Apex court to decide on AG's leave application over Najib's additional document tomorrow
KUALA LUMPUR: The Federal Court will decide on Monday (April 28) on the Attorney-General's (AG) leave application to appeal against the existence of an additional document in the case involving former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.
A three-member bench comprising Chief Judge of Malaya Datuk Seri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim and Federal Court judges Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof and Datuk Hanipah Farikullah will deliver the verdict at 9am.
On March 24, the panel heard submissions from Attorney-General Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar and Najib's lead counsel, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, on the AG's leave application.
On Jan 6, in a 2-1 majority decision, the Court of Appeal remitted the case on Najib's claim of the existence of an additional document purportedly allowing him to serve the remainder of his six-year prison sentence under house arrest, to the High Court to be heard on its merits.
This decision overturned the High Court's earlier ruling, which had dismissed Najib's application for leave to commence a judicial review regarding the alleged additional document.
The AG, as the applicant, had filed the leave application against the Court of Appeal ruling. An applicant must obtain leave to proceed with the appeal to the Federal Court.
Najib, 71, is seeking a mandamus order compelling the respondents to confirm and disclose the existence of the alleged additional document dated Jan 29, 2024.
He named the Home Minister, Commissioner-General of Prisons, Attorney-General, Pardons Board for the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan, and Putrajaya, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform), Director-General of the Legal Affairs Division in the Prime Minister's Department and the Government of Malaysia as respondents.
The former Pekan MP also sought an order that, should the additional document be proven to exist, all respondents or any one of them should enforce it immediately and transfer him from Kajang Prison to his residence in Kuala Lumpur to serve the remainder of his sentence.
On July 3 last year, High Court Judge Datuk Amarjeet Singh dismissed Najib's application for leave to initiate a judicial review, ruling that the four affidavits submitted in support of his claim, which included statements by Umno president Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and Umno vice president Datuk Seri Wan Rosdy Wan Ismail, were hearsay and inadmissible as evidence in court.
Najib has been serving his sentence at Kajang Prison since Aug 23, 2022, following his conviction for misappropriating RM42mil from SRC International Sdn Bhd.
The High Court initially sentenced him to 12 years in prison and fined him RM210 million, a decision which was subsequently upheld by the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court.
However, his petition for a royal pardon on Sept 2, 2022 resulted in the Pardons Board halving his prison sentence to six years and reducing his fine to RM50mil. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
21 minutes ago
- The Star
Najib's RM27mil case to go on
KUALA LUMPUR, 11 Jun -- Bekas Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak (tengah) ketika hadir ke Kompleks Mahkamah Kuala Lumpur hari ini. Jabatan Peguam Negara (AGC) menolak representasi yang dikemukakan oleh bekas Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak bagi menggugurkan tiga lagi pertuduhan pengubahan wang haram membabitkan RM27 juta dana SRC International Sdn Bhd. Perkara itu dimaklumkan oleh Timbalan Pendakwa Raya Mohd Ashrof Adrin Kamarul ketika kes berkenaan disebut di hadapan Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi K. Muniandy hari ini. --fotoBERNAMA (2025) HAK CIPTA TERPELIHARA KUALA LUMPUR: The RM27mil money laundering case involving Datuk Seri Najib Razak and SRC International Sdn Bhd will go on now that the Attorney General's Chambers has rejected the former prime minister's plea to review the charges. During case management yesterday, deputy public prosecutor Mohd Ashroff Adrin Kamarul informed Justice K. Muniandy that the AGC had rejected the former Pekan MP's representation. He said the prosecution was ready to proceed with the trial but sought a later hearing date to sort out the documents in the case. 'There are 807 exhibits tendered in the previous SRC International trial. 'Many of the exhibits in that trial are required in this trial and that will require a bit of time. We humbly seek a longer trial date,' he said. Najib's lead counsel Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, in his reply, urged the court to grant a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) due to the prolonged delay in the case. A DNAA means a person is discharged from the charges without being acquitted and could face future prosecution for the same offence. Justice Muniandy then fixed June 20 to deliver his decision on whether to set trial dates or grant a DNAA. On Feb 3, 2019, Najib claimed trial to three charges of money laundering by accepting proceeds from unlawful activities amounting to RM27mil through his three AmPrivate Banking accounts at AmIslamic Bank Berhad, AmBank Group Building, Jalan Raja Chulan on July 8, 2014, under Section 4(1)(a) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001. He faces a maximum fine of RM5mil or imprisonment of up to five years, or both, if convicted.
Daily Express
4 hours ago
- Daily Express
Sabah pushes for fairer punishments: Proposed changes to criminal laws
Published on: Wednesday, June 11, 2025 Published on: Wed, Jun 11, 2025 By: Sherell Jeffrey Text Size: Those from the CLRC posing in a photo with Sabah stakeholders. Kota Kinabalu: Legal experts and civil society representatives in Sabah are pushing for fairer punishments and real action on proposed changes to Malaysia's criminal laws, as the country undertakes its biggest review of crime-related legislation in decades. These suggestions were expressed during a townhall session here, Monday, hosted by the Criminal Law Reform Committee (CLRC) as part of its nationwide consultation tour which kicked off in the peninsula on May 21. Advertisement Chaired by former Federal Court Judge Tan Sri Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal, the townhall here aimed to gather input from Sabah stakeholders on proposed reforms to three important pieces of legislation, namely the Penal Code (Act 574), Criminal Procedure Code (Act 593) and Evidence Act (Act 56). 'We have not finalised anything. For now, we are just seeking feedback from everyone,' Harmindar told the townhall session. 'From then on, the committee, the researchers and so on will look into all the proposals and see which ones we can implement immediately and those that we can implement maybe in the longer term,' he said, pointing out that the committee remains in the consultation phase. The consultation process includes townhall sessions across Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and upcoming sessions in Sarawak, including online feedback forms. The public consultation period has been extended from May 31 to June 15 to accommodate wider participation. Among those present at the townhall session here were Sabah Law Society Immediate Past President Datuk Roger Chin who pointed out the importance of inclusive consultation in the law-making process. 'A lot of these laws, a lot of times if they do not consult stakeholders, they do not take into account their views, then the laws will be not good,' Roger told Daily Express when met after the session. 'This is the only way that we can advance law because law cannot be static. It must be amended all the time to suit the changing times,' he said. The reform initiative, spearheaded by Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said, reflects the Government's commitment to ensuring Malaysia's legal framework remains relevant and effective in addressing modern challenges. While Sabah stakeholders welcomed the consultation process, several expressed cautious optimism about whether their feedback would translate into actual legislative changes. 'I hope the feedbacks are actually incorporated. I think a lot of times, for whatever policy reasons or reasons unknown, even worse, laws are not changed when they should be,' Roger said, citing concerns about prison overcrowding due to inflexible sentencing for minor drug offenses. Social activist cum former journalist Dr Kanul Gindol shared this sentiment while expressing confidence in the committee's leadership. 'I hope the Government will really look into all these loopholes, grievances and comments from the stakeholders, especially from our learned lawyers who are very involved in carrying out fair involvement or solutions of any cases involving criminal laws,' he said. Justice for Sisters representative Megan Stephen pointed out the need for gender-neutral language in criminal laws. 'In all the provision or law, amendment should be done to make it a more gender-neutral language. For example, rape cases. The word 'woman' should be changed to 'person' because anyone can be raped, not just women,' said Megan. 'What I hope as well is to protect stateless and undocumented people, not just for Malaysians, but underprivileged people as well. 'I have a 50-50 confidence level due to concerns about double standards in the justice system where if you have more privilege, more money, then certain people that are underprivileged, they cannot be protected,' said Megan, expressing measured expectations about its implementation. Sabah Prisons' Board of Visiting Justices Chairperson Datuk Katherine Lee advocates for Community Service Orders (CSO) as alternatives to imprisonment for lesser crimes. 'I would like to see more CSO implemented, especially for the lesser crimes,' she said, expressing concern over the current system where mothers who steal milk or food for their baby are sentenced to three months jail or six months' jail. 'It does not make sense to me. Nobody's looking after the babies,' she said. She also expressed concerns about the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA), saying that wealthy defendants should not be able to simply negotiate settlements for crimes. Instead, she proposed that offenders still be charged properly, but they can add on to the sentence to contribute to society as a contribution to help the needy. She would also like to see Restorative Justice (RJ) which focuses on repairing harm caused by crime involving the victims and offenders and even families in the resolution process. 'This approach addresses the harm caused by crime rather than solely focusing on punishment, potentially facilitating reconciliation between all parties involved. 'The implementation would require comprehensive training for stakeholders including police officers, social workers and judges, as well as legislative amendments to the Child Act 2001, Penal Code and Criminal Procedure Code to formally recognise and support RJ practices,' she said. For the record, this is Malaysia's first comprehensive attempt at criminal law reform through a dedicated committee structure. The CLRC, supported by an Ad Hoc Committee comprising experts in law, enforcement, technology and civil society, has been tasked with completing its review within 18 months in phases. The reform initiative reflects the Madani Government's commitment to ensuring Malaysia's criminal justice system becomes more responsive, fair and effective while maintaining the rule of law and protecting individual rights. The success of these reforms will largely depend on how effectively the Government incorporates the diverse voices and concerns raised during these consultation sessions into concrete legislative action. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Borneo Post
11 hours ago
- Borneo Post
July 23 decision on vocational college murder case
TAWAU (June 11): The High Court Wednesday postponed to July 23 its decision on the case involving 13 male students of Kolej Vokasional Lahad Datu, who are jointly charged with the murder of their college mate Mohamad Nazmie Aizzat Mohd Narul Azwan, last year. The verdict, initially scheduled for Wednesday, was postponed to allow for clarification related to the submissions, according to deputy public prosecutor, Nur Nisla Abdul Latif. She said that both prosecution and defence had filed their written submissions. The prosecution had filed a total of 366 pages of written submission. 'The defence team, comprising eight lawyers, has also filed their submissions,' she told reporters at the High Court, here, today. On May 14, High Court Judge Datuk Duncan Sikodol had set Wednesday to decide on the Mohamad Nazmie Aizzat murder case. However, a notice issued by the High Court on Tuesday (June 10) informed parties of the rescheduling. On Feb 28, Duncan ordered the 13 teenagers, aged 16 to 19, to enter their defence on the charge of murdering Mohamad Nazmie Aizzat, 17, in the dormitory rooms 7 Resak and 5 Belian at the Lahad Datu Vocational College, between 9pm on March 21 and 7.38am on March 22, 2024. They were charged under Section 302 of the Penal Code for murder, read together with Section 34 of the same Code which carries the death penalty, or up to 40 years' imprisonment and not more than 12 strokes of the cane, if convicted. The defence proceedings began on March 10, with 18 witnesses, including all 13 accused, called to testify. The prosecution had earlier opened its case on Nov 19 last year, calling 25 witnesses, including students and teachers from the vocational college. Apart from Nur Nisla, the prosecution team also includes DPPs Ng Juhn Tao and Batrisyia Mohd Khusri. Eight of the students were represented by lawyers Datuk Ram Singh, Kamarudin Mohmad Chinki and Chen Wen Jye, while five others were represented by lawyers Mohamed Zairi Zainal Abidin, Abdul Ghani Zelika, Vivian Thien, Jhesseny P. Kang and Kusni Ambotuwo. – Bernama
