Chatham Islands hopes for a more independent future
Photo:
Jonathan Milne/Newsroom
For generations, New Zealand's remotest community existed without outside help.
Now the 600-odd residents of the Chatham Islands can't live and thrive here without a lot of public money.
Millions of dollars is needed for a long-awaited new ship to freight goods on and off the islands, replacing the old Southern Tiare. Residents also want a fairer share of the fishing quota in the waters surrounding the Chathams, better wharf facilities and cheaper electricity.
They want to build their economy and create opportunities for their children who live on the island and bring back those who have left.
Local fisherman Tom "Chubb" Lanauze recalls dozens of pupils attended the local schools until fishing quotas were introduced in the 1990s.
"There was a huge family base here, like for instance, Kaingaroa School there were 60 kids. Te One school, there was a huge population," he says.
"Once the quota management system got introduced families moved."
Gone with the families was a lot of industry and money, he says.
The fiercely independent islanders don't want handouts, Newsroom Pro managing editor Jonathan Milne says, but it is difficult to keep a remote community going in the 21st century.
"This is not some kind of benefit basket-case economy. But times have changed and what we require, what civilisation requires now, the extent of the infrastructure that's required - ports and airports and stuff - that's not something that they can sustain on their own as a community, that's not something they can pay for on their own."
Milne joined the air force Hercules on a brief visit to the Chathams earlier this month. The delegation was led by regional development minister Shane Jones, complete with a brass band and a container full of kumara, with Jones joking that he hoped that he would leave with it filled with local seafood.
Also on board were government officials, other journalists and business leaders who see the potential for government money to be spent on infrastructure. Milne says there are opportunities in roading and ports construction, water and power.
Soon-to-be-finished wind turbines will bring down the cost of power on the island but prices will still be double the amount mainlanders pay.
"So there's an opportunity to save money further on electricity," Milne says.
Lanauze says that the community wants fairer access to fishing quotas in the waters surrounding the Chathams and better wharf facilities.
"It gives us more revenue coming back through the island, more incentive for the young ones to come home," he said in an interview with Milne.
It is not clear whether the Chathams community could be in line for more money from the quota or be given greater access to the surrounding fishing grounds, says Milne.
"Shane Jones says the government's actually kept back a little stash of quota for use in settlement of litigation and whatnot which comes along occasionally.
"So he's looking into whether that quota could be used to help develop the Chatham Islands. He seems a bit equivocal though when you talk to him about whether he would actually hand over that quota to the Chathams to fish themselves or whether he would provide them the revenues from that quota."
Despite its unique circumstances, the country's remotest community shares more than one common problem with our largest city.
Like Auckland, the Chathams has a housing crisis but on a much smaller scale, because the council cannot afford to build the infrastructure required.
But it is working with the big city in at least one area - water. Under this government's Local Water Done Well scheme to address infrastructure challenges, the Chathams council leaders met up with their counterparts at Auckland Council.
"Auckland Council agreed to at least support them with advice in the first instance on setting up their new water and wastewater utility," says Milne. That agreement could one day extend to the Chathams taking a stake in Watercare.
"I think that's quite wonderful. You've got the biggest and smallest councils teaming up, trying to work out how they can help each other."
Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail
here
.
You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on
or following us on
.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
14 hours ago
- Newsroom
Terror law consultation extended amid overreach concerns
A proposed overhaul of the country's terrorism laws has had its consultation process extended indefinitely, as more groups raise concerns about potential overreach and a lack of meaningful engagement. Last month, Newsroom revealed the Government was considering a suite of changes to the Terrorism Suppression Act, such as making membership of a terrorist entity a criminal offence, creating new offences to capture public expressions of support for a terrorist act or designated entities.
RNZ News
5 days ago
- RNZ News
Battling apathy over local government
Local body elections are struggling to spark interest in spite of candidate numbers rising. Photo: Marika Khabazi / RNZ It is the most grassroots level of our democracy - the place where potholes get fixed, parks are built, and local voices matter. But this year's local body elections are proving to be a sobering snapshot of just how uninspired and underwhelmed Kiwis feel about their councils. While candidate numbers are up , six one-term mayors are leaving office; some seats are going unchallenged, meaning power is being achieved without even a campaign; and in some cases positions have had no applicants. "It does show a bit of a crisis in local democracy, when these are important roles, we need them, we need people in those roles, we need people to represent the public and make decisions, and we can't get them," says Newsroom Pro managing director Jonathan Milne, who has been covering local body elections extensively. Local Government New Zealand says 3526 candidates will vie for roles across 78 councils. That's actually the highest number seen in New Zealand's past six elections. LGNZ released the figures on Wednesday. "We see the numbers as a strong sign that people are more engaged in this year's local elections in the past," says LGNZ chief executive Susan Freeman-Greene. But that depends on how you look at the numbers. There are 1465 individual elections in total - the exact number of those uncontested has not been confirmed yet but about half a dozen will require by-elections because there are fewer candidates than the number of places. "It's not ideal," says Milne. "You would kind of like a democracy to be hard fought and hard won. You'd like options to be available to voters, and that's not the case." He says the health of local democracy is vital for the country. "I think this election is one of the most important we've seen in a generation for local government. I think it's existential. I think the future of local government, as we know it, is at stake. "Because right now, it's not sustainable, and we need to elect people who can help us navigate through a very difficult three years, six years, nine years to find a new model of governing at a local level, which we all agree is important." This year, 16 mayors across the country have decided not to stand for re-election - six of them first-termers. Two mayors, in Hurunui and Manawatū, will be elected unopposed, but that's down from seven mayors in 2022. Campbell Barry, the outgoing two-term mayor of Lower Hutt and the vice president of Local Government New Zealand, tells The Detail it is a less-than-ideal situation. "I think we need to do a deep dive into this," he says. "I can't recall any situation where we've had that many first-term mayors not stand for a second term. "I think [the reasons for that] would be quite different in each location. I think you look at the experience of [Wellington's] Tory Whanau, who has been quite open about the reason she's not standing again for mayor. "I think it would be worth having a deep dive with them individually to just understand and unpack those reasons and see if we can learn anything from it." Both Barry and Milne agree that postal voting is past its prime and question if it is time to bring back polling booths to boost voter participation. "There are some practical reasons why I think voter turnout is low," Barry tells The Detail . "The postal system that we have. Good luck finding an 18-year-old who receives letters, who's going to then be motivated to work out how to vote in this upcoming election. "And even if you want to vote by post, you then have to find a post box or else the orange bin that the council might put out to be able to put it in. So, I think there are some practical things we can do." The last day for posting votes by mail is 7 October, while election day is 11 October. But LGNZ is hoping the bigger candidate numbers will lift the 40 percent turnout from last time. Both Barry and Milne agree that a boost in pay for candidates would potentially lure more to put their hands up for the next election in three years' time. So, what is the money? A councillor's salary can range from $14,274 in the Chatham Islands to more than $100,000 in Christchurch and Auckland. For a mayor, the salary can range from about $59,000 to more than $300,000 in Auckland. If you're on the Methven Community Board though, the pay is $2995 a year, while in Mataura, it is $2288. And community board members in Auckland hover around the $50,000 mark, even though that is a full time job and you are available round the clock. "No question that [a pay rise] would help," says Barry. Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook
Scoop
30-07-2025
- Scoop
Balancing Risk With Overreach In Our Terror Laws
The government wants to tighten our terror laws, but critics fear it will mean a corresponding trampling of advocacy groups and free speech. The government is eyeing an overhaul of the country's terrorism legislation, which is necessary, it says, to keep New Zealanders safe in a rapidly evolving world and keep pace with modern threats. However, critics are warning that the move could come at a steep price, specifically a loss of civil liberties. The proposed changes, still in the closed-door consultation phase with a handpicked selection of groups and experts, would give police and intelligence agencies broader powers to intervene earlier, redefine what constitutes a "terrorist act" and expand preventative detention powers, all in the name of public safety. Today, The Detail spoke with Newsroom national affairs editor Sam Sachdeva and University of Waikato terrorism and firearms expert Alexander Gillespie about the potential changes to the Terrorism Suppression Act and how the government will balance risk without resorting to overreach. "What this is really about is are our current terror laws fit for purpose, and where do we draw the line between dealing with the very real threat that is posed by terrorist groups and terrorists, while still preserving the fundamental political freedoms and rights and liberties that all New Zealanders hold dear," Sachdeva told The Detail. He said critics, worried that those freedoms and rights are now at risk, are fired up. "Look, they are. We have seen the Council for Civil Liberties, [and] the Free Speech Union has now come out as well, expressing some concern about this. "So, it's early stages, but it seems like it's something that could quite easily animate or light a fire under a lot of these rights groups who are concerned." The terror law, enacted in 2002 following the 11 September terror attacks, allows governments to formally designate people or groups as terrorist entities, freezing their assets and making it illegal to financially support, recruit for, or participate in a designated terrorist entity. Minor changes were made after the 15 March terror attack in 2019 and the New Lynn Countdown Supermarket attack in 2021. Sachdeva said among the new potential changes are making membership of a terrorist entity a criminal offence, creating new offences to capture public expressions of support for a terrorist act or designated entities - including showing insignia - and modernising definitions for terms like "material support" to capture new online forms of support. Extending the renewal period for terrorist designations to five years, from three at present, is also being considered. The government said there will be safeguards and judicial oversight. The proposed changes are expected to go before Parliament later this year. Gillespie, speaking to The Detail from Vienna, where he is working on gun reforms, said the threat of a terror attack has long lingered in New Zealand, and while the likelihood of another attack will never be zero, the risk can be lowered. "Part of reducing that risk is making sure the law is as good as it can be. That the balance between civil liberties and risk is correct. And that we have proportionate penalties for those who are willing to advocate the use of violence against civilians to change policy. "I support looking at it... I think it's foreseeable that the tensions in our society are going to be around for the foreseeable future. And to make sure they are fit for purpose, because when I look back at recent times, our laws weren't fit for purpose, and now we need to be thinking, 'what more can we do?'." While the debate on security versus liberty and protection versus principle will undoubtedly continue, one thing is certain -in the fight against terror, New Zealand is searching for a line, but it will not be easy to draw. here.
