logo
Fox News Politics Newsletter: Red State Notches SCOTUS Win Over Planned Parenthood

Fox News Politics Newsletter: Red State Notches SCOTUS Win Over Planned Parenthood

Fox News5 hours ago

Welcome to the Fox News Politics newsletter, with the latest updates on the Trump administration, Capitol Hill and more Fox News politics content. Here's what's happening…
-Legalized same-sex marriage turns 10 after landmark Supreme Court decision reshaped American law and culture
-Former Biden aide Anthony Bernal subpoenaed by House committee after refusing to appear for deposition
-ICE arrests more Iranian nationals across amid sleeper cell concerns
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that South Carolina has the power to block Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood clinics, in a technical interpretation over healthcare choices that has emerged as a larger political fight over abortion access.
The case, Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, centers on whether low-income Medicaid patients can sue under what is known as Section 1983 – part of the Civil Rights Act of 1871 – in order to choose their own qualified healthcare provider.
It involves South Carolina's blocking of Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, which the organization argued violated federal law. In a 6-3 decision, the Court noted that the typical redress for such a violation would be for the Secretary of Health and Human Services to withhold Medicaid funding from the state, not for an individual to sue the state.
"Section 1983 permits private plaintiffs to sue for violations of federal spending-power statutes only in 'atypical' situations … where the provision in question 'clear[ly]' and 'unambiguous[ly]' confers an individual 'right,'" Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in the majority opinion, ruling that the law in question in the present case "is not such a statute."…READ MORE.
TAXPAYER BURDEN: FIRST ON FOX: Congressman calls on Noem, Dr. Oz with a plan to 'swiftly remove' 1.4 million illegal migrants who receive Medicaid
COURT BATTLE RAGES: Abrego Garcia lawyers ask US judge to order return to Maryland amid ongoing criminal case
'SWISS ARMY KNIFE': What has Vance accomplished in first 5 months as VP? His peers weigh in
FAKE NEWS FRENZY: Trump admin pushes back against 'false reporting' by mainstream media outlet on children deportations
JUDICIAL POWER GRAB: Revisiting Justice Scalia's same-sex marriage dissent: prophetic or inflammatory?
TWISTED PRIORITIES: Hegseth tears into reporters, alleging they 'cheer against Trump' and Iran strikes
EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Fmr. Trump Secy. of State Pompeo says Iran strike sends message: 'America is back leading in the world'
WOKE WASTE SLASHED: FIRST ON FOX: Noem uncovers and kills multimillion dollar Biden-era DEI, LGBTQ program
WAITING FOR THE CALL: Top Dem demands answers from Social Security, claiming wait times spiked during DOGE cuts
SPIES IN THE SKIES: Drone incursions on US bases come under intense scrutiny as devices upend modern combat
ART OF THE TROLL: White House drops 'Daddy's Home' meme after viral NATO summit moment
HEROES SURVIVE FIRE: Caine reveals details on the 44 young soldiers who defended largest US base in Middle East from Iran
TORTURE AND ABUSE: Belarusian dissident thanks Trump admin for his freedom, demands the UN act
REGIONAL OUTREACH: Trump's crown jewel Abraham Accords may expand to normalize ties between Israel and other nations
AUTHORITARIAN LUXURY: North Korea's Kim cuts tape at coastal tourist site; foreigners not yet welcome
'HISTORIC' TEAM: Mossad chief thanks US for help with Iran, says 'significantly thwarted' regime threats
NUKE SITE SHOWDOWN: 'The mission was accomplished': Senate Republicans push back against leaked report on Iran strikes
POWER PLAY BACKFIRE: FIRST ON FOX: GOP senator calls for parliamentarian's firing after serving Medicaid blow to Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'
UNELECTED POWER: Fury erupts as unelected Senate 'scorekeeper' blocks Trump's agenda
FLIP-FLOP FIASCO: DC House delegate's office backtracks after 88-year-old's statement that she'll run for re-election
VALUES VS. VERDICT: WATCH: Republicans share views on gay marriage decade after Supreme Court decision
THREATS UNLEASHED: Republican congresswoman's office evacuated after pro-abortion activists send chilling threats
SMACKDOWN: Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' faces setback as Senate rules knock out key Medicaid provisions
GREAT DIVORCE: Decade after landmark ruling, Republican support for same-sex marriage craters
NEW ROUND BEGINS: JB Pritzker takes aim at Trump in launching Democratic re-election bid for Illinois governor
CAMPAIGN LAUNCH: 'No dignity' in socialism: NYC Mayor Adams announces re-election bid after Mamdani wins Dem primary
GREEN BRAINWASHING: Parental rights watchdog exposes left-wing climate group's strategy to recruit kids for environmental activism
RED RISING: New York Republicans warn of 'disaster' if 'dangerous' Zohran Mamdani wins mayoral race
Get the latest updates on the Trump administration and Congress, exclusive interviews and more on FoxNews.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House Panel Subpoenas Harvard in Tuition-Pricing Inquiry
House Panel Subpoenas Harvard in Tuition-Pricing Inquiry

New York Times

time20 minutes ago

  • New York Times

House Panel Subpoenas Harvard in Tuition-Pricing Inquiry

The House Judiciary Committee subpoenaed Harvard on Thursday in its investigation into whether Ivy League universities have coordinated their pricing, turning up pressure on a school already in an all-out battle with the Trump administration. In the subpoena letter, Representatives Jim Jordan, the Ohio Republican who is chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Scott Fitzgerald, a Wisconsin Republican who leads a key subcommittee, demanded documents and communications about the university's tuition and financial aid by July 17. They said they were issuing the subpoena after Harvard's response to an earlier request for information was 'inadequate' and 'substantively deficient,' with much of the material that was turned over already publicly available. Harvard disputed the committee's assessment. 'We are disappointed that the committee has chosen to issue a subpoena and believe it is unwarranted, unfair and unnecessary,' said Jason Newton, a Harvard spokesman. He added that the university 'has produced thousands of pages of documents regarding our tuition setting process and financial aid program.' The subpoena threatened to break open yet another front in what has become a sprawling legal battle between Harvard and Republicans in Washington. The Trump administration has sought to punish the university for not acceding to its demands as President Trump pushes to shift the ideological tilt of the higher education system. The university has been the target of investigations from at least six federal agencies, and the administration has already tried to cut off billions of dollars in federal funding and block international students from attending Harvard, among other measures. Courts have halted many of the Trump administration's actions, and the university has become a symbol of resistance for not bowing to Mr. Trump. But Harvard officials have concluded their legal victories alone may not be enough to protect the university and are debating whether they might be able to reach a deal with the administration. The House Judiciary Committee had originally sought information in a letter to Harvard on April 8, alleging that Ivy League schools were 'collectively raising tuition prices' in breach of antitrust laws and were 'engaging in perfect price discrimination by offering selective financial aid packages to maximize profits.' They requested a large swath of documents between Harvard, other Ivy League schools and the College Board that contained any communication related to tuition, financial aid and admission practices. As part of the request, the committee asked for any documents related to the 568 Presidents Group, a collection of universities that worked to provide similar tuition prices and financial aid. The organization was dissolved in 2022 amid a class-action lawsuit. Harvard was not involved in the group or in the lawsuit. In an attempt to address its high tuition, Harvard announced in March that students whose families earned less than $100,000 could attend the school for free, while those whose families earn less than $200,000 would not have to pay the cost of tuition.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store