How is crisis-hit UHI Perth College funded?
Claims that UHI Perth College is in a state of chaos led to questions about exactly how the institution is funded – and what it means for the future of the institution.
We already know managers are trying to deal with a £2 million deficit, and to do that, it was even suggested degrees could be scrapped.
The institution set savings targets of £3.2m last year.
On Monday, in an interview with The Courier, its former finance chief says he warned bosses it was at risk of closure without huge cuts.
Gavin Stevenson – who resigned on April 18 – told us: 'The financial position is perilous.'
Here's a closer look at where UHI Perth College, part of the University of Highlands and Islands, gets its money.
The majority of UHI Perth College's funding comes directly from government grants.
In its statement of income for July 2023 the college says it received over £18.4 million from funding grants.
Of this, over £8m was provided directly to the college for further education students. An additional £7.8m was received by Perth College as its share of the total grant awarded to the University of the Highlands and Islands.
Further funding was also provided for capital projects – a total of £300,000 – as well as cash for childcare provision.
The next largest source of income for Perth College in 2022-23 was broadly defined as 'other income' – which totalled just over £4 million in total.
The financial statements indicate this included just over £1m in revenue from catering and residences.
A total of £1.5m came from 'income generating activities' – this is likely to include events, conferences and other commercial activities.
The remaining £1.4m in this category is listed only as 'other income' – but the exact sources of this are not defined. It is likely to include donations and other small amounts of income.
The third largest source of income for UHI Perth College are tuition fees and education contracts, accounting for some £3.64m.
While most Scottish students do not pay for their college and university education, some will if they have already studied and used up their 'allowance'.
Of the total, in 2022-23 around £2.67m came from charging students from England, Wales and Northern Ireland tuition fees.
This includes degree courses.
International students can also be charged fees. In 2024-25, international students studying a full-time undergraduate degree can expect to pay over £15,000 in tuition for a science course.
The college also earned over £900,000 from its contracts with Skills Development Scotland.
The smallest proportion of UHI Perth College's income came from research grants – around £500,000 in 2022-23.
The institution is largely grant funded, which is influenced by student numbers.
In the financial year ending July 2023 – the most recent data available – the college had a total revenue of £26.59 million.
Staff costs represented the biggest outlay that year.
The college spent over £21.3m on salaries, social security and pension contributions for its 354 staff members.
Perth College gained university status as part of the Highlands and Islands group in 2011.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
The signs from Labour are more welfare cuts in Spending Review
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (centre), Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar (right) and Ed Miliband, Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary (left), during a visit to St Fergus Gas Terminal, a clean power facility in AberdeenshirePicture: Jeff J Mitchell/PA Wire This week's UK Spending Review presents a stark choice: a continuation of Westminster austerity or a long-overdue shift toward investment in people, services and the economy. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... So far, signs from the Labour Government suggest more of the same cuts that have already failed families for over a decade. As always, it is the most vulnerable in our society who will pay the price. With household bills high and public services already stretched, now is the time for serious, compassionate action. Yet Labour has refused to rule out real-terms cuts to affordable housing, police recruitment, and local government funding. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad At the same time, the UK Government is pressing ahead with damaging welfare reforms – including proposed cuts to disability benefits, the continuation of the two-child benefit cap, and delays to anti-poverty action like the long-promised child poverty taskforce. All of this risks worsening the cost-of-living crisis and driving already struggling families into deeper hardship, especially in communities already hit hardest by past austerity measures. The SNP has laid out a clear and achievable alternative. The Chancellor must fully reverse planned welfare cuts, protect public services and unlock investment in clean energy and economic growth. In particular, Labour must finally deliver full and immediate funding for Scotland's Acorn carbon capture project – a vital climate initiative that has faced years of Westminster delay. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The UK Government must also fully cover the cost of its increase to employer National Insurance, which threatens to drain frontline budgets in areas like health, social care and education. Scotland is already delivering targeted, effective support – and the evidence speaks for itself. According to new House of Commons Library research, nearly two million families across the UK would be lifted out of poverty if Labour adopted SNP policies: a UK-wide rollout of the Scottish Child Payment, scrapping the two-child cap, and ending the bedroom tax. Under the SNP, Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling. The Scottish Child Payment alone delivers £27.15 per eligible child per week – a direct boost to family incomes that is helping to turn the tide on child poverty across our communities. By contrast, the UK Government's own impact assessment shows that proposed cuts to disability benefits could push a further 250,000 people – including 50,000 children – into poverty. Families affected stand to lose £4500 a year on average. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And despite repeated calls from campaigners, Labour MPs have failed to back even basic reforms, like abolishing the two-child limit, voting against it in the House of Commons just last year – a decision that remains indefensible in the face of rising need. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has made clear that, without new revenue, the UK Government's current fiscal rules mean public spending will fall in real terms across most departments. That includes justice, local government and housing – all critical areas already under severe strain. If the Chancellor refuses to invest and clings to outdated austerity thinking, the consequences will be felt in every community across the UK for years to come. In Scotland, the SNP is focused on lifting people out of poverty and building a fairer, greener, more resilient economy. But we cannot shield families indefinitely from the consequences of Westminster choices. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour must use this Spending Review to deliver the funding and flexibility Scotland needs – not double down on the failed cuts that brought us here in the first place. MSP for Edinburgh Central and Constitution, External Affairs and Culture Secretary
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Call for watchdogs to be scrapped to curb Scottish Water execs pay
They are saying that having three bodies with regulatory oversight of the industry is wasteful and means there is a lack of responsibility and suggest there should be only one. They say restructuring will allow the same level of scrutiny with clearer lines of accountability and less expense. Andrew Thomson, GMB Scotland's representative rep at Scottish Water, has said that the current set-up has encouraged creeping privatisation at the company and led to workers being scapegoated for executive failures. The branch has been supported by the union in calls for ministers to implement strict conditions around public sector executive pay and bonuses through its Public Sector Pay Strategy – extending this to the quangos, commissions and regulatory bodies. The issue surrounds a complex web of three separate regulators operating to oversee operations at Scottish Water - the Water Industry Commission for Scotland (WICS) which examines finances, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) which oversees pollution issues and the Drinking Water Quality Regulator for Scotland which investigates safety. WICS, which the branch says is "a disgrace" has been at the centre of a scandal over what watchdog Audit Scotland described as inappropriate public spending, including: a £77,000 Harvard Business School course for a senior executive, lavish spending on meals, with some exceeding £200 per head and £100 gift vouchers for staff, surpassing the £75 limit for gifts. SEPA was told by watchdog Environmental Standards Scotland (ESS) in September, last year, to improve monitoring after finding that pollution of Scotland's rivers and beaches was far more widespread than realised because ministers have failed to take the problem seriously. The union has been concerned that ten days of strikes in a bitter pay dispute is to cost nearly £3m in bringing in extra staff as part of a contingency plan. It comes amidst a row over Mr Plant receiving a 50% rise in the existing pay package - despite public sector pay rules saying he should expect to have a 10% cut. Alex Plant (Image: Supplied) The £483,000 remuneration for Alex Plant over just ten months of 2023/24 is nearly £100,000 more than the outgoing chief executive Douglas Millican, received in his last full year before taking flexible retirement which resulted in a cut in salary and reduced pension benefits. The Scottish Government's public sector pay policy has since 2010 included an "expectation" that the remuneration of a new chief executive appointment will be at least 10% lower than that of the outgoing officer. MSPs raised their concerns in the Scottish Parliament after The Herald further revealed that executives of the nation's state-owned water supplier saw bonuses hiked by over a third in one year - taking a five-year total to nearly £1.6m despite public sector pay rules suspending the payments. Read more by Martin Williams: It has told users: "We will do all we can to ensure customers do not experience any disruption to their water supplies and that treatment of the country's waste water continues as usual, despite the planned industrial action. Union members on the picket line (Image: Andrew Milligan) While Scottish Water has remained included on the list of public sector organisations that should conform with the pay policy, the Scottish Government say that they are exempt. Mr Thomson has taken the calls for changes to GMB Scotland's Congress saying that regulation of the water industry "is required to ensure drinking water is safe and accessible, and that wastewater is dealt with responsibly to protect human life, environmental health and our waterways". He says that excessive regulatory demands from the three agencies has created a "blame culture within Scottish Water where workers – not management – are held to account for organisational failures and that "this motivates management to place excessive responsibilities and pressures on the performance of the workforce affecting health and morale". He said that an "excessive number of regulatory bodies, overbearing [Scottish Water] board governance and a lack of transparency have created a top-heavy system of patronage and a culture of elitism where undisclosed contracts and bonuses are given to executives while the pay of Scottish Water workers lags far behind the private sector leading to the increased threat of industrial action". SEPA (Image: Archive) The branch says a full review of regulatory bodies is required in relation to Scottish Water with an aim to consolidate responsibilities and reduce costs. GMB Scotland said the long-running and ongoing industrial action at Scottish Water only underlined the need for root and branch reform. Mr Thomson said: "It is time government which is ultimately the main regulator, concentrated on cutting preposterous costs at the high end; hold management to account and stop allowing the victimisation of workers for wasteful regulation failures. "Prosecute the bosses and protect the workers." A 10-day ballot of workers on a revised pay offer delivered to unions by Scottish Water will start on Wednesday but Claire Greer, GMB Scotland organiser, said disruptive and expensive strikes could have been averted months ago if executives had seriously engaged with the workforce. She said: 'There has now been a series of different disputes at this company all marked by the same failure of management to negotiate with clarity or urgency. A Scottish Water protest'That not only suggests systemic problems at an executive level but a failure to provide effective and proper oversight by the board and independent watchdogs. 'Scotland was meant to be different to the rest of UK with Scottish Water being structured to ensure the people of Scotland retained ownership and control. 'That means nothing unless there is rigorous and independent oversight of management by board members and expert and respected regulators. 'That is clearly not happening and a complicated and needlessly expensive system of oversight must be rebuilt for the benefit of all Scots. A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'We remain committed to a water industry model where Scottish Water is publicly owned, commercially run and independently regulated. "Ministers have set out their policy in relation to public sector pay. It is a matter for Scottish Water and its unions to agree a settlement within the constraints of that policy and affordability. " A Scottish Water spokesperson said: "After the latest talks with the Joint Trade Unions on Friday, we made an improved pay offer that would see average wages increase by more than 7% over two years. This included a minimum increase of £2,825 over the period. 'In addition, we also proposed a number of other enhancements including improved stand-by payments and carers' leave. 'This is a very strong and progressive offer that balances the interests of our people and customers' and we asked the Joint Trade Unions to ballot their members on the new proposal. So we are glad they are doing so and hope members vote to accept our offer. 'It is in everyone's interests that the current dispute is resolved so that our people can get the pay increases they deserve and return to delivering an essential service to the people of Scotland.' WICS declined to comment.
Glasgow Times
2 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Deloitte promotes five Glasgow staff to partner level
Deloitte has announced seven new partners in Scotland, including five Glasgow-based staff members, as part of a nationwide round of 60 partner promotions in 2025. Glasgow's newly promoted partners are Jennifer Donnachie, Laura MacDougall, Lyndsay MacGregor, Marc McNulty, and Paul Cowley. Deloitte said the team brings a "wealth of experience" to their new roles, with Mr Cowley marking 28 years at the firm. Ms Donnachie and Ms MacGregor started their careers at the firm as graduates in the Tax team, while Ms MacDougall and Mr Cowley followed the Audit & Assurance route. Read more: Major London contract gives jobs boost for Glasgow engineering firm Across Scotland, Patrick Werner in Edinburgh and Sarah McGavin in Aberdeen have also been promoted. The promotions span a number of areas, including Deloitte's Tax & Legal, Audit & Assurance, and Technology & Transformation businesses. Overall, 495 people have been promoted within Deloitte's Scottish practice this year, including 13 who have been appointed to director. New Deloitte partners Sarah McGavin, Laura MacDougall, and Patrick Werner with Angela Mitchel - practice senior partner for Scotland and Northern Ireland, (Image: Supplied) Read more: Viral Glasgow food stall 'expecting' as team set to open exciting new restaurant Angela Mitchell, practice senior partner for Scotland and Northern Ireland, said: "I'd like to extend my congratulations to this year's partners on their well-earned promotions. "These appointments reflect their expertise, commitment, and leadership, and it is particularly encouraging to see so many of our new partners have started their careers as graduates, highlighting the firm's focus on developing talent from within. "I'd also like to acknowledge all of our people who have been promoted across our Scottish offices this year, including those who have stepped up to director. "Their achievements reflect the depth of talent we are proud to nurture across the business. "As we continue to grow our presence across Scotland, we remain focused on developing the talent and leadership that will shape the future of our business." The announcement follows the recent appointments of Hazel Gray and David Mitchell as senior partners for Aberdeen and Glasgow respectively.
