logo
Pritzker announces Christian Mitchell as running mate

Pritzker announces Christian Mitchell as running mate

Axios01-07-2025
Gov. JB Pritzker has picked former Deputy Gov. Christian Mitchell as his running mate.
Why it matters: If Pritzker is reelected, Mitchell could be in line to take over if Pritzker runs for president in 2028.
State of play: Mitchell replaces current Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton on the ticket, since Stratton is running for U.S. Senate.
The big picture: Mitchell served as a deputy governor for Pritzker from 2019-2023, working on the state's capital plan and other big initiatives during Pritzker's first term.
Before that, Mitchell was a state representative for the 26th district for six years, which included the lakefront and Hyde Park.
He's currently the vice president of civic engagement at the University of Chicago.
What they're saying:"Christian Mitchell is a proven leader with deep experience, steady judgment, and an unshakable commitment to the working families of Illinois," Pritzker said in a press release. "I couldn't ask for a better partner to continue delivering results for the people of Illinois."
"The governor has led with courage and compassion, and together we've built a foundation that's moving Illinois forward," Mitchell said in a statement.
Zoom in: While he was deputy governor — an appointed position inside the governor's administration — he helped push the Climate and Equitable Jobs Act across the finish line, which has become a signature piece of legislation for Pritzker and has catapulted Illinois to one of the leading states in clean energy.
He is also credited with shepherding Pritzker's capital plan, plus taking a lead role in the state's medical supply chain during COVID-19.
Mitchell was also integral in passing Illinois' legal recreational cannabis law in 2019, which focused on social equity.
Yes, but: The program stumbled out of the gate with court challenges and financial hurdles.
The intrigue: Mitchell was also the first Black executive director of the Illinois Democratic Party, under convicted politician Michael Madigan, although he wasn't Madigan's first choice. His history at the top of the party could help unify Democrats on the campaign trail.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Karl Rove on Trump, Epstein saga: ‘There's hell to pay'
Karl Rove on Trump, Epstein saga: ‘There's hell to pay'

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Karl Rove on Trump, Epstein saga: ‘There's hell to pay'

Republican strategist Karl Rove said in a new opinion piece for The Wall Street Journal, 'there's hell to pay' surrounding convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and the saga around the Epstein files. 'Attorney General Pam Bondi, Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino—all members in good standing of MAGA world—said there was no client list of powerful figures in politics, finance and media,' Rove wrote in his Wednesday piece. 'They also confirmed Epstein wasn't killed by a Deep State hit squad at midnight in a federal prison but committed suicide. Many in MAGA reacted with incredulity and anger at Mr. Trump, the attorney general and the FBI leadership. There's hell to pay when those who hyped the conspiracy have closed the books on the case,' he added. Right-wing influencers who had long pushed conspiracy theories about Epstein turned their fury toward the Trump administration, especially Attorney General Pam Bondi, due to a recent Justice Department memo that dispelled many of the theories. Last week, President Trump admonished and sought to distance himself from backers who have pushed for additional information about documents related to Epstein. In a Truth Social post, the president dismissed the uproar due to the Epstein files as a 'scam' pushed by Democrats and suggested he no longer welcomed his supporters who have called for extra transparency around the documents. 'Their new SCAM is what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax, and my PAST supporters have bought into this 'bulls‑‑‑,' hook, line, and sinker,' Trump said in his post. 'They haven't learned their lesson, and probably never will, even after being conned by the Lunatic Left for 8 long years.' The Hill has reached out to the White House, the FBI and Justice Department for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

Former Epstein lawyer says Bondi ‘jumped the gun a bit' on files
Former Epstein lawyer says Bondi ‘jumped the gun a bit' on files

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former Epstein lawyer says Bondi ‘jumped the gun a bit' on files

David Schoen, a former lawyer for Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, said Attorney General Pam Bondi and other officials 'jumped the gun a bit' in overhyping the Epstein files. Schoen in an interview with BBC 'Newsnight' Thursday said there is no Epstein 'client list' that would highlight connections between the disgraced financier and wealthy individuals. 'If someone were to think that there's actually a list — which Jeffrey Epstein wrote down the name of, you fill in the name of the famous, wealthy person with some young girl — that just doesn't exist,' he said. He also suggested that Bondi and other officials created a hyped environment about what might be included in the files that couldn't be matched by what was released. Schoen was careful to not blame President Trump for overhyping the files. He said he thought Trump had called on the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI to release anything big they found and that the others jumped the gun in how they described what was coming. 'I think what happened is, President Trump said he's open to the idea, and it should be disclosed if there's any such file that hasn't been disclosed so far. But he didn't know what was in it,' Schoen said. 'I think that maybe some of the others, the attorney general, director of the FBI, and so on, jumped the gun a bit. They were in favor, for good reasons, of disclosing and full transparency, but they didn't know what they had yet,' he said. 'When they saw what they had, there was no 'smoking gun' and therefore they said there was nothing to release of any substance. And now you see this catch-up,' Schoen said. The controversy over the Epstein files has continued for weeks, causing problems for Trump and Republicans in Congress. Democrats have sought to further divide the GOP over the issue by offering amendments in committee to release more federal information on Epstein. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Friday was set to meet with Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who is imprisoned on sex trafficking charges. Trump said Friday he hadn't thought about pardoning Maxwell. Republicans in Congress have been divided over how to handle the issue. Some have called for the release of all files on Epstein held by the DOJ, while others have wanted to put guardrails on disclosures. Schoen is far from the first person to argue the files were overhyped. Karl Rove, republican strategist, said Thursday, 'There's hell to pay when those who hyped the conspiracy have closed the books on the case.' Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino as a conservative pundit outside the administration was among those pressing the idea there were files that showed the government could be protecting wealthy associates of Epstein. Epstein's acquaintances include a number of luminaries — including Trump and former President Clinton — which has sparked conspiracy theories for years. Schoen previously made statements that no client list existed and that Trump was not involved in the Epstein case. He stated June 16 on NewsNation that Bondi and Trump were not hiding a client list. On June 5, Schoen posted on social platform X, 'I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein's defense as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died. He sought my advice for months before that. I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Five unanswered questions around Trump and the Epstein saga
Five unanswered questions around Trump and the Epstein saga

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Five unanswered questions around Trump and the Epstein saga

The controversy over Jeffrey Epstein rumbles on, despite President Trump's efforts to put it behind him. It's been almost three weeks since a joint, unsigned memo from the FBI and the Department of Justice (DOJ) insisted 'no incriminating 'client list'' had been found among material related to Epstein. The memo also contended that there had been 'no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions.' The statement caused a firestorm – including among many Trump supporters, who had been primed to expect big revelations about Epstein, the sexual predator and disgraced financier who died, apparently of suicide, in 2019. Attorney General Pam Bondi had said in a February Fox News interview that an Epstein client list was 'sitting on my desk right now to review.' In previous years, people very close to Trump, including his eldest son Don Jr. and Vice President Vance, had suggested there was a nefarious motive behind the failure to disclose more material about Epstein. But even as the controversy moves on, there are many unanswered questions. Here are five of the biggest. What happens with Ghislaine Maxwell? Developments around Maxwell, the British socialite and Epstein associate, have been among the most intriguing new developments. Todd Blanche, the second highest ranking figure in the DOJ, met with Maxwell in Tallahassee, Fla., on Thursday and Friday. Maxwell received a 20-year prison sentence in 2022 for conspiring with Epstein in his abuse. The unusual move by Blanche, who served as one of Trump's personal attorneys before ascending to his current role at the DOJ, has become a partisan flashpoint. Democrats and other Trump critics are warning of the prospect of some kind of quid-pro-quo deal, in which Maxwell would be offered a pardon, or at least some level of clemency, in return for exculpatory words on Trump. 'The conflict of interest just stares you in the face,' Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said in a speech on Thursday. Blanche has defended the meetings as a straightforward pursuit of more information. In a statement on Tuesday, he said, 'President Trump has told us to release all credible evidence. If Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.' There are reasons to be skeptical about whether lenient treatment of Maxwell would quel the controversy. It might just as easily ratchet it up. But on Friday, before leaving for a trip to Scotland, Trump notably did not rule out a pardon or clemency of Maxwell. 'I'm allowed to do it but it's something I have not thought about,' he told reporters at the White House. How does Trump's case against the Wall Street Journal go? The Epstein matter has seen Trump go into full legal battle against the Wall Street Journal, its parent company News Corporation and media mogul Rupert Murdoch. Trump says he was defamed by a Journal story that alleged a letter bearing his name and a drawing was included in an album put together by Maxwell to mark Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003. The president is seeking $10 billion in damages. The Journal has stood by its story and has continued to report vigorously on Trump and Epstein. On Wednesday, days after Trump filed his suit, the Journal reported that Trump had been told by the DOJ back in May that his name was mentioned in the Epstein files – though the news organization noted that such a mention is not, in itself, evidence of wrongdoing. The fact that neither Trump nor Murdoch are inclined to back down sets up a striking clash, not least because of the Murdoch family's role at Fox News. Is Pam Bondi in trouble? Some Republicans and other Trump allies plainly blame Bondi for at least part of the political mess in which they find themselves. They contend that the attorney general's comments in the February Fox interview were the spark that ignited the flame of controversy that is now burning the president. A former attorney for Trump and Epstein told the BBC this week that the DOJ had 'jumped the gun a bit' in overhyping the information that they had. 'They were in favor, for good reasons, of disclosing and full transparency, but they didn't know what they had yet,' David Schoen told the BBC's 'Newsnight.' Meanwhile, Politico reported this week on GOP disquiet over Bondi's role, quoting one unnamed senior House GOP aide saying, 'I think she, from pillar to post, handled this thing so badly and bizarrely.' But voices close to Trump, including White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, have publicly defended Bondi, stressing her work to advance Trump's broader agenda. The New York Times also reported on Thursday that Bondi 'felt blindsided and annoyed' by demands from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard that the DOJ should probe actions taken by the Obama administration in relation to Russian meddling in the 2016 election. Will Republicans rally around Trump? The Epstein controversy has been unusually damaging to Trump because it has cracked the unity of the GOP and his Make America Great Again (MAGA) base. A Wall Street Journal poll released on Thursday evening, found that 69 percent of all registered voters – and a striking 54 percent of Republicans – had either little or no confidence that the DOJ had fully investigated the Epstein matter. Elected Republicans have also made a stand, at least in some cases. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) is leading an effort to force the DOJ to release as much documentation as possible on Epstein. In a separate, closely-watched vote on a House panel this week, three Republicans – Reps. Nancy Mace (S.C.), Brian Jack (Ga.) and Scott Perry (Pa.) – voted with Democrats to subpoena the DOJ for Epstein documents. Republicans are also expected to receive plenty of hostile questioning on the Epstein matter from their constituents while the House is on its summer recess. All of that being said, Trump's overall grip on the GOP is tight. He may well be able to bring his party into firmer line. How long does the story keep making headlines? The new lease of life for the Epstein story shows no real signs of dying down – much to Trump's displeasure. Indeed, actions that he or his allies have taken have injected new fuel into the furor. Trump's case against the Journal and Blanche's meetings with Ghislaine Maxwell both fall into that category. Critics allege that some other actions taken by the Trump administration, including the rash of loud allegations against the Obama administration over the 2016 election, are intended as a distraction from the Epstein matter. If that's the case, they haven't really worked. It's always possible that some major domestic or world event could intervene and banish Epstein from the headlines. But Massie, the maverick Kentucky Republican leading the fight for more disclosure, told reporters this week that he expected public demands on the issue to grow stronger over the summer. If that proves true, it's very bad news for Trump. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store