
ICC seeks arrest of Taliban leaders over persecution of women
Judges said there were "reasonable grounds" to suspect Taliban Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada and chief justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani of committing gender-based persecution.
"While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms," the court said in a statement.
The Taliban had "severely deprived" girls and women of the rights to education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion, ICC judges said.
"In addition, other persons were targeted because certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban's policy on gender."
The court said the alleged crimes had been committed between August 15, 2021, when the Taliban seized power, and continued until at least January 20, 2025.
Taliban authorities rejected the warrants as "nonsense".
The ICC warrants "won't affect the strong commitment and dedication to sharia (Islamic law)" of Taliban authorities, spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in a statement.
The ICC, based in The Hague, was set up to rule on the world's worst crimes, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity.
It has no police force of its own and relies on member states to carry out its arrest warrants -- with mixed results.
In theory, this means anyone subject to an ICC arrest warrant cannot travel to a member state for fear of being detained.
'Ongoing persecution'
After sweeping back to power in August 2021, the Taliban authorities pledged a softer rule than their first stint from 1996 to 2001.
But they quickly imposed restrictions on women and girls that the United Nations has labelled "gender apartheid".
Edicts in line with their interpretation of Islamic law handed down by Akhundzada, who rules by decree from the movement's birthplace in southern Kandahar, have squeezed women and girls out of public life.
The Taliban government barred girls from secondary school and women from university in the first 18 months after they ousted the US-backed government, making Afghanistan the only country in the world to impose such bans.
Authorities imposed restrictions on women working for non-governmental groups and other employment, with thousands of women losing government jobs -- or being paid to stay at home.
Beauty salons have been closed and women blocked from visiting public parks, gyms and baths as well as travelling long distances without a male chaperone.
A "vice and virtue" law announced last year ordered women not to sing or recite poetry in public and for their voices and bodies to be "concealed" outside the home.
The ICC prosecutor's office welcomed the warrants as "an important vindication and acknowledgement of the rights of Afghan women and girls."
"Through the Taliban's deprivation of fundamental rights to education, privacy and family life... Afghan women and girls were increasingly erased from public life," said ICC prosecutors.
"The decision of the judges of the ICC affirms that their rights are valuable, and that their plight and voices matter."
When requesting the arrest warrants in January, chief prosecutor Karim Khan warned that he would seek warrants for other Taliban officials.
Agnes Callamard, secretary general of Amnesty International, said the ICC warrants gave hope to women and girls inside and outside of Afghanistan.
Liz Evenson, international justice director at Human Rights Watch, said the arrest warrants showed that 'when justice is supported, victims can have their day in court.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
29 minutes ago
- India Today
Despite war and warnings, US traded more with Russia than ally Ukraine
United States President Donald Trump on August 6 announced an additional tariff of 25 per cent on India, taking the total to 50 per cent, making tariffs on India one of the highest in the tariffs, as per Trump, are a sanction against India for importing fuel from Russia. Trump alleges that India, by doing this, has been financing the Russian invasion of data by the US Census Bureau presents a different picture.A deep dive into the monthly trade data of the US with Russia and Ukraine reveals that the US has been doing more trade with Russia than it is with since the war began in February 2022, the US-Russia total trade has stood at USD 25.233 billion, while the trade with Ukraine stands at a mere USD 9.69 we merely look at import data for the two nations, as Trump's major concern is India financing Russia through imports, we see a trend that exposes US hypocrisy. In 2022, US imports from Russia stood at USD 14.43 billion, while imports from Ukraine stood at $1.503 billion In 2023, US imports from Russia stood at USD 4.57 billion, while imports from Ukraine fell to USD 1.39 billion In 2024, US imports from Russia stood at USD 3 billion, while imports from Ukraine stood at USD 1.17 billion In 2025, till June, US imports from Russia stood at USD 2billion while imports from Ukraine stood at merely USD 769 trend is clear, in terms of imports. Even though substantially reduced, the US continues to buy from Russia more than it does from all, the US has imported goods worth over USD 22 billion from Russia, ever since Ukraine was attacked, while has only imported goods worth USD 4 billion in the same time period from we take a look at the percentage increase in Indian trade cooperation with Ukraine, when it comes to Ukrainian imports to India, since the the war began during FY 2021-22, India imported USD 3.38 billion worth of goods from Ukraine, as per data published by the Indian Embassy in Kyiv, while in 2024-25 this data stood at USD 1.2 billion, which stands more than what the US buys from the war-torn the data is clear: While the US has accused India of arming and financing the Russian war, it is the US which is financing Russia more than it is financing Ukraine through trade, while India is balancing its partnership without taking a side and without financing any one side.- EndsTune InMust Watch


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
No direct impact on JSW biz, but sentiment in India will be hit: Parth Jindal on Trump's tariff
There would be no impact on the USD 23 billion-JSW Group's business due to the 50 per cent tariff imposed by the Trump administration, but sentiments in India may be hit, Jindal Cements MD Parth Jindal said on the imposition of additional tariffs of 25 per cent by the Trump administration on Wednesday, Jindal said it was "very unfortunate", and the industry should stand with "whatever route the government of India wants to take" in the national interest."We have to worry about 1.4 billion people here; we don't have to worry about what's happening in other parts of the world," said Jindal on the sidelines of an event statement came a day after Trump ratcheted up tariffs on Indian goods to 50 per cent, even as the two nations discuss a bilateral trade deal. The trade deal has been stuck over the US demand for greater access to India's agricultural and dairy market. When asked about the development, Jindal said: "No, there is no direct impact on either the steel industry or the cement industry or the power industry or the paint industry, there is no impact" due to the tariff. However, the managing director, who also heads the paints business of the group, said the "sentiment will take a hit for sure".The export from India to the US is around USD 86 billion, of which around USD 10 billion is pharma, which has an exemption."So, you are looking at about USD 76 billion getting impacted, which is mainly gems and jewellery, textile and a bit of the toy industry and some of the auto component guys," he added. When being asked if the high tariff persists, what would be the industry's demand from the government, Parth said: "I think the government, in their wisdom, is already taking steps to boost the gems and jewellery industry, to boost the textile industry. They are acutely aware of what's going to happen if the tariffs stay and the government machinery is "working double time" on finding a solution."I am sure, Ficci, CII, and Assocham are also working with the government very diligently, and I am sure steps will be taken, but we have to stand by whatever route the government of India wants to take. They are taking the route which is in the interest of 1.4 billion Indians," he the India-US relationship, Parth said It's been three decades of hard work by India and the US to get the relationship back to where it needs to be. "India has spent a lot of time and effort as well on improving the relationship, which started improving under President Clinton and improved with every successive president," Parth who had attended the Howdy-Modi event in 2019 in Houston, said: "I saw the bonhomie between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump. So, I really don't know what's changed". The oldest democracy in the world and the largest democracy in the world are natural allies, and this is just an aberration.


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Why is Donald Trump imposing massive tariffs on India? US based expert reveals Trump's ego is hurt because...
Trump on India trade New Delhi: In a significant statement after the announcement of additional tariffs on India by US President Donald Trump, a US-based expert has analysed the reason behind the tariff war initiated by the US President against India despite the growing India-US strategic ties. More specifically, the expert has indicated that the Trump tariffs are driven less by economic rationale and more by personal grievance. Why Trump is attacking India with tariffs? 'China has not stood out there and refused to let President Trump take credit for his role in the ceasefire. China has not had its leader have a long conversation with Trump on the phone and essentially dictate to him what's right and what's wrong. These are things that happened with India. So I think that's why perhaps President Trump would reserve some of his greatest ire on the trade and tariff front for India and for the Indian government. Indeed, it's a double standard. It's hypocritical, whatever you want to say…', Director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center, Michael Kugelman said in an interview to news agency ANI about why Trump is attacking India. Are India-US facing worst crisis in decades? 'I think this is the worst crisis that the relationship has faced over the last two decades of strategic partnership…I would argue that there is potential for this relationship to be salvaged, not just because of the natural, shared interests and the strategic convergences, but this is a relationship that is multifaceted and has many different areas of cooperation that play out on parallel tracks and have the insulation to withstand shocks to the broader relationship…', he added in his statement. What's the update on India's energy ties with Russia? The PTI report also quoted the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) as saying that the imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of the country, thus defending India's energy ties with Russia. (With inputs from agencies)