Veteran councillors rule out returning
Peter Kett and Lesley Soper have ruled out returning to the table after serving seven terms and three terms respectively.
Their decisions come at a time when the majority of councillors are putting their hands up for another stint.
Cr Kett made up his mind three years ago that this would be his last term and said that would not change.
"I'd always go out in person and talk to the people that called me, so I'll miss all that.
"I'll miss most of the councillors."
Last year was a difficult year for him as he faced both the death of his wife and numerous health difficulties.
Multiple knee operations late last year and two heart attacks under anesthetic forced him to step aside from council duties while he recovered.
Despite the setbacks, he was now feeling "bloody good" and was sad to be leaving.
Also finishing up is Cr Soper, whose nine years at the council ends a long political career.
She spent time on the district health board and had two stints in Parliament as a Labour MP in 2005 and from 2007-08.
She made the decision to leave "some time ago", she said.
"Very early in my career I discovered you can help individuals, but if you want to make really lasting changes for large groups of the population, then get involved where the power actually is."
Her highlights on the council included fighting to keep the children's library in its current location, the council's credit rating and supporting the appointment of mana whenua representatives.
Mayor Nobby Clark's recent use of his casting vote to not update the council's procurement policy in support of Palestine was "a definite low point".
Invercargill will be in for a new mayor with Mr Clark repeatedly ruling out the possibility of a second term.
The mayoral race includes deputy mayor Tom Campbell and councillors Alex Crackett, Ria Bond and Ian Pottinger.
Mr Campbell is all-in with his bid having ruled out running for council, while Cr Crackett is also leaning in that direction while keeping her options open.
She recently quit her job to focus on her campaign.
TikTok enthusiast Tom Morton is also throwing his hat in the ring for mayor while town crier Lynley McKerrow changed her mind and will now just run for council.
Other councillors standing again include Grant Dermody, Trish Boyle, Steve Broad, Barry Stewart and Darren Ludlow.
Cr Allan Arnold could not be reached for comment.
Nominations officially opened on Friday and candidates have until August 1 to put their name forward.
Voting documents will be sent out in September ahead of election day on October 11.
• LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
The importance of clear laws shown in impressive evidence from Italy
If New Zealand's laws were as ambiguous, we would be worse off by $20 billion – or about $10,000 per household – every year. What family would not welcome avoiding that? What is 'poorly drafted' law? The researchers used 10 indicators of writing that likely lacks clarity. It assesses each of over 75,000 Italian laws. One measure is sentence length. According to experts, sentences with more than 25 words are likely to be unclear. The authors found that 85% of the millions of sentences in all of this law exceeded 25 words. That might seem staggering for those who do not read law books. Authors of children's books might think it was absurd. Lawyers are likely less surprised, but still disturbed. Greater clarity in drafting should be easy to fix. So why isn't it? The paper's answer lies in law-making imperatives. These include haste, compromise, personal career aspirations and short-term expediency. Ambiguity conceals likely outcomes. It shields blame and defuses critics' attempts to pinpoint a proposed law's problems. Even lawyers cannot be sure how courts will interpret unclear laws. Nor can judges in a lower court be sure about how a higher court will interpret them. This uncertainty creates a cascade of problems throughout the legal system. The authors examined 620,000 Italian Supreme Court judgments between 2004 and 2017. They found 32% of them reversed a decision of a lower court solely on legal grounds The rule of law is a precondition for national prosperity. The law should be clear and accessible. When it is not clear to judges, it cannot be clear to those who must obey it. The paper next assessed the effects on over 700,000 Italian firms of reversed court decisions. It looked, for example, at changes in their investment spending and output growth. This aspect was another exhaustive, path-breaking achievement. It found the adverse effects were significant. The estimated permanent 5% drop in Italian national income encapsulates that. The paper's approach is ingenious, but too complex to explain here. Are New Zealand's laws better drafted in these respects? It would be good to know, because low productivity is holding New Zealanders back. It should be easy to improve drafting quality. The bigger the gains, the more it should be a priority. To better inform this article, I used AI to count the word lengths of sentences in two of New Zealand's acts. From an Italian perspective, the results were encouraging. The proportion of sentences in the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 that exceeded 25 words was 'only' 70%. For the Resource Management Act 1991, it was 53%. Even so, the implication is that most New Zealanders would not find the Resource Management Act (RMA) law clear and accessible. Parliament could be more insistent about improving clarity. The Government's Regulatory Standards Bill would increase this discipline. One part requires the Government to tell Parliament if a bill is unclear and hard to understand – and explain why. Small comfort, but better than nothing. Of course, there is more to good law than just clear drafting. Its content surely matters even more. Prominent symptoms of content problems include unaffordable housing, and infrastructure delays and inadequacies. However, much more is hidden or accepted as 'part of the woodwork'. Content problems have many sources. Public pressure on governments to 'do something' about the latest adverse headline is one source. Appeasing that pressure can be the easiest option. More mundane are the relentless daily calls on ministers to regulate or spend for this or that partisan or public-spirited cause. Such calls often fail to consider the costs to others. The Italian paper acknowledges that content also matters. It cites literature that shows property rights and institutional quality are key determinants of economic prosperity. The RMA is deficient in both respects. It offends almost everyone. The Regulatory Standards Bill also recognises the importance of protecting private property. Ministers must tell Parliament of any grounds for concern but Parliament can ignore this information at will and continues to be supreme lawmaker. (Most public opposition to this bill ignores this limiting aspect.) Greater transparency about these matters could help inform voters. Governments would spend and regulate more judiciously if more voters rewarded them for doing so. This exhaustive Italian research helps make the potential gains more concrete.
RNZ News
16 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Wednesday Politics Panel for 20 August 2025
It's another hit of the most insightful and sharp 30 minutes in political analysis. Today Wallace is joined by journalist Annabelle Lee-Mather, former Greens MP Sue Kedgley and Maddison Burgess-Smith, commentator and Senior Consultant at Iron Duke Partners. Topics discussed on the show tonight include: Former Prime Minister Helen Clark has lamented the "boys club" environment of golbal politcs. The backlash over Labour ministers refusing to front up publicly for the Covid Royal Commission of Inquiry. Finance Minister Nicola Willis caused quite the stir this week by nabbing the Prime Minister's interview spot on the caucus run. Should we take note of the whispers of a roll? The Government's decision to remove te reo Maori from new early-reading books is, according to critics, just the latest in a run of policies seemingly targeting Maori. is it an assualt on Te Ao Maori? To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
RNZ News
18 hours ago
- RNZ News
Mayoral hopeful Andrew Clark opens up on ‘frosty' relationship with brother Nobby Clark
Andrew Clark. Photo: LDR/supplied Invercargill mayoral hopeful Andrew Clark says a "frosty" relationship with brother Nobby didn't stop the current mayor sharing private thoughts on the current council. Clark is visiting Invercargill this week from hometown Nelson, where he is also contesting the Tasman mayoralty under first name Maxwell. His late nomination for Invercargill's top job drew a cold public response from Nobby Clark, who questioned why he was standing in two places under different names. But Andrew Clark claims the pair had a long phone conversation when he made his nomination and Nobby even shared thoughts about the council and councillors, which ran to eight pages of notes. Andrew said he was then "really surprised" when Nobby went public with his criticism the following day. "I put it down to his health needs and he was extremely stressed, and he acknowledged that," he said. Asked what his relationship was like with older brother Nobby now, Andrew replied it was "a bit frosty". Andrew had also reached out to Nobby for a catch-up during his southern trip but received an impolite response. "I rang him yesterday or the day before and told him I'm coming down, I'd like to catch up with him, wouldn't that be nice... And he didn't pick up the phone, he sent an email which was less than courteous," Andrew said on Monday. Nobby Clark. Photo: LDR/supplied Mayor Nobby Clark was approached by Local Democracy Reporting but did not wish to comment. Andrew Clark has contested the Tasman mayoralty multiple times and will try again this election alongside his Invercargill bid. The mayoral hopeful is campaigning in the south on water security, saying no to residential water meters, keeping rates down and sorting council "dysfunction". He has previously made headlines for a land dispute, receiving money from a gang-affiliated event, and spreading misinformation about a dam bursting. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air
