
Axed pediatrician who mocked Texas flood victims makes weak excuse after suggesting Trump voters deserved fate
Dr Christina Propst sparked massive backlash over a now-deleted Facebook post where she appeared to blame Republican voters for the tragedy.
'May all visitors, children, non-MAGA voters and pets be safe and dry,' the post read. 'Kerr County MAGA voted to gut FEMA. They deny climate change. May they get what they voted for. Bless their hearts.'
Propst's post went viral last weekend after a screenshot of it was shared across multiple social media platforms, resulting in calls for her termination and to have her medical license revoked.
The Houston-based doctor has now issued a public apology - but still had the nerve to temper it and play the victim.
She now claims she didn't realize at the time how many had died and that her post was 'being shared with the false impression that I made it after the devastating loss of life was known'.
'I speak to you as a mother, a neighbor, a pediatrician, and a human being who is deeply sorry,' Propst wrote Wednesday in a statement published by KPRC.
'I understand my comment caused immense pain to those suffering indescribable grief and for that I am truly sorry.'
She said she wanted to 'apologize to each and every individual suffering through terrible loss in this difficult time'. The catastrophic flash floods have killed at least 120 people, with over 170 who are still missing also presumed dead.
Propst also urged the community not to direct 'responsibility or harassment' towards her former employer Blue Fish Pediatrics.
'They are kind, hard-working, dedicated pediatricians who had no role in this whatsoever,' she said of her ex-colleagues.
'Perhaps my biggest regret is that my words are now serving as a distraction from our shared responsibility to heal the pain and suffering of those whose lives have been forever changed by unspeakable loss, and to take every step to ensure such a disaster never occurs again.'
Blue Fish Pediatrics distanced itself from Propst in a statement Saturday night in which the practice disavowed her comments.
'We are aware that a personal social media comment by one of our physicians has caused significant hurt and outrage,' the statement read.
'The content and timing of that post do not reflect the values, standards, or mission of Blue Fish Pediatrics.
'We want to be clear: we do not support or condone any statement that politicizes tragedy, diminishes human dignity, or fails to clearly uphold compassion for every child and family, regardless of background or beliefs.
'Our practice exists for one purpose only - to provide excellent, loving, and respectful care to all children and their families.
'Our patients come from every walk of life, every political belief, and every background, and we are honored to serve each of them with empathy and integrity.
'In moments of crisis, we believe in unity over division, healing over judgment, and humility over rhetoric. We are taking this matter seriously, reviewing it internally, and have placed the physician on administrative leave.'
The practice later added that 'the individual is no longer employed.'
The head of the Texas Medical Board Dr. Sherif Zaafran also shared Blue Fish's message and added: 'There is no place for politicization. The entire focus needs to be on looking for survivors. Any complaints we may receive will be thoroughly investigated.'
Propst's profile has been removed from both the Blue Fish Pediatrics and Children's Memorial Hermann hospital websites.
Propst's former employer Blue Fish Pediatrics distanced itself from the pediatrician in a statement Saturday night in which the practice disavowed her comments
Friday's flash flooding that has left more than 120 people dead, including dozens of children, across the Texas Hill Country region.
The confirmed death toll is expected to rise as the urgent search for more than 170 people still missing entered a seventh day.
Hundreds of workers in Kerr County and other central Texas communities continue to comb through piles of muddy debris, but there have been no live rescues reported this week.
President Donald Trump is preparing to visit the disaster zone Friday with First Lady Melania Trump.
The floods are now one of the deadliest natural disasters in Texas history. It is also the deadliest from inland flooding in the US since 1976, when Colorado's Big Thompson Canyon flooded, killing 144 people.
Dr Christina Propst's 'apology' to Texas flood victims
Dr Christina Propst has issued a formal apology to the victims of the flash floods that left more than 120 people dead in Texas' Hill Country.
Her statement, published Wednesday by KPRC, reads in full:
I speak to you as a mother, a neighbor, a pediatrician, and a human being who is deeply sorry.
I take full responsibility for a social media comment I made before we knew that so many precious lives were lost to the terrible tragedy in Central Texas.
I understand my comment caused immense pain to those suffering indescribable grief and for that I am truly sorry.
I would like to make clear that my regrettable comment was in no way a response to the tragic loss of human life. But the words written were mine and regardless of how they are being presented, that is a fact that I deeply regret.
I want to apologize to each and every individual suffering through terrible loss in this difficult time. As news of heartbreaking fatalities became clear I immediately removed my thoughtless comment, as it does not reflect the depth of my compassion or the respect I have for each and every human life.
Unfortunately, my online comment is now being shared with the false impression that I made it after the devastating loss of life was known. I did not. But again, the comment was mine and mine alone.
Even in these divisive times, some things are and should remain sacred. Human life is sacred. The well-being of children is sacred. Politics and party affiliation should never affect the judgment or actions of any medical provider and have never affected mine.
Anyone who has sat in my office, cried on my shoulder in moments of loss, afforded me the privilege of helping their child grow, or trusted me with their child's life knows that I am tirelessly committed to children's medical care and would never be so callous as to make such a remark about lives cut so terribly short.
I did not choose my words with the sensitivity the moment required, or with any awareness of the heartbreaking loss that would later become clear to all of us.
My comment came from a place of frustration - born of my belief that our communities, first responders, healthcare system, early-warning systems and disaster infrastructure need more and better support and funding to help prevent and respond to tragedies such as this.
But my poor choice of words has been perceived as a response to this tragedy, and for that I am deeply sorry.
I respectfully ask that no responsibility or harassment be directed toward my former employer. They are kind, hard-working, dedicated pediatricians who had no role in this whatsoever.
Perhaps my biggest regret is that my words are now serving as a distraction from our shared responsibility to heal the pain and suffering of those whose lives have been forever changed by unspeakable loss, and to take every step to ensure such a disaster never occurs again.
One thing on which we can all agree: The heart of every Texan breaks for each and every family shattered by this tragedy. I pray that those who are suffering find peace and comfort in the difficult days ahead and commit myself to helping the entire community heal and recover.
Moving forward, I will do my very best to listen, learn, grow and serve my community as I have always done. Because that is really who I am.
With deep regret,
July 8, 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US court blocks Trump administration from revoking Afghans' protected status
A US appeals court has for now blocked the Trump administration from removing the temporary protective status of thousands of Afghans in the United States, court documents showed on Monday. An administrative stay on the termination of temporary protected status for Afghans will remain until 21 July, the US court of appeals for the fourth circuit said in an order granting a request from immigration advocacy organization Casa. The group had filed a lawsuit against the US Department of Homeland Security to challenge the terminations of the temporary protected status for Afghans and Cameroonians announced by the Trump administration in April. Casa had filed for an emergency motion for a stay on Monday, when the protected status for Afghans was scheduled to be terminated. The protected status for Cameroonians is set to end on 4 August, according to the court document. The DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In April when the Trump administration terminated temporary deportation protections for thousands of Afghans and Cameroonians, the department had said conditions in Afghanistan and Cameroon no longer merited the protected status. The Trump administration has until 1159pm ET on Wednesday to respond. The US evacuated more than 82,000 Afghans from Afghanistan after Taliban's takeover in 2021, including more than 70,000 who entered the US with temporary 'parole', which allowed legal entry for a period of two years.


Daily Mirror
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump's MAGA mob fume over refusal to release Epstein files
The poll found that 67% of Trump voters in the 2024 election disagreed with the president's decision not to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein, compared to 58% of Kamala Harris voters American voters, particularly those in Donald Trump's MAGA base, are fuming over the president's apparent refusal to disclose the so-called Epstein files, as revealed by a recent survey. The uproar follows the Trump administration 's declaration to its followers that there isn't an Epstein list, despite previous campaign promises to unveil all involved parties. Notably, it's Trump's own backers who are most irked by his sudden U-turn, with a new Democracy Institute poll indicating that 67% of MAGA supporters who voted for him last November are at odds with his decision not to release the client list, in contrast to 58% of Kamala Harris voters who also disagree. First-time voters in 2024 appear to be particularly incensed by Trump's choice, with a staggering 71% opposing his decision. Among all Americans, the figure dips slightly to 63%, yet this still signifies a majority, according to the poll. The incumbent's latest actions seem to be taking a toll on his approval ratings, signalling that even Trump's staunchest advocates might have found a reason to withdraw their support from the contentious figurehead. Presently, data shows that 50% of Americans disapprove of President Trump's performance, reports the Mirror US. All this turmoil has emerged after the Justice Department and the FBI issued an unsigned memo last week, asserting that there is no alleged Epstein client list, contradicting Attorney General Pam Bondi's February statement that the list was "on her desk." The DOJ's decision has sparked controversy among Trump's supporters, with many viewing the Epstein case as a pivotal reason for backing Trump. FBI Director Kash Patel and his deputy Dan Bongino, before assuming their roles, had consistently spoken out about the list and the alleged "deep state" efforts to conceal it from the public eye. They also repeatedly insisted that Epstein did not take his own life. The DOJ memo confirmed that Epstein indeed died by suicide while detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in New York City in 2019. On Saturday, the president took to social media to voice his discontent over the split within his staunch "Make America Great Again" following regarding this issue, throwing his support behind Bondi. In his extensive post, he made no reference to Bongino. "What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?'" Trump penned. "They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening." Nevertheless, following an exhaustive months-long review of the evidence held by the government, the Justice Department concluded in Monday's memo that no further revelations would be appropriate or justified. The department highlighted that much of the information was sealed by a court order to safeguard victims, and only a small portion "would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial."


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Fed's Powell asks watchdog to take fresh look at renovation project, Politico reports
WASHINGTON, July 14 (Reuters) - U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has asked the Fed board's inspector general to take a fresh look at the project aimed at overhauling Fed buildings, Politico reported on Monday, citing a letter to lawmakers by Powell. Powell called on the Fed's inspector general, Michael Horowitz, to examine the project's cost, which has ballooned to $2.5 billion, leading to allies of President Donald Trump to call for Powell to be held accountable. Trump has repeatedly criticized Powell over interest rates and said the Fed chair should resign, but the president does not have the power to fire him over a monetary policy dispute. Recent comments from White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett on criticism of the Fed's renovation costs have confirmed the view that the Trump administration is actively exploring those costs and Powell's testimony about the project as a possible avenue to try to fire the Fed chief well before his term as chair ends in May 2026. The lawmakers addressed in the reported Powell letter were Republican Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott and Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the committee. "The Chairman looks forward to receiving additional information about the costly renovations at the Fed's headquarters," a spokesperson for Scott said in response to the reported letter, adding the letter was consistent with improving transparency. The Fed had no immediate comment. Powell wrote in the letter cited by Politico that the watchdog has had "full access to project information on costs, contracts, schedules, and expenditures and receives monthly reports on the construction program." Powell, who was nominated by Trump in late 2017 to lead the Fed and then nominated for a second term by then-President Joe Biden four years later, has said he intends to serve out his term as Fed chief, which ends on May 15.