
Gas plant that caused stink in parts of the Hunter to stay off this week
Snowy Hydro CEO Dennis Barnes told ABC Radio they would pause operations for the next week or so while they figure out what went wrong.
Burning eyes and breathing issues plagued residents in parts of the Hunter after Kurri Kurri's Hunter Power Project began late last week.
From Kurri Kurri to Belmont, Newcastle and West Wallsend people noticed a strong, burning diesel-like smell moving through Tuesday, July 8, afternoon and into Wednesday, July 9.
"We were getting responses all around the Hunter," federal member Dan Repacholi said.
"They're having trouble breathing and their washing reeks of fumes," he said.
In response to the public outcry, Snowy Hydro Hunter Project Power team paused their testing at the Kurri Kurri gas station on Wednesday afternoon, a spokesperson said.
They said during the testing phase of a new turbine, both gas and diesel were used but once fully operational, the station would operate on gas with diesel as a back-up.
"The testing resulted in visible emissions and an odour that drifted over parts of the Hunter," they said.
"We understand this caused undue discomfort and worry, and for that, we sincerely apologise to the local community."
The spokesperson said they were working with the EPA to further investigate the emissions, the possible source of the odour, and to undertake extra monitoring of air quality.
Mr Barnes said they would consider beginning gas commissioning of the plant over the coming weeks, but going forward, the wider Hunter community would be notified of future operations.
He said gas testing would not have the same effect as diesel testing.
"The problem in the last week is we were burning diesel before the plant was synchronised with the grid, in full operation, we won't get any of these emissions," he said.
He said they would have to test the turbines on diesel at some point but they would not go ahead until they figured out how to prevent the stink caused from this week's testing.
The Hunter MP said his office was inundated with anywhere from 600 to 1000 concerned residents reaching out in less than 24 hours.
"We have had doctors ringing up saying their surgeries are being overrun by this issue," he said.
"We've had childcare centres that have said they've had to send their kids home."
Concerned residents have contacted the Newcastle Herald to complain of the "burning diesel" smell and fumes visible in the air.
One Black Hill resident said that at about 10.30am on Wednesday morning, she could almost "taste" the smell, while another in West Wallsend said the smell was "sickening"
Mr Repacholi said the community needed clear communication, accountability and a plan for residents when the smell happens again.
"Locals deserve to know what's in the air and how long it's going to last and what's being done to minimise any harm," he said.
"Honestly, the communication levels from Snowy Hydro have been disgusting."
Mr Repacholi said that neither he nor other federal, state or local government had communicated about the potential air pollution risk.
"I've raised my concerns to the energy minister already, and it has definitely gone up the chain," he said.
"That's just not good enough by Snowy Hydro, they need to be better, and they should be better."
Late last week, Snowy Hydro's Hunter Power Project team successfully fired up one of the Kurri Kurri stations' gas turbines for the first time.
The gas-fired project entered the national grid in March, two years after it was meant to begin operating.
Snowy Hyrdo stated that the power station remained on track to be delivered within it's target of around $1.3 billion but in March the Newcastle Herald reported that costs could be closer to $2 billion.
A Snowy Hydro spokesperson they had continuous emissions monitoring on-site and were currently operating within environmental compliance limits.
The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) confirmed they had officers in Kurri Kurri on Wednesday investigating reports of visible and odorous emissions.
"The source appears to be the new Hunter Power Station near Kurri Kurri where Snowy Hydro is currently commissioning gas/diesel turbine units," a spokesperson said.
Commissioning is when new equipment is tested to ensure it is operating safely before being brought into full working order.
The EPA said they reviewed air dispersion modelling ahead of the commissioning phase of the site, which predicted the emissions would not have any adverse effect on public health or the environment.
They said the power station was required to conduct continous emissions monitoring, including during the commissioning phase where emissions are usually higher than normal operation.
"We will check that the emissions limits haven't been breached and continue to closely monitor the process to ensure compliance with the environmental standards," they said.
TESTING has halted at the Hunter's newest power generator for at least a week as investigations into an odour detected across the region get under way.
Snowy Hydro CEO Dennis Barnes told ABC Radio they would pause operations for the next week or so while they figure out what went wrong.
Burning eyes and breathing issues plagued residents in parts of the Hunter after Kurri Kurri's Hunter Power Project began late last week.
From Kurri Kurri to Belmont, Newcastle and West Wallsend people noticed a strong, burning diesel-like smell moving through Tuesday, July 8, afternoon and into Wednesday, July 9.
"We were getting responses all around the Hunter," federal member Dan Repacholi said.
"They're having trouble breathing and their washing reeks of fumes," he said.
In response to the public outcry, Snowy Hydro Hunter Project Power team paused their testing at the Kurri Kurri gas station on Wednesday afternoon, a spokesperson said.
They said during the testing phase of a new turbine, both gas and diesel were used but once fully operational, the station would operate on gas with diesel as a back-up.
"The testing resulted in visible emissions and an odour that drifted over parts of the Hunter," they said.
"We understand this caused undue discomfort and worry, and for that, we sincerely apologise to the local community."
The spokesperson said they were working with the EPA to further investigate the emissions, the possible source of the odour, and to undertake extra monitoring of air quality.
Mr Barnes said they would consider beginning gas commissioning of the plant over the coming weeks, but going forward, the wider Hunter community would be notified of future operations.
He said gas testing would not have the same effect as diesel testing.
"The problem in the last week is we were burning diesel before the plant was synchronised with the grid, in full operation, we won't get any of these emissions," he said.
He said they would have to test the turbines on diesel at some point but they would not go ahead until they figured out how to prevent the stink caused from this week's testing.
The Hunter MP said his office was inundated with anywhere from 600 to 1000 concerned residents reaching out in less than 24 hours.
"We have had doctors ringing up saying their surgeries are being overrun by this issue," he said.
"We've had childcare centres that have said they've had to send their kids home."
Concerned residents have contacted the Newcastle Herald to complain of the "burning diesel" smell and fumes visible in the air.
One Black Hill resident said that at about 10.30am on Wednesday morning, she could almost "taste" the smell, while another in West Wallsend said the smell was "sickening"
Mr Repacholi said the community needed clear communication, accountability and a plan for residents when the smell happens again.
"Locals deserve to know what's in the air and how long it's going to last and what's being done to minimise any harm," he said.
"Honestly, the communication levels from Snowy Hydro have been disgusting."
Mr Repacholi said that neither he nor other federal, state or local government had communicated about the potential air pollution risk.
"I've raised my concerns to the energy minister already, and it has definitely gone up the chain," he said.
"That's just not good enough by Snowy Hydro, they need to be better, and they should be better."
Late last week, Snowy Hydro's Hunter Power Project team successfully fired up one of the Kurri Kurri stations' gas turbines for the first time.
The gas-fired project entered the national grid in March, two years after it was meant to begin operating.
Snowy Hyrdo stated that the power station remained on track to be delivered within it's target of around $1.3 billion but in March the Newcastle Herald reported that costs could be closer to $2 billion.
A Snowy Hydro spokesperson they had continuous emissions monitoring on-site and were currently operating within environmental compliance limits.
The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) confirmed they had officers in Kurri Kurri on Wednesday investigating reports of visible and odorous emissions.
"The source appears to be the new Hunter Power Station near Kurri Kurri where Snowy Hydro is currently commissioning gas/diesel turbine units," a spokesperson said.
Commissioning is when new equipment is tested to ensure it is operating safely before being brought into full working order.
The EPA said they reviewed air dispersion modelling ahead of the commissioning phase of the site, which predicted the emissions would not have any adverse effect on public health or the environment.
They said the power station was required to conduct continous emissions monitoring, including during the commissioning phase where emissions are usually higher than normal operation.
"We will check that the emissions limits haven't been breached and continue to closely monitor the process to ensure compliance with the environmental standards," they said.
TESTING has halted at the Hunter's newest power generator for at least a week as investigations into an odour detected across the region get under way.
Snowy Hydro CEO Dennis Barnes told ABC Radio they would pause operations for the next week or so while they figure out what went wrong.
Burning eyes and breathing issues plagued residents in parts of the Hunter after Kurri Kurri's Hunter Power Project began late last week.
From Kurri Kurri to Belmont, Newcastle and West Wallsend people noticed a strong, burning diesel-like smell moving through Tuesday, July 8, afternoon and into Wednesday, July 9.
"We were getting responses all around the Hunter," federal member Dan Repacholi said.
"They're having trouble breathing and their washing reeks of fumes," he said.
In response to the public outcry, Snowy Hydro Hunter Project Power team paused their testing at the Kurri Kurri gas station on Wednesday afternoon, a spokesperson said.
They said during the testing phase of a new turbine, both gas and diesel were used but once fully operational, the station would operate on gas with diesel as a back-up.
"The testing resulted in visible emissions and an odour that drifted over parts of the Hunter," they said.
"We understand this caused undue discomfort and worry, and for that, we sincerely apologise to the local community."
The spokesperson said they were working with the EPA to further investigate the emissions, the possible source of the odour, and to undertake extra monitoring of air quality.
Mr Barnes said they would consider beginning gas commissioning of the plant over the coming weeks, but going forward, the wider Hunter community would be notified of future operations.
He said gas testing would not have the same effect as diesel testing.
"The problem in the last week is we were burning diesel before the plant was synchronised with the grid, in full operation, we won't get any of these emissions," he said.
He said they would have to test the turbines on diesel at some point but they would not go ahead until they figured out how to prevent the stink caused from this week's testing.
The Hunter MP said his office was inundated with anywhere from 600 to 1000 concerned residents reaching out in less than 24 hours.
"We have had doctors ringing up saying their surgeries are being overrun by this issue," he said.
"We've had childcare centres that have said they've had to send their kids home."
Concerned residents have contacted the Newcastle Herald to complain of the "burning diesel" smell and fumes visible in the air.
One Black Hill resident said that at about 10.30am on Wednesday morning, she could almost "taste" the smell, while another in West Wallsend said the smell was "sickening"
Mr Repacholi said the community needed clear communication, accountability and a plan for residents when the smell happens again.
"Locals deserve to know what's in the air and how long it's going to last and what's being done to minimise any harm," he said.
"Honestly, the communication levels from Snowy Hydro have been disgusting."
Mr Repacholi said that neither he nor other federal, state or local government had communicated about the potential air pollution risk.
"I've raised my concerns to the energy minister already, and it has definitely gone up the chain," he said.
"That's just not good enough by Snowy Hydro, they need to be better, and they should be better."
Late last week, Snowy Hydro's Hunter Power Project team successfully fired up one of the Kurri Kurri stations' gas turbines for the first time.
The gas-fired project entered the national grid in March, two years after it was meant to begin operating.
Snowy Hyrdo stated that the power station remained on track to be delivered within it's target of around $1.3 billion but in March the Newcastle Herald reported that costs could be closer to $2 billion.
A Snowy Hydro spokesperson they had continuous emissions monitoring on-site and were currently operating within environmental compliance limits.
The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) confirmed they had officers in Kurri Kurri on Wednesday investigating reports of visible and odorous emissions.
"The source appears to be the new Hunter Power Station near Kurri Kurri where Snowy Hydro is currently commissioning gas/diesel turbine units," a spokesperson said.
Commissioning is when new equipment is tested to ensure it is operating safely before being brought into full working order.
The EPA said they reviewed air dispersion modelling ahead of the commissioning phase of the site, which predicted the emissions would not have any adverse effect on public health or the environment.
They said the power station was required to conduct continous emissions monitoring, including during the commissioning phase where emissions are usually higher than normal operation.
"We will check that the emissions limits haven't been breached and continue to closely monitor the process to ensure compliance with the environmental standards," they said.
TESTING has halted at the Hunter's newest power generator for at least a week as investigations into an odour detected across the region get under way.
Snowy Hydro CEO Dennis Barnes told ABC Radio they would pause operations for the next week or so while they figure out what went wrong.
Burning eyes and breathing issues plagued residents in parts of the Hunter after Kurri Kurri's Hunter Power Project began late last week.
From Kurri Kurri to Belmont, Newcastle and West Wallsend people noticed a strong, burning diesel-like smell moving through Tuesday, July 8, afternoon and into Wednesday, July 9.
"We were getting responses all around the Hunter," federal member Dan Repacholi said.
"They're having trouble breathing and their washing reeks of fumes," he said.
In response to the public outcry, Snowy Hydro Hunter Project Power team paused their testing at the Kurri Kurri gas station on Wednesday afternoon, a spokesperson said.
They said during the testing phase of a new turbine, both gas and diesel were used but once fully operational, the station would operate on gas with diesel as a back-up.
"The testing resulted in visible emissions and an odour that drifted over parts of the Hunter," they said.
"We understand this caused undue discomfort and worry, and for that, we sincerely apologise to the local community."
The spokesperson said they were working with the EPA to further investigate the emissions, the possible source of the odour, and to undertake extra monitoring of air quality.
Mr Barnes said they would consider beginning gas commissioning of the plant over the coming weeks, but going forward, the wider Hunter community would be notified of future operations.
He said gas testing would not have the same effect as diesel testing.
"The problem in the last week is we were burning diesel before the plant was synchronised with the grid, in full operation, we won't get any of these emissions," he said.
He said they would have to test the turbines on diesel at some point but they would not go ahead until they figured out how to prevent the stink caused from this week's testing.
The Hunter MP said his office was inundated with anywhere from 600 to 1000 concerned residents reaching out in less than 24 hours.
"We have had doctors ringing up saying their surgeries are being overrun by this issue," he said.
"We've had childcare centres that have said they've had to send their kids home."
Concerned residents have contacted the Newcastle Herald to complain of the "burning diesel" smell and fumes visible in the air.
One Black Hill resident said that at about 10.30am on Wednesday morning, she could almost "taste" the smell, while another in West Wallsend said the smell was "sickening"
Mr Repacholi said the community needed clear communication, accountability and a plan for residents when the smell happens again.
"Locals deserve to know what's in the air and how long it's going to last and what's being done to minimise any harm," he said.
"Honestly, the communication levels from Snowy Hydro have been disgusting."
Mr Repacholi said that neither he nor other federal, state or local government had communicated about the potential air pollution risk.
"I've raised my concerns to the energy minister already, and it has definitely gone up the chain," he said.
"That's just not good enough by Snowy Hydro, they need to be better, and they should be better."
Late last week, Snowy Hydro's Hunter Power Project team successfully fired up one of the Kurri Kurri stations' gas turbines for the first time.
The gas-fired project entered the national grid in March, two years after it was meant to begin operating.
Snowy Hyrdo stated that the power station remained on track to be delivered within it's target of around $1.3 billion but in March the Newcastle Herald reported that costs could be closer to $2 billion.
A Snowy Hydro spokesperson they had continuous emissions monitoring on-site and were currently operating within environmental compliance limits.
The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) confirmed they had officers in Kurri Kurri on Wednesday investigating reports of visible and odorous emissions.
"The source appears to be the new Hunter Power Station near Kurri Kurri where Snowy Hydro is currently commissioning gas/diesel turbine units," a spokesperson said.
Commissioning is when new equipment is tested to ensure it is operating safely before being brought into full working order.
The EPA said they reviewed air dispersion modelling ahead of the commissioning phase of the site, which predicted the emissions would not have any adverse effect on public health or the environment.
They said the power station was required to conduct continous emissions monitoring, including during the commissioning phase where emissions are usually higher than normal operation.
"We will check that the emissions limits haven't been breached and continue to closely monitor the process to ensure compliance with the environmental standards," they said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


West Australian
3 days ago
- West Australian
‘Brown-noser': Crass statue appears outside Richard Marles electoral office in Geelong
A crass piece of political art has accused Richard Marles of being 'Australia's biggest brown-noser' as the defence minister signed a 50-year treaty alongside his UK counterpart. The installation, outside Mr Marles electoral office in Geelong, depicted a large nose with an apparent fecal smear. Affixed to a light post by chain, the work is attributed to The New Radicals and names Mr Marles. The protest art comes as Mr Marles signed a new five-decade treaty with the United Kingdom to cement the AUKUS submarine pact in his home city. Dubbed 'The Geelong Treaty', the defence minister said the agreement would enable co-operation on the SSN-Aukus submarine. 'In doing this, AUKUS will see 20,000 jobs in Australia. It will see, in building submarines in this country, the biggest industrial endeavour in our nation's history, bigger even than the Snowy Hydro scheme,' Mr Marles said. 'In military terms, what it will deliver is the biggest leap in Australia's military capability, really, since the formation of the navy back in 1913.' The new treaty was announced following the annual AUKMIN talks in Sydney on Friday. Alongside his counterpart, UK Secretary of State for Defence John Healey, the two men celebrated the treaty with a beer at a Geelong brewery. Spotted in Geelong's CBD on Saturday afternoon, the piece has vanished by 5pm.


The Advertiser
6 days ago
- The Advertiser
US beef unlikely to flood Australia as ban lifted
Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally. Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally. Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally. Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally.

The Age
22-07-2025
- The Age
The rise in international pressure over Gaza should be welcomed
On Tuesday, Australia joined with 27 countries including Canada, Denmark, France, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK to condemn Israel for the deaths of hundreds of Palestinians seeking aid. The countries also demanded an end to restrictions on food and medical supplies. A ceasefire was needed now. 'The suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths. The Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity,' the nations said. Australia's Home Affairs Minister, Tony Burke, went further. Many of Israel's actions were 'indefensible'. Burke said on ABC radio: 'We're all hoping that there'll be something that'll break this. We've seen too many images of children being killed, of horrific slaughter, of churches being bombed.' The statement also called for the release of Israeli hostages 'cruelly held captive by Hamas since 7 October 2023 [who] continue to suffer terribly'. Hamas must release the hostages and Israel must heed the international message and pull back its military actions. The statement followed the deaths of at least 79 people on Sunday near a UN food aid convoy at the Israel border. They were seeking flour. On Saturday, more than 30 died near two aid centres in southern Gaza. It is in Gaza that mothers, fathers and children are starving to death, that tens of thousands are in various stages of malnutrition leading to starvation, that people are dying from gunshots and missile fire while trying to reach humanitarian aid. It is there that tens of thousands have died following the indiscriminate massacre of 1200 Israelis across the border. A ceasefire, of course, is not the end of a war. It is impossible to know what Israel's endgame is. Will the war be over when Israel has built a 'humanitarian city' – critics call it a 'concentration camp', including former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert – for Palestinians, initially 600,000 on the ruins of Rafah, then expanding to take in 2.2 million? The 28 nations hit out against the Israeli proposal. 'Permanent forced displacement is a violation of international humanitarian law,' the joint statement said. In the past few days, the military has pushed into the southern and eastern districts of the Gazan city of Deir al-Balah, which had been removed from the conflict. Thousands of Palestinians had sought refuge there.