Midterm review of the Pakatan government — Lee Hwa Beng
The Unity Government now has 153 members of parliament (MP) as follows:
1. PH (81): DAP (40), PKR (31), Amanah (8), United Progressive Kinabalu Organisation - UPKO (2)
2. BN (30): Umno (26), MCA (2), MIC (1), Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah - PBRS (1)
3. GPS (23): Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu - PBB (14), Sarawak United Peoples' Party - SUPP (2), Parti Rakyat Sarawak - PRS (5), Progressive Democratic Party - PDP (2)
4. GRS (6)
5. Warisan and others: 6
6. Independents of formerly Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia — members (7)
The Opposition has 69 seats, led by Perikatan Nasional (PN), comprising PAS with 43 seats and Bersatu with 25 and Muda, one.
There have been four by-elections since the last elections at the federal level. Kemaman and Kuala Terengganu were retained by PAS, and Pulai by PKR. But in Padang Serai, PKR lost to Bersatu.
Party flags line the road ahead of the Sungai Bakap by-election June 26, 2024. ― Bernama pic
Two parties, DAP and PKR had their party elections. The Lim stronghold over DAP were finally over with Lim Guan Eng being only one left in the central committee and Anthony Loke firmly in charge.
In PKR, Anwar's daughter, Nurul Izzah took over as Deputy President of PKR, taking over from Rafizi Ramli after challenging the latter during the party elections in May 2025. Anwar's term as President is limited by the constitution to three terms, to end by 2026. Some people believe that Anwar is engineering for Nurul to take over as president in 2026 so that he can still be the PM after the next general elections due in 2028.
The federal government is held by a unity government consisting of PH and BN. Seven states are held by this Unity Government: Johor, Pahang, Negri Sembilan, Selangor, Perak and Penang. Sarawak is under GPS and Sabah under GRS, with both aligned with the federal government. Interestingly, Umno is the opposition in Sabah and DAP, in Sarawak.
The other four states Kelantan, Terengganu, Kedah and Perlis are held by PN.
As the last federal level elections were held on November 19, 2022, the next is due by February 17, 2028. Sabah had its state election on September 26, 2020, and must have its next election by December 8, 2025.
Sarawak had its state election on December 18, 2021 and must hold the next by April 10, 2027.
Melaka held its state elections on November 20, 2021 and must hold the next one by November 2026. Johor held its on March 12, 2022, with the next election due in April 2027.
For the other states, all their elections were held after the federal elections in 2022; as such, their terms can last past the due date of the elections of the federal government.
As the title of my article suggested, I will attempt to review the state of affairs of our political situation for the federal government and not the state governments.
Most independent political analysts agree that a slight majority of the Malays voted for PN and a high number of non-Malays voted for PH in the last general elections held in 2022. Hence the results reflected that high-majority Malay areas were won by PN, while mixed and non-Malay areas were won by PH. Umno was then contesting independently under BN and won in their traditionally strong Malay areas.
Undeniably, voting are still based on racial lines.
At this halfway point, has the support for the parties along racial lines changed?
A lot of people voted for PH due to Umno's financial scandals, especially the 1MDB. But the Umno they thought they kicked out is now in Anwar's government. Umno's Ismail Sabri, also former Prime Minister, allegedly caught with RM170 million, will reinforce their hatred for Umno. The discharge not amounting to acquittal (DNAA) given to pro-government leaders, including those in Umno and Najib's AmBank case, whose cases were dropped, would also erode PH's traditional support.
This factor will definitely push most of the Malays who voted for PH due to their dislike of Umno away from PH. Similarly, the non-Malays may not all move to PN but will likely stay at home.
DAP has an Indian national chairman in Gobind Singh Deo, with his brother Ramkarpal as deputy secretary general, both of which are key party roles. However, both are Punjabis and not seen as Indians. There are also no credible Indians in PKR and this may make PH lose a lot of Indian votes, if people continue to vote along racial lines.
The two years of PN government under Muhyiddin Yassin, and another two years of Muafakat under Ismail Sabri government, with PAS in both governments, might have pushed the non-Malays towards PH in the last elections.
Will Umno supporters stay with them to vote PH or remain with PN without Umno? I believe the traditional Umno supporters will vote where there are Umno candidates and unlikely to vote for the other PH candidates. Very likely, these Umno supporters will vote PN when there are no Umno candidates.
PH's support from the non-Malays depends a lot on DAP. Most Chinese depend on DAP to fight for their rights as they previously depended on MCA until MCA failed them. Anwar's pro-Islamic actions like the Mufti Bill, amendment to the law related to the jurisdiction of the shariah courts in RUU 355, the appointment of the new Chief Justice, DNAAs, etc, have scared quite a few Chinese. DAP's seemingly weak stand against PKR and especially Umno's Youth head's rhetoric has also weakened their traditional Chinese support.
The Penang government with DAP control and a CM's recent introduction (which was then rescinded) of 5 per cent discount for house purchases by Indian Muslims also raised alarm.
All these have weakened the green wave scare of Chinese against a PAS dominated government. In fact, the green wave scare was the main reason why most non-Malays, and especially the Chinese, won't be inclined to vote PN.
On the economic front, is our country in better shape? The weak economic climate of the world, and especially the tariff factor of Trump, have also affected Malaysia. But has our government done anything to mitigate this economic slowdown?
The recent economic stimulus and goodies announced by Anwar will not be enough to change their minds.
To summarise, PH cannot rely on their past solid non-Malay support and must entertain the possibility that more Malays will vote PN in next GE.
PH without BN's 30 MPs, GPS' 23 MPs and GRS's 6 MPs, and the 7 Independents would only have 81 MPs.
Umno's support for PH will depend on the distribution of seats between PH and BN. It is unlikely that they can agree as a number of Umno seats lost in the last elections were won by PKR and Amanah. Similarly, most of the MCA and MIC seats were lost to DAP. I cannot imagine that PH will give up enough seats to make Umno, MCA and MIC happy. I believe these three parties will compete separately and there will be a three-coalition fight, ie, PH, PN & BN, as happened in the last elections.
What can PH or Anwar do to ensure of victory?
A lot will depend on the outcome of the state elections of Sabah and Sarawak, which will definitely be held before the next national elections.
An increase in seats will require a 2/3 majority, but a redrawing of seat boundaries needs a simple majority. I believe Anwar will opt for the latter.
As PH's support from the non-Malays will still be more than 50 per cent despite an expected drop as compared to last elections and Malay support for PN will increase, Anwar will redraw boundaries to have more Chinese in the mixed seats. The Umno-led Muafakat government had created a lot of big Chinese seats like Petaling Jaya, Subang Jaya, Klang, Ipoh, etc, for the last elections. I am sure Anwar will redraw the boundaries to shift the Chinese from these big seats to neighbouring areas to create more mixed seats.
He will do this whole exercise just before the next elections to enjoy the advantage of surprise.
Another possibility is that PKR might dissolve and merge with Umno with Anwar as the President. This will create new dynamics into our political arena. If this happens, MCA and MIC will again be played out by Umno as the new Umno will likely work with DAP.
Anwar's age is also a factor. He is 77 now and will be 80 by 2028.
To conclude, I dare to say, bravely, if elections were held today, PH will lose more seats and be forced to form a unity government again, possibly with Umno once more. Also, expect GRS of Sabah to lose the state, and Warisan to be the winner. In Sarawak, GPS will still win handsomely. Warisan and GPS will then be the kingmakers for federal politics.
Datuk Lee Hwa Beng
Three-term State Assemblyman
Sacked by MCA in 2012 for the PKFZ Exposure
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
26 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Race-based policies a thorn in both sides, says ex-Umno man
(From left) Shahril Hamdan, formerly of Umno, was at a panel discussion with Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad of PKR and Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal of Bersatu. KUALA LUMPUR : A former Umno leader has called for an honest national dialogue on how Bumiputera policies are implemented, as current approaches have bred resentment not just among non-Bumiputeras but also within the Bumiputera community itself. 'I think you need to make sure that whatever set of policies you have, reduce resentment,' former Umno Supreme Council member Shahril Hamdan said at the Malaysian student leaders summit held here today. 'There's too much resentment in this country,' he said. 'Clearly, the Bumiputera policy has been actioned in a way that has caused resentment among the non-Bumiputeras. And what's tragic is that you also have resentment from the Bumiputera community. 'Although they get Bumiputera privilege, they feel that they got a raw deal,' he said at a panel discussion on the mandate of the Madani government. Another speaker, former minister Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad of PKR said Malaysia should gradually shift away from race-based affirmative action to a needs-based approach, which was also seen in the 13th Malaysia Plan. Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal of Bersatu called for the social contract to be renegotiated, through a national dialogue. He agreed that some reforms were overdue, saying: 'It's high time in certain areas, race-based policies need to be forgone.' However, he said he would continue to uphold Bumiputera rights and privileges as part of his political struggle, but without sacrificing justice for other communities, because strategic intervention or affirmative action in certain areas was still needed on a race-based basis. Shahril said Singapore also provides for Malay rights in its constitution, but does so without stoking public frustration. 'Nobody talks about it, because the way it is expressed is probably a lot smaller than ours, and secondly, it's done in a way that does not cause resentment.' He said Malaysia's constitutional provisions for Bumiputera rights are difficult to amend, requiring not only a two-thirds majority in Parliament but also consent from the Conference of Rulers. 'So how do we then action (act) the policy in a particular way that reduces resentment? And that's a worthwhile national dialogue to have, but it has to be done honestly and sincerely,' he added. Wan Fayhsal, in calling for renegotiation of the social contract, said: 'How do we go about it? Through political discussion. And there has to be a lot of engagements done by political parties and governments. It's a national dialogue to begin with.' Any shift towards a more inclusive identity must be preceded by public engagement, 'unless you want a somewhat equal identity of Malaysian-based politics or economic policy'. Nik Nazmi said affirmative action must also consider other factors beyond race. 'We need to look at gender, look at communities, and race in terms of how you push people to participate in the country,' he said. He said this shift was discussed in Najib Razak's government and remains relevant today. Current policies place excessive focus on race alone, which undermines the broader goals of equitable development, he said. The three political leaders were responding to a question on what each panel member thought about Bumiputera quotas and the relationships between Bumiputeras and non-Bumiputeras.
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Creating Anwar's legacy — ending ‘gomenshud'
One of the most common Malaysian words I hear is 'gomenshud'. This is used whenever an issue of concern arises and the 'government should' do something about it rather than the private sector or, heaven-forfend, that individuals should fix it for themselves. It is ironic that people complain of incompetence, systemic corruption and moral turpitude within the executive, legislature, judiciary and the permanent civil service at federal and state levels but still demand that more money, responsibility and interference opportunities should be handed to them. The economics of government and policy design, called 'public choice theory' tells us clearly that people in government are not driven by the 'greater good' or the 'public interest', they are, just like the rest of us, driven by personal and collective self-interest. This is not meant to be cynical or offensive but simply to help us understand those in public policy as human beings — they have hopes and dreams, they want to make life easy for themselves as far as possible and if there is a chance to make a few bucks they will take it. Each year the auditor-general reports hundreds of millions lost in wastage and leakages across the government sector. The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) estimates RM277 billion lost to corruption between 2018 and 2023. The think tank Emir Research estimates that RM4.5 trillion was lost to corruption in the last 26 years. This is all identified after the fact and to stop this haemorrhage of resources we need to address the 'gomenshud mentality' which defaults to intervention from the start without proper evaluation of the costs and benefits and the likely losses due specifically to policy design. A common form of policy design in Malaysia is the 'patronage cascade' where projects, concessions and access routes to money are specifically built-in to benefit middlemen often through pre-allocated packages and contracts. With this in mind, the 13th Malaysia Plan which will be tabled this week should reduce the role and interference of government. We should be cautious if we see 'patronage cascades' where policies are specifically designed to pass projects to vested interests. Instead, broad-based universal programmes, available to everyone, with open and transparent access routes should be the emphasis. This can be achieved first by government exiting commercial activities which crowd out large businesses, SMEs and micro enterprises and leaving these activities to the private sector. Second by slashing regulations and focusing only on minimum standards of health and safety, anti-corruption, good governance and anti-trust issues. Finally, by focusing on the basic role of government in many areas where there are direct and legitimate concerns for public policy including public health, education and social protection. Economic mechanisms we hope to see in the 13MP include liberalisation of markets, reducing regulatory burdens, limiting government interference and promoting creative, innovative, agile, competitive businesses. The US tariff issue also sends us a lesson that protectionist policies come with a reciprocal cost. So removing restrictions to market access should also be a priority for the 13MP. Proper independent assessments have rarely been made of the targets of previous Malaysia plans and many have not been delivered, fully or at all. The main unfulfilled target of every Malaysia plan is to build in a mechanism to end the need for future plans. In other words, these are 'forever wars' against dreamed up economic challenges more typical of centrally planned economies. They are increasingly irrelevant in a modern technology-driven economic environment in which anything laid down in July 2025 will be obsolete by December 2025 let alone by 2030 — gomenshud recognise this and end it once and for all. The views expressed are the writer's own and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
Free Malaysia Today
5 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Review 25km ‘straight-line' travel allowance for Sabah teachers, says union
The union said several teachers in Sabah were forced to pay back the travel allowances they had received. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : The education ministry and public services department have been urged to review the implementation of a new 25km 'straight-line' travel allowance rule for teachers in Sabah. The allowance for teachers travelling from their home to their schools is capped at a travel distance of 25km, measured as a straight line on a map rather than the actual distance covered by road. The Sabah government teachers' union (KGKS) said this rule cannot be implemented rigidly in Sabah given the state's hilly terrain and lack of infrastructure, like roads. KGKS president Gundohing Murkam Hussien cited the example of teachers working at SK Penimbawan Tuaran, which can be reached by boat or road, The Borneo Post reported. 'The first way is by boat along the river, which takes between 10 and 15 minutes, depending on weather conditions. The second is to use a car and drive for 78km. 'This means that strictly enforcing the 25km requirement is not appropriate. After considering the views of all KGKS members, the union has agreed to appeal to the ministry to review this issue,' he said. Gundohing said several teachers under KGKS were taking home lower salaries now because of this rule. Previously, they were given the travel allowance after it had been verified by the district education office. Gundohing also said some teachers were ordered to repay the allowances they had 'wrongly' received, forcing a few of them to apply for bank loans or sell their cars to pay off the amount. 'Of course, the teachers involved have been badly affected, leading to a decrease in their enthusiasm for work. 'All those involved in the process (of approving the allowances for the teachers) should by right be held responsible and share the cost of these claims,' he said.
