Pakistan, US to finalise trade deal next week
Listen to article
Pakistan and the US have resolved to conclude trade talks next week, the finance ministry said on Wednesday after a meeting between Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb and US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.
The negotiations, focused on reciprocal tariffs, are part of a broader push to reset economic ties at a time of shifting geopolitical alignments and Pakistan's efforts to avoid steep US duties on exports.
'Both sides showed satisfaction on the ongoing negotiations and resolved to conclude the trade negotiations next week,' finance ministry said in a statement, adding that a longer-term strategic and investment partnership is also under discussion.
Pakistan faces a 29% tariff on exports to the US under President Donald Trump's measures to target countries with large trade surpluses with the US. Pakistan's surplus was around $3 billion in 2024.
To offset the imbalance and ease tariff pressures, Islamabad has offered to import more US goods, including crude oil, and to open up investment opportunities through concessions for US firms in Pakistan's mining sector.
Earlier this week, Pakistan-US co-hosted a webinar promoting investment in Pakistan's mineral sector, including the $7 billion Reko Diq copper-gold project.
Read More: Trump says Pakistani officials visiting US next week for trade talks
Senior officials from both governments and US investors discussed public-private partnerships and regulatory reforms. The US Export-Import Bank is reviewing financing proposals worth $500 million to $1 billion in Reko Diq.
Trump, who hosted Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir at the White House last week, has earlier said trade helped avert a deeper conflict between Pakistan and India.
After last month's Pakistan-India conflict, which led to heightened military tensions in the region, Trump repeatedly stated that the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours agreed to a ceasefire following US-mediated talks. He claimed hostilities ended after he urged both countries to focus on trade instead of war.
The Trump statements came in the context of heightened tensions triggered by the killing of 26 people—mostly tourists—in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK).
Read More: 'If you don't stop, no trade': Trump on Pakistan-India ceasefire
The attack led to a dramatic escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. India accused Pakistan of supporting the militants behind the assault, a claim Islamabad strongly denied.
India launched airstrikes against what it described as militant training camps across the border. Pakistan said the strikes hit civilian areas, causing dozens of casualties.
In retaliation, Pakistan hit 26 Indian military facilities and dozens of Pakistani drones hovered over major Indian cities, including capital New Delhi, in the offensive operations on May 10.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
The war is over — for now
The writer is a retired major general and has an interest in International Relations and Political Sociology. He can be reached at tayyarinam@ and tweets @20_Inam Listen to article Finally, at the desperate urging of PM Netanyahu, the US on June 21, 2025, in a complex attack involving around 125 aircraft, including seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, and one submarine bombed three Irani nuclear sites at Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan. The US dropped fourteen 30,000 pounds GBU-57 bunker busting MOP (massive ordnance penetrator) at Fordow and Natanz and fired around 75 BGM-109 Tomahawk cruise missiles, mainly at the Isfahan site. The Virginia-based B-2s flew in two directions on takeoff, one component heading towards Guam for deception, and the other towards the Middle East. The sites already pulverised by the IAF revisits were described as 'obliterated' by President Trump. Fordow, containing around 3,000 sophisticated centrifuges in two enrichment halls, was attacked through ventilation shafts at two points, and GBU-57s seems to have "severely damaged but not destroyed" it, as per US officials. Iran claims the site was already evacuated. Natanz, the largest uranium enrichment centre, had earlier sustained 11 explosions in Israel's clandestine operation in 2020. IDF destroyed its above ground structures and electric supply on June 13. The US strikes extensively damaged its underground enrichment centrifuges. The Isfahan complex, outside the ancient Isfahan capital, was a storage site for the near bomb-grade nuclear fuel. IDF struck its laboratories that convert Uranium gas into the substance needed to produce a weapon. IAF jets again targeted it on June 21, before the US bombing. Satellite images show extensive damage. Israel's no-holds-barred illegality aside, the US attack on another country's nuclear sites was unprecedented, and sets a new normal by the sole superpower, that can and would be emulated in future conflicts with immense consequences. It renders the sanctity of nuclear sites even during active hostilities, null and void. India Pakistan regularly exchange the locations of their nuclear installations to avoid even accidental targeting. This situation under Modi's India, following Netanyahu's template, now stands altered. The question whether the US attack destroyed Iran's nuclear programme is debatable. The main site at Fordow is reportedly hardened using steel and concrete and is around 800 metres deep. It has uninterrupted and multiple sources of power for the thousands of humming centrifuges, that so far has provided Tehran with over 400 kg of Uranium (enough for some 9 nuclear bombs), reportedly enriched up to 60%, a little below the weapons grade enrichment of around 80-90%. At that depth, even tandem employment of GBU-57 at the same point of application may not have caused the desired damage. Iran would have stored the enriched uranium safely elsewhere, and most likely shifted some critical infrastructure to other unknown, undeclared and undetected sites beforehand. So, it is safe to assume that Iran's nuclear programme is mauled, delayed but probably not eliminated. So, the next logical step for the West Plus is to pressurise Iran to sign the much-touted nuclear deal, and force Tehran to agree to cap and roll back its nuclear programme. For this, Iran will continue to be threatened using all means, with or without the US involvement. Iran was politically compelled to respond to the US aggression especially for regime survival, by considering: a) a limited and calibrated response, without undue escalation; b) escalating and targeting some of the 19 US bases in the Middle East, especially in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and GCC etc; and c) blocking the Strait of Hormuz, carrying over 20% global oil flows, to upend the world energy market. Iran wriggled out of its 'response dilemma' by hitting the sprawling Al Udaid US base in Qatar on Monday, pre-coordinated with Qatar and the US. This limited response avoided further retaliatory strikes and enables Iran to undertake legal, diplomatic and political recourse and advantage, subsequently during negotiations. On June 24, President Trump dramatically announced a complex ceasefire deal after extensive behind-the-scenes parleys during the 12-day crisis. Israel emerged neither victorious nor unscathed from the relentless Irani hypersonic missile response, lately penetrating through its multi-layered AD system, comprising Arrow Missiles, David's Sling and Iron Dome. The system, reportedly, showed signs of wear and tear, and suffered from non-availability of required munitions even with the US. This costly AD system (costing some 167 million USD per engagement) was swarmed, saturated and exhausted repeatedly by low-cost Irani drone and missile combos, in layers. Deterioration of the AD situation was compelling IDF to let some missiles through, to focus on the incoming warheads against critical assets. The estimated percentage of such uncontested and otherwise penetrating ballistic missiles remained over 11% — very significant for a small country like Israel. On June 23, immediately after the US strikes, Irani onslaught continued for the longest time — some 40 minutes. Iran also successfully targeted Israeli settlements on occupied lands, causing mass exodus of Jewish settlers. Besides, many Israelis were fleeing to Ukraine, Poland, etc, to a not very warm welcome. Antisemitism spiked high for the 'child killers of Gaza' as reported by the international press. The over 600-day wars left deep scars on the already stressed Israeli state, society, psyche and armed forces. This exhaustion was to naturally lead to a ceasefire. As a consequence, the regime in Tehran is more firmly entrenched for now, Iran's nuclear programme seems to have survived the strongest possible challenge, and its missiles proved decisive. The US-Israeli nexus does not seem to have achieved the intended military objectives of war. This intense conflict again demonstrated, like the Afghan wars, the success of mass against technological superiority in a modern conflict. This carries profound lessons for countries like Pakistan. This conflict also validates the age-old dictum of 'might is right', demonstrating to the week that rules, regulations and statutes are only for them. The strong can trample them with impunity. This war will, heretofore, intensify the race to acquire nuclear weapons globally, hitting at the very basis of non-proliferation. Iran may be restrained for some time, but a nuclear Iran in the mid to long-term is a reality, that Israel will have to live with, with or without the Ayatollahs in power. For Pakistan, investment in drone and missile technologies, asset hardening especially the nuclear sites, counterintelligence, AD and PAF are critical now, like never before.
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Can our oil and gas sector keep pace with climate demands?
The writer is an Islamabad-based researcher and climate policy expert. He can be reached at khalidmayo@ Listen to article As nations accelerate their shift to cleaner energy, Pakistan's continued dependence on fossil fuels, accounting for over 85% of its energy mix, presents both a challenge and an opportunity. The oil and gas sector — long central to powering homes, industries and transport — must now adapt to a shifting global landscape. Pakistan remains one of the ten most climate-vulnerable countries. The 2022 floods, which inflicted over 30 billion dollars in damages and displaced millions, were a tragic reminder of this vulnerability. Worsening air quality, volatile energy prices and increasingly frequent climate-related disasters highlight the unsustainable nature of current energy practices. Globally, the energy sector is undergoing transformation. British Petroleum has committed to cutting oil production by 40% while investing 5 billion dollars annually in low-carbon technologies. Shell is rapidly scaling up hydrogen and electric mobility infrastructure. In Southeast Asia, Malaysia's Petronas is diversifying through climate bonds and renewable energy initiatives. These companies are not just reacting; they are redefining their role in a low-carbon economy. Pakistani firms must learn from these transitions. Some positive developments are emerging locally. Mari Petroleum, now Mari Energies Limited, has joined the Oil and Gas Decarbonization Charter and issued its first integrated sustainability report — complete with a net-zero policy and a pilot carbon capture initiative that aims to store 1.6 million tonnes of carbon annually. OGDC and PPL have also joined the charter, indicating a shared commitment to decarbonization. PSO, meanwhile, is advancing its clean-energy journey through steps like energy-audits and renewables planning, although it has not yet signed the charter. As a next step, all these companies can demonstrate leadership and enhance credibility in the global transition. What is needed is not just technical upgrades but a mindset shift across the sector. Energy companies must integrate sustainability into all aspects of operations - from investment planning to workforce development. This includes setting verifiable emissions reduction targets, investing in carbon capture technologies, piloting renewable energy projects and ensuring transparent environmental reporting. Equally important is building internal climate literacy so that employees, leadership and stakeholders understand the long-term implications of their actions. Collaborations with international energy companies can further facilitate the transfer of green technologies and practices suited to Pakistan's conditions. Policy support will play a crucial role in this transition. Regulators must enforce existing environmental standards, introduce practical incentives for clean energy and mandate public disclosure of emissions. Meanwhile, solar and wind energy — despite their abundance — remain underexploited and skeptical among the masses. Reducing import duties on renewable energy equipment, encouraging local manufacturing and simplifying project approvals could significantly scale up adoption. Thar's lignite coal reserves, while offering short-term energy relief, present a long-term environmental conundrum. Continued reliance on coal undermines Pakistan's international climate commitments. A more balanced path involves deploying cleaner coal technologies, tightening environmental oversight and concurrently expanding renewables to gradually displace coal's role in middle timeframe. Looking ahead, the upcoming COP30 summit in Brazil offers a timely opportunity. In preparation, a national roundtable titled 'Road to COP30' brought together stakeholders, including regional ministers, policy experts and professionals. The discussion emphasized strengthening regional cooperation, aligning domestic energy goals with climate resilience and fostering inclusive policymaking. These ideas now need to be translated into actionable strategies. Pakistan must reform outdated practices, invest in clean technologies and embrace a future where environment sustainability and economic development go hand in hand. As the world moves toward a carbon-neutral future, Pakistan must not only follow — but lead. COP30 offers a moment not just to reflect, but to act.
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
India central bank withdrawing surplus funds will dampen money market's mood
MUMBAI: The Indian central bank's decision to withdraw surplus liquidity from the banking system just weeks after a large rate cut and cash boosting measures has prompted an uptick in money market rates which may continue in the coming days, traders said. The Reserve Bank of India will conduct a seven-day variable rate reverse repo (VRRR), for 1 trillion rupees ($11.64 billion) on Friday, its first such operation since November-end. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT Conducting VRRRs shows the RBI's discomfort with the overnight and treasury bill rates remaining below repo rate. India's 5-year bond yield leads rise on RBI's cash withdrawal plan These are expected to move towards the repo rate as the RBI continues such operations, potentially for shorter tenors. This would increase the short-term cost of funding for banks, and undo some of the benefits of the rate cut, analysts said. Weighted average call rate, which is the RBI's operative rate, has remained near the Standing Deposit Facility (SDF) rate, for the past few weeks. CONTEXT Earlier this month, Reuters reported that the RBI could start conducting VRRRs to pump out surplus as and when required. Liquidity has averaged at around 2.76 trillion rupees on a daily basis in June, higher than 1% of banking deposits. The RBI is looking at surplus of around 1%, Governor had said. Last week, Reuters reported that RBI sought feedback on aligning call rate more closely with repo rate. GRAPHIC KEY QUOTES Money market rates are likely to get impacted with treasury bill yields moving up by 5-10 bps, said Alok Singh, group head of treasury at CSB Bank. A suitably sized daily VRRR could have been more efficient to pull up the overnight policy rates quickly, said Abhishek Upadhyay, senior economist at ICICI Securities Primary Dealership. "The focus now will be on whether RBI proactively moves to shorter tenor VRRRs, if tendering in 7-day auction is not very strong," he added.
