
Live updates: Attack on Iranian nuclear sites thrusts US into Israel-Iran conflict
Update:
Date: 8 min ago
Title: Fallout from US strikes as Israel-Iran conflict enters 11th day. Here's what you need to know
Content:
All eyes are on how Tehran will react to the US attack on three key Iranian nuclear facilities early Sunday local time, which thrust America into the Israel-Iran conflict that is entering its 11th day.
Early assessments raise questions over whether the US destroyed the bulk of the country's enriched nuclear material while President Donald Trump alluded to the possibility of regime change in Iran.
Here's what you need to know:
How will Iran respond?: Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said his country has 'a variety of options' when deciding how to respond to the US attacks. Tehran denounced the US and Israel at an emergency UN Security Council meeting and voiced skepticism about the potential for diplomacy. From striking US bases in the region, to possibly closing a key waterway – the Strait of Hormuz — to global shipping, Iran is likely mulling its next moves.
Calls for regime change: Trump floated the idea of possible of regime change in Iran in a social media post Sunday evening. 'If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' Trump wrote. The president's post is a pivot from messaging by senior administration officials, though Trump did not specifically say the US would enact regime change.
Allied support: A number of close US allies have expressed support for America's strikes against Iran, arguing that Iran had presented a nuclear threat, but urging diplomacy and de-escalation. Others, including key partners in the Gulf, have expressed concern and dismay over the strikes. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, for example, said Monday that Iran 'cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon.'
Domestic criticism: Some lawmakers, including from usually highly opposed ends of the US political spectrum, have criticized Trump's decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities, and the move has highlighted a divide within Trump's MAGA movement. Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a staunch Trump ally, said 'This is not our fight' while Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders said, 'we cannot let history repeat itself.'
A misdirect: While the final call came Saturday as bombers were already in the air, those around Trump believed his mind had been largely made up for days regarding taking action in Iran. Trump directed staff to announce 2-week window – thinking the timeline could throw off the Iranians and conceal his plans, according to several sources familiar with what happened.
'Operation Midnight Hammer': B-2 stealth bombers dropped more than a dozen massive 'bunker-buster' bombs on Iran's Fordow and Natanz facilities, while Tomahawk missiles struck Isfahan, according to a US timeline of the attack. The strikes thrust the US into the Israel-Iran conflict, which has seen the two sides trade attacks for over a week. Top administration officials insist the US is not at war with Iran, but Trump has warned the US could launch more attacks if Tehran does not make peace.
Strikes continue: Israel launched fresh airstrikes targeting military infrastructure in western Iran's Kermanshah city, the Israeli military said Monday morning. Earlier, Iranian state affiliated media said Israel struck Parchin, a large military complex southeast of Tehran. Iran launched its own strike on Israel on Monday, firing a missile that was intercepted by Israel's air defenses.
Update:
Date: 17 min ago
Title: Israel launches strikes on Iranian military infrastructure
Content:
Israel launched fresh airstrikes targeting military infrastructure in western Iran's Kermanshah city, said the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) on Monday morning.
Earlier, Iran's state-affiliated Nour News reported that Israel had struck Parchin, a large military complex southeast of Tehran, in a strike during the early hours of Monday.
Iran launched its own strike on Israel on Monday, firing a missile that was intercepted by Israel's air defenses.
Update:
Date: 17 min ago
Title: China, the biggest buyer of Iranian oil, would be vulnerable to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz
Content:
As calls grow within Iran for closing the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for US attacks on its nuclear sites, a key diplomatic and economic backer of Tehran would stand to lose from that decision: China.
Connecting the oil-rich Persian Gulf to the open ocean, the Strait of Hormuz is one of the most critical oil checkpoints in the world. Some 20 million barrels per day of crude oil, or 20% of the global consumption, flowed through the narrow strait between Iran and Oman last year, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA).
For China, the world's largest importer of oil and the biggest buyer of crude from Iran, the Strait of Hormuz is even more important.
China imported 5.4 million barrels of crude every day through the strait in the first three months of 2025, according to the EIA's estimates. That's equivalent to about half of China's daily average crude imports in the first quarter of the year, according to CNN's calculation based on Chinese customs data.
On Sunday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio highlighted that vulnerability when he called on China to dissuade Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz.
'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil,' Rubio said in an interview with Fox News on Sunday, adding that closing the strait would hurt other countries' economies more than the US economy.
China remains by far Iran's largest energy buyer, though it has not reported purchases of Iranian oil in its official customs data since 2022, according to analysts. Some 90% of Iran's oil exports now go to China, according to commodities data company Kpler, providing a key lifeline to Tehran's heavily sanctioned economy.
China has condemned US attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities, saying the move 'exacerbates tensions in the Middle East.' It has not commented on the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
Update:
Date: 16 min ago
Title: Demonstrators across US protest strike on Iran
Content:
Americans in cities across the US took to the streets Sunday to protest President Donald Trump's decision to bomb nuclear sites in Iran. From Los Angeles to New York, demonstrators expressed worries about sparking a broader war and detracting from existing problems within the US.
Update:
Date: 17 min ago
Title: Why some officials raised doubts about whether a single bombing campaign can set back Iran's nuclear program
Content:
Intelligence analysts are still working to determine how much the US attacks on three key Iranian nuclear sites hindered Tehran's ability to build a nuclear weapon if it chose to.
Prior to the strikes, US intelligence officials believed Israel's extensive missile campaign against Iran, which also killed a number of top Iranian scientists, had only set back Iran by a matter of months.
And before President Donald Trump ordered the strikes, some US officials had raised doubts about whether a single bombing campaign would be able to entirely destroy Iran's nuclear program, especially at sites like Isfahan where the equipment is deeply buried.
The Trump administration has touted the strikes as an operational success but has provided few details.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said Sunday morning it was 'way too early' to comment on whether Iran still retains some nuclear capabilities.
One key question, according to a senior US lawmaker, is whether Iran had already moved any of its highly enriched uranium stockpiles from the facilities in question by the time the US dropped bombs on them. Trump had made public he was weighing striking at least one of the sites, Fordow, and 'Iranians aren't idiots,' this person said.
But without American or allied boots on the ground to physically inspect the sites, answering that question is infinitely more difficult.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
30 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Four Scenarios Facing a Trump-Rattled World Economy
With his decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities and join Israel's war on Iran, President Donald Trump has injected new geopolitical risks into an already fragile global economy. It also makes what comes next in his trade and economic conflicts all the more important. It should be causing some recalculations. And perhaps deleting a popular meme.


Forbes
39 minutes ago
- Forbes
Oil Price To $150?
SEALY, TEXAS - JUNE 19: In an aerial view, oil storage tanks are seen at the Enterprise Sealy ... More Station on June 19, 2025 in Sealy, Texas. (Photo by) Oil prices have surged approximately 25% in just one month, with WTI climbing to $75 per barrel as the Israel-Iran conflict escalates. The situation has taken a critical turn with the United States entering the fray, launching attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities. This military escalation has sent shockwaves through global energy markets, but historical precedents suggest the current price surge may be just the beginning. Historical Pattern: U.S. Military Actions Drive Sustained Oil Price Increases Over the past two decades, U.S. military interventions in oil-producing regions have consistently triggered significant and sustained increases in crude oil prices. The pattern reveals that initial market reactions often pale in comparison to the prolonged price elevation that follows. The 2011 U.S.-led NATO intervention in Libya provides a relevant historical parallel to current events. Libya's oil production of 1.6 million barrels per day was effectively eliminated from global markets, creating an immediate supply shock. Price Impact: During the Iraq War's intensification period, oil prices experienced their most severe sustained increase in modern history. While multiple factors contributed to this surge, U.S. military operations in Iraq were central to market psychology and supply concerns. Price Impact: Notably, this doubling of oil prices played a significant role in aggravating the 2008 economic Situation: Warning Signs Point to Further Escalation Iran's leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has stated their refusal to surrender. In retaliation for the U.S. attack on its nuclear sites, Iran has ordered the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. This action threatens to block roughly 20% of the world's oil supply, valued at approximately $1 billion per day, and is poised to drive oil prices higher. Forbes Daily: Join over 1 million Forbes Daily subscribers and get our best stories, exclusive reporting and essential analysis of the day's news in your inbox every all set! Enjoy the Daily! You're all set! Enjoy the Daily! The current crisis resembles the 2011 Libya intervention, and several factors indicate that oil prices are likely to keep climbing. From a supply risk perspective, Iran's daily oil output of approximately 3.2 million barrels is double what Libya produced in 2011. The direct military involvement of the United States significantly raises the chances of a prolonged conflict, and there's also the potential for the conflict to spread, involving other oil-producing nations in the region. Regarding market psychology, the rapid 25% price increase in just one month shows how sensitive the market is right now. History teaches us that initial price spikes often don't fully capture the eventual peak, as geopolitical risk premiums typically build up over months, not just days. Market Implications History shows that U.S. military actions in the Middle East can result in oil prices spiking over time. Based on these historical trends, we can consider a few scenarios for market implications: Overall, the current 25% surge in oil prices is likely just the beginning of a more significant and prolonged increase. Historical evidence from U.S. military interventions in the Middle East consistently shows that oil markets tend to underestimate how long and how much prices will be affected. Given that Iran is a larger oil producer than Libya and the conflict appears to be escalating rather than de-escalating, investors and policymakers should be ready for oil prices to continue climbing. The historical precedent is clear: when the U.S. launches military attacks in major oil-producing regions, prices don't just spike; they can double. Rising oil prices typically signal trouble for the markets, potentially leading to a stock market correction. This is precisely why a diversified portfolio is crucial for investments, especially given geopolitical and macroeconomic risks. Our Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, which is a collection of 30 stocks, is developed using a rigorous risk assessment framework, and it has consistently outperformed the S&P 500 over the past four years. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance Roasted For Line That Inadvertently Seemed To Insult Donald Trump
Vice President JD Vance faced ridicule on Sunday over what critics mockingly suggested was an inadvertent insult of Donald Trump. Appearing on NBC's 'Meet The Press,' Vance was defending U.S. strikes on Iran as he told anchor Kristen Welker that he could 'certainly empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East.' 'I understand the concern, but the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents,' Vance said. 'And now we have a president who actually knows how to accomplish America's national security objectives.' Vance: I empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East. I understand the concern, but the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents — Acyn (@Acyn) June 22, 2025 The comment raised eyebrows, especially given how Trump was president for four years during the quarter-century period Vance referred to, alongside George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden. Vance also promised the current strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities wouldn't turn into 'some long, drawn-out thing,' saying: 'We've got in, we've done the job of setting their nuclear program back.' But moments later, he appeared to contradict that assurance by adding: 'We're going to now work to permanently dismantle that nuclear program over the coming years, and that is what the president has set out to do.' This is insane behavior from a vice president. This administration has lost all amount of decency. — bleezy 🔮 (@bleezy_eth) June 22, 2025 🚨 BREAKING: Trump was president for four years during that time Vance is talking about. — SatoshEh (@SatoshEh) June 22, 2025 Dumb presidents? The current president thinks windmills cause cancer and can't spell parade correctly but go off couch boi — Colin Gubbins (@RitleySammich) June 22, 2025 Absolute piece of shit. — Kristen Schaal (@kristenschaaled) June 23, 2025 Does he really think his audience is this 'dumb'!? — Lib Dunk (@libdunkmedia) June 22, 2025 Donald was one of them. Now he is again. — Art Candee 🍿🥤 (@ArtCandee) June 22, 2025 It has become completely normal for Trump and Vance to refer to their predecessors as stupid and dumb. Doing it once would have been scandalously uncouth in any other administration. Yet another subtle sign of America's decline. — William Alfred Pawson (@wilfredpawson) June 22, 2025 Vance: It's not gonna be some long drawn out thingVance 5 seconds later: And we're going to continue dismantling it over the coming years — Akoshic Revival (@AkoshicMutiny) June 22, 2025 Dumb presidents? Really. Crude and ignorant language coming from one of the country's "leaders." He'll probably be praised by Fox News and right-wing social media. — Holy Bullies (@holybullies) June 22, 2025 He's saying Trump is a smart president?Is he serious? 🧐 — Ryca (@_oRyca_) June 22, 2025 If we're calling 'then' presidents dumb, what are we calling this one? — Karly Kingsley (@karlykingsley) June 22, 2025 Trump not being the dumbest president isn't gonna fly. — Outspoken™️ (@Out5p0ken) June 22, 2025 Huh? We have the dumbest motherfucker on the planet as our current president. — Fookin Chookay 🎗️🇺🇸🦅🇳🇴🇮🇪🏳️🌈🌊🇺🇦🇮🇱 (@slayergoddess69) June 22, 2025 As opposed to the guy who hosted a reality game show and thinks BleachBit is a bathroom cleaner? — Warren (@swd2) June 22, 2025 Kayleigh McEnany's 'Every Dictator' Take On Trump Iran Strike Draws Online Fire Critics Point Out Glaring Contradiction In Trump's Iran 'Regime Change' Post Trump Rages At Reporter Who Refuses To Stick To 'Positive' Questions