
Japan grapples with its past 80 years after World War II – DW – 08/15/2025
August 15th marks the 80th anniversary of Japan's unconditional surrender and the end of World War II, putting focus once again to the reckoning of the country's past. The domestic debate in Japan on shaping narratives about World War II is often referred to as "history wars."
Japan's actions during the war are also a sore spot in international diplomacy. China and both North and South Korea have bitter memories of life under Japanese occupation and rarely miss an opportunity to remind their neighbor of the past.
Inside Japan, what were once far-right fringe voices have grown more prominent in recent years by insisting on a narrative denying or minimizing the brutality of Imperial Japan during World War II. Historical revisionist groups want the victims of Imperial Japan's rampage across Asia and the Pacific eight decades ago to leave history in the past.
"There are very few people alive today who experienced the war in any of these countries, but I do not think they will ever stop talking about it because it is an effective tool with which to bash Japan," said Hiromichi Moteki, chairman of the Tokyo-based Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact, which promotes an alternative narrative of Japan's actions during World War II.
"They want to claim the moral high ground over Japan, but all we want to do is have the right to remember and honor our war dead and teach our younger generations the history of the nation," he told DW.
Moteki's organization seeks to spreads its message by translating Japanese nationalist works of historical revisionism into English.
An article published in the Georgetown University's Journal of International Affairs exploring historical revisionism in Japan describes Moteki's organization as part of an "interlocking web of small but vocal lobby groups" that emerged as part of a "denialist movement" in the 1990s.
Other groups with similar aims include the "International Research Institute of Controversial Histories" or the "Historical Awareness Research Committee."
Moteki's group, for example, insists World War II was not a war of aggression started by Japan but an act of self-defense against the US and European nations that had colonized Asia. It claims Imperial Japan "liberated" the countries it conquered.
Similar to other nationalist organizations, the society also insists that euphemistically named "comfort women," most of whom were from Korea were not abducted and forced into sexual servitude but were in fact well-paid prostitutes. It also contends that Allied prisoners of war were well treated and that laborers from Korea and Taiwan willingly toiled in mines, shipyards or factories during the conflict.
At the same time, the group says the US committed war crimes by dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The hundreds of trials carried out by the allies prosecuting Japanese troops for war crimes was merely "victor's justice."
"These groups share a distinctive method of historical writing similar to the methods of Holocaust denialism," writes Tessa Morris-Suzuki, professor emerita of Japanese history in the College of Asia and Pacific at Australian National University.
"They seize on historical documents that are often relatively obscure and cherry-pick them for information which supports their cause. These fragments of information are then strung together without contextualization into writing that overlooks source reliability, ignores contradictory evidence, and fundamentally misrepresents content," Morris-Suzuki wrote in the Georgetown Journal of International Affairs.
"These issues are embedded in a wider, all-embracing view of twentieth century Japanese history: one that presents Japan as the victim and attributes negative images of Japan's pre-war and wartime past to international propaganda conspiracies," she continues.
The Georgetown report, which was published in 2021, said a "substantial number" of conservative lawmakers "belong to lobby groups which disseminate revisionist views."
Historical revisionist lobby groups have also worked with diplomats on propaganda efforts abroad, including opposing monuments to "comfort women" in countries like the US and Germany.
Yuji Hosaka is a professor of history and politics at Sejong University in South Korea who has long been critical of Japan's failure to honestly address its past, or to teach younger generations of the Japanese the truth about the war-time era.
"I see many on the right in Japan who just want to forget about all the bad things that happened when Japan occupied Korea and invaded China and southeast Asia,' he said. "These people often say that Japan brought development and modern technology to help these countries, but that just makes the people of Korea angry."
Korean historians largely agree that after annexing the peninsula from 1910, Japan forcefully assimilated the Korean people, forbade them to speak their own language, suppressed the indigenous culture and exploited the land and its people. The intent was to make Korea a part of the Japanese empire, with thousands of Koreans serving in the Japanese military during the war.
Hosaka says that Japanese history school books still gloss over the atrocities carried out by the Japanese military, with often little or no mention of the Nanjing Massacre which killed hundreds of thousands in China, the abuse of civilian laborers and POWs or other crimes for which Japanese were executed after the war.
"Those who forget the past will inevitably find themselves in a similar situation again in the future," he said. "It is imperative that Japan learns from the past."
"In the past, Germany and France worked together to create common history books for their children," he added. "I believe that Japan should reach out to Korea and China and do the same thing."
An editorial in the July 7 edition of the newspaper declared, "It's time Japan faced its war crimes and militarist past."
For China, the Nanjing Massacre continues to bear weight in the present day.
According to Chinese historians, 300,000 civilians and soldiers were killed in a six-week frenzy of murder, torture, rape, arson and looting after the invading Japanese military entered Nanjing, then the capital city of China, on December 13, 1937.
Moteki and others on the right say successive Japanese leaders have expressed genuine remorse for what happened nearly a century ago but that other countries always say the apologies are inadequate or are insincere.
"It will never change," said Moteki, who was born in 1941.
"Japan has to defend itself from these criticisms and verbal attacks. But the time has come for Japan to stop apologizing because it is meaningless now."
On August 15, the anniversary of the emperor announcing in a radio broadcast that Japan was surrendering, Moteki will go to the controversial Yasukuni Shrine in central Tokyo to pay his respects to war dead.
He will be surrounded by thousands more who want to mark the anniversary, including dwindling numbers of old soldiers, the relatives of men who fought, and far-right groups in uniforms.
Yasukuni is the last resting place of more than 2.4 million military and civilian victims of war in Japan since 1869. To other nations, however, Yasukuni is a controversial symbol, as it also honors more than 1,000 people convicted of war crimes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
an hour ago
- DW
Trump, Putin summit on Ukraine underway in Alaska – DW – 08/15/2025
Trump described Putin as a "smart guy" while teasing the meeting as "high stakes!" Ukrainian President Zelenskyy said a trilateral meeting with Kyiv's involvement must follow. Follow DW for more. US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are meeting at a military base in Alaska Trump greeted Putin with a handshake on a red carpet laid out on the tarmac Zelenskyy says summit should "open up a real path toward a just peace" Yulia Navalnaya calls for the release of political prisoners from Russia and UkraineDonald Trump and Vladimir Putin sat together in a room at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson after their arrival in Alaska. Against a backdrop bearing the slogan "Pursuing Peace," the US and Russian presidents sat with members of their respective delegations without taking any questions from reporters or making any statements. Donald Trump has greeted Vladimir Putin with a handshake on the red carpet in Alaska. The two leaders met on the tarmac before briefly posing for photos standing side-by-side. After not taking any questions from reporters, they left the stage and got into a waiting car together, and could be seen smiling and chatting to each other in the backseat as the vehicle drove off. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has said the previously planned one-on-one meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will now be a three-on-three session. The US president is to be joined by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who arrived in Alaska earlier, is likely to be one of the team alongside Putin. According to the Kremlin, the meeting will be followed by talks between the full delegations and continue over lunch. The two leaders are expected to hold a joint press conference. Donald Trump has landed in Alaska for the highly anticipated summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump and Putin are expected to discuss Russia's invasion of Ukraine and US-Russia on Friday, several hundred people had gathered in Anchorage, the state capital, to show their support for Ukraine. A rally outside Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, where the Trump-Putin summit is being held, however, was much smaller. Only a handful of protesters turned out to denounce Russia's invasion of its neighbor. As US and Russian leaders meet to discuss peace in Ukraine, key voices are missing — Ukraine and Europe. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz warns that any deal must include Kyiv and begin with a ceasefire. Though Europe's influence is limited, Merz could emerge as a key figure, urging President Trump to protect European and Ukrainian interests. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 videoA Russian government aircraft has landed in Alaska ahead of the talks between the Russian and US presidents, according to flight tracking site Flightradar24. It was unclear whether Kremlin leader Vladimir Putin was on board. The plane departed from Magadan in Russia's Far East, where the Russian president had been earlier on Friday. The Kremlin said the summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska is expected to last six to seven hours. Spokesman Dmitry Peskov told Russian state television the meeting will begin with a personal conversation involving advisers, followed by delegation-level talks that could take place over a working lunch. He said the two leaders would later meet privately again before holding a joint press conference. Putin left for Alaska from Russia's Magadan region in the Far East. Peskov said the Russian leader was expected to arrive on time at 11 a.m. local time (1900 GMT/UTC) in Anchorage, where the meeting will take place at a US military base. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Friday that Moscow was continuing to kill people and showing no intention of ending the war, just hours before the Russian and US presidents meet in Alaska "There is no order, nor any signals from Moscow that it is preparing to end this war... they are also killing on the day of the negotiations," Zelenskyy said in a video address posted on social media. Separately, in his nightly video address, the Ukrainian leader reiterated his call for a trilateral meeting with himself, US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "It is precisely in this format that real solutions are possible," Zelenskyy said. A Friday night in mid-August is usually the peak of the European Union's sleepy summer political recess. But tonight, officials are glued to their phones, waiting for any clue on whether their bid to influence US President Donald Trump ahead of his talks with Putin has worked. European leaders said their virtual meeting with the US president and his Ukrainian counterpart earlier this week went well — and there's no doubt the trans-Atlantic mood music is better now than back in February when President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was booted out the White House, and Europe was left looking powerless. A European Commission spokesperson told reporters on Thursday their "understanding" is that Trump will "debrief" Zelenskyy and European leaders following his tete-a-tete with Putin. "We don't have a timeframe on this," she added. Until then, it's a case of putting on a brave face and watching from afar. You can read all about Europe's hopes and fears in this analysis by my colleague Anchal Vohra. On his way to the summit with US President Donald Trump in Alaska, Russian President Vladimir Putin visited the Magadan region of his country, some 6,000 kilometers (about 3,750 miles) east of Moscow. According to state media, Putin's scheduled included a visit a fish oil capsule factory and cultural centers in the Russian Far East region's capital, also called Magadan. The city was a major transit centre for political prisoners during the Stalin era and was the administrative centre of a forced labor gold mining operation. The sparsely populated wider Magadan region, on the Sea of Okhotsk, today relies on mining and fishing. After his visit, Putin was expected to review materials on Ukraine, bilateral tensions, and economic cooperation on his 3,000-kilometer journey to the summit in Donald Trump is rolling out the red carpet for Vladimir Putin, not everyone is pleased with the visit. Several hundred people have expressed their protests by waving yellow and blue flags in support of Ukraine. Their main concern is that Zelenskyy is not participating in the meeting. Many of the protesters have voiced their opposition to having an alleged war criminal on American soil. The International Criminal Court in The Hague has issued a warrant for Putin's arrest. Conversely, some Alaskans we met at a golf course expressed pride in having the president here, stating that they would prefer him to meet his Russian counterpart on American soil rather than in Russia. US President Trump is expected to greet Russian President Putin on the plane upon his arrival in Anchorage, Alaska, the Kremlin has said. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Russian state TV that the Russian president was due to arrive at 11:00 am local time (1900 GMT). The meeting between US President Trump and Russian President Putin in a few hours in Alaska should " open up a real path toward a just peace and a substantive discussion between leaders in a trilateral format," Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said. In a Friday post on X, Zelenskyy said he expected an intelligence report on Russia's intentions and preparations for the meeting. "It is time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia," Zelenskyy wrote. "We are counting on America. We are ready, as always, to work as productively as possible."


DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Fact check: Trump's false claims about Washington, D.C. – DW – 08/15/2025
US President Donald Trump has deployed the National Guard in Washington, D.C. He declared that crime in the capital was "out of control" — but is this really true? DW checks the facts. Two months after deploying the National Guard in Los Angeles, US President Donald Trump has sent 800 National Guard troops into the American capital. On Monday, he placed the city's police department under federal control, and announced that he would bring in the military if necessary. He justified the move by saying that Washington had a very high level of violent crime, and quoted various statistics to support this. Claim: "Crime is out of control in the District of Columbia. […] The magnitude of the violent crime crisis places the District of Columbia among the most violent jurisdictions in the United States," Trump declared in an official White House statement on August 11, reiterating a claim he had posted on his Truth Social platform on August 5. "In 2024, the District of Columbia averaged one of the highest robbery and murder rates of large cities nationwide. Indeed, the District of Columbia now has a higher violent crime, murder, and robbery rate than all 50 States, recording a homicide rate in 2024 of 27.54 per 100,000 residents." DW Fact check: Misleading At first glance, it would appear that Trump is right. Crime rates in the US capital are indeed high [see table]. According to the FBI, the National Center for Health Statistics, and the Center for Public Safety Initiatives, in 2023, compared to the 50 US states, Washington, D.C., was one of the most dangerous territories in the US, with a murder rate of 39 for every 100,000 inhabitants. However, if the numbers for the same year are compared to other major US cities, rather than US states, Washington, which currently has a population of around 684,000, is not the worst offender. Top of the chart, with homicide rates of more than 50 per 100,000 inhabitants, were the cities of New Orleans and St. Louis (Missouri), whose populations are only about half the size. Washington, D.C., is not actually a state, which makes the city comparison more apt. Trump also fails to mention in his statement that the homicide rate in Washington, D.C., has dropped significantly, from 39 per 100,000 in 2023 to 27 in 2024, which is the figure Trump is quoting. This puts Washington in fourth place in the most recent national statistics of cities with the most homicides per 100,000 residents. According to Washington, D.C.'s Metropolitan Police Department, there was a 32% decrease in the number of recorded murders in 2024 — down to 187 from 274 cases in 2023. And a comparable annual period of August 2024 to the present (August 2025) has seen a 26% reduction in reported violent crime. The mayor of Washington, Muriel Bowser, spelled this out earlier this week. "It is […] true that we experienced a crime spike post-COVID," she said. "But we worked quickly to put laws in place, and tactics, that got violent offenders off our streets and gave our police officers more tools. Which is why we have seen a huge decrease in crime, because of those efforts. We have been able to reverse that 2023 crime spike." Trump supporters are claiming in various online media — as here and here — that the Washington, D.C., Police Department's statistics have been falsified. And yet statistics published by the independent Council on Criminal Justice also confirm that crime in Washington has in fact decreased. The FBI statistics Trump is using also attest that crime is going down all across the US. According to FBI Data Explorer, there was a reduction in all forms of violent crime in the US in 2024 compared to the previous year. The number of murders dropped by 14.9%, robbery by 8.9%, rape by 5%, and aggravated assault by 3%. Recent data show that this positive trend has continued in 2025. Unlike the president himself, the new AI bot on Trump's Truth Social network gives a nuanced response to the question "Is crime out of control in Washington, D.C.?" "D.C. had a severe crime peak in 2023, but 2025 data show significant declines so far," it says. "Describing crime as 'out of control' today overstates the current downward trend while accurately reflecting the recent high-water mark and ongoing public concern." Trump has also said that his intervention in Washington is "only the beginning." He mentioned the cities of Chicago, New York, Baltimore, and Oakland as places where he might also deploy the National Guard. During his first term in office, Trump mobilized the National Guard in more than half of the US states following the murder of George Floyd by a police officer in May 2020. The troops were sent in to confront the mass protests by the Black Lives Matter movement.


DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Can the war in Ukraine be 'frozen?' – DW – 08/15/2025
European leaders say one option to at least temporarily bring an end to the conflict in Ukraine is to freeze it. Fighting between Russia and Ukraine would stop immediately while negotiations on reaching a more lasting peace would continue. DW looks at what a "frozen" conflict could mean for Ukraine.