Higher education chair condemns WSU student protest as EFF launches petition
The decision by Mthatha Magistrate's Court to grant bail to Manelisi Mampane, accused of murdering Walter Sisulu University student Sisonke Mbolekwa, has drawn sharp criticism from parliamentary and political leaders who question the integrity of the justice system and warn against violent student protests.
The chairperson of the portfolio committee on higher education, Tebogo Letsie, cautioned WSU students that disagreement with the Mthatha Magistrate's Court's decision to grant bail to Manelisi Mampane does not justify violent protest.
Meanwhile, the Economic Freedom Fighters Youth Command launched a campaign on Change.org to have the bail decision overturned in the case involving the fatal shooting of student Sisonke Mbolekwa.
Mampane faces charges of murder, attempted murder of two other students, and unlawful possession of a firearm and ammunition following a shooting incident at the university campus.
Students at the university were unhappy about Mampane's release, which prompted demonstrations by students at the University's Mthatha campus on Wednesday morning.
The fresh protests prompted police deployment and the closure of the N2 highway.
The protests began in the early hours of Wednesday, at approximately 5am, with students burning tyres and blocking the main N2 road between Durban and the town centre.
Police responded with rubber bullets and tear gas to disperse the demonstrators, who shielded themselves with cardboard and foam materials while wearing balaclavas to avoid identification.
Parliament warns against WSU students violent protests
Letsie issued a stern warning to protesting students on Wednesday, cautioning that disagreement with court decisions does not justify actions that threaten public order and safety.
'While we understand the deep pain and frustration students may be feeling following the tragic and senseless killing of their fellow student, resorting to violent protests and damaging property is not the answer,' Letsie said during a portfolio committee meeting in parliament.
The parliamentary leader specifically condemned road blockages and tire burning incidents that followed the bail decision, arguing that such actions divert police resources from combating serious crimes, including gender-based violence.
Letsie expressed hope that justice would ultimately be served, while emphasising the need for lawful responses to the court's decision.
'Destruction only sets us back and hinders our collective progress,' he said.
'We are hopeful that justice will be served and that the matter will continue to receive the attention it deserves. However, we must channel our emotions constructively and within the confines of the law. Furthermore, we call upon the university not to bring the perpetrator back to the institution, and he must be placed on special leave,' Letsie added.
ALSO READ: 'SAPS has no authority over judicial decisions': Police respond to new WSU student protest
WSU leadership called to action
Letsie directed his appeal to the university's Student Representative Council, urging them to provide leadership during the crisis and protect community infrastructure.
He emphasised that destruction of property would only hinder collective progress and called for de-escalation efforts.
'Lastly, we urge the SRC to engage with students and help de-escalate tensions. It is vital that we avoid further incidents that could lead to harm or damage to university and community property.'
ALSO READ: Walter Sisulu University murder case: Magistrate accused of bias after employee granted R10k bail
EFF youth command condemns bail decision
The Economic Freedom Fighters Youth Command (EFFYC) launched a petition demanding the revocation of bail, while condemning the magistrate's decision as evidence of a justice system that favours criminals over victims.
The party expressed strong dissatisfaction with what they characterised as a dangerous precedent.
It further highlighted the severity of the charges against Mampane, noting that he allegedly brought an unlawfully possessed firearm onto university premises, designated as a gun-free zone, and opened fire on unarmed students from behind.
Additionally, the youth organisation argued that allowing such an individual back into society, even temporarily, sends a disturbing message about the value placed on students' lives.
READ MORE: Walter Sisulu University's protest shooting denial
Procedural concerns raised
The EFF Youth Command outlined several procedural irregularities that they observed during the bail process, which contributed to their concerns about the case's handling.
These included the downgrading of the matter from Schedule 6 to Schedule 5, which lowered the threshold for securing bail despite the serious nature of the charges.
The party also raised alarm about the accused's alleged relocation to a 'safe house' with an address unknown to the investigating officer.
They noted that the court rejected an affidavit from a senior police official denying knowledge of the address, yet the magistrate relied solely on claims that the address had been provided.
Additional concerns centred on the risk of witness and evidence interference, given that the accused now has access to electronic communication and Walter Sisulu University's ICT and student databases.
The youth command emphasised that at least one surviving victim has expressed fear for their life.
It also questioned the abrupt change in magistrates, court delays allegedly due to fuel shortages for a generator, and what they described as an unexplained interruption and hasty conclusion of the judgment, raising concerns about the transparency and integrity of the proceedings.
Broader justice system critique
The youth organisation placed the bail decision within what they described as a worrying pattern in South Africa's justice system, where cases with overwhelming evidence and significant public interest fail to deliver credible outcomes.
'While the EFFYC remains adherent to the constitutional democratic practices that empower the courts on matters of dispute, we take the view that the justice system must be seen to be just so as not to erode public trust,' the organisation stated.
'The justice system has the potential of being overridden by the public, where justice is not being accepted by the public as a means to protect all those who cannot do so independently.'
The EFFYC warned that when courts fail to take public trust and concern seriously, communities will find alternative ways to respond to what they termed 'small-time, cheap rascal criminals such as the accused Manelisi Mampane.'
ALSO READ: Man arrested for Walter Sisulu University shooting
Calls for legal action and accountability
In response to the bail decision, the EFFYC called upon the National Prosecuting Authority to file an urgent appeal against the bail decision and pursue a review of the matter's handling.
They also demanded accountability from the magistrate who presided over the bail hearing, arguing that the observed irregularities warrant scrutiny of the official's conduct.
The organisation expressed solidarity with WSU students, whom they described as having been failed by the Department of Higher Education, university management, and now the courts.
They reiterated support for the families of Sisonke Mbolekwa, Lizwa Ndzumo, and Sethu Ndamase during what they characterised as a time when the justice system has delayed retribution.
Related case raises additional concerns
The EFFYC also noted concerns about another bail application scheduled for the same day in the case of Sethu Ndamase, a 20-year-old medical student allegedly shot by university security on 12 March 2025.
The organisation expressed hope that similar errors would not be repeated and that the court would act appropriately given the weight of the allegations.
They emphasised that Mbolekwa was part of the WSU student community and called for black youth to unite unconditionally in her memory and in the cause of justice.
NOW READ: Boy shot dead in Westbury as 'gang members roam freely'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
25-07-2025
- The Herald
Bid for promotion leads to arrest for ‘degree fraud'
An Eastern Cape prosecutor has been arrested by the Hawks on charges of fraud, forgery and uttering for allegedly submitting forged academic qualifications to secure employment. Police spokesperson W/O Ndiphiwe Mhlakuvana said the 33-year-old had been enrolled for a Bachelor of law (LLB) degree at Walter Sisulu University (WSU) between January 2010 and December 2016. He allegedly failed to meet the academic requirements to graduate. Despite this, he allegedly submitted a falsified LLB degree certificate and a bogus legal education and development (Lead) attendance report as part of his application to the National Prosecuting Authority's (NPA) aspirant prosecutor programme, which required a legitimate LLB qualification or proof of final year status. Mhlakuvana said the accused was appointed as an aspirant prosecutor i n January 2021 and later elevated to the position of public prosecutor. Proof of his qualifications was requested when he sought to climb the career ladder. "The accused applied for promotion at regional court as a prosecutor using the same credentials and he was shortlisted for appointment. However, the NPA requested him to submit the original academic certificates," Mhlakuvana said. He resigned with effect from March 15. "The institution picked up discrepancies in his qualifications and referred the matter to the Hawks for investigation. "The Hawks confirmed WSU had never conferred an LLB degree to him and Lead had never issued him the attendance report due to outstanding fees. "Through misrepresentation, the NPA suffered financial prejudice of more than R1.1m from the salaries paid to him during his fraudulent term of employment." The would-be prosecutor was arrested on July 22 and briefly appeared before the Mthatha specialised commercial crime court on the same day, where he was granted R5,000 bail. The case was postponed to August 18. TimesLIVE
The Herald
18-07-2025
- The Herald
Defiant Nkabane snubs higher education committee meeting
She said she would attend a cabinet committee meeting on progress made to resolve National Student Financial Aid Scheme challenges and later fly to the Eastern Cape to attend a gender-based violence (GBV) awareness campaign. 'Allow me to tender my apology to you and the entire committee in this regard,' Nkabane wrote. Letsie said he responded on the same day, making clear her apology was not accepted. He told her the meeting of the committee was a priority. 'The constitution mandates that members of the cabinet are accountable, collectively and individually, to parliament for their actions. Your presence in the meeting on Friday is critical for the committee to fulfil its constitutional oversight mandate. 'I request that you kindly reconsider your decision not to attend the meeting on July 18 based on the matters raised above. It is not my intention to seek alternative means within the legislative framework to compel you to come to the meeting,' Letsie wrote to Nkabane. He said she wrote back on Thursday requesting that he reconsider his decision. She claimed she was required to attend a stakeholder engagement focused on GBV prevention and awareness and leadership capacity development within the higher education and training sector. 'The GBV engagement involving student leaders, institutions, civil society organisations and the department addresses one of the most serious and systemic challenges affecting our post-schooling institutions, specially young women. 'The minister made the prevention of GBV a strategic and moral priority within the post-school education and training sector, consistent with government's broader commitment. I acknowledge and do not diminish the importance of the committee's follow-up deliberations concerning the appointment process of SETA accounting authority chairpersons. I remain ready to appear to clarify and fully account on the matter,' she said when requesting an alternative date for the committee sitting. Nkabane said her request was made in good faith and not as an act of avoidance. She said should the committee feel compelled to explore the use of other mechanisms, such as a subpoena, she requested that it note the public expenditure committed towards the GBV programme would be rendered wasteful. 'An outcome I believe we all seek to avoid,' she said. TimesLIVE
TimesLIVE
18-07-2025
- TimesLIVE
Defiant Nkabane snubs higher education committee meeting
She said she would attend a cabinet committee meeting on progress made to resolve National Student Financial Aid Scheme challenges and later fly to the Eastern Cape to attend a gender-based violence (GBV) awareness campaign. "Allow me to tender my apology to you and the entire committee in this regard," Nkabane wrote. Letsie said he responded on the same day, making clear her apology was not accepted. He told her the meeting of the committee was a priority. "The Constitution mandates that members of the cabinet are accountable, collectively and individually, to parliament for their actions. Your presence in the meeting on Friday is critical for the committee to fulfill its constitutional oversight mandate. "I request that you kindly reconsider your decision not to attend the meeting on July 18 based on the matters raised above. It is not my intention to seek alternative means within the legislative framework to compel you to come to the meeting," Letsie wrote to Nkabane. He said she wrote back on Thursday requesting that he reconsider his decision. She claimed she was required to attend a stakeholder engagement focused on GBV prevention and awareness and leadership capacity development within the higher education and training sector. "The GBV engagement involving student leaders, institutions, civil society organisations and the department addresses one of the most serious and systemic challenges affecting our post schooling institution, specially young women. "The minister made the prevention of GBV a strategic and moral priority within the post school education and training sector, consistent with government's broader commitment. I acknowledge and do not diminish the importance of the committee's follow up deliberations concerning the appointment process of SETA accounting authority chairperson. I remain ready to appear to clarify and fully account on the matter," she said when requesting an alternative date for the committee sitting. Nkabane said her request was made in good faith and not as an act of avoidance. She said should the committee feel compelled to explore the use of other mechanisms, such as a subpoena, she requested that it note the public expenditure committed towards the GBV programme would be rendered wasteful. "An outcome I believe we all seek to avoid," she said.
