Children in the U.S. Are Dying at a Higher Rate than Kids in Similar Countries, Study Says
Babies are 1.78 times more likely to perish, and children aged 1 to 19 are 1.8 times more likely to die than those in comparable countries
Author Dr. Chris Forrest pointed out that the worrying trends are like a "proverbial canary in the coal mine," pointing to a larger problem within AmericaA new study shed light on a worrying trend in the health of American children.
In a Monday, July 7 study published by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), research suggested that American children are in worse health than those growing up in other developed countries. Additionally, they are progressively less healthy than they were in previous years.
The study examined trends in the health of children between 2007 and 2023. It found that in the U.S., "children's health has deteriorated across a broad spectrum of indicators."
Data and trends between 2007 and 2022 suggest that infants are 1.78 times more likely to die in the U.S. than in other countries of a similar standing. Children between the ages of 1 and 19 were also 1.8 times more likely to die than their counterparts in other countries.
In the latter group, there was a marked difference in the likelihood of dying from "firearm-related incidents" and "motor vehicle crashes," with American children dramatically more likely to perish as a result of these avoidable tragedies.
In perspective, this amounts to approximately 54 more children dying per day in America, per the study. The findings come after deaths in the U.S. were in line with other countries in the 1960s.
The study also suggested that American children were 14% more likely to suffer a chronic condition than their counterparts. The likelihood of being diagnosed with a chronic condition also increased from 39.9% to 45.7% in America between 2011 and 2023.
Examples of chronic issues that children are now battling include the likes of "depression, anxiety and loneliness increased, as did rates of autism, behavioral conduct problems, developmental delays, speech language disorders and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders."
'I think we all should be disturbed by this,' Dr. Chris Forrest, a professor of pediatrics at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and director of the Applied Clinical Research Center, told CNN. 'Kids in this country are really suffering.'
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
Speaking to the outlet, Forrest noted that he has seen a change in his patients since he started practicing medicine in the '90s.
He attributed that to a variety of elements, saying that it comes together to create "a very toxic environment."
While the Make America Healthy Again Commission, fronted by U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy has targeted chemicals in food and elsewhere as a cause for America's worsening health, Forrest said that the problem runs much deeper.
"It's not just the chemicals. It's not just the food and the iPhones. It's a much broader. It's much deeper. It's what we call the developmental ecosystem, and it makes it very challenging to change it,' Forrest told CNN. 'That's a hard answer for people who want a pithy message that tells them how to fix the issues. It's about where they're growing up, where they're going to school, they're playing, where their families live, their neighborhoods, and it's not just one population. It's the whole nation that needs help.'
Another element that he highlighted was that "women are also suffering in this country," suggesting that children are being born into already sickening households.
Citing the research, he said, 'This means the same kid born in this country is much more likely to die than if they were born in Germany or Denmark. Why are we allowing this to happen?'
For Forrest, the research is comparable to "the proverbial canary in the coal mine."
"When [children's] health is deteriorating, that means the foundation of our nation is also deteriorating," he concluded.
Read the original article on People
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


TechCrunch
7 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Rocket Lab's first hurdle to flying its new rocket is getting it to the pad
Rocket Lab has asked regulators for permission to transport oversized Neutron rocket structures through shallow waters to a spaceport off the coast of Virginia as it races to meet a September delivery deadline. The request, which was made in July, is a temporary stop gap while the company awaits federal clearance to dredge a permanent channel to the Wallops Island site. Rocket Lab plans to launch its Neutron medium-lift rocket from the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (MARS) on Wallops Island, Virginia, a lower-traffic spaceport that's surrounded by shallow channels and waterways. The company currently launches its Electron small rocket from this location. Rocket Lab has a sizable checklist to tick-off before Neutron can make its orbital debut, like mating the rocket stages, performing a 'wet dress' rehearsal, and getting its launch license from the Federal Aviation Administration. Before any of that can happen, the rocket hardware needs to make it onto the island. Rocket Lab submitted an application for the dredging project to the Virginia Marine Resources Commission in March. In its application, the company touted the benefits of MARS, noting other launch facilities in Florida and elsewhere are highly congested, which could limit launch cadence. MARS, in contrast, 'will allow both frequent launch cadence and the return-to-Earth capability of recovering boosters,' Rocket Lab said at the time. Despite that upside, MARS is constrained in a crucial way: existing maritime infrastructure is limited, and access to the channel – called Sloop Gut – depends on favorable tides. As Rocket Lab and its co-applicant, Virginia Port Authority, notes in its request, 'there is no permanent existing means of providing safe and reliable access for large infrastructure deliveries to Wallops Island.' (Electron is substantially smaller and delivered via road.) Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW Rocket Lab has poured millions into the MARS site to ensure it's ready to support regular Neutron launches. The company is planning to spend more than $5 million to dredge the roughly mile-long Sloop Gut, so barges can perform regular deliveries of large Neutron rocket components. Rocket lab's plans to dredge sloop gut The dredging project was approved by VMRC in May, but the company has yet to start digging because it's still awaiting federal sign-off from the Army Corps of Engineers. As the company waits for federal approval, Rocket Lab and VPA are seeking permission to use a temporary method called 'kedging' to ensure the first five hardware deliveries can arrive on schedule starting in September. The company has said it plans to launch Neutron's maiden test mission in the second half of 2025. But the dredging application and Rocket Lab's separate kedging request suggest that it's not hardware delays, but maritime access that could be a bottleneck for the first launch. Kedging, a little-known nautical method, is used to ensure the barges can safely navigate the existing shallow channel. Workers would use a series of anchors and lines to steer the barge through the shallow waters. The company is seeking permission to use this method through the end of June 2026 or until the dredging work is complete, whichever comes first. It's unclear how long the dredging project will take. In the case that the kedging request is not approved in a timely manner, Rocket Lab said in its application that it would be able to transport structures over the beach using ramps and cranes. The company received permission for up to three beach barge landing test events – but these cannot take place between March 15 and August 31, so it is far from a long-term solution. In the dredging application, the company detailed several other alternative methods to get hardware on the island, like transporting it by road or public boat ramp. However, these methods were ultimately deemed infeasible for reasons such as cost, infrastructure limitations, and the weather. Rocket Lab did not respond to TechCrunch's request for comment. Both filings highlight the importance of maritime access for Rocket Lab's Virginia ambitions. The sooner the company can start dropping kedge anchors in time to receive the hardware shipments, the sooner it can start knocking off the rest of its pre-flight checklist.


CNET
7 minutes ago
- CNET
Fitness Enthusiasts Can Score the Ultrahuman Ring Air for $290 or Less, a Record Low
Many of us would like to stay on top of our health, and one way to keep track of your fitness, sleep and other important metrics is a wearable fitness tracker. But not all of us want a bulky smartwatch. That's where smart rings come in. Right now QVC has slashed the cost of the Ultrahuman Ring Air to just $290. That's a solid $59 savings on its list price and beats the price we saw during Prime Day this year. What's more -- if you're new to QVC, you can use coupon code HELLO30 for an additional $30 off, slashing the price to just $260. This smart ring is one of our favorite options for tracking sleep, stress, your heart rate and even caffeine intake. It's also water-resistant, compatible with both iOS and Android and, perhaps best of all, you do not need to pay for an additional subscription to use the Ultrahuman ring. The battery should last up to five days between charges, too. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money. CNET expert Vanessa Hand Orellana wrote in her review that "the Ultrahuman Ring Air is a solid first smart ring for most people. It's not flawless, especially when it comes to workout tracking, but it's a great wellness companion that can help you improve or adopt healthier habits. The lack of a subscription alone makes it one of the most accessible smart rings out there." Plus, this deal is available in all five colors, so you can grab the one that best suits your style. Note that QVC will first ship a sizing kit, then you'll need to select the right size for you and your ring will ship separately after your confirmation. Why this deal matters It's rare to find deals on smart rings, and this particular offer knocks up to $90 off the original price. If you've been considering investing in a sleek wearable to help you on your wellness journey that isn't as heavy and chunky as a smartwatch, this is an exceptional deal. But be quick -- an offer this good won't last long.


Gizmodo
7 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Gluten Could Be Wrongly Blamed for Americans' Stomach Troubles
For many of us, gluten is a dietary villain, capable of causing all sorts of gastrointestinal troubles. Research out this week looks to complicate that narrative, however, finding that people are sometimes wrongly blaming gluten for triggering their symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome. Scientists at McMaster University in Canada conducted the study, a small, randomized trial of IBS patients. People became sicker just as often after eating food containing gluten or wheat as they did after eating food without the ingredient, they found. Gluten is likely safer to eat for those with IBS than commonly thought, the researchers say. 'These findings suggest that expectations played a major role in symptom generation and that only some of these patients could benefit from gluten or wheat restriction,' they wrote in their paper, published Monday in The Lancet Gastroenetrology and Hepatology. IBS is a complex, chronic, and relatively common condition, estimated to affect between 5 and 10% of the population worldwide (including up to 45 million people in the U.S.). Its symptoms include stomach pain, bloating, and diarrhea or constipation. Unlike the closely named inflammatory bowel disorder, IBS isn't marked by physical changes or visible damage along the digestive tract, but it can still be a debilitating burden for many, with around 20% of sufferers experiencing severe bouts. The exact causes of IBS remain unclear, though scientists have speculated it can arise from a miscommunication between the nerves found in the gut and the brain. People with IBS tend to report having specific triggers that can cause a flare-up of illness, gluten included, and often manage their condition by avoiding these triggers. The researchers behind the new study aimed to better understand gluten's potential role in IBS, so they recruited over two dozen people with IBS for their randomized, double-blinded trial, all of whom had reported improving after switching to a gluten-free diet. At first, the volunteers were randomly assigned to one of three groups. All the groups were first told to eat cereal bars for a week. One group ate bars made with flour containing gluten, the second ate bars made with wheat flour, and the third ate bars made with gluten- and wheat-free flour. Afterward, the volunteers took a break for two weeks. Then they switched to eating the bars they hadn't eaten yet for another round of testing, a process repeated twice. By the study's end, all the volunteers had eaten all three kinds of bars, though on different schedules and without knowing which bars they had eaten on a given week. A total of 28 people completed the trial. A significant percentage of people reported having worsening IBS symptoms after eating gluten or wheat bars, the study showed, but about just as often as they did after eating non-gluten/wheat bars (roughly a third experienced worsening IBS during each of the three conditions). 93% of participants also reported having adverse events after each scenario of bar-eating. Interestingly enough, tests of the participants' stool found that only a third strictly followed their diets as instructed, with likely many fearing they would get sick. The findings are based on a very small sample size, so it's not yet certain that they apply to the general population of people with IBS tied to gluten. There are also, of course, digestive conditions clearly caused by an intolerance to gluten, particularly celiac disease. And the researchers aren't saying gluten can't sometimes be a genuine trigger for people's IBS. But they argue that in many cases, people's negative perception of gluten is causing a nocebo effect, the dark cousin of the placebo effect. In other words, someone's belief that gluten is bad for them can potentially spark or worsen the IBS symptoms seen after eating it, rather than gluten itself. The researchers say better communication and follow-up care from doctors are needed for IBS patients, given the findings. 'What we need to improve in our clinical management of these patients is to work with them further, not just tell them that gluten is not the trigger and move on. Many of them may benefit from psychological support and guidance to help destigmatize gluten and wheat and reintroduce them safely in their diet,' said senior author Premysl Bercik, a professor at McMaster's Department of Medicine, in a statement from the university. That may be easier said than done, though. The researchers note that most patients, upon learning the team's findings, staunchly refused to entertain the idea of gluten not being a trigger for their IBS symptoms. So it looks like gluten may need a promotional campaign to win back its reputation.