Walter Sisulu University residence manager's murder case postponed amid student protests
The case of murder involving Walter Sisulu University (WSU) residence manager has been postponed to next month after the fatal shooting of student, Sisonke Mbolokwa.
The murder case against a 54-year-old residence manager accused of killing Walter Sisulu University (WSU) student Sisonke Mbolekwa has been postponed to next month.
The suspect, reportedly named as Manelisi Mampane, made his first appearance at the Mthatha Magistrate's Court on Tuesday afternoon.
The case was postponed to May 2 for a formal bail application. Mampane indicated his intention to apply for bail.
Mbolekwa was fatally shot, allegedly by Mampane, during a protest last week over deteriorating living conditions at university residences accredited by the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS).
Three other students were injured and taken to the hospital.
The students allegedly stormed the residence manager's on-campus residence, confronted him about the state of students' residences, and later set his vehicle on fire.
Due to the sensitivity of the matter, the court reportedly prohibited the media from recording the proceedings, as the defence argued that the matter was domestic and should not be publicised.
However, it is reported that the State did not oppose the proceedings from being recorded.
Outside the court, scores of WSU students protested, calling for Mampane to be denied bail.
The university descended into chaos last week as students protested over poor accommodation, including cracked walls, damaged ceilings, and broken tiles.
Students allegedly stormed the on-campus residence where Mampane lived, confronting him and setting his vehicle on fire during the altercation.
Meanwhile, an independent investigation led by retired Justice Chris Jafta, assisted by two advocates and an attorney, will probe the events that led to Mbolekwa's death.
The inquiry will also assess whether there were lapses by students or university officials in managing the situation.
In a separate legal development, the Student Representative Council (SRC) approached the Mthatha High Court to block the eviction of students.
The university argued that violence, including the burning of vehicles and the destruction of property, escalated after April 15 and that evictions were necessary to prevent further unrest.
Lawyers representing students countered that the violence was triggered by the shooting and that it was unclear whether students were responsible.
Judge Mbulelo Jolwana refused to grant the university's eviction application, citing the need to protect students' lives. Instead, he issued an interdict preventing both evictions and further damage to university property.
"Eviction must be a last resort, and students must be given the opportunity to demonstrate in a manner that maintains the integrity of the institution," Jolwana said.
[email protected]
IOL News

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Herald
a day ago
- The Herald
Revolutionary men can also have a dark side
On May 28, the world awoke to news of the death of Kenyan author and academic Ngugi wa Thiong'o, regarded as one of the leading African novelists and an important figure in modern African literature. Wa Thiong'o, who survived a prostate cancer diagnosis decades before, had been struggling with kidney problems at the time of his death. He passed away in Georgia in the US. Wa Thiong'o was an award-winning author of many books, including his debut novel, Weep Not Child , which was awarded the 1966 Unesco First Prize. Many other book prizes and accolades would follow, including the prestigious 2022 PEN/Nabokov Award for Achievement in International Literature, which is awarded biennially to writers, principally novelists, 'whose works evoke to some measure of brilliant versatility and commitment to literature as a search for the deepest truth and the highest pleasure'. He was also the recipient of 13 honorary degrees from some of the most renowned higher learning institutions in the world. In 2014, Walter Sisulu University awarded him a Doctor of Literature and Philosophy honorary degree, and in the same year, the University of Bayreuth in Germany, where I am currently pursuing my PhD in Geography, also awarded him an honorary doctorate. There is no question that Wa Thiong'o was a giant of African literature. But in March 2024, shocking allegations were made by his son, Kenyan-American writer Mukoma Ngugi, who stated on social media that his father, the great novelist and academic, had physically and psychologically abused his late wife Nyambura, Mukoma's mother. Writing on X (formerly Twitter), the Associate Professor of Literature at Cornell University shared the pain of growing up witnessing the abuse and silencing of his late mother. 'My father @NgugiWaThiongo physically abused my late mother. He would beat her up,' he wrote. 'Some of my earliest memories are of me going to visit her at my grandmother's where she would seek refuge. 'But with that said, it is the silencing of who she was that gets me. Ok — I have said it.' The revelations sent shock waves across the literary world and society in general, with many question how such a respected man could be guilty of such heinous actions. While the story was widely reported, it did little to diminish the legacy of Wa Thiong'o, who continues to be revered and celebrated in death as he was in life. But the allegations of Wa Thiong'o's abuse of his wife should not be swept under the carpet. They are as much a part of his legacy as his accolades and award-winning novels are. The refusal to engage with this aspect of his life, to see him as a complex human being who was both a victim of colonial violence in Kenya and a perpetrator of domestic violence on the home front, is an injustice not only to the memory of Nyambura, but to all women in the world who have been erased and whose own legacies are overshadowed by those of the powerful men they are married to. This perpetuates the privatisation of violence, where men are revolutionaries in public and abusers in private. This is the case with many great revolutionaries. One of the greatest black revolutionaries, Black Panther Party cofounder Huey P Newton, was accused by close Panther associates of behaving erratically and in abusive ways towards comrades, particularly women. In 2007, Ericka Higgins, one of the women leaders of the Panthers, disclosed that she was allegedly repeatedly raped by Newton and told that if she reported the rapes, her children would be harmed. There are wounds that many women who are in relationships with men celebrated as revolutionaries have had to endure in silence. When they speak out, they are shamed for 'tarnishing' the men's images. But if we are to reflect on the legacy of Wa Thiong'o and other great men, we must do so truthfully and remember them in their fullness.

IOL News
6 days ago
- IOL News
WSU Protest: Students to appear in court after violence erupts over bail decision
Five Walter Sisulu University students will appear in court on Thursday. Five people arrested in connection with violent protests at the Walter Sisulu University (WSU) in the Eastern Cape are expected to appear in court on Thursday. According to police, protests turned violent at the institution's Mthatha main campus after news emerged residence manager, Manelisi Mampane, was granted R10,000 bail by the Mthatha Magistrate's Court on Tuesday. Mampane is accused of fatally shooting student Sisonke Mbolekwa during a protest in April this year. At the time, the students who were protesting over the poor condition of residences were reportedly marching towards the manager's on-campus residence when live shots were fired.


The Citizen
6 days ago
- The Citizen
Higher education chair condemns WSU student protest as EFF launches petition
In response to the bail decision, the EFF Youth Command called upon the NPA to file an urgent appeal against the bail decision. The decision by Mthatha Magistrate's Court to grant bail to Manelisi Mampane, accused of murdering Walter Sisulu University student Sisonke Mbolekwa, has drawn sharp criticism from parliamentary and political leaders who question the integrity of the justice system and warn against violent student protests. The chairperson of the portfolio committee on higher education, Tebogo Letsie, cautioned WSU students that disagreement with the Mthatha Magistrate's Court's decision to grant bail to Manelisi Mampane does not justify violent protest. Meanwhile, the Economic Freedom Fighters Youth Command launched a campaign on to have the bail decision overturned in the case involving the fatal shooting of student Sisonke Mbolekwa. Mampane faces charges of murder, attempted murder of two other students, and unlawful possession of a firearm and ammunition following a shooting incident at the university campus. Students at the university were unhappy about Mampane's release, which prompted demonstrations by students at the University's Mthatha campus on Wednesday morning. The fresh protests prompted police deployment and the closure of the N2 highway. The protests began in the early hours of Wednesday, at approximately 5am, with students burning tyres and blocking the main N2 road between Durban and the town centre. Police responded with rubber bullets and tear gas to disperse the demonstrators, who shielded themselves with cardboard and foam materials while wearing balaclavas to avoid identification. Parliament warns against WSU students violent protests Letsie issued a stern warning to protesting students on Wednesday, cautioning that disagreement with court decisions does not justify actions that threaten public order and safety. 'While we understand the deep pain and frustration students may be feeling following the tragic and senseless killing of their fellow student, resorting to violent protests and damaging property is not the answer,' Letsie said during a portfolio committee meeting in parliament. The parliamentary leader specifically condemned road blockages and tire burning incidents that followed the bail decision, arguing that such actions divert police resources from combating serious crimes, including gender-based violence. Letsie expressed hope that justice would ultimately be served, while emphasising the need for lawful responses to the court's decision. 'Destruction only sets us back and hinders our collective progress,' he said. 'We are hopeful that justice will be served and that the matter will continue to receive the attention it deserves. However, we must channel our emotions constructively and within the confines of the law. Furthermore, we call upon the university not to bring the perpetrator back to the institution, and he must be placed on special leave,' Letsie added. ALSO READ: 'SAPS has no authority over judicial decisions': Police respond to new WSU student protest WSU leadership called to action Letsie directed his appeal to the university's Student Representative Council, urging them to provide leadership during the crisis and protect community infrastructure. He emphasised that destruction of property would only hinder collective progress and called for de-escalation efforts. 'Lastly, we urge the SRC to engage with students and help de-escalate tensions. It is vital that we avoid further incidents that could lead to harm or damage to university and community property.' ALSO READ: Walter Sisulu University murder case: Magistrate accused of bias after employee granted R10k bail EFF youth command condemns bail decision The Economic Freedom Fighters Youth Command (EFFYC) launched a petition demanding the revocation of bail, while condemning the magistrate's decision as evidence of a justice system that favours criminals over victims. The party expressed strong dissatisfaction with what they characterised as a dangerous precedent. It further highlighted the severity of the charges against Mampane, noting that he allegedly brought an unlawfully possessed firearm onto university premises, designated as a gun-free zone, and opened fire on unarmed students from behind. Additionally, the youth organisation argued that allowing such an individual back into society, even temporarily, sends a disturbing message about the value placed on students' lives. READ MORE: Walter Sisulu University's protest shooting denial Procedural concerns raised The EFF Youth Command outlined several procedural irregularities that they observed during the bail process, which contributed to their concerns about the case's handling. These included the downgrading of the matter from Schedule 6 to Schedule 5, which lowered the threshold for securing bail despite the serious nature of the charges. The party also raised alarm about the accused's alleged relocation to a 'safe house' with an address unknown to the investigating officer. They noted that the court rejected an affidavit from a senior police official denying knowledge of the address, yet the magistrate relied solely on claims that the address had been provided. Additional concerns centred on the risk of witness and evidence interference, given that the accused now has access to electronic communication and Walter Sisulu University's ICT and student databases. The youth command emphasised that at least one surviving victim has expressed fear for their life. It also questioned the abrupt change in magistrates, court delays allegedly due to fuel shortages for a generator, and what they described as an unexplained interruption and hasty conclusion of the judgment, raising concerns about the transparency and integrity of the proceedings. Broader justice system critique The youth organisation placed the bail decision within what they described as a worrying pattern in South Africa's justice system, where cases with overwhelming evidence and significant public interest fail to deliver credible outcomes. 'While the EFFYC remains adherent to the constitutional democratic practices that empower the courts on matters of dispute, we take the view that the justice system must be seen to be just so as not to erode public trust,' the organisation stated. 'The justice system has the potential of being overridden by the public, where justice is not being accepted by the public as a means to protect all those who cannot do so independently.' The EFFYC warned that when courts fail to take public trust and concern seriously, communities will find alternative ways to respond to what they termed 'small-time, cheap rascal criminals such as the accused Manelisi Mampane.' ALSO READ: Man arrested for Walter Sisulu University shooting Calls for legal action and accountability In response to the bail decision, the EFFYC called upon the National Prosecuting Authority to file an urgent appeal against the bail decision and pursue a review of the matter's handling. They also demanded accountability from the magistrate who presided over the bail hearing, arguing that the observed irregularities warrant scrutiny of the official's conduct. The organisation expressed solidarity with WSU students, whom they described as having been failed by the Department of Higher Education, university management, and now the courts. They reiterated support for the families of Sisonke Mbolekwa, Lizwa Ndzumo, and Sethu Ndamase during what they characterised as a time when the justice system has delayed retribution. Related case raises additional concerns The EFFYC also noted concerns about another bail application scheduled for the same day in the case of Sethu Ndamase, a 20-year-old medical student allegedly shot by university security on 12 March 2025. The organisation expressed hope that similar errors would not be repeated and that the court would act appropriately given the weight of the allegations. They emphasised that Mbolekwa was part of the WSU student community and called for black youth to unite unconditionally in her memory and in the cause of justice. NOW READ: Boy shot dead in Westbury as 'gang members roam freely'