logo
Rosmah's lawyer argues trial judge erred in refusing to recuse himself

Rosmah's lawyer argues trial judge erred in refusing to recuse himself

The Sun15-05-2025
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal was told today that the High Court Judge had erred in refusing to recuse himself from presiding over Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor's corruption trial involving the RM1.25 billion solar hybrid project in Sarawak.
Counsel for Rosmah, Datuk Jagjit Singh, submitted that the then High Court Judge, Datuk Mohamed Zaini Mazlan (now elevated to the Court of Appeal), ought to have disqualified himself from hearing the case after he allegedly instructed the court's Research Unit to prepare a draft judgment prior to the delivery of his decision.
'The judge erred in dismissing the recusal application on the basis that the 71-page document or the two purported judgments were merely opinions by the Research Unit.
'The Research Unit would not have prepared the draft opinions if instructions were not specifically given. The research unit would not venture on a frolic of its own without instructions and directions,' he submitted before a three-member panel chaired by Justice Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim, sitting with Justices Datuk Azman Abdullah and Datuk Noorin Badaruddin.
Jagjit further submitted that the delegation of the preparation of a written judgment, whether in draft or final form, to the court's Research Unit on behalf of the judge was improper, unacceptable and gravely prejudiced his client.
'Therefore, the appellant (Rosmah) did not get a fair trial when her constitutional rights and liberty had been violated, thus resulting in a serious miscarriage of justice,' he said at the hearing of Rosmah's appeal to recuse Judge Mohamed Zaini from presiding over her solar case.
On Sept 1, 2022, Rosmah Mansor, 73, failed in her bid to recuse Judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan from presiding over her corruption trial, following allegations that a draft judgment in her case, purportedly prepared by a third party, had been leaked before its official delivery.
On the same day, Rosmah was convicted on three charges of corruption in connection with the RM1.25 billion hybrid solar project in Sarawak.
She was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment and a fine of RM970 million, in default 30 years in prison.
However, she was granted a stay of execution on both the custodial sentence and the fine, pending the disposal of her appeal before the Court of Appeal.
Rosmah was charged with one count of soliciting RM187.5 million and two counts of receiving RM6.5 million in bribes from former Jepak Holdings Sdn Bhd managing director, Saidi Abang Samsudin.
The hearing is scheduled to resume on June 25.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gov't to take 'offensive', 'annoys' ruling to Federal Court
Gov't to take 'offensive', 'annoys' ruling to Federal Court

Malaysiakini

time7 hours ago

  • Malaysiakini

Gov't to take 'offensive', 'annoys' ruling to Federal Court

PARLIAMENT | Putrajaya intends to appeal a Court of Appeal ruling declaring two words under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA) 1998 - 'offensive' and 'annoys' - as unconstitutional. Confirming that he was informed of the Attorney-General's Chambers' (AGC) plan to appeal the ruling, Communications Minister Fahmi Fadzil (Harapan-Lembah Pantai) clarified that the words have been refined under amendments brought under his leadership. 'Regarding the Court of Appeal's decision, I was informed that...

Court for Children closed-door sessions protect minors in Malaysia
Court for Children closed-door sessions protect minors in Malaysia

The Sun

time11 hours ago

  • The Sun

Court for Children closed-door sessions protect minors in Malaysia

KUALA LUMPUR: Court for Children proceedings in Malaysia are conducted behind closed doors to safeguard minors' welfare and ensure fair trials. Only immediate family members, lawyers, deputy public prosecutors, and court staff can attend these sessions. The public and media are denied access to protect children's safety and confidentiality. Former Court of Appeal Judge Datuk Yaacob Md Sam explained the court's establishment under Section 11 of the Child Act 2001. 'Children accused of committing criminal offences will face charges under laws such as the Penal Code,' he stated. 'Cases will be registered and tried in accordance with Act 611, the Child Act 2001.' He emphasized that revealing child offenders' identities constitutes an offence under the Act. Former Magistrate Ahmad Shamil Azad highlighted Section 15 restrictions on media reporting. 'Section 15 prohibits the media from reporting names, addresses or personal details of child offenders,' he said. Media cannot publish photographs of children under 18 involved in court cases. Section 12 requires cases to be held behind closed doors with limited attendance. 'The public is not permitted to enter to protect the identity and safety of the children,' he added. Media cannot cover proceedings inside the courtroom during sessions. Journalists typically wait for statements from family or lawyers after proceedings conclude. Section 90(1) requires charges to be explained to children in simple language. 'If the child is represented by a lawyer, the responsibility may be delegated,' Ahmad Shamil noted. This ensures children understand charges and available options. The court will inquire about the child's plea preference during proceedings. For unrepresented children, the court may assist by asking trial-related questions. Children must be accompanied by their mother or guardian throughout court proceedings. Failure to appear may result in punishment under Section 88(2) of the Act. Penalties include a maximum fine of RM5,000 or imprisonment up to two years. Former Magistrate Nur'Aminahtul Mardiah Md Nor addressed media ethics. 'Ethical journalists must refrain from photographing child offenders,' she stated. Disclosing identifying information constitutes an offence under Section 15(1). Violations carry a maximum fine of RM10,000 or imprisonment up to five years. Former Deputy Public Prosecutor Abdul Khaliq Nazeri discussed offence types. 'Child offenders face charges including drug use, theft, and sexual crimes,' he said. Special procedures ensure children are not handcuffed and do not sit in the dock. - Bernama

Gov't to take 'offensive', 'annoys' ruling to Federal Court
Gov't to take 'offensive', 'annoys' ruling to Federal Court

Malaysiakini

time12 hours ago

  • Malaysiakini

Gov't to take 'offensive', 'annoys' ruling to Federal Court

PARLIAMENT | Putrajaya intends to appeal a Court of Appeal ruling declaring two words under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA) 1998 - 'offensive' and 'annoys' - as unconstitutional. Confirming that he was informed of the Attorney-General's Chambers' (AGC) plan to appeal the ruling, Communications Minister Fahmi Fadzil (Harapan-Lembah Pantai) clarified that the words have been refined under amendments brought under his leadership. 'Regarding the Court of Appeal's decision, I was informed that...

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store