was given [to Russia] all because Barack Hussein Obama gave it away in one of the dumbest real estate deals I've ever seen,' Trump said, even though the international community still recognises Crimea as part of Ukraine. Zelensky will have to meet Putin with bombs falling Despite the concerns of European leaders, particularly German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron, Trump has made clear he won't push Putin for a ceasefire. That means that if Zelensky and Putin do have this purported meeting, it will be with bombs still falling. That makes for trying circumstances. Remember, on the flight to Anchorage on Friday, Trump said he would be unhappy if he didn't walk away from the Putin meeting with some form a ceasefire. Now he says it's not necessary at all. Oleh Shamshur, a former Ukrainian ambassador to the US and a senior fellow at the Atlantic Institute, said the talks had largely failed as Trump still believed 'peace talks can advance while hostilities continue'. But Michael O'Hanlon, foreign policy director at the Brookings Institution, said a ceasefire would soon become less important. 'If there is no reasonable effort by Putin to end this war fairly soon – and I doubt there will be – then this whole notion that we should try to negotiate peace will just seem to everyone like a play for time,' he told CNBC. 'Trump's pretty good at sniffing out that kind of tactical ploy.' Europe will have to do the work but cede the credit Trump clearly revelled in the role of ringmaster, and the White House duly pumped out photographs showing European leaders thanking the president, listening to him or inspecting his 'shop' of caps, books and merch. One thing they heard over and over again was that Trump had already ended six wars – a dubious claim at best – and while this one was proving to be the hardest, he was sure he would get it done. After leaving the door ever-so-slightly ajar to putting US boots on the ground as part of a peacekeeping force, Trump scotched that definitively the next morning on Fox News. But he did signal the US could support the Europeans with air power, as well as 'co-ordinating' the security guarantee. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the details of this arrangement were now being worked out. It was one of many components that remained vague after the meeting in Washington, but overall the picture was clear: US involvement will be minimal but just large enough for Trump to take credit. The one thing Trump is wedded to is staying involved Gone are the threats that the US may walk away from the Ukraine-Russia conflict altogether. Trump is now in this for the long-haul. Loading Not only is the US president desperate for the Nobel Peace Prize – he even cold-called a Norwegian minister about it last week, according to a German media report – but he feels ending the war is his ticket to salvation. 'I want to try and get to heaven, if possible,' Trump told Fox. 'I'm hearing I'm not doing well. I am really at the bottom of the totem pole. But if I can get to heaven, this will be one of the reasons.'

Five takeaways from Trump's Ukraine summit (and his post-mortem on Fox News)
Five takeaways from Trump's Ukraine summit (and his post-mortem on Fox News)

The Age

time11 hours ago

  • The Age

Five takeaways from Trump's Ukraine summit (and his post-mortem on Fox News)

On Fox, he said it was 'insulting' for Ukraine to have sought to join NATO. As for wanting to regain Crimea, a large territory Putin annexed in 2014, Trump said this was impossible because Putin got it in a 'good deal'. 'That was given [to Russia] all because Barack Hussein Obama gave it away in one of the dumbest real estate deals I've ever seen,' Trump said, even though the international community still recognises Crimea as part of Ukraine. Zelensky will have to meet Putin with bombs falling Despite the concerns of European leaders, particularly German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron, Trump has made clear he won't push Putin for a ceasefire. That means that if Zelensky and Putin do have this purported meeting, it will be with bombs still falling. That makes for trying circumstances. Remember, on the flight to Anchorage on Friday, Trump said he would be unhappy if he didn't walk away from the Putin meeting with some form a ceasefire. Now he says it's not necessary at all. Oleh Shamshur, a former Ukrainian ambassador to the US and a senior fellow at the Atlantic Institute, said the talks had largely failed as Trump still believed 'peace talks can advance while hostilities continue'. But Michael O'Hanlon, foreign policy director at the Brookings Institution, said a ceasefire would soon become less important. 'If there is no reasonable effort by Putin to end this war fairly soon – and I doubt there will be – then this whole notion that we should try to negotiate peace will just seem to everyone like a play for time,' he told CNBC. 'Trump's pretty good at sniffing out that kind of tactical ploy.' Europe will have to do the work but cede the credit Trump clearly revelled in the role of ringmaster, and the White House duly pumped out photographs showing European leaders thanking the president, listening to him or inspecting his 'shop' of caps, books and merch. One thing they heard over and over again was that Trump had already ended six wars – a dubious claim at best – and while this one was proving to be the hardest, he was sure he would get it done. After leaving the door ever-so-slightly ajar to putting US boots on the ground as part of a peacekeeping force, Trump scotched that definitively the next morning on Fox News. But he did signal the US could support the Europeans with air power, as well as 'co-ordinating' the security guarantee. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the details of this arrangement were now being worked out. It was one of many components that remained vague after the meeting in Washington, but overall the picture was clear: US involvement will be minimal but just large enough for Trump to take credit. The one thing Trump is wedded to is staying involved Gone are the threats that the US may walk away from the Ukraine-Russia conflict altogether. Trump is now in this for the long-haul. Loading Not only is the US president desperate for the Nobel Peace Prize – he even cold-called a Norwegian minister about it last week, according to a German media report – but he feels ending the war is his ticket to salvation. 'I want to try and get to heaven, if possible,' Trump told Fox. 'I'm hearing I'm not doing well. I am really at the bottom of the totem pole. But if I can get to heaven, this will be one of the reasons.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store