'Can you share Virat Kohli's number?': R Ashwin foils scam attempt by fake ‘Devon Conway' after IPL 2025
Ashwin shared that he got a WhatsApp message from someone posing as his CSK teammate Devon Conway. The chat began innocently, with casual greetings and talk about MLC matches to make the story sound genuine. Since he didn't have Conway's number saved, he initially thought it was really him.
Ashwin grew suspicious when the supposed Conway suddenly asked for Virat Kohli's contact number. He didn't want to create any misunderstanding with the real Conway and decided to share a different number instead.
"After the IPL got over, one guy messaged me claiming to be Devon Conway, 'Hi buddy, how are you?' and I also responded that we'll stay in touch. You're playing in MLC; I'll watch the games and all that talk. He then asked, 'I've missed Virat Kohli's number, can you share Virat's number?' I thought Why is he asking Virat's number. I thought I should ask him, but I didn't want Devon Conway to misunderstand. Then I picked Virat Kohli's card and gave him a different number," Ashwin said on his YouTube channel.
Ashwin bluffs the fraudster
The veteran all-rounder revealed how the events that unfolded confirmed his suspicions, as he managed to outwit the scammer by cleverly calling their bluff.
"Once I shared it, he replied, 'I've lost a few more numbers.' I asked him whose numbers, he responded, 'Rohit Sharma and MS Dhoni.' I got suspicious and then asked him a question, 'I gave you a bat this year, how's that bat?'. He said the bat is amazing, and I've not even gave him any bat, he lied and I blocked him instantly,' Ashwin added about the encounter.
Realising the scam, Ashwin later confirmed it by checking Conway's number on the CSK official WhatsApp group and went on to block the scammer's number.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
16 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Rashtrapati Bhavan Amrit Udyan 2025: From babbling brooks to floral clocks, here's what you can explore, booking details inside
Synopsis Amrit Udyan at Rashtrapati Bhavan will welcome visitors from August 16 to September 14, 2025. This year's highlight is the Babbling Brook, replacing the musical fountain. The garden includes new features like a water stream and a banyan grove. Special provisions are made for disabled visitors. Entry is free with online booking or walk-in registration. PTI Amrit Udyan to open for public from Aug 16; Babbling Brook among key highlights The famous Amrit Udyan at Rashtrapati Bhavan will be open to the public from 16 August to 14 September 2025, officials announced on Wednesday. This year, the highlight will be the Babbling Brook, a peaceful garden feature where flowing water, greenery, and colourful flowers create a calm and relaxing Deputy Press Secretary to the President Navika Gupta said the Babbling Brook replaces the earlier musical fountain. 'Lush greenery surrounds the brook, with flowers adding bright colours. It winds gently through stones and plants, offering visitors a moment of quiet reflection,' she said during a media preview. Amrit Udyan is now more friendly for people with disabilities. Ramps, Braille information boards, and special plant displays for sensory experiences have been added for visually challenged from the Babbling Brook, the landscaped area now includes: A water stream with small cascades and sculptural spouts Stepping stones and a raised reflecting pool A tranquil banyan grove with reflexology paths and panchtatva trails A plumeria garden with grass mounds and curated plants The trail also covers the Bal Vatika, Herbal Garden, Bonsai Garden, Central Lawn, Long Garden, and Circular Garden. Visitors can scan QR codes along the route to learn about the plants and designs. A food court will be available near the exit. Entry is free – book online at Walk-in registration is possible at kiosks outside Gate No. 35 Open daily from 10 am to 6 pm (last entry 5:15 pm), closed on Mondays Entry from Gate No. 35, near North Avenue Road Rashtrapati Bhavan Museum tickets are separate; school groups get free museum entry during the season The President's Estate spans 154 hectares, with 139 hectares covered in trees, lawns, and open spaces. Amrit Udyan covers 15 acres and is often called the 'soul' of Rashtrapati Bhavan. Its beauty lies in its mix of fountains, water channels, ponds, seasonal flowers, and native plants. This summer, visitors can see more than 42 types of flowers, including Periwinkle, Celosia, Indian shot, Kochia, Tuberose, and Portulaca. A new floral clock has also been installed, featuring a real working clock surrounded by flower beds and colourful pebbles. President Droupadi Murmu will officially inaugurate the summer opening on Thursday, continuing her vision of making Rashtrapati Bhavan more open and citizen-friendly. Inputs from PTI
Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Washington Sundar avows Stokes' handshake controversy fired up Indian team on England tour: ‘It brings out a lot'
Washington Sundar shared his views on the infamous handshake controversy between India and England, in which he was at the centre of the incident. It happened on the final day of the Manchester Test, and India were fighting hard to avoid a defeat after England claimed a massive first-innings lead. India mounted a strong second-innings resistance, with KL Rahul and Shubman Gill laying the foundation before Ravindra Jadeja and Sundar attacked the English bowlers on the final day. Washington Sundar scored a brilliant century at Old Trafford, Manchester.(PTI) In the last hour, with Jadeja and Sundar both closing in on centuries, England skipper Ben Stokes walked up to Jadeja and offered a handshake—England's customary way of signalling a draw and calling off play early, with about 15 overs still remaining. However, India declined the offer. Jadeja and Sundar, both on the verge of personal landmarks, were determined to see them through. The decision didn't sit well with Stokes and several England players, who showed visible signs of displeasure. Sundar weighed in on the incident, noting that such moments are quite common when two fiercely competitive sides face off on the field. "I mean, it just happens in any sport, doesn't it?" Washington told Wisden. "We've seen a lot of such things happen, not just in cricket, but in any sport. I mean, that's how sport is. It brings out a lot. I think it was just an experience for all of us, honestly." Sundar admitted that the tension kind of fired him up," he said. 'You want to be challenged': Sundar The Indian all-rounder further acknowledged that the episode added extra spark to the team's performance, explaining how such moments tend to heighten the intensity of a contest, particularly in the red-ball format. "One hundred per cent," he said. "You ask this to any player — that's exactly what you would hear. Especially in Test cricket, you want to be challenged because that's exactly what you expect every single day. And when the situation gets tough, the only thing that will help you get over it and come out successful is being really tough in your head," he added. Sundar talked about the demands of excelling in the longest format, stressing the importance of sustaining high standards over time. "Every player who's played this format and been successful would have done this extremely well and over a long period of time, quite consistently as well," he said.
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Failure of Alia Bhatt's Jigra did not shock us,' says Karan Johar as recalls being ‘disappointed' by the film's fate at the box office
Despite opening to widely favourable reviews and eventually making it onto several distinguished 'best Indian/Bollywood movies of 2024' lists, director Vasan Bala's action thriller Jigra, featuring Alia Bhatt and Vedang Raina in the lead roles, ended up being a massive box-office bomb. Mounted on a reported budget of Rs 80 crore, the movie ended up making only Rs 56 crore, according to industry tracker Sacnilk, delivering a heavy blow to the makers. Although disappointed by the outcome, producer Karan Johar, recently revealed that he does not regret making the movie. He went one step further and maintained that he was, in fact, 'proud of the film'. Describing Vasan's 'syntax' as individualistic and brilliant, Karan stated that he is one of the finest minds working in Bollywood now. 'Jigra had a certain syntax that was not quintessentially mainstream. We had realised that when we watched the movie. But we all believed in it together. None of us were not on the same page. We knew what we were going for. Yes, we were hoping against hope that it would find a wider audience… but we all understand it,' he shared during a chat with Suchin Mehrotra on his YouTube channel. Karan further expressed hope that the filmmaker would continue on the same path, creating films he truly believed in. 'Vasan's meta-referencing, quirks and style of absolutely breaking the grammar of filmmaking, such things may not always land, right? But should he stop making films like this because of that? No! He must always make films that he believes in,' he stated. Mentioning that he would love to collaborate with Vasan Bala again, Karan said he would gladly agree to produce another project helmed by the filmmaker, no questions asked, regardless of Jigra's outcome. He added, 'I really believe in him.' Karan continued, 'Yes, we were disappointed, dejected and sad. But we are all very proud of that film, even today. Even now, we have a group comprising Vasan, me and Alia. Vasan has a brilliant self-deprecating sense of humour. He will make fun of himself in the most unique way possible. We still send messages on that group. I do believe that a decade or two later, we will reference Jigra as something that broke ground, something that Alia, Vasan and the rest of us were so brave to do. 'I'm very proud of Jigra. There are films that I'm not proud of. This film may have failed at the box office, but to me and our studio, it's a success story. Yes, every film is flawed; we can discuss and analyse those flaws. But did it shock us when the film failed? No, we understood it, and we did discuss it. We were pragmatic enough to know that we could be in a hit-miss zone; that we may hit the bullseye or we might miss it. We were self-aware. So, its outcome did not come to us as a devastating shock to any of us,' he added.
