Trump says it will be ‘rough situation' if Putin does not agree peace plan
He said it would be a 'rough situation' if Mr Putin failed to agree peace terms but stressed that Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky had to show flexibility, including giving up hopes of getting Crimea back or joining Nato.
The US president's comments came as Sir Keir Starmer held talks with members of the 'coalition of the willing', the nations prepared to contribute to guaranteeing Ukraine's security if a deal to end the Russian invasion can be reached.
In a call on Tuesday, members of the group discussed the possibility of further sanctions on Russia, while planners from the nations will meet their US counterparts 'in the coming days', amid efforts to set up 'robust security guarantees', Number 10 said.
The Prime Minister and Mr Zelensky were among European leaders who travelled to Washington on Monday for talks at the White House.
Those discussions have paved the way for a potential meeting between Mr Zelensky and Mr Putin for the first time since the Russian leader invaded his neighbour in 2022.
Mr Trump told Fox News: 'I hope President Putin is going to be good and if he's not, that's going to be a rough situation.
'And I hope that Zelensky, President Zelensky, will do what he has to do. He has to show some flexibility.'
The UK and France have pledged to commit forces to Ukraine to deter Mr Putin from launching a fresh assault on his neighbour if a deal is done to end the war.
Mr Trump said they were 'willing to put people on the ground', and added: 'We're willing to help them with things, especially probably if you could talk about by air, because there's nobody has the kind of stuff we have.'
But he suggested that Mr Putin was unlikely to launch another invasion as he was 'tired of it' after three years of war.
'We are going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks, that I can tell you,' Mr Trump said, acknowledging that it was 'possible he doesn't want to make a deal'.
Sir Keir said work with the US on what the security guarantees would entail could start as soon as Tuesday.
He said there was a 'real significant breakthrough when it comes to security guarantees, because we're now going to be working with the US on those security guarantees'.
Sir Keir told the BBC that teams from both sides of the Atlantic were starting 'the detailed work on that'.
The Prime Minister co-chaired a call on Tuesday morning of the so-called 'coalition of the willing', the group of nations he has been leading with France's President Emmanuel Macron.
Mr Trump spoke directly to Mr Putin to begin planning a meeting between the Russian leader and Mr Zelensky while hosting the gathering on Monday, which will then be followed by a three-way meeting involving himself.
The US president said Moscow will 'accept' multinational efforts to guarantee Ukraine's security.
Mr Zelensky, meanwhile, said he was 'ready' for bilateral and trilateral meetings.
But he told reporters following the White House meeting that if Russia does 'not demonstrate a will to meet, then we will ask the United States to act accordingly'.
Nato secretary general Mark Rutte said the US and Europe would 'do more' on tariffs and sanctions against Russia if the country 'is not playing ball' on direct talks with Ukraine, in comments to Fox News.
Sir Keir described the talks as 'good and constructive' and said there was a 'real sense of unity' between the European leaders, Mr Trump and Mr Zelensky.
He said Mr Trump's plans to arrange the bilateral and trilateral meetings showed a recognition that Ukraine must be involved in talks.
'That is a recognition of the principle that on some of these issues, whether it's territory or the exchange of prisoners, or the very serious issue of the return of children, that is something where Ukraine must be at the table,' the Prime Minister said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
29 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Souring US Ties Push India Closer to China
Bloomberg Insight Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi welcomed improved ties with China as US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent escalated criticism of the South Asian nation over its purchases of Russian oil. Pushan Dutt, Professor of Economics and Political Science at INSEAD, discusses the reshaping of those geopolitical relations and what could be next. (Source: Bloomberg)
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia's Upgraded Nuclear Battlecruiser Back At Sea After Nearly Three Decades
For the first time since 1997, the Russian Navy's nuclear-powered battlecruiser Admiral Nakhimov is finally back in the water and moving under its own power, after years of repair work and modernization. The milestone comes after the 28,000-ton battlecruiser's two nuclear reactors went back online earlier this year, and the warship is now expected to become the future flagship of the Russian fleet, superseding sister vessel the Pyotr Velikiy. At nuclear cruiser «Admiral Nakhimov» left SevMash shipyard for sea-trials after refurbishing. The ship spent more than 25 yrs at the shipyard. Courtesy: — KURYER (@RSS_40) August 18, 2025 Videos showing the Admiral Nakhimov underway in the White Sea confirm reports from Russian state media that the warship has commenced factory sea trials. The photo at the top of this story shows the warship heading out to sea, pulled by a tug, and further imagery appears in the embedded tweets. According to the news agency TASS, citing an unnamed shipbuilding industry source, Andrei Kostin, the head of the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC), informed President Vladimir Putin of the development yesterday. #Russian#Navy The nuclear-powered battlecruiser Admiral Nakhimov of Project 11442M went out to sea for first stage of sea trials after repairs and deep modernization. This was reported to TASS by a source in the shipbuilding industry. — Capt(N) (@Capt_Navy) August 18, 2025 In February, Russian reports stated that both the battlecruiser's reactors were online again, with plans for the warship to commence trials in the summer, a timeline that has been achieved. However, the path to this point has been far from easy, with the warship's return to service being plagued by delays. A couple more photos. — Capt(N) (@Capt_Navy) August 18, 2025 The Admiral Nakhimov was laid down in Leningrad in 1983 and was first launched in 1986, under its original name Kalinin. The warship is part of the class of warships known in Russia as the Project 1144.2 Orlan, which is codenamed Kirov class by NATO. In its current modernized form, the battlecruiser has the revised designation Project 1144.2M. The battlecruiser joined the Northern Fleet in 1988 and received its current name, in honor of Russian Admiral Pavel Stepanovich Nakhimov, in 1992. Still with the Northern Fleet, the Admiral Nakhimov was laid up in dry dock at the Sevmash shipyard in the port city of Severodvinsk on the White Sea since it last went to sea in 1997. Work on the battlecruiser only really began in earnest in 2014. At one point, it was predicted that the project would be completed around 2018. But the date was repeatedly pushed to the right, first to 2019, and then to 2020. By 2017, TASS was reporting that work on the Admiral Nakhimov should be completed by 2021. In 2021, reports stated that the warship wouldn't be back in service before 2023, while in 2022, the Sevmash shipyard stated that service re-entry had been pushed back to 2024. While the timeline has slipped dramatically, the refurbishment effort has now at least yielded more tangible results. A question remains, however, about how 'deep' this modernization really is. Put another way, of the whole range of new weapons and sensors that were planned for the battlecruiser, how many of these have actually been installed, and with what degree of operational practicality? At the core of the modernization was the plan to install no fewer than 174 vertical launch tubes, which would provide it with more than any other surface combatant or submarine in the world. In comparison, China's Type 55 'super destroyer' has 112 vertical launch system cells. A Flight III Arleigh Burke class destroyer has 96 cells, while a Ticonderoga class cruiser has 122 cells. The U.S. Navy's Zumwalt class stealth destroyers currently have 80 cells. A video gives some idea as to how extensive the work on the Admiral Nakhimov has been (starts at 4:45): Just as important is what the cells on the Admiral Nakhimov were planned to accommodate, with 78 of them assigned for various modern Russian cruise missiles, including the subsonic Kalibr, the supersonic Oniks, and the hypersonic Zircon. While the Kalibr has already been extensively used in combat in Ukraine, fired from a variety of surface and sub-surface platforms, Russia has so far claimed that the more exotic Zircon has only been deployed on Admiral Gorshkov class frigates. At the same time, there is compelling evidence that the missile has at least been combat tested in Ukraine, perhaps from a ground launcher. In the past, it was stated that the Kirov class would be the first operational launch platform for the hypersonic weapon, although delays with the work on the Admiral Nakhimov put an end to these ambitions. The other 96 cells in the reworked Admiral Nakhimov were intended to be loaded with surface-to-air missiles associated with the S-300FM Fort system, derived from the land-based S-300 system. Missiles in this series were already part of the basic armament of the Kirov class. Other reports in the past have suggested that missiles from the land-based S-400 air defense system may be incorporated in the battlecruiser, which would enhance its anti-ballistic missile capability. Other air defense armament would include eight Pantsir-M combined gun/missile systems for short-range interceptions, although, at this point, it appears that only six are fitted, three on each side of the vessel. All of these weapons were to be supported by a comprehensive array of new sensors and command and control systems. So far, however, we can only say for sure that the Admiral Nakhimov has received at least some new radar systems as well as a new main gun. The Soviet-era 130mm AK-130 dual-purpose gun has been replaced with a more modern AK-192M gun in the same caliber. #Russian#Navy Video of the Admiral Nakhimov, a Kirov Class nuclear-powered battlecruiser's first sea trials after repairs and upgrades. It provides a closer look at the new radar systems and the new AK-192M 130mm naval gun. Video by Lyudmila Alekseeva. — Capt(N) (@Capt_Navy) August 18, 2025 Of course, all of the aforementioned new weapons might also end up getting installed in the battlecruiser, but for now, we cannot be certain, and it's unclear if the modernized warship really will return to the Northern Fleet in a basically 'as new' condition. It should also be recalled that even less-invasive warship modernization programs can take a very long time. For example, the U.K. Royal Navy's Type 45 destroyer HMS Daring, the lead ship of its class, yesterday marked 3,000 days out of service, meaning that its current refit and regeneration effort has taken longer than its original construction. The destroyer is expected to rejoin the British fleet later this year. Monday 18 August will mark 3000 days since HMS DARING was last at sea. — Sir Humphrey (@pinstripedline) August 17, 2025 As a nuclear-powered warship, the work on the Admiral Nakhimov was also more complicated from the outset. The Kirov class is the last nuclear-powered surface combatant in service anywhere in the world, with the U.S. Navy retiring the last of its nuclear-powered cruisers in the 1990s, primarily on cost grounds. At the same time, while the battlecruiser will be welcomed back into service, it's widely expected that its return will see the decommissioning of the Pyotr Velikiy, also with the Northern Fleet. Pyotr Velikiy Pyotr Velikiy underwent only a minor modernization and still relies primarily on Soviet-era weapons and sensors. At one time, it was planned that both battlecruisers would undergo the same in-depth rework. The status of those plans is now very much uncertain, with several reports indicating that the Russian Navy will retire the Pyotr Velikiy altogether. Two earlier hulls, the Admiral Ushakov and the Admiral Lazarev, have been out of service for many years and have since been consigned to scrap. The importance of returning to service another major surface combatant is also magnified by the likelihood that the Russian Navy aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov will not now return to service, and with plans for a new class of 'super-destroyer' being shelved. As such, the modernized Admiral Nakhimov will likely be expected to form the centerpiece of future Russian flotillas. After over a decade of work and many delays, the fact that Russia has finally returned its nuclear battlecruiser to sea is certainly a welcome development for the Russian Navy. Contact the author: thomas@
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
9 years ago, Marco Rubio explained why Trump's birthright citizenship order is unconstitutional
As a presidential candidate in 2016, Marco Rubio defended the conventional understanding of birthright citizenship, which contradicts the view embraced by the administration he currently serves as secretary of state. The contrast is especially striking because Rubio is one of the defendants in federal lawsuits challenging President Donald Trump's attempt to restrict birthright citizenship by executive decree. When New York Times reporter Adam Liptak noted those points this week, State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott said it was "absurd" that the paper was "wasting time digging around for decade-old made-up stories." Yet Rubio's history on this issue is relevant to the birthright citizenship debate because it illustrates the clash between Trump's idiosyncratic reading of the 14th Amendment and a longstanding, bipartisan consensus about its meaning. The 14th Amendment says "all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" are "citizens of the United States." An executive order that Trump issued on his first day in office nevertheless purported to exclude U.S.-born children from citizenship when neither parent is a citizen or legal permanent resident. That order is consistent with the 14th Amendment, Trump argues, because the children it covers are not subject to U.S. jurisdiction. The government's lawyers say jurisdiction requires both "primary allegiance" and "permanent domicile"—criteria that undocumented immigrants, legal visitors, and authorized temporary residents cannot meet. Trump's position is untenable for reasons that Rubio's attorney, election law specialist Jason Torchinsky, explained in a 2016 motion to dismiss a lawsuit by fringe presidential candidate David Librace. The lawsuit argued that Rubio, then a Florida senator, was not qualified to run for president because his Cuban immigrant parents were not U.S. citizens when he was born. That argument was fundamentally mistaken, Torchinsky said, because Rubio was indisputably born in the United States, which was enough to make him a "natural born citizen"—the requirement that Librace claimed Rubio did not meet. "Under the common law of England at the time of the American founding, under U.S. Supreme Court precedent, and under U.S. historical practice," Torchinsky noted, "anyone born in the United States, regardless of ancestry and immigration status of the parents, is a 'natural born citizen' under the Constitution." English common law recognized just two exceptions to the general rule of citizenship by birth: children of diplomats and foreign military invaders, groups that were not subject to English jurisdiction. When the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868, Torchinsky wrote, "there was no question that persons born in the United States to foreign parents (who were not diplomats or hostile, occupying enemies) were citizens of the United States by virtue of their birth." That understanding was apparent in early judicial decisions and in subsequent legislative debates. The Supreme Court confirmed it in 1898, when the justices held that a man who had been born to Chinese parents in San Francisco thereby qualified as a U.S. citizen. The Court recognized one additional exception to birthright citizenship in the American context: Like the offspring of diplomats and foreign enemies, it said, "children of members of the Indian tribes owing direct allegiance to their several tribes," which had quasi-sovereign status, were not subject to U.S. jurisdiction within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. But apart from those three exceptions, the Court ruled, anyone born in the United States automatically becomes a U.S. citizen. The Supreme Court has repeatedly reiterated that principle, holding that even children of unauthorized residents are citizens by birth—a position echoed by officials in the executive and legislative branches. This background explains why Rubio's lawyer warned that "entertaining Mr. Librace's argument would jeopardize centuries of precedent." That is precisely what Trump aims to do, but so far his plan has not fared well in the courts. The Supreme Court is expected to take up the issue during its next term. Where will Rubio stand then? According to Pigott, the secretary of state is "100 percent aligned with President Trump's agenda." © Copyright 2025 by Creators Syndicate Inc. The post 9 Years Ago, Marco Rubio Explained Why Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order Is Unconstitutional appeared first on
