
Why Lugu Hills victory is a crucial point in final stretch of battle against Maoists
This underlines the strategic importance of Vivek da's death to the broader counter-insurgency campaign. Vivek da's notoriety within the Maoist hierarchy stemmed from his reputed role in orchestrating several high-profile ambushes against security forces over the past two years. Local police officials blame him for planning attacks that left more than a dozen personnel dead in Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand. His neutralisation, according to Jharkhand police, will deal a significant blow to the operational cohesion of the insurgent network in eastern India.advertisementThe gun battle extended for over an hour before the Maoists, taken by surprise, were forced into retreat. When the last echoes of gunfire faded, security personnel swept the site, recovering a formidable array of weaponry: one AK-series assault rifle, one self-loading rifle (SLR), three INSAS rifles, a semi-automatic pistol and eight country-made Bharmar firearms. Such an arsenal, officials said, indicated both the insurgents' preparedness for protracted guerrilla operations and their capacity to procure or manufacture arms in remote forest sanctuaries.There were no casualties among the security forces. The success, according to officers, was due in large part to the element of surprise, rigorous training and the surgical execution of the assault plan. 'This is a decisive strike against Left Wing Extremism (LWE),' declared inspector general of police Amol Vinukant Homkar. 'It demonstrates our unwavering commitment to eradicating Naxalism and restoring the rule of law in every corner of Jharkhand.'The encounter forms part of a nationwide offensive under which the central government aims to eliminate LWE by March 2026. In a post on X, dated April 1, Union home minister Amit Shah highlighted that the number of districts most affected by LWE had halved to six. He added that 'districts of concern' have fallen from nine to six while other LWE-affected districts have decreased from 17 to just six. This, he asserted, reflects the success of combined security operations and targeted development projects.advertisementYet, analysts caution that military victories alone will not end the insurgency. The Maoists have long tapped into grievances over land rights, displacement and poverty among indigenous and other marginalised groups. Their guerrilla tactics—ambushes, improvised explosive devices and assassinations—remain a potent threat in forested and mineral-rich terrain where state presence has historically been thin.For the families of the slain insurgents, the encounter is a reminder of a conflict that has wrought tragedy on both sides. The government has for years offered rehabilitation and surrender schemes, including vocational training and financial assistance, to Maoist cadre who lay down arms. Yet activists argue that such measures must be expanded and coupled with genuine dialogue on land and labour rights, if the cycle of violence is to be broken.As security forces continue combing operations in and around the encounter site, the broader community looks on with a mixture of relief and apprehension. For many villagers, the presence of armed cadre has meant extortion, forced recruitment and the constant fear of reprisals. The removal of key leaders like Vivek da may well disrupt the insurgents' ability to coordinate attacks and recruit new members, but it may also prompt desperate last-ditch efforts by remaining cadre to demonstrate their resilience.advertisementThe encounter in Lugu Hills is, for now, a significant chapter in India's protracted struggle against LWE. But a truly historic victory will require not only further eliminations of insurgent leadership but also the forging of a social contract that addresses the deep-rooted inequalities on which the Maoists have long thrived. Only then, advocates say, can the promise of peace and development in states like Jharkhand be fully realised.Subscribe to India Today MagazineMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
10 minutes ago
- Business Standard
PMIS needs independent review, relaxed norms for inclusion: Parl panel
The Prime Minister Internship Scheme (PMIS) must undergo periodic independent evaluations to improve transparency and should ease eligibility norms for marginalised and economically weaker candidates, the Standing Committee on Finance has recommended. In its report submitted to Parliament on Thursday, the committee, chaired by Member of Parliament Bhartruhari Mahtab, said challenges relating to inclusivity, monitoring, stakeholder participation, and post-internship outcomes continue to impact the scheme's budget efficiency. The scheme was allocated Rs 2,000 crore in the Budget Estimates for FY25, but the Revised Estimates reduced this to Rs 380 crore. 'These funds suffice for the pilot phase, but dynamic reassessment of financial needs is crucial for scaling up,' the panel noted. The committee raised concerns over the blanket exclusion of candidates from families of regular government employees, calling the provision unwarranted. Many such families, it noted, may still require support under the scheme. It also emphasised that lack of support for living expenses could prevent candidates from remote or underserved regions from participating, thereby weakening the programme's inclusivity and limiting the diversity of talent. Further, the panel urged the government to build a robust system to monitor and track the internship-to-employment conversion rate, calling it a key success metric for the scheme. To broaden the scheme's reach, the panel recommended stronger engagement with small and medium enterprises (SMEs), startups, and regional stakeholders to ensure inclusive sectoral and geographic representation across the internship programme. The committee also addressed delays under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), recommending the creation of fast-track tribunals with strict timelines for high-priority cases. To enhance efficiency, it also proposed exploring a public-private partnership (PPP) model to streamline judicial processes—citing the success of privatised Seva Kendras—and called for improved infrastructure for the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). In its response, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs told the committee that changes to the IBC and reforms to strengthen both tribunal and appellate mechanisms would be initiated. 'Additional tribunals will be established,' it said. The panel urged the government to 'provide clearer guidelines on the treatment of government dues, especially taxes and penalties, ensuring equitable and transparent resolution of government claims.' The committee also recommended mandating a 14-day processing period for insolvency applications and raising competency standards for resolution professionals through rigorous certification, specialised training, and independent performance reviews. 'By addressing delays, competency gaps, and broadening stakeholder engagement, along with leveraging technology and domain expertise, the IBC can further enhance its impact on India's economy, ensuring faster resolutions and boosting investor confidence,' the panel concluded. Taking note of the discontinuation of disinvestment targets, the Standing Committee on Finance, in its report submitted to the Parliament on Thursday, pressed upon the government to keep in mind the importance of strategic disinvestment in reducing the fiscal burden and promoting efficiency. The government told the committee that a calibrated disinvestment strategy is an integral part of the value creation process, keeping the interests of minority shareholders in mind. The standing committee in its report on the Department of Economic Affairs, stressed on the need for realistic preparation of estimates and efficient utilisation of allocated funds. 'The Department of Economic Affairs, being the nodal Department in formulation of the Budget, is expected to observe the requisite financial norms and maintain fiscal prudence while making budgetary allocations,' the panel said. Noting that budget estimates for interest payments on both gross and net basis have shown an increase over the years, the committee said, 'Given that the interest payment estimates are closely linked to market conditions; building budget buffer would allow the Government to respond swiftly and flexibly during any adversities that may arise due to global macroeconomic and geopolitical developments.' The panel has asked the government to explore all possible ways and means in collaboration with State Governments to achieve more consistent inflation control across the country. The committee in its report also appreciated the increased allocation for capital expenditure, which it said would enhance India's global competitiveness and fast-track sustainable economic development.


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Saffron terror narrative fell flat': BJP corners Congress after Malegaon blast acquittals, demands apology
NEW DELHI: In a series of coordinated statements, BJP leaders tore into the Congress and its allies, claiming that the 17-year-old case was driven by political vendetta aimed at defaming Hindu saints and nationalists. Seventeen years after a bomb strapped to a motorcycle exploded in Malegaon, killing six people and injuring over 100, a special NIA court in Mumbai on Thursday acquitted all seven accused, including BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit. The court said the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt and cited the absence of "cogent and reliable" evidence. The court also directed the Maharashtra government to pay Rs 2 lakh to the families of those killed and Rs 50,000 to the injured. BJP, allies slam Congress for 'Hindu terror' narrative Reacting to the verdict, top BJP leaders accused the Congress-led UPA government of fabricating the "Hindu terror" narrative to target political opponents. Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis said the police acted under pressure during the UPA regime and demanded an apology from the Congress. "The fake Hindu terror narrative set by the UPA for minority appeasement was exposed by the court order," he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo "Congress should apologise to the acquitted accused and the entire Hindu society." Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma echoed the sentiment. 'The verdict proves there is no such thing as Hindu terror,' he said. 'No Hindu by philosophy can be a terrorist.' Maharashtra CM Eknath Shinde called the verdict a 'slap on the face of those who called it saffron terror' and claimed it was a conspiracy to defame Hindutva. 'Innocent people were jailed for 17 years,' he said. Senior BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad alleged that the entire case was "a Congress conspiracy to spread the Hindu terror theory". "Colonel Purohit fought against terrorists in Kashmir, and he was framed. Sadhvi Pragya couldn't even walk after the torture she suffered. This was all for vote-bank politics," he said at a press conference. Former Jharkhand CM Raghubar Das called the verdict a 'slap on the Congress's misdeeds,' posting on X: 'The Congress and its allies must answer for defaming Hindus and causing immense harassment to innocent people.' BJP MP Nishikant Dubey invoked Union home minister Amit Shah's recent Rajya Sabha statement: 'A Hindu cannot be a terrorist. All terrorists in this country have only one religion. Congress polluted the discourse with 'Saffron Terrorism'. Now it's clear, the real culprits were never caught because the focus was on blaming Indians instead of Pakistani terrorists.' BJP national spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi said, 'The term 'Hindu terror' was coined with political motives. Rahul Gandhi and the Congress ecosystem owe an explanation for maligning an entire faith.' Shehzad Poonawalla, BJP spokesperson , accused the Congress of running a campaign of lies. 'This verdict is not just a legal outcome, it's a political and moral victory against those who used Malegaon to vilify nationalists. Congress should tender an unconditional apology,' he posted on X. Former Madhya Pradesh CM Uma Bharti broke down while recalling the alleged torture BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur endured during her jail time. "When she was in Nashik jail, a police officer told me how she was tortured. I met her when no one else did. I cried. What she went through, no woman should ever face,' Bharti told ANI. Bharti accused Congress leaders, including P Chidambaram, Digvijay Singh, and Rahul Gandhi, as well as leaders of the Left and Samajwadi Party, of coining and promoting the 'Bhagwa terror' tag. 'I want to ask what punishment they deserve for pushing this narrative? Extraordinary action must be taken against them,' she demanded. Social media also witnessed a flurry of support for the acquitted, with BJP supporters using hashtags like #SaffronTerrorLies and #MalegaonVerdict to trend pro-BJP sentiments. Owaisi questions probe, calls verdict 'disappointing' AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi criticised the acquittal, alleging that the investigation was deliberately weakened. 'Six namazis were killed and nearly 100 were injured. They were targeted for their religion,' he said in a post on X. He also asked whether the state would appeal the verdict as it did in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case. Owaisi blamed the Modi government for making a 'terror accused' a Member of Parliament and questioned the alleged directive to former prosecutor Rohini Salian to "go soft" on the case. 'Will NIA/ATS officers be held accountable for their faulty investigation?' he asked. Congress defends record, says terror has no religion Senior Congress leader Digvijay Singh responded by saying that terrorism should not be linked to any religion. 'Neither can a Hindu be a terrorist, nor a Muslim, Sikh or Christian,' he said. Singh rejected the charge that Congress coined the term "Hindu terror" and said the BJP was wrongly blaming the party. Congress MP Amrinder Singh Raja Warring also pushed back, saying, 'When did we ever let terrorists go? The Congress laid down its lives for the unity and integrity of the country.' Accused speak out, allege political conspiracy Shyam Sahu, one of the accused who was discharged in 2017, claimed that the case was part of a Congress conspiracy to malign Hindus. 'While I was in jail, my brother died of a heart attack during a hearing. My family can never be compensated for that loss,' he said, adding that justice had finally been served. Victims' lawyer plans to challenge acquittal The lawyer representing the victims' families said he would challenge the acquittal in the high court. 'Six people died and over 100 were injured. If these people are not guilty, then who is?' he asked. What the court said Judge AK Lahoti, who delivered the verdict, said the prosecution proved that a blast occurred but failed to prove that the accused were behind it. 'Terrorism has no religion, but conviction cannot be based on moral grounds,' the judge remarked while acquitting the accused of charges under the UAPA, IPC and Arms Act. Timeline of events in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case Sept 29, 2008: Bomb explodes on motorcycle in Malegaon, killing six and injuring over 100 Sept 30: FIR filed at Azad Nagar Police Station Oct 21: ATS takes over probe Oct 23: First arrests, including Pragya Singh Thakur Nov 2008: Lt Col Purohit arrested Jan 2009: Charges filed under MCOCA, UAPA, IPC July 2009: MCOCA dropped by special court July 2010: Bombay HC restores MCOCA charges April 2011: NIA takes over investigation Feb–Dec 2012: NIA makes two more arrests May 2016: NIA drops MCOCA charges; gives clean chit to 7 Apr–Sept 2017: All accused granted bail Dec 2017: 3 accused discharged; UAPA charges dropped Oct 2018: Charges framed against 7 accused Dec 2018: Trial begins Sept 2023: Prosecution concludes after 323 witnesses (37 hostile) July 2024: Defence concludes after 8 witnesses Aug 12, 2024: Final statements recorded Apr 19, 2025: Trial closed for judgment July 31, 2025: All accused acquitted due to lack of evidence


News18
30 minutes ago
- News18
Man gets 20-year imprisonment for rape of minor in Mangaluru
Mangaluru (Karnataka), Jul 30 (PTI) A Mangaluru court has sentenced a 30-year-old man to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment in a 2023 case involving the rape of a minor girl. The Fast Track Special Court (FTSC-2) also imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on the convict, identified as Mansoor alias Mohammad Mansoor alias Zabeer, a resident of Sajipanadu village in Bantwal taluk. He has additionally been sentenced to one year of imprisonment and fined Rs 5,000 under IPC Section 506 for criminal intimidation. The case was registered on December 23, 2023, at the Mangaluru Women's Police Station, after the 16-year-old survivor alleged that the accused raped and threatened her on May 30, 2023, while also recording the assault on video. Charges were framed under the relevant sections of the POCSO Act and IPC. After evading arrest for eight months, Mansoor was apprehended on July 2, 2024. Investigations were led by inspectors Gururaj and Rajendra B., who gathered supplementary evidence and filed the charge sheet within the prescribed time. Delivering the verdict on July 30, 2025, Judge Manu K S convicted the accused after hearing arguments from Government Prosecutor Badrinath and Special Public Prosecutor Sahanadevi Boluru. PTI COR GMS GMS ADB view comments First Published: July 31, 2025, 17:30 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.